
Leading up to the Iris Murdoch Society Conference in 2028 (I already have something prepared for this year’s conference and I need time to get through all the novels one a month), and because I like to do this in every decade of my life, I’m rereading all of Iris Murdoch’s novels in order, again. The last time I did this, 2017-2019, I ran a big readalong project, and the time before, I read them with a group of friends: this time is a solo effort, just to allow myself to think about how I find them as I move into my 50s (and age past a lot of the main characters!). So I’m writing more notes than recaps of the novels: if you want the deeper dive, please take a look at the Readalong post and comments for this one. My earlier review on here from 2008 is here.
Iris Murdoch – “The Sandcastle”
(1980s)
Mor, a middle-aged teacher at a lower level public school, has a dull marriage to the controlling Nan and two children who aren’t going to achieve what he’d hoped. So when Rain Carter appears to paint a portrait of the old headmaster, Mor’s dear friend Demoyte, he’s ripe to fall for her. Against the background of school events and Mor’s fumblings towards becoming the candidate to be the local Labour MP, alongside his (and the family’s) friend Tim Burke, another of Murdoch’s slightly separate Irish men, and his ambitions for Mor. As Donald plans to climb a school landmark, Mor’s obsession climbs and so apparently does Rain’s.
Thoughts on themes
Painted ladies / ageing hags
Not really a theme in this one. Nan is quite glamorous but not really a painted lady; Rain is boyish. Does she move towards this theme from here?
Sudden revelations
Mor is hit by the thunderbolt of his love for Rain: “He waited. Then from the very depths of his being the knowledge came to him, suddenly and with devastating certainty. He was in love with Miss Carter. He stood there looking at the dusty ground and the thought that had taken shape shook him so that he nearly fell”. (p. 136)
Reading Iris Murdoch post-#MeToo
Saints are passive, non-threatening / non-masculine men (as discussed in the last post) – Reverend Everard fits the bill here. Poor Rain is pawed by Demoyte and then idealised by Mor. She only really has a “moment” when she realises Mor’s political ambitions and states firmly she would never let anything separate her from her painting. Meanwhile, it takes another man’s gaze for Mor to realise Rain is a decent painter and he’s excited later to be “keeping her in the house” (p. 164). Rain is described several times as boylike, with her slim figure and short, tousled hair (prefiguring “The Black Prince”).
I was reminded of something I thought I remembered IM saying which I found in a post in the IM Society Facebook (thank you to Daniel Read): ‘She writes this to Georg Kreisel, late Oct 1967, around the time when she’s starting to develop A Fairly Honourable Defeat: “I think I am sexually rather odd, which is a male homosexual in female guise. (This is fairly evident from the novels where it is the male queer relations which tend to carry the most force from the unconscious.) I doubt if Freud knew anything about me, though Proust knew about my male equivalent.”’ Is this because of her internalised misogyny?
Mid-life crises?
The book is basically about Mor’s mid-life crisis.
Alternative idea: set pieces
If the MeToo stuff is too much, an alternative idea to look at. Here, of course Donald’s climb and rescue, also Felicity’s spell and the car falling into the river. As with all the set pieces in the novels, there is so much satisfying detail. Note: Flight from the Enchanter – Annette’s jump to swing at the beginning / the AGM of the magazine. Under the Net – the rescue of Mr Mars and/or the destruction of the set.
What’s changed in my reading this time?
I had remembered most of this but I had sympathies for Bledyard this time around. I had thought the romance fascinating, now it seems dirty. I have been in my relationship longer than the Mors have been married. Is there a theme of long marriages somewhere, even before IM had one? Chimes with previous books I’d not noticed – Tim decides he wants to tell Nan all about his childhood, just as Mischa does in “Flight”.
What has stayed the same?
I remembered most of the story and main scenes. I have always loved this quotation:
Eccentric people, he concluded, were good for conventional people, simply because they made them able to conceive of everything being quite different. This gave them a sense of freedom. Nothing is more educational, in the end, than the mode of being of other people. (p. 62)
Links to my life and way of being
Bledyard’s late assertion chimed with me: “‘Happiness?’ said Bledyard, making a face of non-comprehension. ‘What has happiness got to do with it? Do you imagine that you, or anyone, has some sort of right to happiness? That idea is a poor guide.'” (p. 195)
As with my previous, this is my thinking aloud, and it might bet that these posts are only interesting to Iris Murdoch afficionados, I don’t know. If it’s disappointed you, go back to one of the earlier links and read a proper review. Back soon with the next one!















Recent comments