Commit 07c5e2b
committed
Use a more efficient iteration order for forward dataflow
Currently, dataflow begins by visiting each block in order of ID
(`BasicBlock(0)`, `BasicBlock(1)`, etc.). This PR changes that initial
iteration to reverse post-order. This ensures that the effects of all
predecessors will be applied before a basic block is visited if the CFG
has no back-edges, and should result in less total iterations even when
back-edges exist. This should not change the results of dataflow
analysis.
The current ordering for basic blocks is pretty close to RPO
already--`BasicBlock(0)` is already the start block, so the gains from
this are pretty small, especially since we need to do an extra traversal
up front.
Note that some basic blocks are unreachable from the `START_BLOCK`
during dataflow. We add these blocks to the work queue as well to
preserve the original behavior.1 parent a5b1729 commit 07c5e2b
1 file changed
+18
-2
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
228 | 228 | | |
229 | 229 | | |
230 | 230 | | |
231 | | - | |
232 | | - | |
233 | 231 | | |
| 232 | + | |
| 233 | + | |
| 234 | + | |
| 235 | + | |
| 236 | + | |
| 237 | + | |
| 238 | + | |
| 239 | + | |
| 240 | + | |
| 241 | + | |
| 242 | + | |
| 243 | + | |
| 244 | + | |
| 245 | + | |
| 246 | + | |
| 247 | + | |
| 248 | + | |
| 249 | + | |
234 | 250 | | |
235 | 251 | | |
236 | 252 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments