ruby-core

Mailing list archive

[#119390] [Ruby master Feature#20775] Gemify win32-registry, win32-sspi and win32-resolv — "larskanis (Lars Kanis) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20775 has been reported by larskanis (Lars Kanis).

12 messages 2024/10/01

[#119410] [Ruby master Feature#20778] ruby/repl_type_completor as a bundled gem — "tompng (tomoya ishida) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

SXNzdWUgIzIwNzc4IGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlcG9ydGVkIGJ5IHRvbXBuZyAodG9tb3lhIGlzaGlkYSku

7 messages 2024/10/02

[#119432] [Ruby master Misc#20781] DevMeeting-2024-11-07 — "mame (Yusuke Endoh) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20781 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

11 messages 2024/10/03

[#119442] [Ruby master Feature#20782] Introduction of Happy Eyeballs Version 2 (RFC8305) in TCPSocket.new — "shioimm (Misaki Shioi) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

SXNzdWUgIzIwNzgyIGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlcG9ydGVkIGJ5IHNoaW9pbW0gKE1pc2FraSBTaGlvaSku

12 messages 2024/10/04

[#119462] [Ruby master Bug#20785] Should `a in b, and c` `a in b, or c` `a in b, rescue c` be syntax ok? — "tompng (tomoya ishida) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20785 has been reported by tompng (tomoya ishida).

10 messages 2024/10/05

[#119495] [Ruby master Feature#20792] String#forcible_encoding? — "kddnewton (Kevin Newton) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20792 has been reported by kddnewton (Kevin Newton).

16 messages 2024/10/09

[#119514] [Ruby master Bug#20796] Segmentation fault in rubyzip tests with ruby 3.4.0-preview2 — "tikkss (Tsutomu Katsube) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20796 has been reported by tikkss (Tsutomu Katsube).

10 messages 2024/10/13

[#119534] [Ruby master Bug#20800] Don't place `ruby` executable into `/usr/libexec/x86_64-linux/bin` — "vo.x (Vit Ondruch) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20800 has been reported by vo.x (Vit Ondruch).

10 messages 2024/10/21

[#119575] [Ruby master Bug#20808] Cannot override Data#inspect — "maicolben (Maicol Bentancor) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20808 has been reported by maicolben (Maicol Bentancor).

8 messages 2024/10/21

[#119621] [Ruby master Bug#20816] Potential regression in Ruby 3.3.x (compared with 3.1 and 3.2) regarding fast syscalls and multi-threading. — "adrienjarthon (Adrien Jarthon) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

SXNzdWUgIzIwODE2IGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlcG9ydGVkIGJ5IGFkcmllbmphcnRob24gKEFkcmllbiBK

6 messages 2024/10/25

[#119622] [Ruby master Bug#20817] Ruby 3.4.0dev emits `warning: possibly useless use of + in void context` while Ruby 3.3.5 does not — "yahonda (Yasuo Honda) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20817 has been reported by yahonda (Yasuo Honda).

8 messages 2024/10/26

[#119646] [Ruby master Feature#20855] Introduce `Fiber::Scheduler#blocking_region` to avoid stalling the event loop. — "ioquatix (Samuel Williams) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20855 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).

10 messages 2024/10/31

[#119650] [Ruby master Bug#20857] Don't change `Hash#inspect formatting` — "vo.x (Vit Ondruch) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>

Issue #20857 has been reported by vo.x (Vit Ondruch).

17 messages 2024/10/31

[ruby-core:119515] [Ruby master Bug#20795] Timeout method doesn't check for negative time values

From: "Eregon (Benoit Daloze) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@...>
Date: 2024-10-13 16:46:54 UTC
List: ruby-core #119515
Issue #20795 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).


Could you make a PR to https://github.com/ruby/timeout ? (or if not open an issue there?)

----------------------------------------
Bug #20795: Timeout method doesn't check for negative time values
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20795#change-110128

* Author: kanakchaudhari12 (kanak chaudhari)
* Status: Open
* ruby -v: 3.1.0
* Backport: 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
```ruby
require 'timeout'

# Case 1: Negative timeout with quick execution
Timeout.timeout(-5) do
  puts "This should not execute"
end

# Case 2: Negative timeout with sleep
Timeout.timeout(-5) do
  sleep(10)
end

```


Potential issues with current behaviour:

* Inconsistency: The behaviour differs based on the block's content, which may not be immediately apparent 
* Silent failure: The negative timeout is silently ignored, potentially masking logical errors in the calling code.
* Unexpected source of error: one might expect the timeout method to validate its input, rather than relying on methods called within the block to catch invalid time values.

I suggest this change for the consistent behaviour regardless of code-block as well as the clear indication of the source of the error

```ruby
def timeout(sec, klass = nil, message = nil, &block)
  raise ArgumentError, "timeout must be positive" if sec.is_a?(Numeric) && sec < 0
  # ...
end
```



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
 ______________________________________________
 ruby-core mailing list -- [email protected]
 To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
 ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/


In This Thread