Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Do Emergency Microsoft, Oracle Patches Point to Wider Issues?
  2. MacOS 26.4 Adds Warnings For ClickFix Attacks to Its Terminal App
  3. SystemD Contributor Harassed Over Optional Age Verification Field, Suggests Installer-Level Disabling
  4. IBM Quantum Computer Simulates Real Magnetic Materials and Matches Lab Data
  5. Sony is Raising PlayStation 5 Prices Again, Between $100 and $150
  6. Thousands of Americans Treated With Psilocybin in 2025
  7. Linux Maintainer Greg Kroah-Hartman Says AI Tools Now Useful, Finding Real Bugs
  8. NASA’s First Nuclear-Powered Interplanetary Spacecraft Will Send Helicopters to Mars in 2028
  9. ‘Ads Are Popping Up On the Fridge and It Isn’t Going Over Well’
  10. Transporting Antimatter On a Truck Is Tricky…
  11. People are Using AI-Powered Services to Find Lost Pets
  12. OpenAI’s US Ad Pilot Exceeds $100 Million In Annualized Revenue In Six Weeks
  13. UK Startup Ignites Plasma Inside Nuclear Fusion Rocket
  14. AV1’s Open, Royalty-Free Promise In Question As Dolby Sues Snapchat Over Codec
  15. Google Moves Post-Quantum Encryption Timeline Up To 2029

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Do Emergency Microsoft, Oracle Patches Point to Wider Issues?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Emergency out-of-band fixes issued by enterprise IT giants Microsoft and Oracle have shone a spotlight on issues around both update cycles and patching,” reports Computer Weekly:
Microsoft’s emergency update, KB5085516, addresses an issue that arose after installing the mandatory cumulative updates pushed live on Patch Tuesday earlier this month. According to Microsoft, it has since emerged that many users experienced problems signing into applications with a Microsoft account, seeing a “no internet” error message even though the device had a working connection. This had the effect of preventing access to multiple services and applications. It should be noted that organisations using Entra ID did not experience the issue.

But Microsoft’s emergency patch comes just days after it doubled down on a commitment to software quality, reliability and stability. In a blog post published just 24 hours prior to the latest update, Pavan Davuluri of Microsoft’s Windows Insider Program Team said updates should be “predictable and easy to plan around”.
Michael Bell, founder/CEO of Suzu Labs tells Computer Weekly that Microsoft’s patch for the sign-in bug follows “separate hotpatches for RRAS remote code execution flaws and a Bluetooth visibility bug. Three emergency fixes in eight days does not shout reliability era.”
Oracle’s patch, meanwhile, addresses CVE-2026-21992, a remote code execution flaw in the REST:WebServices component of Oracle Identity Manager and the Web Services Security component of Oracle Web Services Manager in Oracle Fusion Middleware. It carries a CVSS score of 9.8 and can be exploited by an unauthenticated attacker with network access over HTTP.

What “wider issues”?

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Vibe-coding?

Funny!

By oldgraybeard • Score: 3 Thread
“Three emergency fixes in eight days does not shout reliability era.” Just Microsoft being Microsoft, consumer quality for consumer tasks.

Depends

By The MAZZTer • Score: 3 Thread

I think Microsoft in general does a great job considering they test numerous software packages going back decades, as I understand it.

"

The real question is, each time this happens, do they sit down and have a meeting and discuss why the problem happened, what they can do to keep it from happening again, and then implement a solution in their testing? If so then it’s fine. It’s only if they fail to learn from each emergency that we have a problem.

Same should apply to Oracle.

Also not sure why we’re discussing these specific Microsoft and Oracle bugs. The bugs are not similar at all. Microsoft’s isn’t even a security issue like Oracle’s is.

Apply Betteridge’s Law

By swillden • Score: 3 Thread

And the law of large numbers. Statistically, there will but patch clusters, the same way there are clusters of every other random-ish event. The fact that one happens to occur right after Microsoft promises a commitment to predictable patch schedules means not just nothing the but opposite. Any commitment to doing better means that they recognize they haven’t been doing well enough, and obviously it’s not possible to do significantly better immediately; changing processes takes time, and observing the effects of those changes takes even longer.

So, no, this cluster of patches doesn’t tell us anything in particular beyond what we already knew: That emergency patches are relatively common.

It points to AI slop code

By rsilvergun • Score: 3 Thread
GitHub apparently has dropped below 90% uptime and it’s very likely because they are using AI slop to write important code and it doesn’t work.

It’s a huge problem but there isn’t really a solution.

MacOS 26.4 Adds Warnings For ClickFix Attacks to Its Terminal App

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous Slashdot reader writes:
ClickFix attacks are ramping up. These attacks have users copy and paste a string to something that can execute a command line — like the Windows Run dialog, or a shell prompt.

But MacRumors reports that macOS 26.4 Tahoe (updated earlier this week) introduces a new feature to its Terminal app where it will detect ClickFix attempts and stop them by prompting the user if they really wanted to run those commands.
According to MacRumors, the warning readers “Possible malware, Paste blocked.”

“Your Mac has not been harmed. Scammers often encourage pasting text into Terminal to try and harm your Mac or compromise your privacy....”

There is also a “Paste Anyway” option if users still wish to proceed.

This reminds me of something

By Powercntrl • Score: 3 Thread

Back in the day, AOL attempted to address phishing scams by putting a disclaimer at the bottom of IM windows. Something along the lines of “Reminder: AOL staff will never ask for your password or billing information”. Problem was, people who were foolish enough to fall for social engineering scams don’t pay much attention to those sort of warnings, either.

Seems like all the scammers will have to do is update their instructions to include “Please disregard the pop-up and click Paste Anyway".

Re:And the Apple haters squawk.

By larwe • Score: 5, Informative Thread
True but useless. For a long complex commandline input, it saves a lot of work to be able to paste it in. Not to mention the possibility that a typo might have undesirable consequences.

Re:Question

By Powercntrl • Score: 4, Funny Thread

You know run su and then accidentally do something dumb?

I’m pretty sure my Mac will let me run su and then send a text to my ex, but I’m not going to try it.

SystemD Contributor Harassed Over Optional Age Verification Field, Suggests Installer-Level Disabling

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
It’s FOSS interviewed a software engineer whose long-running open source contributions include Python code for the Arch Linux installer and maintaining packages for NixOS. But “a recent change he made to systemd has pushed him into the spotlight” after he’d added the optional birthDate field for systemd’s user database.
Critics saw it not merely as a technical addition, but as a symbolic capitulation to government overreach. A crack in the philosophical foundation of freedom that Linux is built on. What followed went far beyond civil disagreement. Dylan revealed that he faced harassment, doxxing, death threats, and a flood of hate mail. He was forced to disable issues and pull request tabs across his GitHub repositories…


Q: Should FOSS projects adapt to laws they fundamentally disagree with? Because these kinds of laws are certainly in conflict with what a lot of Linux users believe in.

A. Unfortunately, in a lot of cases, the answer is yes — at least for any distribution with corporate backing. The small independent distributions are much more flexible to refuse as a protest.

If we ignore regulations entirely, we risk Linux being something that companies are not willing to contribute to, and Linux may be shipped on less hardware. I’m talking about things like Valve and System76 (despite them very vocally hating these laws). That does not help us; it just lowers the quality of software contributions due to less investment in the platform and makes Linux less accessible to the average person. We need Linux and other free operating systems to remain a viable alternative to closed systems.

Q. Do you think regulations like these will reshape desktop Linux in the next 5-10 years where we might have “compliant Linux” and “Freedom-first Linux”?

A. Unfortunately, yes, to some degree this is likely. I imagine the split will be mostly along the lines of independent distributions and those with corporate backing.

We’re already seeing it as far as which distributions plan on implementing some sort of age verification and which ones are not, and that sucks. I’d rather nobody have to deal with this mess at all, but this is the reality of things now. As I said in the previous response, the corporate-backed distributions really have no choice in the matter. Companies are notoriously risk-adverse, but something like Artix or Devuan? Those are small and independent enough where the individual maintainers may be willing to take on more risk.

I was actually thinking about what this would look like if we added it to [Linux system installer] Calamares and chatting about that with the maintainers before that thread got brigaded by bad actors posting personal information and throwing around insults. I completely support the freedom for the distro maintainers to choose their risk tolerance. If the distribution is based out of Ireland or something (like Linux Mint) without these silly laws in the jurisdiction the developer operates in, I think that we should leave it up to them to make a choice here.
They think the installer should have a date picker with a flag to disable it, and “We can even default it to off, and corporate distributions using Calamares or those not willing to take the risk could flip it on if they need to. That way if maintainers of the distributions do not wish to collect the birth date, they won’t have to, and no forking is required to patch it out.”

advice to children

By martin-boundary • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Child, you do not live in a vacuum. You live in a country with laws. These laws apply to you. Ignoring them will be bad for you. Don’t do it.

Re:advice to children

By Morromist • Score: 5, Informative Thread

In 2015 Harvard University professor Harvey Silverglate estimated that daily life in the United States is so over-criminalized the average American professional commits about three felonies a day.

I don’t agree with age verification

By dskoll • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I am strongly opposed to age verification.

However, given that the developer faced (according to the article) “harassment, doxxing, death threats, and a flood of hate mail”, maybe we need some form of maturity verification? There’s no call for that sort of crap. And I really hope that criminal charges are filed against anyone sending death threats.

Re:advice to children

By keltor • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Hilarious to pull quotes from Atlas Shrugged given the current state of the world being taken over by Atlas Shrugged influenced shitheads.

Laws for slavery

By Firethorn • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I’d argue that slavery wasn’t “legal because nobody banned it.” It was legal because there were explicit laws that created, defined, and enforced the institution.

There were statutes specifying who could be held as slaves, rules that the child of an enslaved woman was automatically a slave, procedures for manumission, regulations on how slaves could be bought, sold, punished, or inherited, and laws requiring that escaped slaves be returned. That’s not a legal vacuum, that’s a full legal framework.

It’s similar to how segregation laws later forced discrimination on people who might not have engaged in it otherwise. The state wasn’t passively allowing something; it was actively mandating and structuring it.

Slavery existed because the law built and maintained it, not because the law failed to forbid it.

IBM Quantum Computer Simulates Real Magnetic Materials and Matches Lab Data

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“IBM says its quantum computer can now simulate real magnetic materials and match actual lab experiment results,” writes Slashdot reader BrianFagioli, “which is something people have been waiting years to see.”
Instead of just theoretical output, the system reproduced neutron scattering data from a known material, meaning it lines up with real world physics. It still relies on a mix of quantum and classical computing and this is a narrow use case for now, but it is one of the first times quantum hardware has produced results that scientists can directly validate against experiments, which makes it a lot more interesting than the usual hype.
Classical computers “are not great at modeling quantum systems,” according to this article at Nerds.xyz. “The math gets messy fast, and scientists end up relying on approximations… Quantum computers are supposed to solve that problem…”
If this direction continues, it could start to matter in areas like superconductors, battery tech, and even drug development. Those are the kinds of problems where better simulations can actually lead to better outcomes, not just nicer charts in a research paper.
“I am extremely excited about what this means for science,” said study co-author Allen Scheie from the Los Alamos National Laboratory. In an announcement from IBM, Scheie calls this “the most impressive match I’ve seen between experimental data and qubit simulation, and it definitely raises the bar for what can be expected from quantum computers.”

This is the QC we need!

By Gravis Zero • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Finally, we’re seeing applications of QC that are actually useful. I look forward to this expanding so that we can greatly advance materials science by being able to simulate materials without ever having to construct them.

IBM: The eternal punching bag of Big Tech

By LondoMollari • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Yeah, let me get out infront of the comments that will be full of the usual “Big Blue is so 1970s” snark, because nothing says “edgy” like dunking on the company that literally built the infrastructure the entire digital world runs on.

But let’s be real for a second. While everyone was busy calling IBM boring, stodgy, or “the company your grandpa still uses,” they were out here creating one foundational technology after another:

    The hard disk drive (1956 RAMAC — the first one ever)
    The floppy disk that made personal computing actually personal
    DRAM — the memory chips inside literally every device you own
    The relational database and SQL that power basically the entire internet
    Fortran, the first high-level programming language
    Magnetic stripe cards (you know, the thing that made credit cards and ATMs work)
    Silicon-germanium chips that make your smartphone’s Wi-Fi, GPS, and cellular actually fast

And while we’re on the subject of “irrelevant old tech”: over 87% of the world’s credit card transactions still run on IBM mainframes every single day. Your salary, your rent, your impulse buy at 2 a.m. — all of it humming along on the same “dinosaur” systems the cool kids love to mock.

So sure, pile on the hate. IBM’s used to it. They’ve been the Rodney Dangerfield of computing for decades: “No respect, no respect at all!” But every time you swipe a card, save a file, run a query, or (now) watch a quantum computer match real lab data on magnetic materials you’re standing on IBM’s shoulders. They didn’t just ride the wave. They built the ocean.

Keep innovating, Big Blue. The haters will be back next week to complain about something else you quietly made possible.

This is the first story I’ve heard about IBM

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 3 Thread
…in awhile, that didn’t involve the usual 30K personnel firing we hear about every year. Does this company still make computers?

Sony is Raising PlayStation 5 Prices Again, Between $100 and $150

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Memory and storage shortages and price hikes have “steadily rippled outward across all kinds of consumer tech,” reports Ars Technica.

“Today’s bad news comes from Sony, which is raising prices for PlayStation 5 consoles in the US just eight months after their last price hike.”
The drive-less Digital Edition will increase from $500 to $600; the base PS5 with an optical drive will increase from $550 to $650; and the PS5 Pro is going up from $750 to a whopping $900. At the beginning of 2025, these consoles cost $450, $500, and $700, respectively…

RAM and flash memory chips are in short supply primarily because of demand from AI data centers — memory manufacturers have shifted more production toward making the kind of memory found in AI accelerators like Nvidia’s H200, leaving less for the consumer market. And the situation is unlikely to improve any time soon, barring a major shift in demand from the AI industry.

Some might, I won’t be.

By AgTiger • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

$900 USD is just not worth it for me for console gaming. I’ve already got a PC that works, and games I like for it.

I’m just going into a holding pattern for buying any computing equipment unless I absolutely need to. I suspect I’m going to be in the majority on that.

That’s a bold strategy

By Powercntrl • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It’s a 5-year-old gaming console at this point. I’d imagine by now there’s a decent supply of used ones available.

Personally, aside from a Nintendo Switch that I was given as a gift (and it’s basically obsolete at this point), I’m team PC Master Race when it comes to gaming. If you’re buying a console you may as well just take your money outside and light it on fire.

This is getting into Mac territory…

By ctilsie242 • Score: 3 Thread

For this price, I can buy a Mac and go into Mac gaming… …oh wait.

But still, when console prices wind up this high, it only will hurt the software sellers because fewer people will be buying consoles, diminishing the audience of their games.

I would say SOE is eating their seed corn. You want inexpensive consoles so you can sell stuff for them. Basic razor and blade marketing.

Re:Some might, I won’t be.

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Just wait until you see Steam Machine pricing.

It’s not going to come to market in the current politico-economic situation in the US.

Thank you, AI

By Somervillain • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
This is pure bullshit. It’s a 5.5 year old console and priced more than it was during introduction! OK, so Sony is overcharging me…well, so is everyone else. Every device is going up in cost, purely due to us subsidizing this LLM circular economy. Fuck every LLM provider. I want useful devices, like consoles, laptops, phones, and tablets…without shortage pricing…not your useless LLMs that can’t even generate code that compiles, Claude 4.6 opus/sonnet. This week, I used it like 10x…EVERY fucking attempt was a failure…“why did I get this exception?”…failure…“update this json schema to validate across 3 fields”…failure. “Update this code to the latest version of Spring”....failure. “Change this legacy for loop into a lambda”…failure…didn’t even compile and hallucinated methods that don’t exist.

I have to listen to employers AI-washing their failures and convincing the industry they can lay us all off.

I have to pay a lot more for any device I want…with the prospect that things aren’t getting better any time soon.

So far, I am not seeing any tangible benefits to these technologies, yet lots of suffering.

This bubble can’t pop fast enough.

I know AI will someday be useful, but it’s been nothing but a curse. Instead of getting slow, steady progress, we’re getting fever-pitched investment that’s not paying off, disrupting the job market, and now making it a lot harder to buy useful technology. Fuck these guys. I am sick of paying for their stupidity.

Thousands of Americans Treated With Psilocybin in 2025

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
In a new 4,000-word article, CNN tells the story of a retired appellate paralegal and grandmother in her early 70s who was treated for depression with psilocybin. CNN notes there’s now retreats featuring psilocybin in a few countries — and while psilocybin is illegal under United States federal law, “In Oregon, 5,935 clients received psilocybin services through Oregon’s state-regulated program in 2025.”
High doses of psilocybin are effective in treating depression, a growing body of research suggests, with promise for other conditions, like PTSD and addiction, said Dr. Albert Garcia-Romeu, associate director of the Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research at Johns Hopkins University… Some researchers suggest it disrupts entrenched traffic patterns in the brain or grows new neuron connections to change thinking. Others say the results from psilocybin could have to do with its anti-inflammatory effect, Garcia-Romeu said…

Colorado became the second state to make psilocybin legal with a 2023 law and issued its first healing center” last year. A law adopted in New Mexico last year established that state’s Medical Psilocybin Program, now in development… Psilocybin seems to be “knocking on the door of FDA approval,” said Dr. Lynn Marie Morski, president of the Psychedelic Medicine Association, which educates health care providers on the therapeutic use of psychedelics so they can answer patients’ questions through the lenses of clinical evidence and harm reduction. Psilocybin therapy first received a “breakthrough therapy” designation for treatment-resistant depression from the US Food and Drug Administration in 2018, and now psilocybin drug products are on track to be submitted to the FDA for possible approval in the not-too-distant future.

While psilocybin is illegal under United States federal law, more states are creating their own paths for legal use under state laws.


Re:Psilocybin?

By lxnt • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

What she meant is that only losers buy drugs on the street, real people have them delivered in less class-denying packages.

You can’t legalize drugs

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Criminalizing drugs completely changes us politics. We learned a long time ago that the reason drugs were criminalized was so that the right wing could go after the left wing because statistically working class people are more likely to take drugs. Nixon’s people came out and just admitted it because they felt guilty. The entire purpose of the drug war was and always is political.

Because of that you are never going to see things like this used properly and legalized which is a shame because psychedelics have been shown repeatedly to be a game changer for people with post traumatic stress disorder. And there are a lot of people with PTSD beyond soldiers.

The catch is that for it to work you need to do it under Dr supervision generally. You need someone there who can carefully guide you through the process. Just dropping a tab of acid isn’t usually going to work. So by criminalizing it an entire group of people whose lives could be transformed or just left out in the cold. But compared to the billions and billions of dollars that can be made using the drug war to win elections that’s a small price to pay.

And of course because we have been conditioned to view talk about politics as dirty anytime you bring this up you’re guaranteed to piss everybody off. It is no coincidence that you are conditioned not to talk about your salary with your coworkers or your political beliefs.

Fun fact the reason rural towns tend to be right wing is because there is usually one extremely wealthy landowner who runs the show and if you deviate slightly from orthodoxy then he’s the only employer in town and he runs the church and everything else and you’re basically persona non grata.

I bring it up because it’s another way that the discussion and debate in our country is locked down to the benefit of people who do not have your best interests at heart

Just ignorant?

By Gravis Zero • Score: 4, Informative Thread

It’s Oregon, where will they find a control group?

You do realize they have Mennonites in Oregon right? If not then you should really educate yourself about the nation you live within because it’s quite diverse. If you think diversity is a bad thing then perhaps you’re in the wrong nation.

It works

By fadethepolice • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I am a medical marijuana patient adn when I travelled this winter I went adn got some gummies at a smoke shop. They were processed in the same facility that produces psilocybin gummies and there was cross contamination. Snapped me out of my depression instantly. Lasted about 2 weeks until I was subjected to another traumatic event.

Re:BOOK: The Mindful Way through Depression

By rayd75 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

You’re holding you wrong. Congrats on your relative positive baseline perception of life. Next, tell people with chronic fatigue about what energizes you, those with diabetes about the “natural sugars” you consume, and those with paraplegia about the pleasure you get from thought experiments.

Pro tip for Amazon or any sales link: Immediately re-sort reviews by time. Interesting how this one had a middling review recently and ~40 5-star reviews without comments within a couple months of the book’s 2024 release.

Linux Maintainer Greg Kroah-Hartman Says AI Tools Now Useful, Finding Real Bugs

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Linux kernel maintainer Greg Kroah-Hartman tells The Register that AI-driven code review has “really jumped” for Linux. “There must have been some inflection point somewhere with the tools…”
“Something happened a month ago, and the world switched. Now we have real reports.” It’s not just Linux, he continued. “All open source projects have real reports that are made with AI, but they’re good, and they’re real.” Security teams across major open source projects talk informally and frequently, he noted, and everyone is seeing the same shift. “All open source security teams are hitting this right now....”

For now, AI is showing up more as a reviewer and assistant than as a full author of Linux kernel code, but that line is starting to blur. Kroah-Hartman has already done his own experiments with AI-generated patches. “I did a really stupid prompt,” he recounted. “I said, ‘Give me this,’ and it spit out 60: ‘Here’s 60 problems I found, and here’s the fixes for them.’ About one-third were wrong, but they still pointed out a relatively real problem, and two-thirds of the patches were right.” Mind you, those working patches still needed human cleanup, better changelogs, and integration work, but they were far from useless. “The tools are good,” he said. “We can’t ignore this stuff. It’s coming up, and it’s getting better....” [H]e said that for “simple little error conditions, properly detecting error conditions,” AI could already generate dozens of usable patches today.

The sudden increase in AI-generated reports and AI-assisted work has also spurred a parallel push to build AI into the kernel’s own review infrastructure. A key piece of that is Sashiko, a tool originally developed at Google and now donated to the Linux Foundation.
Kroah-Hartman said some patches are being generated with AI now. “You have a little co-develop tag for that now. We’re seeing some things for some new features, but we’re seeing AI mostly being used in the review.”

For me, it is last few months…

By dragisha • Score: 5, Informative Thread

since AI agents became usable and started to bring results.
Of course, you must have skills usually not associated with the manager caste - ask precise questions, be realistic in expectations, and be ready to jump in and fix in ten minutes instead of spending time on 5 prompts. Among others.
So it is not a question about AI being usable or not; it is a question about it being useful enough to cover its expenses and ensure ROI.
An improbable thing to happen.

One thing that would be interesting

By rsilvergun • Score: 3 Thread
If AI ever gets to the point where it can outperform human beings at finding defects then there’s going to be a major issue with world powers.

That’s because right now if you really want to hack somebody’s data you can do it. There is a company out of Israel that will sell you software if you have enough money had enough connections and that software can break into just about any phone in existence. If they can break into the phones they can get past most encryption mechanisms.

So the question is what happens if intelligence agencies and law enforcement can no longer get data when they really want it.

I’m not so naive to think that is going to be a glorious time of freedom.

Facebook for example is facing an existential crisis from AI slop. There is so much slop and it is so hard to tell from the real content they are having a hard time getting data they can sell. Advertising rates are also at risk although it’s less of an issue because as it stands advertising on Facebook is pretty useless and largely done out of habit. But the risk of slop overwhelming their data collection is a much bigger deal.

I bring it up because Facebook didn’t just roll over and die. They are going around the world buying off politicians and getting laws passed requiring age verification that will in turn let them identify real users from bots so that they can continue to collect your data and sell it to their advertisers and governments and whatnot.

My point being that when a large powerful group faces a problem they solve it. And when somebody with that much money in power has a problem and they solve it it’s usually to your detriment and mine.

What I would expect is that we are going to lose more freedoms. And any attempt to save those freedoms will fail because at the end of the day we would have to vote for politicians that would protect those freedoms and I think the 2024 elections proved that it’s pretty easy to get people to do the opposite if you dangle cheap eggs in front of them…

Re:Code review is not what AI is being sold as

By LainTouko • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
In general, the principle problem with LLMs is that they’re completely unreliable, due to the basic design. But in cases where they’‘re just saying “look at this, maybe this is a problem”, reliability is not required because if it makes no sense, someone can just say “no”. The problem comes when people begin to trust them, despite them being completely untrustworthy. Applications where trust is not required are fine.

Re:For me, it is last few months…

By Kisai • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The answer to that is “absolutely not”

If you can’t code worth a damn, then of course the AI is going to find a lot of “bugs” and many of those bugs aren’t even bugs, they generate warnings in the compiler otherwise the program would not compile in the first place. The first thing you do when you want to eliminate bugs is “treat all warnings as errors”

You don’t need AI for that.

I’m sure AI is useful for finding errors that don’t show up as warnings first, but I can tell you first and second hand that your average open source project has thousands of bugs in them, and they’re ignored because the compiler is allowed to ignore warnings, especially those about truncation and incorrect cast’s.

Do not let the AI recommend solutions unless the code going into it is already 100% correct, otherwise you may simply be “unplugging the oil pressure light” rather than servicing the vehicle.

Unfort. e’ryone picked an opinion/side two yrs ago

By Hadlock • Score: 3 Thread

Unfortunately everyone picked an opinion two years ago, when AI was genuinely garbage beyond some basic bash scripts or a top 1000 bug/question on stack exchange (which mostly overlap). AI started getting really good in Dec ‘24, particularly spring ‘25 and by August 2025 even the $20/mo tier of chatgpt was starting to get legit as OpenAI started to try catching up with (now market leader) Anthropic and their blessed claude code. The 4.5/4.6 models released this year are nothing short of incredible, and the Qwen 3.5 series of models are right behind the state of the art models. Google is doing some stuff too but I’m kind of done giving them my money.
 
In 2-3 years we’ll have found all 20,000 top reasons LLMs hallucinate things and solved for 95% of them
 
Creatives rallied against LLMs but as has been proven, nobody actually cares about making funny pictures of , they just want to know that they can.

NASA’s First Nuclear-Powered Interplanetary Spacecraft Will Send Helicopters to Mars in 2028

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
After decades of studying, this week NASA announced “a major step forward in bringing nuclear power and propulsion from the lab to space.”
NASA will launch the Space Reactor-1 Freedom, the first nuclear powered interplanetary spacecraft, to Mars before the end of 2028, demonstrating advanced nuclear electric propulsion in deep space. Nuclear electric propulsion provides an extraordinary capability for efficient mass transport in deep space and enables high power missions beyond Jupiter where solar arrays are not effective.
Steven Sinacore, NASA’s program executive for Fission Surface Power who will also oversee the SR-1 Freedom mission, emphasized to CNN that “On the ground the reactor is off. There’s no radiation coming from it. It doesn’t actually turn on until you’re up in space, and that’s where the radiation comes from.” NASA says they aim to develop the capabilities required “for sustained exploration beyond the Moon and eventual journeys to Mars and the outer solar system.”

And Space Reactor-1 Freedom will carry a fleet of tiny helicopters (much like Ingenuity) to explore Mars, reports Space.com:
Whereas Ingenuity was a technology demonstrator, however, the Skyfall fleet will have concrete tasks. Chief among them is scout: If all goes to plan, the little choppers will help NASA assess the potential of their target area (wherever that happens to be) to support human exploration. The Skyfall helicopters will carry cameras and ground-penetrating radar to scout a future landing site, to understand the slopes and hazards for human-scale landers,” Steve Sinacore, the program executive for NASA’s Space Reactors Office, said during the briefing. “They will also map and characterize the subsurface water ice to find out where the water ice deposits are, along with the size, depth and other important characteristics,” he added…

And that might not be the end of the line for SR-1 Freedom; NASA may decide to keep flying the spacecraft out into the solar system after it deploys the Skyfall choppers, according to Sinacore. The mission architecture, like much of NASA’s exploration portfolio, is not yet finalized.

Queue up …

By PPH • Score: 3 Thread

Send Helicopters to Mars

… Ride of the Valkyries.

‘Ads Are Popping Up On the Fridge and It Isn’t Going Over Well’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Wall Street Journal reports:
Walking into his kitchen, Tim Yoder recoiled at a message on his refrigerator door: “Shop Samsung water filters.” Yoder, a supply-chain manager in Chicago, owns a Samsung Electronics Family Hub fridge. He paid $1,400 for an appliance that came with a 32-inch screen on the door that allows him to control other Samsung gadgets, pull up recipes or stream music. But since last fall, it’s been intermittently serving up ads, part of a pilot program being tested on some of Samsung’s smart fridges sold in the U.S. The response? Not warm. “I guess this is another place for somebody to shove an ad in your face,” said the 47-year-old Yoder, recalling the first time he noticed one…

The ads are only on certain Family Hub fridges that have screens and internet connectivity. They run as a rectangular banner at the bottom — part of a widget that also shows news, the weather and a calendar. Samsung declined to say how long the pilot might last or whether it would end. The firm recently unveiled a “Screens Everywhere” initiative that also includes washers, dryers and ovens.... Samsung launched the banner-type fridge ads that come as part of the widget via an October software update. In a footnote of a news release at the time, Samsung pledged to “serve contextual or non-personal ads” and respect data privacy. The banner ads can be turned off in settings.

Samsung said the purpose of the pilot is to explore whether ads relevant to home chores can be useful to owners, and that overall pushback has been negligible. The “turn-off” rate for the pilot ad program remains in the bottom single-digit range, it said… While owners can turn off the banner ads, doing so eliminates the widget altogether, a bummer for Brian Bosworth, a media-industry engineer who liked the feature. Bosworth thinks it’s wrong to take away the new feature as a condition. Wanting to keep the widget but not the ads, the 49-year-old in Edgewater, Md., made sure his home router’s ad-blocking software extended to his fridge. He hasn’t seen another since.
One 27-year-old plans to return his refrigerator after the entire display “lit up with a full-screen ad for Apple TV’s sci-fi show Pluribus,” according to the article. The all-caps ad beckoned him “with an oft-used refrain directed at protagonist Carol Sturka: ‘We’re Sorry We Upset You, Carol.’"

Thanks to Slashdot reader fjo3 for sharing the article.

What did he expect?

By ebcdic • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Don’t but anything with a screen that doesn’t need it.

Re:What did he expect?

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I’m waiting for the day when they forget to renew a domain and porn ads start showing up.

Re:Simultaneously Paid For And Became the Product

By ClickOnThis • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

And companies today are greedy enough to not give a fuck about the negative sentiment it generates among consumers.

You underestimate how much power consumers have. They can vote with their wallets.

Oh wait, you said Apple consumers. Never mind.

Re:What did he expect?

By Z80a • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If you’re buying a online computer you can’t control what is installed on it, you should expect it to not work for you.

Re:What did he expect?

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Cool. You’ve just described literally ever piece of consumer electronics on the market currently. What do you propose the consumer do? I guess I shouldn’t expect my car to work? My TV? Games console? My home security camera? Lightbulbs?

I should expect none of this to work for me?

What a truly absurd comment. No we should very much expect them to work the way we expect them to, and then rally together to hold vendors accountable when they don’t.

Your view is defeatist and doesn’t help anyone.

Transporting Antimatter On a Truck Is Tricky…

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Long-time Slashdot reader Qbertino writes:
… but the CERN Project “Antimatter in motion” just did it. For the first time in history researchers at CERN have transported 92 antiprotons on a truck in a specially designed magnetic enclosure. The test-drive went so well that the researchers spontaneously decided to go another round… The purpose of the experiment was to test the feasibility of transporting antimatter to other facilities in Europe to conduct further antimatter research. German news Tagesschau has a nice report.
CNN reports that the antiproton enclosure was nearly six feet tall and weighed about 1,760 pounds. And Smithsonian magazine explains that it trapped the antiprotons in a vacuum chamber that had to be cooled to around -450 degrees Fahrenheit:
Experts used a crane to carefully move the box of precious cargo from a lab onto a truck, which took about three hours, per the Associated Press' Jamey Keaten. Then, they drove the vehicle for roughly 30 minutes around CERN’s campus, and subsequently returned the antiprotons to the lab. They worked with so little antimatter that even if it did touch ordinary matter and annihilate, it would release a small amount of energy detectable only by a special instrument, reports the AP.

Particularly …

By PPH • Score: 4, Informative Thread

… if you do it twice.

Re:Future

By dskoll • Score: 5, Funny Thread

-4 years.

I’d hate to be the guy

By Baron_Yam • Score: 5, Funny Thread

“Inventory says we should have 92 antiprotons, but I keep counting 91”.

“Keep looking!”

People are Using AI-Powered Services to Find Lost Pets

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A dog missing for two months was found at an animal shelter — and its owner received an email from an artificial intelligence service that identified it, according to the Washington Post.

“As controversial as AI is right now, this is one of those areas where it’s a real win,” according to the chief executive at the nonprofit animal welfare organization Best Friends Animal Society. And while it shouldn’t replace microchipping pets, AI does offer another tool to help desperate pet owners (and overcrowded animal shelters) — and might even be “game-changing”…
People send photos of their lost pets to a database, and AI compares the pets’ features — including facial structure, coat pattern and ear shape — to photos of stray pets that have been spotted elsewhere. Many of the stray pets have already been taken to shelters… Doorbell cameras have recently implemented facial recognition for dogs, and perhaps the largest AI database for pet reunification is Petco Love Lost, which says it has reunited more than 200,000 pets and owners since 2021… After owners upload photos of their lost pets, AI scans thousands of photos of lost animals from social media and from about 3,000 animal shelters and rescues that use the software, according to Petco Love, an animal welfare nonprofit that’s affiliated with the pet store Petco. It notifies owners if two photos match.
The article notes that one in three pets go missing during their lifetime, according to figures from the Animal Humane Society. “But as technology has progressed, so have resources for finding lost pets” — including GPS collars — and now, apparently, AI-powered pet identification.

Chipped Aminals

By beebware • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Or you could just have a NFC-like chip inserted into the animal’s neck which can be cheaply scanned by rescues/vets and have owners contact details looked up (as we do in the UK: it is a legal requirement to have all dogs and now cats ‘microchipped’).

Success rate?

By Gravis Zero • Score: 3 Thread

Anecdotes are great for swaying the mindless but how about some statistics on the rate of success this thing has. I would also want to know the rate of false identifications because who wants to have their hopes dashed?

However, what would VASTLY improve helping lost pets is directly microchip reading into the computer. I’m not joking when I say, the biggest issues with microchip’d pets is that many times, the ID code read from the chip, shown on the scanner display, and then is manually transcribed into the computer. This results in a lot of transcription errors which is something absurdly high like 7%. Sometimes the transcription error happens upon registration, sometimes it’s upon lookup. Either way, if everyone simply used readers that relayed the info directly to the computer then a lot more pets would be reunited with their owners.

Re:Chipped Aminals

By siege72 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I remembered a lawsuit in America about a pet chip where the company (HomeAgain?) refused to provide the needed information. I couldn’t find the original, but there’s a class action settlement. While googling, I found a another pet microchip tracker went bankrupt. They’re completely shut down, and this chips are useless.

Chipping pets is a good idea… if the infrastructure is secure and stable.

Re:Chipped Aminals

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Yup I remember when i adopted my first dog from the local humane society and they chip every animal that comes through but during the adoption they explained the chip doesn’t actually do anything until you pay the database company a yearly(!) fee. I ended up never doing it because that felt like the most scummy thing on earth. Maybe that’s just my state but it was an unreal moment and really dashed my ideas of how these things work.

It’s very American that we take an idea that rally is a universal public good and declare “there’s profit to be made” and effectively ruin it.

I get paying for the chip, it’s a piece of hardware but the database should be maintained by your state with free access. It just doesn’t make any sense otherwise.

OpenAI’s US Ad Pilot Exceeds $100 Million In Annualized Revenue In Six Weeks

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:
OpenAI’s ChatGPT ads pilot in the United States has crossed the $100 million annualized revenue mark within six weeks of launch, a company spokesperson said on Thursday, pointing to robust early demand for the AI startup’s nascent advertising business. […] While roughly 85% of users are currently eligible to see ads, fewer than 20% are shown ads daily, with considerable room to grow ad monetization within the existing user pool, the spokesperson said.

“We’re seeing no impact on consumer trust metrics, low dismissal rates of ads, and ongoing improvements in the relevance of ads as we learn from feedback,” OpenAI said. The company plans to expand the test globally in additional countries in the coming weeks, including in Australia, New Zealand, and Canada. OpenAI has now expanded to over 600 advertisers, with nearly 80% of small- and medium-sized businesses signaling interest in ChatGPT ads, the spokesperson said. The ChatGPT maker is set to launch self-serve advertiser capabilities in April to broaden access and drive further growth.
CEO Sam Altman announced plans to begin testing ads on ChatGPT back in January after previously rejecting the idea. “I kind of think of ads as like a last resort for us as a business model,” Altman said in 2024.

Further reading: OpenAI CFO Says Annualized Revenue Crosses $20 Billion In 2025

Fuck This and Fuck Them

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Fuck ads.

My take

By Registered Coward v2 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I am not a fan of ads, but will tolerate them if I find the content worthwhile and it is free, as in someone else is buying the beer. There are sites I like and do not block ads because I want them to be around, and in the end they either need to paywall or run ads to stay in business. If I pay for a site, then I want it ad free. That’s the deal.

For sites like Netflix, with ads + subscription price, I need to decide where the value/cost trade off occurs. For some sites, it’s cancel and forget about them, others pay at some level.

Unfortunately, ads are here to stay. The days of Archie, Veronica, Lynx are long gone…

What’s the ROI then ?

By greytree • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
$100 billion invested
vs
$100 million p.a. income.

And that is, by Dirty Altman’s own words, their “Last Resort”.

Goodbye and good riddance.

Anthropic’s Super Bowl ads addressed this issue!

By echo123 • Score: 3 Thread

Of course no one on Slashdot watches sports or ads, so let me point out…

Anthropic’s Super Bowl ads were extremely well done IMHO, with just the right amount of ‘pause’. Anthropic came to the Super Bowl party in ad form to make it clear Anthropic/Claude won’t do ads.

How can I communicate better with my mom?

Is my essay making a clear argument?

What do you think of my business idea?

Can I get a six pack quickly?

Scale

By sudonim2 • Score: 3 Thread

OpenAI lost $11,500,000,000 last year. There are 52 weeks in a year. $100,000,000 over 6 weeks is $866,666,666.67 per year; that’s less than a billion. Even if that was just 20% of possible revenue, that’s still just $4,333,333,333.33 per year. Meaning OpenAI would still be losing $7,166,666,666.67 per year. And that’s assuming it doesn’t lose users because of the ads.

Due to other market conditions, I’m predicting that the hyperscalers are all going to crash sometime in late 2028 and take the rest of the US market (and thus the world market) down with it. It will make 2008 look like minor market correction. Not a recession but a full blown depression.

UK Startup Ignites Plasma Inside Nuclear Fusion Rocket

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
UK startup Pulsar Fusion says it has achieved the first plasma ignition inside a nuclear fusion rocket engine prototype — a huge step for space travel that could cut missions to Mars “from months-long journeys to just a few weeks,” reports Euronews. From the report:
Pulsar Fusion revealed the milestone during a live stream at Amazon’s MARS Conference, hosted by Jeff Bezos in California this week, with CEO Richard Dinan calling it an “exceptional moment” for the company. The team successfully created plasma - an intensely hot, electrically charged state of matter, often described as the fourth state of matter - using electric and magnetic fields inside its experimental and early prototype “Sunbird fusion exhaust system.” […] The company now plans further testing of its Sunbird system to improve performance. Upcoming upgrades include more powerful superconducting magnets designed to better contain and control plasma.

The fusion delusion strikes again

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 4, Informative Thread

“Successfully created plasma” is so far from fusion that this isn’t a laughable claim, it is just stupid bullshit marketing.

Re:The fusion delusion strikes again

By quenda • Score: 4, Informative Thread

If only you could get to Mars by burning investor capital and government grants.

Specific impulse

By burtosis • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
All rockets basically do is throw mass out the back to move forward with an equal and opposite reaction since we don’t have massless drives like using light for propellant. The problem lies in that the mass has to be loaded on and can’t be collected as it goes so the faster you can eject the mass the more force you can get from each particle and this ratio of mass to thrust is called specific impulse. A high specific impulse means you will be able to travel faster long term, and even short term if the engine also is capable of high thrust. The reason ion drives are so efficient is because the electric fields can accelerate mass to a far higher speed then chemical reactions giving them roughly 10x the specific impulse. If a Fusion Drive could be created, even if you put more energy into it than was used as thrust (powered by a fission reactor or RTG for example), the incredibly high temperatures could exceed ion drives specific impulse while the nuclear power source has an energy density that far exceeds any chemical reaction. So it’s not totally crazy to want a Fusion Drive that’s energy negative.

Re:Specific impulse

By burtosis • Score: 4, Informative Thread
In an abstract sense photons have mass, but it is not the same as rest mass and so the convention is to call it massless. This is an important distinction not because equations can’t be made accurately and precisely but because it’s useful to break down the thinking of energy from mass to be intrinsic to the particle or intrinsic to the larger system as a whole. They have _momentum_ which they transfer by absorption or reflection causing a corresponding momentum change in the particle(s) but the mass is precisely zero for all photon energies.

Re:The fusion delusion strikes again

By XXongo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

There will be no manned Mars missions: radiation.

Not a showstopper, but definitely a problem that needs to be addressed.

It’s not per se a deadly amount of radiation, but it does increase the astronaut’s risk of cancer. A quick calculation once suggested that a trip to Mars and back would give you an increased risk of cancer roughly equivalent to smoking a pack of cigarettes a day. Robert Zubrin once quipped that the answer is simple: pick astronauts who are smokers… and don’t send any cigarettes with them.

The problem is that no one has any doable idea to stop it.

To the contrary, this has been analyzed a lot, and there are many ideas for how to stop it. With respect to the current topic, one idea is simply to use a more effective engine, and make the trip faster to shorter the exposure.

And this isn’t the milk toast radiation we get around the Earth. This is the really nasty stuff from the rest of the Universe.

Really there are two types of radiation to worry about. One is solar protons (coronal mass ejections, or “CME"s), and the other is galactic cosmic rays (“GCR"s).

And if you are lucky, you won’t run into a solar flare on the way.

That, at least, is a solvable problem. The protons from a solar flare can be seen in advance, and last only a day or so. You can make a small portion of the spacecraft a “storm shelter” with enough shielding to stop protons (light elements are best for stopping protons; water, for example, is a great dhielding material. GCRs are harder to stop). It would be too heavy to shield the entire ship, but the astronauts can stay in their shelter for a day or so. GCRs you simply have to live with. This risk is cumulative, so the solution is to go as fast as possible.

Aside from the pretty lights, it is really nasty radiation. Don’t forget to protect your space craft’s instruments, they are more delicate than even you.

Protecting electronics is something we already know how to deal with. We have robotic probes that have been operating for literally years in deep space, not to mention one probe that routinely dips into the ferocious radiation environment of Jupiter’s radiation belts.

AV1’s Open, Royalty-Free Promise In Question As Dolby Sues Snapchat Over Codec

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
AOMedia Video 1 (AV1) was invented by a group of technology companies to be an open, royalty-free alternative to other video codecs, like HEVC/H.265. But a lawsuit that Dolby Laboratories Inc. filed this week against Snap Inc. calls all that into question with claims of patent infringement. Numerous lawsuits are currently open in the US regarding the use of HEVC. Relevant patent holders, such as Nokia and InterDigital, have sued numerous hardware vendors and streaming service providers in pursuit of licensing fees for the use of patented technologies deemed essential to HEVC.

It’s a touch rarer to see a lawsuit filed over the implementation of AV1. The Alliance for Open Media (AOMedia), whose members include Amazon, Apple, Google, Microsoft, Mozilla, and Netflix, says it developed AV1 “under a royalty-free patent policy (Alliance for Open Media Patent License 1.0)" and that the standard is “supported by high-quality reference implementations under a simple, permissive license (BSD 3-Clause Clear License).”

Yet, Dolby’s lawsuit filed in the US District Court for the District of Delaware [PDF] alleges that AV1 leverages technologies that Dolby has patented and has not agreed to license for free and without receiving royalties. The filing reads: "[AOMedia] does not own all patents practiced by implementations of the AV1 codec. Rather, the AV1 specification was developed after many foundational video coding patents had already been filed, and AV1 incorporates technologies that are also present in HEVC. Those technologies are subject to existing third-party patent rights and associated licensing obligations.” Dolby is seeking a jury trial, a declaration that Dolby isn’t obligated to license the patents in questions under FRAND (fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory) licensing obligations, and for the court to enjoin Snap from further “infringement.”

Why are lawsuits allowed against end users?

By anoncoward69 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
The legal system needs changes. Why is an initial lawsuit being filed against one of many end users of this codec? It should be required that Dolby brings an initial lawsuit against the developer of the codec AOMedia. If they successfully win that lawsuit then they can start targeting end users who either don’t appropriately licence said coded from the winner of the lawsuit or continue to use the codec and not switch to something else.

Re:Why are lawsuits allowed against end users?

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 5, Informative Thread

From the legal doc, it appears that Dolby is suing snap for not signing a licensing agreement for other codecs it is using, and not primarily AV1.

IANAL and I only flipped through the case, but the claims are about specific patents that dolby thinks are used in codecs that snapchat is using on their site alongside AV1, which are covered by some large license pool Dolby is a member of, which snapchat refused to sign, despite being “invited” several times over. Perhaps there is a side to the case where methods covered by the referenced patents are claimed to be used in AV1 as well, but I didn’t get to it, it is 91 pages long.

Hopefully, if there are such claims, the consortium behind AV1 will step in and defend it against that part of the claims. For the rest it is very likely the job of snapchat to show it doesn’t need a license.

Re:Dolby is run by fuckwads

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

They don’t make technology, they’re just a fanciful patent troll, all they make is threats. Fuck Dolby and anyone that pays them anything

Errr no, they very much do make technology. Quite a bit of it actually. Lots of what is marketed under Dolby Vision and Dolby Audio was developed by themselves and they spend a quarter of a billion dollar every year on R&D. Heck even the noise cancelling ability in video conferencing software along with music detection was largely developed by Dolby.

Just because you don’t see their products on the shelves at Best Buy doesn’t mean they don’t make those either. They produce reference monitors for colour grading Dolby Vision content, they have an entire line of cinema audio speakers, and they make the rest of the cinema audio stack as well as a first party product, including multichannel amplifiers and audio pre-processors for Atmos content - a codec they also developed from the ground up.

The fact they sit on a bunch of related patents is just the nature of any R&D development.

Re:Thought so

By teg • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It is not actually that hard. And it exists. The Ogg codecs are it. But because they are FOSS, large parts of the industry is irrationally scared of them.

As to AV1, it may not infringe in any way. But it is a commercial target because of the backers behind it and they can get endless litigation and maybe even a settlement even if it is perfectly fine, just from sabotaging its use via a broken legal system.

Ogg is used by large parts of the industry: It is used by the most popular streaming service, Spotify. Not only is the Spotify client widely used on PCs, TVs, and all kinds of streaming boxes etc - a lot of audio equipment also has Spotify connect. All of these devices support Ogg.

As for why not everyone is using it - mp3 had the inertia, and AAC is better than Ogg for the same bandwidth. For mobile devices, that matters. These days, free lossless codecs (FLAC mostly, some ALAC) are taking the spotlight - alongside proprietary spatial audio format, like Dolby Atmos.

Only 8 years late

By Gravis Zero • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

One has to question why Dolby would wait 8 years before making a peep. Yeah, AV1 was released in March 28th, 2018 which was exact 8 years ago, and this is the first time they have ever made any claim about it. What about Snapchat? The complaint states that Snapchat has used AV1 for video streaming “since at least November 24, 2023” but it appears that they have been using the “dav1d” AV1 decoder all the way back in Mar 21, 2019 which wasn’t long after it was announced.

Their extreme delay should be enough to dismiss this case but I know it’s not.

As far as I can tell, it see like Dolby was trying to wait until AV1 started getting hardware implementations in order to make alterations maximally harmful, in order to either extract the largest settlement or maximally disrupt the competition to HVEC. Either way, it seem like Dolby is acting in bad faith.

In response to Alain Williams comment, “How long before a patent troll magics up some patent relating to AV1 ?” It seems the answer is 7 years and 5 months.

Google Moves Post-Quantum Encryption Timeline Up To 2029

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Google has moved up its post-quantum encryption migration target to 2029. “This new timeline reflects migration needs for the PQC era in light of progress on quantum computing hardware development, quantum error correction, and quantum factoring resource estimates,” said vice president of security engineering Heather Adkins and senior staff cryptology engineer Sophie Schmieg in a blog post. CyberScoop reports:
Google is replacing outdated encryption across their devices, systems and data with new algorithms vetted by the National Institute for Standards and Technology. Those algorithms, developed over a decade by NIST and independent cryptologists, are designed to protect against future attacks from quantum computers. While Google has said it is on track to migrate its own systems ahead of the 2035 timeline provided in NIST guidelines, last month leaders at the company teased an updated timeline for migration and called on private businesses and other entities to act more urgently to prepare.

Unlike the federal government, there is no mandate for private businesses to migrate to quantum-resistant encryption, or even that they do so at all. Adkins and Schmieg said the hope is that other businesses will view Google’s aggressive timeframe as a signal to follow suit. “As a pioneer in both quantum and PQC, it’s our responsibility to lead by example and share an ambitious timeline,” they wrote. “By doing this, we hope to provide the clarity and urgency needed to accelerate digital transitions not only for Google, but also across the industry.”

Why do we trust the big ones?

By Uldis Segliņš • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
This looks like shifting the goal posts after realizing that they can’t reach the quantum computer. Any 5 years now. Just like fusion, just like AGI, just like selfdriving and colonizing Mars any day now. Show me a practically working one. Show me it’s build method scalability. Show me that your machine can do anything more than a few very narrow usecase problemsolving. Haven’t seen any proof yet. Until you do the homework, not gonna believe one nonquantum bit of your claims, regardless of your size. It ceases to be magic when you look at the details.

What “progress”?

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They are hallucinating hard. The current actual actual quantum factorization is not even 35 (that attempt failed, overview in https://eprint.iacr.org/2025/1…).

While crypto-agility is a good idea, there is no threat from Quantum “Computing” and there may never be one.

Re:The Horse is Already Gone

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Quantum hardware may never be up to the task. They cannot even factorize 35 at this time (https://eprint.iacr.org/2025/1237). The whole thing is a mirage and a bad idea that refuses to die.

Incidentally, even if they ever become able to do tasks of meaningful size, QCs are completely unsuitable for reversing hashes and that is what cracking passwords needs.

Re:NIST algorithms

By gweihir • Score: 5, Informative Thread

No idea. But what we have in “post quantum” crypto is all laughably weak against conventional attacks and laughably unverified. We have had finalists of competitions broken with low effort (one laptop) and the like. Moving to these algorithms is an excessively bad idea.

Re:The Horse is Already Gone

By parityshrimp • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This is very true. gweihir is 100% correct: quantum computing isn’t computing and is never going to work.

The real tragedy is all the companies and scientists spending so much time and money researching this technology and improving the state of the art. They could all save themselves a whole lot of wasted effort by listening to gweihir and not bothering. A shame.

In other news, that newfangled device Bardeen and Brattain just cooked up is a mere laboratory curiosity and has abysmal gain. Call me when it has a gain of over 100, is smaller than 10 mm^3, and I can buy one for less than a nickel.