@FocusChange and @CheckedChange #459
Conversation
Add generation test and propper validation for @focuschange.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
zeroOrOneMenuItemParameters should be renamed to zeroOrOneMenuItemParameter
|
@mathieuboniface please, check :) |
|
Ok, i'm starting a full review. Github is saying "This pull request cannot be automatically merged." can you fix this ? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you test that this method is called when the checked state is changed (CompundButton.setChecked(boolean)) ?
You could checkout ClicksHandledActivity from the functional-test-1-5 module and ClicksHandledActivityTest from the functional-test-1-5-tests module as example.
|
👏 Really great work ! We just need more tests on Thank you @naixx :) |
|
Who's supposed to write the missing tests ? By the way, I guess master has moved too far: |
|
Hi! I can take a look in about a week |
|
Thanks. Sorry I haven't been involved in this pull request, so I'd rather let @mathieuboniface finish this with you :) |
|
Hi @naixx, I will work on merging that PR next week. Have you worked on the tests ? If not, I can wrote those tests. |
…istener_processor Conflicts: AndroidAnnotations/androidannotations/src/main/java/org/androidannotations/AndroidAnnotationProcessor.java AndroidAnnotations/androidannotations/src/main/java/org/androidannotations/helper/ValidatorHelper.java AndroidAnnotations/androidannotations/src/main/java/org/androidannotations/processing/ClickProcessor.java AndroidAnnotations/androidannotations/src/main/java/org/androidannotations/processing/LongClickProcessor.java AndroidAnnotations/androidannotations/src/main/java/org/androidannotations/processing/TouchProcessor.java
|
Hello! I've just merged develop and resolved some conflicts. It will be easier now. But it fails some tests when I run |
|
Hi Rodolph, thanks for trying to help on merging :) I just merged your work into develop except the commit representing the merge of develop into your branch (#b8bf822) because it's really huge and so hard to understand. |
|
Woow, the this merge was not so nice... I fixed this on 7a83417 |
|
@mathieuboniface Thanks, great! |
3 participants
Here is a not finished yet PR for
@FocusChange.I've made several changes: extracted abstract processor, which generates the same code for
@Click,@LongClick,@Touch. Everything that has same functionality as(T extends View).setOn***Listener()can use this, as well as@ChechedChangeand other annotations.I've also extracted everything that validates parameters to the separate class(it was i bit difficult to navigate, now everything is in one place). Concerning this, was it good idea to use public final field?
This PR also should eliminate stackoverflow problem, that
@Touchhad, whenonTouch()was annotated.There is no javadoc yet. Any feedback is welcome :)
@CheckedChangeadded