[#90865] [Ruby trunk Bug#15499] Breaking behavior on ruby 2.6: rb_thread_call_without_gvl doesn't invoke unblock_function when used on the main thread — apolcyn@...
Issue #15499 has been reported by apolcyn (alex polcyn).
3 messages
2019/01/03
[#90877] [Ruby trunk Bug#15499] Breaking behavior on ruby 2.6: rb_thread_call_without_gvl doesn't invoke unblock_function when used on the main thread — apolcyn@...
Issue #15499 has been updated by apolcyn (alex polcyn).
3 messages
2019/01/03
[#90895] Re: [ruby-alerts:11680] failure alert on trunk-mjit@silicon-docker (NG (r66707)) — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[email protected] wrote:
4 messages
2019/01/05
[#90896] Re: [ruby-alerts:11680] failure alert on trunk-mjit@silicon-docker (NG (r66707))
— Takashi Kokubun <takashikkbn@...>
2019/01/05
VGhhbmtzIHRvIGV4cGxhaW4gdGhhdC4KCj4gSSBzdXNwZWN0IHRoZXJlIGlzIGFub3RoZXIgdGhy
[#91154] Testing MJIT on RHEL 7.5 — Phil Edelbrock <edelbrp@...>
4 messages
2019/01/18
[#91159] Re: Testing MJIT on RHEL 7.5
— Takashi Kokubun <takashikkbn@...>
2019/01/18
SGksCgo+IHRpbWUgL3Vzci9sb2NhbC9ydWJ5LWVkZ2UvYmluL3J1YnkgLS1kaXNhYmxlLWdlbXMg
[#91200] [Ruby trunk Feature#15553] Addrinfo.getaddrinfo supports timeout — glass.saga@...
Issue #15553 has been reported by Glass_saga (Masaki Matsushita).
4 messages
2019/01/21
[#91289] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#15553] Addrinfo.getaddrinfo supports timeout
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2019/01/26
[email protected] wrote:
[ruby-core:91282] [Ruby trunk Feature#14844] Future of RubyVM::AST?
From:
samuel@...
Date:
2019-01-26 11:06:05 UTC
List:
ruby-core #91282
Issue #14844 has been updated by ioquatix (Samuel Williams). I started playing around with `parser` gem, and I actually found it really great too. I think I'll use the parser gem going forward, since it works on many versions of Ruby. That being said, exposing Ruby's AST is also really fun. ---------------------------------------- Feature #14844: Future of RubyVM::AST? https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14844#change-76530 * Author: rmosolgo (Robert Mosolgo) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: ---------------------------------------- Hi! Thanks for all your great work on the Ruby language. I saw the new RubyVM::AST module in 2.6.0-preview2 and I quickly went to try it out. I'd love to have a well-documented, user-friendly way to parse and manipulate Ruby code using the Ruby standard library, so I'm pretty excited to try it out. (I've been trying to learn Ripper recently, too: https://ripper-preview.herokuapp.com/, https://rmosolgo.github.io/ripper_events/ .) Based on my exploration, I opened a small PR on GitHub with some documentation: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/1888 I'm curious though, are there future plans for this module? For example, we might: - Add more details about each node (for example, we could expose the names of identifiers and operators through the node classes) - Document each node type I see there is a lot more information in the C structures that we could expose, and I'm interested to help out if it's valuable. What do you think? -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>
