[#88925] [Ruby trunk Feature#15095] [PATCH] share VM stack between threads and fibers if identical — ko1@...
Issue #15095 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
4 messages
2018/09/09
[#88927] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#15095] [PATCH] share VM stack between threads and fibers if identical
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/09/09
[email protected] wrote:
[#88926] [Ruby trunk Feature#15095] [PATCH] share VM stack between threads and fibers if identical — ko1@...
Issue #15095 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
3 messages
2018/09/09
[#89218] [Ruby trunk Bug#15130] open-uri hangs on cygwin — duerst@...
SXNzdWUgIzE1MTMwIGhhcyBiZWVuIHVwZGF0ZWQgYnkgZHVlcnN0IChNYXJ0aW4gRMO8cnN0KS4K
5 messages
2018/09/30
[ruby-core:88806] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
From:
Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Date:
2018-09-02 09:24:31 UTC
List:
ruby-core #88806
> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13618 > > I have at least one more preparatory change which should be fairly > straightforward; but unfortunately makes some of the current code > more verbose (because of `container_of'): > > https://80x24.org/spew/[email protected]/raw > "unify sync_waiter, waitpid_state, waiting_fd w/ rb_sched_waiter" Here's a work-in-progress patch showing how Queue+SizedQueue would work with "struct rb_sched_waiter": https://80x24.org/spew/[email protected]/raw It goes on top of my coro-r64610 branch posted at [ruby-core:88800]: https://public-inbox.org/ruby-core/20180901131301.5peghdyrtmks5mka@dcvr Several tests are skipped because Thread::Coro#stop?/#status/#[]= aren't implemented, yet. Will fix later when not AFK. Another weird case to think about (not supported, yet): How should Coro switching work inside Signal.trap? q = Queue.new trap(:INT) { q.push(:INT) } q.pop I guess we'll need to figure out a way to support it... Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>
