Skip to content

Use portable_atomic instead of atomic-polyfill - #251

Merged
matklad merged 6 commits into
matklad:masterfrom
taks:portable-atomic
Dec 7, 2023
Merged

Use portable_atomic instead of atomic-polyfill#251
matklad merged 6 commits into
matklad:masterfrom
taks:portable-atomic

Conversation

@taks

@taks taks commented Dec 7, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fix #250

Comment thread Cargo.toml
unstable = []

# Only for backwards compatibility.
atomic-polyfill = ["critical-section"]

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let’s keep this, it’s not a burden to support a feature alias, and this might prevent someone’s build from breaking

@matklad

matklad commented Dec 7, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

CI failure is legitimate

@matklad

matklad commented Dec 7, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Looking good now, thanks! Could you also bump version in Cargo.toml to 1.19.0 and add the corresponding changlelog.md entry? That way, the new version would be released as soon as the PR is merged!

@matklad

matklad commented Dec 7, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

bors r+

Thanks!

@matklad

matklad commented Dec 7, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Hm,

bors ping

@matklad

matklad commented Dec 7, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Ok, apparently the public instance of borsh.tech shut down, while the merge queue isn't available for individual repositories yet?

Merging manually!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The atomic-polyfill crate is deprecated.

2 participants