[#99426] [Ruby master Bug#17098] Float#negative? reports negative zero as not negative — chris@...

Issue #17098 has been reported by chrisseaton (Chris Seaton).

12 messages 2020/08/01

[#99449] [Ruby master Bug#17100] Ractor: a proposal for new concurrent abstraction without thread-safety issues — ko1@...

Issue #17100 has been reported by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).

41 messages 2020/08/03

[#99474] [Ruby master Feature#17103] Add a :since option to ObjectSpace.dump_all — jean.boussier@...

Issue #17103 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

9 messages 2020/08/04

[#99485] [Ruby master Misc#17104] Why are interpolated string literals frozen? — bughitgithub@...

Issue #17104 has been reported by bughit (bug hit).

23 messages 2020/08/05

[#99499] [Ruby master Bug#17105] A single `return` can return to two different places in a proc inside a lambda inside a method — eregontp@...

Issue #17105 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

10 messages 2020/08/06

[#99582] [Ruby master Feature#17122] Add category to Warning#warn — eileencodes@...

Issue #17122 has been reported by eileencodes (Eileen Uchitelle).

20 messages 2020/08/13

[#99700] [Ruby master Bug#17129] bundle install `eventmachine` and `sassc` fails since 914b2208ab3eddec478cdc3e079e6c30d0f0892c — yasuo.honda@...

SXNzdWUgIzE3MTI5IGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlcG9ydGVkIGJ5IHlhaG9uZGEgKFlhc3VvIEhvbmRhKS4N

9 messages 2020/08/26

[ruby-core:99610] [Ruby master Feature#17059] epoll as the backend of IO.select on Linux

From: eregontp@...
Date: 2020-08-17 09:41:00 UTC
List: ruby-core #99610
Issue #17059 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).


I'm unclear how using `epoll` can help for the user calling `IO.select`.
With the API of select(), I'd expect `epoll` is no faster than `select()`.

Regarding the Fiber scheduler, then I think new event is needed, calling epoll() instead of select() wouldn't solve anything, right?

----------------------------------------
Feature #17059: epoll as the backend of IO.select on Linux
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17059#change-87089

* Author: dsh0416 (Delton Ding)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
Current Ruby's `IO.select` method calls POSIX `select` API directly. With the new non-blocking scheduler, this may be the bottleneck of the I/O scheduling. For keeping the backward compatibilty of the current `IO.select` methods, a proposal may be to create a "duck" `select` which uses the `epoll_wait` as the backend.

One tricky part is that the `fd_set` described in POSIX is write-only, which means it is impossible to iterate for generating the `epoll_event` argument for `epoll_wait`. But similar to the large-size select situation, we could define our own `rb_fdset_t` struct in this case, and implement the following APIs.

```
void rb_fd_init(rb_fdset_t *);
void rb_fd_term(rb_fdset_t *);
void rb_fd_zero(rb_fdset_t *);
void rb_fd_set(int, rb_fdset_t *);
void rb_fd_clr(int, rb_fdset_t *);
int rb_fd_isset(int, const rb_fdset_t *);
void rb_fd_copy(rb_fdset_t *, const fd_set *, int);
void rb_fd_dup(rb_fdset_t *dst, const rb_fdset_t *src);
int rb_fd_select(int, rb_fdset_t *, rb_fdset_t *, rb_fdset_t *, struct timeval *);
```

TODO:
1. Implement the fd_set with dynamic allocated fds.
2. Implement the epoll with select API.
3. Edit io.c to use the customized fd_set struct.

I'm trying to work on a branch for this. Any suggestions for this?

---Files--------------------------------
epoll.h (3.62 KB)
epoll.h (6.44 KB)


-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread