Skip to content

Conversation

@apermo
Copy link

@apermo apermo commented Nov 20, 2024

Added _doing_it_wrong() to maybe_serialize to notify about double serialization.

Trac ticket: https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/62483#ticket


This Pull Request is for code review only. Please keep all other discussion in the Trac ticket. Do not merge this Pull Request. See GitHub Pull Requests for Code Review in the Core Handbook for more details.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 20, 2024

The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the props-bot label.

Core Committers: Use this line as a base for the props when committing in SVN:

Props apermo, audrasjb.

To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook.

@github-actions
Copy link

Test using WordPress Playground

The changes in this pull request can previewed and tested using a WordPress Playground instance.

WordPress Playground is an experimental project that creates a full WordPress instance entirely within the browser.

Some things to be aware of

  • The Plugin and Theme Directories cannot be accessed within Playground.
  • All changes will be lost when closing a tab with a Playground instance.
  • All changes will be lost when refreshing the page.
  • A fresh instance is created each time the link below is clicked.
  • Every time this pull request is updated, a new ZIP file containing all changes is created. If changes are not reflected in the Playground instance,
    it's possible that the most recent build failed, or has not completed. Check the list of workflow runs to be sure.

For more details about these limitations and more, check out the Limitations page in the WordPress Playground documentation.

Test this pull request with WordPress Playground.

@audrasjb
Copy link
Contributor

@apermo PHP Unit Tests are failing, this changeset will require some test case update.

@apermo
Copy link
Author

apermo commented Jan 23, 2025

@audrasjb I'll try to figure out how to fix them. In case I need help I'll reach out.

_doing_it_wrong(
'maybe_serialize',
'Double serialization detected, serialized data is likely sent to update_option(), add_option(), update_*_meta(), add_*_meta() and similar functions. These functions will automatically serialize if needed.',
'3.6.1'
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@audrasjb

The actual error message generated is:

Double serialization detected, serialized data is likely sent to update_option(), add_option(), update_*_meta(), add_*_meta() and similar functions. These functions will automatically serialize if needed. (This message was added in version 3.6.1.)

I assumed that the third parameter of _doing_it_wrong() expected the WP version, where the behavior was added, but reading the message, this looks like it should be the version where the message is added, so possibly 6.8?

Your thought?

@apermo
Copy link
Author

apermo commented Feb 26, 2025

@audrasjb That recent push should fix all but one test error, and I'm unsure how to handle that one.

That is thrown in tests/phpunit/tests/privacy/wpPrivacyGeneratePersonalDataExportFile.php test_doing_it_wrong_for_export_data_grouped_invalid_type()

The Data provider will return value that will trigger the double serialization.

array( serialize( array( 10, 'WordPress', null, true, false ) ) ),

My best guess would be to remove that single line, that did fix the remaining error locally.

It was added by @SergeyBiryukov in https://core.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/50613

Happy to discuss this, maybe Sergey can provide an idea.

@apermo
Copy link
Author

apermo commented Feb 26, 2025

Added a condition to the test, instead of altering the dataset, so the test is not weakened.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants