Skip to content

Conversation

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jul 18, 2021

(cherry picked from commit bf89ff9)

Co-authored-by: Yurii Karabas [email protected]

https://bugs.python.org/issue44490

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, I can't merge this PR. Reason: 3 of 5 required status checks are expected..

@gvanrossum gvanrossum changed the title [3.10] bpo-44490: Improve typing module compatibility with types.Union (GH-27048) bpo-44490: [3.10] Improve typing module compatibility with types.Union (GH-27048) Jul 18, 2021
@gvanrossum gvanrossum changed the title bpo-44490: [3.10] Improve typing module compatibility with types.Union (GH-27048) bpo-44490 [3.10]: Improve typing module compatibility with types.Union (GH-27048) Jul 18, 2021
@gvanrossum gvanrossum changed the title bpo-44490 [3.10]: Improve typing module compatibility with types.Union (GH-27048) [3.10] bpo-44490: Improve typing module compatibility with types.Union (GH-27048) Jul 18, 2021
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@uriyyo and @gvanrossum: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@uriyyo and @gvanrossum: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, I can't merge this PR. Reason: Required status check "bedevere/news" is expected..

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, I can't merge this PR. Reason: Required status check "bedevere/news" is expected..

@gvanrossum
Copy link
Member

Sorry for the spurious title changes. But I fear the news check is stuck?

@Fidget-Spinner
Copy link
Member

Sorry for the spurious title changes. But I fear the news check is stuck?

Yeah I gave up on this PR and opened another one at GH-27222 to rerun that check.

@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-bf89ff9-3.10 branch July 18, 2021 07:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants