[#81492] [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — normalperson@...
Issue #13618 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
12 messages
2017/06/01
[#88695] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/08/27
> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13618
[#81581] [Ruby trunk Bug#13632] Not processable interrupt queue for a thread after it's notified that FD is closed in some other thread. — sir.nickolas@...
Issue #13632 has been reported by nvashchenko (Nikolay Vashchenko).
4 messages
2017/06/05
[#81590] Re: [ruby-cvs:66197] ko1:r59023 (trunk): revert r59020 because it may fail some tests sometimes on some environment (http://ci.rvm.jp/). This revert is to check the reason of failures. — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[email protected] wrote:
5 messages
2017/06/06
[#81591] Re: [ruby-cvs:66197] ko1:r59023 (trunk): revert r59020 because it may fail some tests sometimes on some environment (http://ci.rvm.jp/). This revert is to check the reason of failures.
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/06/06
Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote:
[#81596] Re: [ruby-cvs:66203] Re: Re: ko1:r59023 (trunk): revert r59020 because it may fail some tests sometimes on some environment (http://ci.rvm.jp/). This revert is to check the reason of failures.
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/06/06
Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote:
[#81825] [Ruby trunk Feature#13697] [PATCH]: futex based thread primitives — normalperson@...
Issue #13697 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
3 messages
2017/06/29
[ruby-core:81687] [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
From:
samuel@...
Date:
2017-06-15 01:56:05 UTC
List:
ruby-core #81687
Issue #13618 has been updated by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).
Thanks for your detailed reply. It's impressive and useful that you have such a good knowledge of these issues.
I spent some time just thinking about this issue, and how this feature tries to solve the problem in Ruby.
On the one hand, I'm fundamentally opposed to increasing the surface area of Ruby when it could be done by writing a gem. This has a massive upstream cost, affecting both JRuby and Rubinius. While I appreciate what you are saying w.r.t. maximising usage, I feel like building this into Ruby will cause stagnation of progress long term - one solution for all problems isn't always ideal. Seeing initiatives like stdgems.org only reinforces how I feel about this.
Generally speaking - I really appreciate the work that's been done here. I also feel like you've reinvented nio4r, async and a bunch of other stuff, at a very low level, without as much testing, compatibility, etc.
Ideally, we could move all socket related code into a gem - perhaps that's already on the cards e.g. stdgems. Once that's done, fixing issues like `exceptions: false` would be easier since it can be versioned.
I was thinking about how we could expose this to Ruby - and ideally, I think we should add two functions:
`IO.wait_for_single_fd` and `IO.wait_for_pid`. The C functions rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid would invoke these functions, and these functions would implement the current logic of the current C functions. It probably makes sense to think in more detail how these functions should work - e.g. `wait_for_multiple_fds` (or `select`), or something more elaborate.
Then, we could allow things like `async` and `auto-fibers` to extend Ruby's IO system to provide a policy for blocking IO. `auto-fibers` could be implemented as a gem with a C extension.
What do you think?
----------------------------------------
Feature #13618: [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13618#change-65377
* Author: normalperson (Eric Wong)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
```
auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
Implement automatic Fiber yield and resume when running
rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid.
The Ruby API changes for Fiber are named after existing Thread
methods.
main Ruby API:
Fiber#start -> enable auto-scheduling and run Fiber until it
automatically yields (due to EAGAIN/EWOULDBLOCK)
The following behave like their Thread counterparts:
Fiber.start - Fiber.new + Fiber#start (prelude.rb)
Fiber#join - run internal scheduler until Fiber is terminated
Fiber#value - ditto
Fiber#run - like Fiber#start (prelude.rb)
Right now, it takes over rb_wait_for_single_fd() and
rb_waitpid() function if the running Fiber is auto-enabled
(cont.c::rb_fiber_auto_sched_p)
Changes to existing functions are minimal.
New files (all new structs and relations should be documented):
iom.h - internal API for the rest of RubyVM (incomplete?)
iom_internal.h - internal header for iom_(select|epoll|kqueue).h
iom_epoll.h - epoll-specific pieces
iom_kqueue.h - kqueue-specific pieces
iom_select.h - select-specific pieces
iom_pingable_common.h - common code for iom_(epoll|kqueue).h
iom_common.h - common footer for iom_(select|epoll|kqueue).h
Changes to existing data structures:
rb_thread_t.afrunq - list of fibers to auto-resume
rb_vm_t.iom - Ruby I/O Manager (rb_iom_t) :)
Besides rb_iom_t, all the new structs are stack-only and relies
extensively on ccan/list for branch-less, O(1) insert/delete.
As usual, understanding the data structures first should help
you understand the code.
Right now, I reuse some static functions in thread.c,
so thread.c includes iom_(select|epoll|kqueue).h
TODO:
Hijack other blocking functions (IO.select, ...)
I am using "double" for timeout since it is more convenient for
arithmetic like parts of thread.c. Most platforms have good FP,
I think. Also, all "blocking" functions (rb_iom_wait*) will
have timeout support.
./configure gains a new --with-iom=(select|epoll|kqueue) switch
libkqueue:
libkqueue support is incomplete; corner cases are not handled well:
1) multiple fibers waiting on the same FD
2) waiting for both read and write events on the same FD
Bugfixes to libkqueue may be necessary to support all corner cases.
Supporting these corner cases for native kqueue was challenging,
even. See comments on iom_kqueue.h and iom_epoll.h for
nuances.
Limitations
Test script I used to download a file from my server:
----8<---
require 'net/http'
require 'uri'
require 'digest/sha1'
require 'fiber'
url = 'http://80x24.org/git-i-forgot-to-pack/objects/pack/pack-97b25a76c03b489d4cbbd85b12d0e1ad28717e55.idx'
uri = URI(url)
use_ssl = "https" == uri.scheme
fibs = 10.times.map do
Fiber.start do
cur = Fiber.current.object_id
# XXX getaddrinfo() and connect() are blocking
# XXX resolv/replace + connect_nonblock
Net::HTTP.start(uri.host, uri.port, use_ssl: use_ssl) do |http|
req = Net::HTTP::Get.new(uri)
http.request(req) do |res|
dig = Digest::SHA1.new
res.read_body do |buf|
dig.update(buf)
#warn "#{cur} #{buf.bytesize}\n"
end
warn "#{cur} #{dig.hexdigest}\n"
end
end
warn "done\n"
:done
end
end
warn "joining #{Time.now}\n"
fibs[-1].join(4)
warn "joined #{Time.now}\n"
all = fibs.dup
warn "1 joined, wait for the rest\n"
until fibs.empty?
fibs.each(&:join)
fibs.keep_if(&:alive?)
warn fibs.inspect
end
p all.map(&:value)
Fiber.new do
puts 'HI'
end.run.join
```
---Files--------------------------------
0001-auto-fiber-schedule-for-rb_wait_for_single_fd-and-rb.patch (82.8 KB)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>