The DOJ Assails D.C.'s 'Assault Weapon' Ban As an Arbitrary, Historically Ungrounded Gun Law
The department's lawsuit notes that the prohibited firearms are "in common use" for "lawful purposes," meaning they are covered by the Second Amendment.
The department's lawsuit notes that the prohibited firearms are "in common use" for "lawful purposes," meaning they are covered by the Second Amendment.
The executive order does not accomplish much in practical terms, but it jibes with the president's conflation of drug trafficking with violent aggression.
The public wants violent criminals deported, not workers and their families.
Larry Bushart's lawyers argue that his arrest for constitutionally protected speech violated the First and Fourth amendments.
The defense secretary claims the video, which shows a second strike that killed two floundering survivors, would compromise "sources and methods."
Katherine Dee examines how living online reshapes attention and behavior and makes the case for a more grounded, realistic way of using digital tools.
But there's a silver lining—sort of.
The commander who ordered a second missile strike worried that the helpless men he killed might be able to salvage cocaine from the smoldering wreck.
Regardless of what the defense secretary knew or said about the September 2 boat attack, the forces he commands are routinely committing murder in the guise of self-defense.
Many in the rising generation are embracing collectivist ideas.
Political hostility is intensifying and most partisans believe the other side is made up of bullies.
"Look at the corruption," says Dale Davenport. "Look how many city councilmen have gone to jail."
The murder of an American activist tore apart Britain’s hallowed free speech club.
That strategy, which rejects the possibility of sincere disagreement, is poisonous to rational debate.
The new hit horror movie is really about adults using kids for their own ends.
The supposed freedom fighter allied with a government known for imprisoning dissidents, curtailing civil liberties, and forging equality in the sense that people are more equally oppressed.
Nobody should be governed by people who despise them.
Speeches by the president, Stephen Miller, and Tucker Carlson will accelerate dislike of the president’s agenda.
Writer Freddie deBoer discusses the assassination of Charlie Kirk and his theory of "spectacular acts of public violence" on the final episode of Just Asking Questions.
On the latest episode of Free Media, Amber Duke and I discuss the assassination of Charlie Kirk, cancel culture, and political violence.
Plus: Fed rate cut, Luigi watch, Hep B vaccination changes, and more...
Rand Paul, who called for "a crackdown on people" who celebrated the assassination, was less careful in distinguishing between private and government action.
Majorities on the left and on the right denounce political violence and its celebration.
Plus: Memphis gets National Guarded, a second alleged narcotrafficker boat has been struck, and more...
Plus: Trump says he "may let [TikTok] die," the SoHo Forum debates paying for sex, the administration calls birth control "abortifacients," and more...
Plus: The sex scandal mayors, Hasan Piker's hypocrisy, cable host calls for killing the homeless, and more...
All liberty involves tradeoffs. So does repressing liberty.
The alleged shooter was turned in by his family and roommates while the surveillance state remained clueless.
Freedom of speech cannot reliably protect conservatives unless it also protects people they despise.
The phrases are a mix of anti-fascist sentiments and irony-poisoned internet memes.
The 22-year-old Utah man described Charlie Kirk as "hateful."
Plus: Poland invokes Article 4, zoning code has a problem with orgies, and more...
Cato Institute scholar has a great overview of the data on how much political violence there is, and who perpetrates it. It is less prevalent than many think, and right-wing political violence is more common than the left-wing kind.
Nick Gillespie and Matt Welch discuss the murder of Charlie Kirk and how political violence is reshaping the national climate.
We should welcome renunciations of violence from those who disagree with Kirk, and dispute nonsense across the political spectrum.
The political class has been pushing the country towards a conflict nobody should want.
De-escalation is that much harder, yet even more necessary, in the wake of Charlie Kirk's brutal assassination.
The pundit and activist was murdered while speaking at Utah Valley University.
Such a gun ban is not authorized by statute or allowed by the Second Amendment.
The Justice Department reportedly is considering a regulation aimed at disarming "mentally ill individuals suffering from gender dysphoria."
The federal law relies on a risible reading of the Commerce Clause to restrict a constitutional right.
The war on drugs authorizes police conduct that otherwise would be readily recognized as criminal.
Britain’s crackdown on “zombie-style” knives shows how politicians blame objects instead of criminals—and how bans only hurt the law-abiding.
Plus: Kamala Harris makes the right choice for once, the burning of the birth control, and more...
Kathy Hochul's focus on "assault weapons" is puzzling, since the perpetrator easily could have killed the same number of people with a gun that did not fall into that politically defined category.
The Department of Homeland Security is boasting that its mass deportation program is responsible for a major drop in crime. That's unlikely for several reasons.
Plus: Wildfires alter air quality across the Northeast, fertility crisis narratives, and more...
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks