The “reprinted at last” is me being funny.

§ March 27th, 2026 § Filed under swamp thing § 7 Comments

Image
Okay, due to popular demand, given the number of emails, DMs, and “@s” on Bluesky I’ve received, I should mention this forthcoming Swamp Thing Dark Genesis” Omnibus set, shipping in…egads, November? Well, that’ll give everyone time to save their pennies for it, since it retails for a mighty $150.

Oh, what does it include, you may ask. I may answer, by telling you that it includes

  • House of Secrets #92, reprinted at last
  • all 24 issues of the original 1970s Swamp Thing run
  • the first 15 issues of the early 1980s Saga of the Swamp Thing
  • the annual for that series — that’s the adaptation of the first movie, son, with an early Mark Texeira art job!
  • the two Brave and the Bold team-ups with Batman (#122 and #176)
  • DC Comics Presents #8 with Superman
  • Challengers of the Unknown #81-#87 (Swampy himself doesn’t pop up ’til #82, but #81 kicks off the story, and includes an old adversary of his)
  • House of Secrets #140, with the beginning of the aborted “Patchwork Man” serial, featuring the character from early in the Swamp Thing run
  • Phantom Stranger #14, another swamp monster (or…is it?) story by Swampy’s co-creator Len Wein, which came out around the same time as House of Secrets #92 — not actually Swamp Thing, but does have a cool Neal Adams cover

And that’s not all, friends! Included is the restored unpublished issue #25 from the original series, most of the pages of which were unearthed a while back. It’ll be nice to see this issue properly finished (and with the missing page replaced with new art). Finally, the Swamp Thing vs. Hawkman battle we’ve been waiting for! (I mean, aside from the one we got later during Alan Moore’s run.)

We’re also getting a translated version of the Patchwork Man story that would have been in House of Secrets #141, but for some reason was bumped, and only appeared in a foreign edition. Boy, it’s going to be nice to have all this stuff in one place.

I do notice they don’t include Super Friends #28, which technically is a Swamp Thing cameo, but really it’s just a guy in a Swamp Thing costume magically turned into the muck-encrusted mockery, so I guess it doesn’t count.

Oh, and there’s “extensive essays and never-before-seen scripts, art, and more!” so all right already, stop twisting my arm.

This is going to be one of the “new-style” omnibuses, like we saw with the Mike Grell’s Warlord volume we saw recently. Printed on what DC is calling “period-appropriate paper,” so it won’t be the slick fancy stuff. It’ll likely be the nice, white paper from the Warlord book, which means these new omnibuses will be shockingly light, since this paper isn’t nearly as heavy. We’re supposed to be getting the “original coloring,” too, which will likely look better, or more “authentic,” on this paper than the glossy stuff.

We’ll know for sure in about eight months once we have these in our hands. But it’s my understanding that the folks in charge of this, and the future Alan Moore Swamp Thing omnibuses are taking great care in producing these, and I’m hoping these will look as nice as realistically possible. I’ve also had some…assurances that some of the printing problems with previous reprints of the Moore run (like the missing caption, or the missing art) will be addressed.

Am I getting it? Yes, of course I am, at the very least I need what has got to be reprint #25 of House of Secrets #92.

I’m wondering if the forthcoming facsimile edition of Saga of the Swamp Thing #21 (an issue with problems in the reprinting, as linked above), will function as a preview of what the omnibuses will look like? Or is it just a rushed out reprint to take adavtage of the current facsimile trend?

My Fantastic Four-ay: Part Three.

§ March 25th, 2026 § Filed under fantastic four § 7 Comments

So as you might imagine, even this far out from (some version of) the character’s appearance on the silver screen, I’ve had an upswell of demand for comics featuring Doctor Doom. And not too long ago, a young man, probably 12 or 13, fished a couple appearances out of the Fantastic Four boxes and purchased them, one of which being issue #278 from 1985:

Image
Technically, this isn’t Doom in this issue, but rather his young ward Kristoff, whose mind was reprogrammed with Doom’s memories upon the Doctor’s apparent “death.” Comics, everyone! But it’s a fun adventure (continued into the next issue, with a cover blurb referencing arist/writer John Byrne’s early work for Charlton).

Anyway, an hour or three after that kid bought his comic and left, it occurred to me that a particular subplot appeared in that #278, setting up a story a couple of issues later. Johnny “Human Torch” Storm, with his girlfriend Alicia Masters (which will take some explaining, which I plan to do later in this series of posts) are out for a walk, when Johnny notices someone’s been applying offensive stickers to posters advertising an equality rally:

Image
And just so we’re clear, that panel above is the version you’ll see on Marvel’s digital comic platform, with That Word obscured. It was not obscured in the original publication, in the issues I bought off the stands myself 41 years ago. I can only wonder what that young customer of mine thought when he hit that page in the comic after taking it home that day, and frankly I’m still expecting the phone call at the shop from a parent.

I’m trying to recall my own reaction to the usage in the comic. I was a 15/16-year old white kid reading this, and I think I was…maybe a little surprised to see it, but I could see it was there to Make A Point About Racism and therefore this was leading up to some Important Comics.

Looking at it now, I can see it as an attempt at making (spoiler, this is the villain behind it all) the Psycho-Man and his emotion-manipulating powers having a more “real world” relevant impact. And using That Word was absolutely there for the shock value, which was apparently a big year for it because it pops up in Uncanny X-Men just a couple of months after this. As that 15/16-year-old kid back then, and as the 57-year-old white guy I am now, I’m not in a position to say “sure, this was okay to do.” I mean, I think hearts were in the right place, judging by this please-don’t-write-us-letters editorial box on the letters page for #278:

Image
(And just so you all know…I looked to see what reactions this issue generated in later Fantastic Four letter columns, and I found one with letters for #277, and another with a page for letters about #279, but none for #278. Not sure what to make of that.)

In a postscript in #279, That Word gets dropped again as a set-up for the next issue. And, once we get to issue #280, with this admittedly striking cover:

Image
…where this storyline starts in earnest, things get scaled back a little bit, with a policeman under Psycho-Man’s influence harasses an elderly Jewish man, and assaults Wyatt Wingfoot, the FF’s Native American friend. Plus, we get a panel showing an anti-mutant protest:

Image
…which has been, and still is, Marvel’s mainstay allegory for real world racism, feeling a little odd contrasted with the real world racism the comic has been presenting for a couple of issues now.

When all is said and done, the entire point of the slurs and the racism and the violence is to show what a character like the Psycho-Man, and his control over people’s hate and fear, would do in a “realistic” setting. Yes, racism is real, and someone like Psycho-Man would take advantage of it, stirring it up for his own ends, even if his own ends are just causing more hatred and violence for its own sake. But the contrast between a very real-world slur and, well, the inherent comic book ridiculousness of Psycho-Man makes for, at best, a rough fit, resulting in a presentation that feels more like “look what we can do!” than “We Have Something Important to Say.”

The real goal of this storyline is two-fold, and has nothing to do with the racism in the set-up. It’s all about Susan Richards, the Invisible Woman, and redefining her character. In short, under Psycho-Man’s control, and SPOILERS once more for a four-decade-old story, she emerges in the new costumed identity of Malice:

Image
…where she quickly demolishes the other members of the FF with innovative usage of her force field powers. And while the Malice identity, at least during Byrne’s run on the book, departs after the conclusion of this storyline, the character has quite the long tail, appearing and reappearing in one form or another in later creators’ runs, up to Fantastic Four comics being released even as I type this.

The demonstration of Sue’s powers unleashed, combined with her eventual torture at the hands of Psycho-Man and her off-panel presumably-gruesome revenge on the villain, are all part of Byrne’s attempts at “strengthening” her, resulting in this concluding panel in #284:

Image
Despite being a little harder to say out loud than “Invisible Girl,” the “Invisible Woman” moniker has survived to this day. And, largely because of this story, she is still often referred to as the most powerful member of the team.

Which of course is a wild way to wrap up a tale that began with That Word being printed in the comic, in front of God an’ everybody. It’s one of the very few examples of Byrne setting up a story element that doesn’t really come to anything…something similar (though with fewer bad words) occurs in that story with Reed’s father from about a year prior to this, which I’ll probably get to later. It’s just there to show just bad the villain can be, and, well, yes, that’s pretty bad indeed, thanks John.

Again, going back to what I, reading this new in 1985, thought of it…well, I’m sure I didn’t think much about the conclusions I’m drawing here today. I probably thought of it as “comics have really matured if they can make storytelling choices like this!” Or maybe I wasn’t thinking anything of it at all, since I was also reading old undergrounds an’ such at the time, which tended to be a little freer with the language than their four-color counterparts.

I mean, ultimately it’s good to show Our Heroes Hate Racism (a point that now seems sadly lost on some of those who purport to be comic fans), but casually throwing That Word out there in a regular ol’ superhero comic, an edgy move then, is certainly off-putting to modern eyes, regardless of intent.

Sam Kieth (1963-2026).

§ March 23rd, 2026 § Filed under obituary § 19 Comments

Image

Image
My favorite Sam Kieth work, aside of course from his magnum opus, The Maxx, was this odd two-issue series released by Fantagraphics in 1991. It collected together short strips, art pieces, and other stuff by Kieth, all in glorious black and white, and affixed with a title that, to this day, helps me remember how to spell his name properly.

Speaking of The Maxx…just the other day, I was writing here about Spawn, and how people who haven’t been around comics in a while always bring it up. The Maxx is brought up nearly as often, and it’s not just people remembering the short-run cartoon that aired on MTV in the ’90s. They’re specifically asking about the comic book, which casts quite the long shadow.

Image

The Maxx nominally had the trappings of a superhero comic, but in Kieth’s hands (with scripting from William Messner-Loebs on most issues, and a guest-script by Alan Moore) it was a tale about trauma, abuse, mental health, and the very nature of imagination and reality. It was weird, it was funny, it was emotional, and it was unique. And to this very day, when I get issues of this series in the shop, they sell out almost immediately. Maybe someday we can get a collection of this work that’ll stay in print longer than a few minutes…the demand is there.

Image
He had a pretty good run of covers for Marvel Comics Presents, sometimes illustrating work inside as well. He drew an issue of Peter David’s Incredible Hulk, he did the occasional stand-alone mini (Four Women and Zero Girl come immediately to mind), a series of projects for Oni Press, multiple Lobo comics, and he eventually returned to the Maxx with, of all things, a strange Batman team-up. Oh, and let’s not forget the wonderful Epicurus the Sage (written by Messner-Loebs).

Pretty much every time Kieth touched pen to paper, no matter how mainstream-seeming the project appears, you were guaranteed a solidly-drawn weird time. “One of a kind” is kinda of an empty description in most cases, since we’re all unique in our own ways, but I think if it could be said about anyone, it can be said about the artistic talent of Sam Kieth.

So long, Sam.

Image

The Final ’90s Countdown, Part Nineteen.

§ March 20th, 2026 § Filed under final '90s countdown § 12 Comments

And now, for another one-vote getter for my Final ’90s Countdown survey, and pack a lunch, it’s a long one!

Spawn (Image Comics, 1992-present)

ImageMan oh man, where do I even start.

Arising from the mass exodus of Marvel’s top artists and Rob Liefeld, Image Comics provided these creators free reign to generate whatever new concepts their wild imaginations could conceive, and (most importantly) still have complete ownership of them. And it remains today as a powerful publisher of creator-owned work.

Now, when this whole wingding was announced, I remember thinking, “wow, this is a great opportunity to expand comics into new genres with these artists’ large audiences! Imagine a Jim Lee-drawn crime drama, or a Todd McFarlane-drawn Old West story!” Yes, I was perhaps a little…well, a lot naïve, and frankly I still think McFarlane could draw one hell of a cactus. But what we got was more superheroes.

I mean, at first, they were admittedly very popular superheroes. First out of the gate was Liefeld’s Youngblood, and despite the joshing I gave that fresh-faced youngster earlier in this piece, we had a line waiting outside the door of our shop the day of release (thanks largely to the Rob making a talk show appearance the night before). And the comic continued to sell well, and its style and storytelling had a tremendous impact on the superhero artform.

Which is a long way of introducing the subject of today’s entry, Todd McFarlane’s Spawn. Another popular debut series from Image, we didn’t have a line outside the door for this comic when it first came out, but we ordered high numbers and purt’near sold through them all. Coming off several years of illustrating Spider-Man comics, McFarlane was perhaps neck-and-neck with Jim Lee (who’d drawn X-Men books) for Most Popular Guy Who Quit Marvel, 1990s Edition. This comic just sold and sold and kept selling for a number of years, while the market was there, and even continued on through the mid-1990s market crash at slightly less-outstanding sales levels.

As you can see by the header, the comic is still being published to this very day, along with a myriad of recent-ish spin-offs (including Gunslinger Spawn, so we finally did get that western-themed McFarlane comic I was hoping for, kinda-sorta). Sales have been up and down over the decades, but have been a little strong of late, at least on the main title, which has never relaunched or rebooted or renumbered or any darn thing, issue #373 having come out just a couple of weeks back. Plus, its creator, Todd McFarlane his own self, has been involved in its production more often than not over its long life.

In general, as a writer, McFarlane make a good artist, as we all discovered during that solo Spider-Man title he did just prior to departing Marvel, and we all had our fun with his skills in that department. But, honestly, he wasn’t much worse than, say, Bill Mantlo during his more florid moments, or Chris Claremont-isms like “I…hurt,” and even John Byrne’s scripts had some real clunkers. No one is without sin, is what I’m saying, and eventually, I think, McFarlane turned into the kind of writer that the Spawn storytelling required. Nothing particularly clever or polished, but utilitarian enough to move things along at the necessary pace.

As I mentioned, McFarlane kept his hand in one way or another throughout the series, even as other hands took over the story and art, and the comic remained…artistically consistent for its still continuing lifespan. Imagine 373 issues of X-Men or Wonder Woman, all more or less under the same editorial guidance, all looking reasonably similar stylewise, the story remaining consistent and building upon itself all this time. The only comparisons in American comics would be Dave Sim’s Cerebus, and the also still-continuing Savage Dragon by Erik Larsen, both of whom did write and drawn every issue). I’ve often lamented that Liefeld didn’t keep doing Youngblood every month since that long-ago first issue. Just imagine 373 issues of Youngblood and what that would look like now. It would be bonkers beyond our wildest dreams. It would be everyone‘s favorite comic.

So, what’s the comic all about, anyway? Soldier Al Simmons, upon his murder, goes to Hell, where the demon in charge, Malebolgia, gives him a costume and powers and sends him back to Earth to serve his new master’s ends. Once there, Spawn decides to use his powers for good instead, and, well, hijinks ensue for the next 30+ years. (It’s reminiscent of the 1970s Atlas/Seaboard comic The Grim Ghost, except for the running for 30+ years part.) One gimmick is that Spawn is told he only has a limited amount of “energy” for the superpowers he now has, and once he used all those up, he gets sent back to Hell. As such, we, the readers, are given a little on-panel doodad that occasionally pops up and shows us where Spawn’s power levels are at, even though it’s never explained what each number represents and what exactly depletes what stat.

I mean, at least at first, I only read a handful of issues so I have no idea if that counter was ever explained, or refilled, or whathaveyou. In fact, I only read the first dozen issues myself, because, sure, why not, which meant I was there for the four guest-writer issues (8-11, written by Alan Moore, Neil Gaiman, Dave Sim, and Frank Miller, respectively). I don’t know if that was McFarlane reacting to criticisms of the writing by saying “okay, fine, here are some real writers” or what, but they were pretty good, and at least a couple of them (Moore and Gaiman) added some important pieces to the ongoing Spawn saga (even if one of those pieces, the hunter angel Angela, was eventually lost to Marvel in a whole legal/creator ownership thing that I’ll let this article explain).

As to what Spawn has been up to all this time, since I last read the character, I couldn’t tell you beyond what I know of the character’s publishing history. There were a number of spin-offs early on, including Curse of Spawn and Spawn: The DUndead, crossover adventures like Spawn/WildC.A.T.s (written by Alan Moore), multiple minis with Spawn’s nemesis Violator (also written by Moore!), and a couple of intercompany crossovers with Batman (which would happen again recently). Then, a few years ago, there was another big push to launch more Spawn series, like King Spawn and the aforementioned Gunslinger Spawn, and there’s usually three or four different Spawn series on the rack at any given time.

There are reprints a’plenty, including a series of Spawn: Origins (volume 31, coming in August, collects up to #190), and the giant Spawn Compendiums, volume 7 of which gets you up to #350). And there have been several paperbacks and hardcovers reprinting the many spin-offs and tie-ins, all in varying states of in-printness. And of course, I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention the live-action movie from 1997, and the three seasons of the HBO animated series (also starting in 1997). I feel like I keep hearing about a new Spawn movie every couple of years. Oh, and the toys. So many toys.

Spawn remains a touchstone for many former comic book readers, as I don’t know how many times someone has come in, told me “I haven’t been in a comic shop since the ’90s!” and then asked “is Spawn still coming out?” or “how much is Spawn #1 worth?” And speaking of Spawn #1, I continue to do strong trade in those, selling them almost as fast as I can get my hands on them.

Now is it all any good? Well, at least one of you voting in my poll liked it, so who am I to gainsay that? But it’s lasted all this time, through likely multiple cycles of readership. I often wonder what percentage of folks buying the comic have been reading it since buying its very first issue off the stands in 1992? Regardless, it’s had real staying power and a solid fanbase and I suspect, if we check back in thirty years from now, we’ll continue to find it on the stands. Probably at $17.99 an issue, but I don’t think it’s going anywhere.

No idea why Diamond went away.

§ March 18th, 2026 § Filed under death of superman, retailing § 15 Comments

So as I may have mentioned once or thrice, I inherited a number of items from my previous place of funnybook-sellin’ employment, following that location’s final closing. Like, boxes of old promotional material, this sign, and lots of old invoices. “You might find some use from the data there,” my former boss Ralph said, and I agreed, with intentions of going through all those pages to see what I can glean.

Well, it had been a while, and I finally pulled those boxes out to poke through them. Didn’t have any real plan in mind, aside from flipping open one or two here and there for the occasional twinge of nostalgia (“we ordered *that* many of that comic?”). As far as I can tell, I have access to invoices ranging from September 1986 (exactly two years before I started working for that store), running up to sometime in 1996. I don’t know if it’s a complete run, but it’s a significant amount of information of what Ralph had ordered, and what was available, from Bud Plant, Capital Comics, and Diamond Comics, and maybe one or two others in there.

By happenstance — yes, really — I found the invoice for the week when we received Superman #75, the nigh-infamous “Death of Superman” issue, dated “11-20-92.” (That’s the Friday of the week, though I’m pretty sure the comic went on sale on Thursday the 19th.) My memory over the years was that we ordered “ten times what we normally ordered on Superman comics” for this special issue, and thus, now that I have the exact numbers, I can pin down that assumption to a more specific amount.

Now, I don’t feel comfortable giving exact order numbers, as it feels a little bit to me like giving away trade secrets or something. Every once in a while I’ll have someone at the shop ask me “so, how many copies of [title] did you order?” and I’ll answer either “enough” or (usually, because they usually only ask if I’m out) “not enough.”

As such, I’ll be telling you that, combining both the deluxe black-bagged #75 and the unbagged “newsstand” version, we got in just a little over 7 times our normal Superman comic order. I will say that number is a few hundred copies, which, under all normal circumstances, would have been plenty to meet demand.

But then, as discussed on this site plenty of times (click the category link to see), and as you likely know already, the “Death” broke in the real world news just prior to release. Which is why when we were prepping to open, we were taken by surprise by the enormous line stretching down the street waiting to get in. Even by limiting sales to one per customer (which just delighted some folks, I’ll tell you what), we were out in short order. Had we ordered 20 or 30 times our regular order of Superman, we might have had enough, though given the number of people who wanted multiple copies, maybe even more would have been necessary.

Looking at this invoice, I was reminded of a particularly aggravating problem, in that Diamond shorted us our multiple cases of boxes of Doomsday: The Death of Superman trading cards. Just the total cost of the cards alone was about equal to, like, one of my weekly Marvel invoices now. Geez louise. Anyway, I barely recall there was some kind of issue with those cards at the distribution level, in that we never got replacements on them. (Eventually, the folks at the shop would get a full set of the cards for me for a birthday or Christmas or something, since I was a longtime Superman fan. Yes, I still have that set.)

Also interesting is that this week was also the debut of Doom 2099, and you’d think its foil-enhanced first issue would be overlooked in the rush for that guy in the cape what died. But, even though we ordered about 5 times what we would normally order on Superman (to continue using that comparison point), we would — eventually — sell out of it. At this late date, I can’t recall if sales on its initial release was hindered by the Superman rush, but I do remember running out of it.

Also shipped this week: Robin III #2 (both the collectors edition and the regular version), X-Factor #86, G.I. Joe, A Real American Hero #132, and, yes, Horny Biker Sluts #5.

What was amazing was the number of shortages we had, on top of not receiving the Death of Superman cards. We didn’t get our orders on Guardians of the Galaxy #32, Dracula: The Suicide Club #4, Kimagure Orange Road: A Retuirn to That Day VHS, Laundryland #4, Loco Vs. Pulverine #1 (may have been a restock, noted by Diamond as having shipped 10/31 on the invoice), the Marvel Super Heroes 1992 Holiday Special, Meatface: The Amazing Flesh #1 (um, what), Merlin #1, Night of the Living Dead: Aftermath, Nightbreed #33, Personality Presents #15 (with Michelle Pfeiffer), Rock Classics: The Doors #1, Savage Henry #23, Saved by the Bell #4, Scooby-Doo Giant Size #2, Screw Comics #1, Sherlock Holmes: Return of he Devil #2, Southern Knights #36, Stunt Dawgs #1, Tales of Screaming Horror #1, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Mutant Sourcebook #1, Trailer Trash #3, UFOs Alien Contact #1 (both the regular and Deluxe Editions), Urusei Yatsura Movie: Only You VHS, XXX-Women: A Woman’s Work… #1, Yogi Bear Big Book #2, and Zoot #1. Oh, and a copy of Kitchen Sink Pipeline #70, a freebie newsletter to retailers.

And yet somehow we still had lots of comics other than Superman #75 to sell that week. Good gravy, what we put up with. Probably around this time I told our Diamond rep, after dealing with another slew of shortages, “if Diamond was a plane, I wouldn’t fly it” (a gag stolen from David Letterman). May not have been nice of me, no, but boy was I frustrated. But looking at the invoice, it looks like, for example, none of our Fantagraphics books showed up (which includes that Meatface mag), so maybe there was a problem with their books getting to Diamond on time, or something. I don’t know. Still, c’mon guys, that’s a lot of missing books. And cards. And videotapes.

Anyway, that’s a peek back at a notable shipping week from over thirty years ago. Now to find the invoice with the white-bagged Adventures of Superman #500 to see how many of those we shouldn’t have ordered.

My Fantastic Four-Ay: Part Two.

§ March 16th, 2026 § Filed under fantastic four, galactus § 11 Comments

While the Thing quickly became one of my favorite Marvel superheroes, thanks in part to John Byrne’s portrayal in the (probably) first issue of Fantastic Four I purchased off the stands, I very quickly latched onto my favorite Marvel supervillain:

Image
If #259 was my first purchased new issue of Fantastic Four, then #257 (cover date August 1983) was likely one my earliest back issue acquisitions of the series. And what a cover that was, with Galactus’ visage split with that of Death, which I probably thought was largely symbolic when I pulled the comic out of the bins, but surprise, it’s actually a literal representation of the story inside. But more on that in a moment.

I’ve read stories with Galactus, or referencing him, before, primarily in the Fantastic Four and Silver Surfer stories reprinted in the Origins of Marvel Comics and Son of Origins of Marvel Comics 1970s paperbacks that I checked out several times from the library as a young’un. Those books were a primary source of my knowledge of Marvel characters, along with Stan Lee’s semi-apocryphal text pieces therein, which is something I somehow neglected to mention in the previous installments of this series of posts.

The Galactus I encounted in those stories, the 1960s era rendition of the character, were likely more in line with the bombastic, cosmic storytelling of Lee ‘n’ Kirby, or fitting into the more quixotic Silver Surfer stories by Lee and John Buscema. What Byrne gave me in this comic was a combination of both, starting with this issue’s splash page that I remember being quite taken with:

Image
I mean, what? That’s how you start a comic, throwing what may be the most powerful being in the Marvel Universe at you and having him make this quiet, tragic-seeming admission. Plus, that’s a hell of a drawing.

Then Byrne hits us with this two-page spread, that really lays into the cosmic bombast while still giving Galactus his somber soliloquy as he ponders his existence:

Image
I know at least a couple of you out there winced when I referred to Galactus as a “supervillain” earlier in this post. A lot of hay has been made over the fact that Galactus is not a villain, as such, as he is “beyond such concepts as good and evil.” It’s established early on that he does what he does (tools around the universe eating planets) because it’s what he must do to survive. Not out of malice, just out of necessity.

I suppose if you’re on the planet being eating, that’s a splitting of hairs you really don’t have the time for. But this issue, getting into Galactus’s head, as he goes into his motivations and his doubts, goes a long way to fleshing out a being that could have just been a giant monster that our heroes fight occasionally, and let that be that. Giving him this level of…dignity goes a long way to establishing just who and what he is, and while Byrne may not have been the first to do this with the character, this was the first time I’ve seen it done with him. And it just fascinated me.

What especially grabbed me is Byrne further indicating Galactus’s importance to the universe at large, by having him literally have a conversation with Marvel’s embodiment of Death:

Image
Death straight up says that she and Galactus as “two corners of the great triangle which is the universe” (the third corner being, of course, this fella). I ate all this up, buying into the mystery and the cosmic significance of Galactus, and wanting to Read More About It.

Now, later in the issue, Galactus gets his mojo back and decides to eat a planet, this time just happening to be the homeworld of some old pests of the Fantastic Four, the Skrulls:

Image
…and while the Big G usually sets up machinery and such to more effectly absorb the planet’s energies, sometimes you just wanna dive right into the pie and not bother with the fork, right?

And, luckily for me, this would lead into more delving into the nature of Galactus some issues later, as Reed Richards is forced into a space-trial, accused of being responsible for the destruction of the Skrulls’ planet.

Image
Reed’s responsible, you see, because in a previous story, he took the steps to revive a fallen and really dying Galactus, because he wasn’t just going to stand by and watch someone die. Even a someone who’s taller than buildings and likes to eat planets.

And having learned that, I of course, in my Fantastic Four back issue buying, decided to pick up that particular storyline, three issues running from #242 to #245 (May-July 1982). Here’s the middle issue, with a great cover image that, eventually, was turned into a statue or toy of some kind:

Image
It was also in this issue that I learned of the origin of Galactus’s new herald, Nova, who had been in the newer issues I read. It was weird, working my way backwards in time, filling in the holes in the newer stories I’d read. It’s a sensation I don’t really experience much of anymore, piecing together long runs and slowly having the full story come together, like getting chapters of a book out of order and reading them as they come. The old comics I collect now (like Popeye and Turok are episodic, and don’t have continuing subplots and such.

Regardless of the order in which I encounted his comics, Galactus continued to fascinate me and I would pick up his appearances as I saw them. And pal Cully (whom you’ve seen in my comments from time to time) would lend me his run of Lee/Kirby Thor that centered around Galactus and Ego the Living Planet, and that was almost too much cosmic shenaniganery for me to handle. Eventually I would get my hands on Supervillain Classics:

Image
…which would fill in the holes on his backstory for me, using literal panels extracted from previously published comics and tied together with short bits of explanatory text.

Of course we’d eventually see Hatless Galactus, but maybe we’re getting a little off track here.

I still have a fondness for Galactus, particularly when creators have new and unusual takes on the character (like Mark Waid and Mike Wieringo having a depowered Galactus trying to exist as a “normal” person). I also enjoyed getting an actual Big Guy in a Wild Helmet version of Galactus in the recent Fantastic Four film.

Galactus pops up in a lot of places, but whenever he shows up in the Fantastic Four comic, I’m pleased to be seeing my old pal, the one who introduced me to the whole Cosmic-Ness of it all in the Marvel Universe.

57.

§ March 13th, 2026 § Filed under old, variant covers § 19 Comments

So Captain Gallant of the Foreign Legion, the 1955 Charlton comic book adaptation of the television show:

Image
…had both a regular newsstand edition and a “Heinz Foods Premium” edition, which featured the Heinz emblem on the certificate on the back cover:

Image
…and had a listing of the 57 varieties of Heinz products on the inside back cover:

Image
Heinz was a sponsor of the TV show, hence this tie-in comic, though I couldn’t find any video or images of Buster Crabbe juggling bottles of Heinz whilst espousing their fine qualities.
 
 
 
 

images from this eBay auction — also, a happy day to my birthday brother pal Andrew

Nature is healing…

§ March 11th, 2026 § Filed under collecting, retailing § 6 Comments

…as speculation on Image Comics first issues is beginning to ramp up again. A few years back, my general sense of the Image speculation then was people hoping to twig onto whatever will be the new Walking Dead, a comic that expanded into other popular media and drove back issue prices into the stratosphere.

Now the speculation appears to be leaning towards first issues that are perhaps lower ordered, or otherwise under the radar. Titles that when they’re announced, and when it comes time for me to do my ordering, I don’t hear a peep about from anyone. And then, when it’s the day before the comic goes on sale, I start to get the requests.

From what I hear on the social medias, when I noted this, was that the comics folks on the YouTubes and the TikToks started to hype up these particular comics as “investable collectibles” within the last week or two. Of course, this is well past the time I’m able to get more copies, so even if I saw any of these videos (which I wouldn’t since I avoid most comics content on those platforms) what good was that going to do.

I haven’t noted the titles of the comics in question if only because the onus is not on them; they’re by creators doing books with stories they want to tell. And while I’m sure they’re pleased with the sales (and the attendant reprints), I’m not sure how happy they’d be to know that the primary push for sales is as a commodity, not as a storytelling medium. Look, I’m sure a bushel of twenties is a healing balm, but there must be some disappointment.

It reminds me of a creator at Marvel during initial COVID times, when speculators were desperate for anything to invest in, getting excited that an issue of their book suddenly shot through the roof in demand and sales. They seemed to think it portended future success, not realizing it was a one-off fluke as that issue featured an “invesetable” first appearance, and sales went right back to normal levels with the next issue.

So we have high demand for these new first issues, but no real indication of how many of those sales are to people looking to actually read it, and no indication as to what the sales will eventually settle down to once the investment opportunity is over. I’m just sorry that it may take two or three cycles of printings before the books can find their audiences. Unless they want to go on eBay and pick up the $20 or more copies of the first printings that were listed as such even before the release dates.

Collection and investment has always been part and parcel of the comics hobby — the phrase “must-have double-bag item” obviously came from somewhere. But in these days when comic orders are hewn close to the bone as it is, the surprise last-second demand for a low-ordered book is a frustration.

My Fantastic Four-ay: Part One.

§ March 9th, 2026 § Filed under fantastic four § 11 Comments

Image
I am reasonably sure Fantastic Four #259 (cover date October 1983, released June 1983) was the first issue of the series I purchased off the stands. While The Thing #5 that kicked off my still-ongoing dive into the world of Marvel Comics was technically a November ’83 (relased in July) issue, it was still close enough to that Fantastic Four‘s release that I could still find copies on the stands.

This was far further along into John Byrne’s tenure on the series than I imagined. Byrne, of course, had been a hot commodity since his time on the X-Men title with Chris Claremont, which came to an end in late ’80 (#144, cover date March 1981). Picking up Fantastic Four with #232 (July 1981 cover, released circa March), Byrne took what is popularly called a “Back to Basics” approach that he favored, stripping away all the excess subplots and characters and oddball permutations of the book and the team within, scaling it all back to just the family and their adventures. In essence, trying to bring it back to the Stan Lee/Jack Kirby days of the comic’s inception.

Byrne had actually worked on the book before, in the late 1970s/very early ’80s, from 209 to 221 (with a couple of fill-ins from other creators). He worked over Marv Wolfman scripts, and was inked by Joe Sinnott, but Byrne wrote the last couple of issues himself. I feel like this short precursor to his main run on the book is often overlooked, though its adherence to the slightly more overwrought tone of the title may separate it from the aforementioned “Back to Basics” approach from the later run. However, elements from the earlier books would be brought back…

…in particular, Terrax the Tamer, the fella what the FF is squaring off against on the cover of #259 up there. Here’s a better look at him from inside the comic, going by a slightly different moniker that didn’t stick around long:

Image
Anyway, when I picked up this issue, I didn’t know nuthin’ about nuthin’ about any of the backstory, either given the comic’s story or what the history was with the artist behind the scenes. I mean, I knew who the FF were, I knew who Dr. Doom was, I had no idea who this Terrax, or Tyros, guy was, but he was clearly the bad guy. Look, I was 14, I’d read comics before, I knew how these things work and how to pick up what backstory I needed to catch up with what was going on.

But I think overall I was more taken with the overall…grounded (relatively speaking) tone of Marvel I was experiencing here. My superhero fandom, since I started picking up comics on the regular basis, rather than just piecemeal as I could cajole my parents into picking one up for me on an occasional basis, was mostly DC Comics. They had a lighter, more fantasy-oriented tone to most of the titles I was reading, but this Fantastic Four comic went a long way to establishing that these characters existed in a more representative world. That they had complex inner lives and relatable problems aside from whatever that issue’s particular plot contrivances inspired.

Just…just look at this panel of the Thing in the back seat of a cab. Just a dude sittin’ and thinkin’ and Byrne spent a good amount of page space giving us character:

Image
Not that DC wasn’t approaching storytelling in a similar way, but it just didn’t have the frisson that one panel of Ben Grimm in a cab did.

Fantastic Four #259 turned out to be my gateway into the series, and into John Byrne’s work as a whole. But before I expanded too far into his other endeavors, I had what amounted to a couple of years’ worth of back issues I had to acquire in order to catch myself up on what would quickly become one of my favorite new comics. How that went, and what new-to-me character I found there and became obsessed about, I’ll discuss in the next installment of this series.

Featuring the debut of future Conan O’Brien co-star Anima!

§ March 4th, 2026 § Filed under retailing, teen titans § 14 Comments

Image
Oh, just a comic from an acquired collection that not only has a price tag from my previous place of employment, but has my writing on the sticker. Which means, this copy of The New Titans Annual #9 was originally processed as a new back issue after being taken off the stands by me around 33 years ago.

I’ve been at this a long time, you guys.

« Older Entries