[#87467] [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError — mofezilla@...
Issue #14841 has been reported by hirura (Hiroyuki URANISHI).
3 messages
2018/06/10
[#87515] [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError — hirura@...
Issue #14841 has been updated by hirura (Hiroyuki URANISHI).
7 messages
2018/06/19
[#87516] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/06/19
[email protected] wrote:
[#87517] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/06/19
Sorry, I left this out: If you can reproduce it again, can you
[#87519] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError
— hirura <hirura@...>
2018/06/19
Hi Eric,
[#87521] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/06/19
hirura <[email protected]> wrote:
[#87541] [Ruby trunk Feature#14859] [PATCH] implement Timeout in VM — normalperson@...
Issue #14859 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2018/06/21
[#87570] [Ruby trunk Feature#14859] [PATCH] implement Timeout in VM — eregontp@...
Issue #14859 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
4 messages
2018/06/21
[#87605] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — takashikkbn@...
Issue #14867 has been reported by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun).
3 messages
2018/06/23
[#87614] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — normalperson@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2018/06/23
[#87631] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — takashikkbn@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun).
5 messages
2018/06/25
[#87635] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/06/25
[email protected] wrote:
[#87665] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — eregontp@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
4 messages
2018/06/28
[#87710] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — Greg.mpls@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by MSP-Greg (Greg L).
3 messages
2018/06/30
[ruby-core:87582] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#14859] [PATCH] implement Timeout in VM
From:
Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Date:
2018-06-21 20:08:42 UTC
List:
ruby-core #87582
[email protected] wrote: > Should lib/timeout.rb be removed then? Yes, and the rdoc will be moved if accepted. > Why is it moved to core, could it stay an extension? Right now it needs to hook into the core timer thread without needing additional threads. I already run into resource exhaustion problems with timer-thread when testing. I'm working on making all wait functions aware of it: rb_wait_for_single_fd, rb_thread_fd_select, rb_thread_sleep*, etc. Eventually, I also want to get rid of timer thread (for POSIX) but it might not be easy > Note that there are pure-Ruby implementations of Timeout using a single Ruby Thread, like > https://github.com/oracle/truffleruby/blob/71df1ecc4fd9e318b5bd3998cfaeb85a96de7a8b/lib/truffle/timeout.rb (originally from Rubinius) Using one extra Thread is already too much for me. > and that WEBrick has basically its own version of Timeout, using a single Thread: > https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/48efa44719d03eb067d27b30c68cf821074aedce/lib/webrick/utils.rb Yes, I want to get rid of that by making Timeout better. Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>
