Skip to content

Lock file maintenance - #160121

Closed
renovate-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
renovate-bot:renovate/lock-file-maintenance
Closed

Lock file maintenance#160121
renovate-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
renovate-bot:renovate/lock-file-maintenance

Conversation

@renovate-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Update Change
lockFileMaintenance All locks refreshed

🔧 This Pull Request updates lock files to use the latest dependency versions.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM, on day 1 of the month (* 0-3 1 * *)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 29, 2026
@rustbot

rustbot commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

r? @traviscross

rustbot has assigned @traviscross.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

  • Owners of files modified in this PR: lang-docs
  • lang-docs expanded to JohnTitor, ehuss, traviscross
  • Random selection from JohnTitor, ehuss, traviscross

@marcoieni

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I am investigating why this PR only updates one Cargo.lock file.

@rust-log-analyzer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The job tidy failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain enhanced) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
[TIMING:end] tool::Tidy { compiler: Compiler { stage: 0, host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, forced_compiler: false }, target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu } -- 0.000
fmt check
fmt: checked 7059 files
tidy check
tidy [deps]: invalid license `(MIT OR Apache-2.0) AND MIT` for package `registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index#elasticlunr-rs@3.1.0` in workspace `src/tools/rustbook`
tidy [deps]: FAIL
tidy [rustdoc_json (src)]: `rustdoc-json-types` modified, checking format version
tidy: Skipping binary file check, read-only filesystem
removing old virtual environment
creating virtual environment at '/checkout/obj/build/venv' using 'python3.10' and 'venv'
creating virtual environment at '/checkout/obj/build/venv' using 'python3.10' and 'virtualenv'
---
typechecking javascript files
tidy: The following check failed: deps
Bootstrap failed while executing `test src/tools/tidy tidyselftest --extra-checks=py,cpp,js,spellcheck`
Currently active steps:
test::Tidy {  } at src/bootstrap/src/core/build_steps/test.rs:1604
Command `/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1-tools-bin/rust-tidy --root-path=/checkout --cargo-path=/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/cargo --output-dir=/checkout/obj/build --concurrency=4 --npm-path=/node/bin/yarn --ci=true --extra-checks=py,cpp,js,spellcheck` failed with exit code 1
Created at: src/bootstrap/src/core/build_steps/tool.rs:1627:23
Executed at: src/bootstrap/src/core/build_steps/test.rs:1682:29

Command has failed. Rerun with -v to see more details.
Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:02:44
  local time: Wed Jul 29 07:15:53 UTC 2026
  network time: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 07:15:53 GMT
##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.
##[group]Run echo "disk usage:"

@marcoieni marcoieni closed this Jul 29, 2026
@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 29, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants