1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
spacejunkgalaxies
Image
silenthill

We gotta stop saying shit like anti and “anti anti” to describe people and instead use the actual terms: pedophile/incest supporter/apologist and Regular Person.

Enough sugar coating. Enough confusing dialogue and plausible deniability. These people are writing and drawing content about fucking kids. Full stop. Don’t call me an Anti because I think it’s bad you want underage siblings to fuck and wrote a 100k word fanfic about it. Just call me Normal because you’re clearly not.

Image
silenthill

You can, and I encourage you to, reblog this post.

Image
masterofdorkness

I would like to add onto this: This also includes ships with unhealthy power dynamics and abuse.

I’ve read and watched a number of things with that. It ALWAYS makes me uncomfortable. It’s pretty easy to tell the difference between when it’s romanticized and when it’s condemned (as it SHOULD be!). And unfortunately, a disproportionately large amount of people in fandom like to do the former: romanticize it.

If you support ships with that dynamic and create fanwork of that for people to enjoy, then we’ll group you with the freaks. Just. Stop.

Image
alyndra9

While we’re at it, stop romanticizing alcohol and drug abuse. Some people have no idea how much rl harm is done by cancer sticks and fiction and art that portrays that shit as sexy instead of literally poisoning your body is even worse than fiction about high school romance, because kids won’t get how easily they can ruin their bodies and futures.

The glamorization of coffeeshop AUs needs to stop. Nothing they sell is good for you, it’s all caffeine and sugar and we’d have a better world if people would just stop living like that. Please, please, if your fiction isn’t 100% healthy, take the time to understand how problematic it is.

What’s wrong with going on a nice romantic run on the beach instead? Build healthy relationships on positive lifestyle changes and exercising every day, and then you’ll really be making a positive difference in this world!

this is what we mean when we say anti and anti-anti anti anti antis healthy relationships
crystalandrock

Anonymous asked:

Some fics on ao3 are so brutal, why are they allowed to stay up???
Image

ao3commentoftheday answered:

Because AO3 is a hosting service. They don’t exist to police the content on their site as long as that content doesn’t breach the Terms of Service.

It’s an author’s responsibility to tag and rate and warn their fics appropriately. It’s a reader’s responsibility to read those tags and ratings and warnings and decide whether or not they want to read the fic. Anyone who isn’t willing to do their part probably shouldn’t be using the service.

Image
Image
ao3commentoftheday

In the wake of China apparently banning AO3 in the country, this post has been making the rounds on Weibo and now on Twitter. I thought I’d bring it back here, as well. 

AO3 has a robust tagging system so that users can either find or avoid content. The site doesn’t moderate the content because the users do. If authors fail to tag or readers fail to pay attention to tags, that moderation slips and people are exposed to content they don’t want to see. 

I love the fact that AO3 puts the power over what I see in my hands. I have control, not some faceless person and certainly not my government. I can see whatever I want to see and avoid whatever I want to avoid and every other user of the site can do the same thing. 

This is a group effort, and if there’s anything that fandom is good at it’s banding together to get shit done. Tag your fics. Read the tags. Don’t be an asshole.

Image
crystalandrock

I think the argument that full moderation responsibility lies with the users and not with the hosting service is a dangerous one and requires a lot more nuance to be effective. That same argument would allow sites like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube to continue to completely pass off responsibility for misinformation and active deception like we’ve recently seen in spades with the upcoming election and with coronavirus conspiracy theories.

It would be fantastic if we could trust users to always follow community guidelines and tagging procedures but that is just not the reality. The first time I was exposed to explicit porn was on a site aimed towards children, and one stray bad actor decided to post tons of it all over the site. Fortunately, it was stopped and deleted within a few minutes - because I was a moderator for the site and was able to ban them and delete the posts. I hope that I acted quickly enough to keep other people, many far younger than me, from seeing it. It was certainly upsetting enough for me.

Users absolutely should do as much as they are able to self-moderate but it really sucks when people who have been hurt or traumatized by unmoderated, unmarked content are told that actually they must have chosen to seek out that material and that it is their fault and they’re asking for additional protection for no reason. Even if you are adamantly against the removal of any works of fiction for any reason and adamantly supportive of relying on a tagging system, at the absolute minimum it seems like people should be able to agree that sites should be responsible for moderating content /that does not appropriately use the tagging system in place/. Like people posting misinformation on Facebook as if it’s the truth, or untagged explicit content in fandom spaces with a high population of kids.

It doesn’t help to call traumatized people assholes for being exposed against their wishes to explicit content, and it’s completely unfair to act like everyone calling for some moderation is just pissy that they read a fic knowing what to expect and then decided it was evil. I understand the threatening feeling that comes with censorship and moderation, but I urge people to work to look past that initial emotional response and consider where these arguments are coming from.

Image
alyndra9

@crystalandrock , you bring up some interesting points, but I think the comparison of AO3 with Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube falls down on a couple points. First, those companies have more responsibility for spreading misinformation because of how their algorithms actively promote some content they think will interest (or piss off) viewers more than the other posts. That’s why your timeline is never in order. Only it can really backfire on them if the ‘interesting’ content turns out to be troll dung. But AO3 doesn’t do that: it presents works in whatever order the user decides to sort them by. Fics on AO3 can’t really go viral in the same ways as social media facilitates.

Second, as far as misinformation goes, the entire site is works of fiction. By design. Nobody is guaranteed a single fact on the entire site! Are there some facts anyway? Sure. But that’s not the point. AO3 does not have the same sort of responsibility as a news-reporting organization.

Next, I’m sorry about your experience on that other site. The Internet is not always kid-friendly even in spaces where people try to make it so.

I’m not sure if you’re aware of this based on your post, but AO3’s tagging is not all unmoderated. If someone writes Explicit fic and rates it G or T, or tags No Archive Warnings Apply and then their fic contains Graphic Violence, those works are reportable and AO3 volunteers will change the tags if necessary. Is it a perfect system? No. Is it better than just about any alternative out there? A lot of people think so, me included. Hope I managed to add some nuance for you!

diannelamerc

Oh Come On, Fandom! >:-(

Image
diannelamerc

Apparently by being at TGIF/F last week and being sick this, I missed fanfic fandom losing it’s collective freaking mind the weekend before last.

https://fanlore.org/wiki/AO3_App_Wars

WTActualF, people? I hate panic and mob mis-/dis-information bringing out the worst in fandom. It’s truly painful to see.

For fuck’s sake, people: Yes, one of the apps was apparently scraping and storing content on their site–which is Not Cool. But to go all-out screaming incoherent dogpile over the course of  hours on it, instead of, you know, starting by contacting the developer and saying “Hey! What the hell?” is completely out of line.  

(And doxxing?!?–Oh HELL no! Not ever, people! No one with any moral standing or standards ever doxxes. It’s an on-line equivalent to *lynching*–the deliberate digging out of someone’s basic RL information so that they can be more efficiently and severely attacked–not by words on-line, but by an angry mob by physical means in the actual physical world? I don’t give a damn how pissed you are or how much you think they deserve it. You do not do that!)

Not to mention the three (or more?) alternative browser apps that also got crushed under the same ‘righteous’ fury. (If you don’t like them windowing the AO3, then tell them so, but realize that they’re explicitly allowed to create a new window frame for people to look at the AO3 through, just as you are.) 

Charging for it could be problematic, but is worthy of a discussion of whether recouping costs for developing the app is akin to actually monetizing the fanworks. (Is OTW “monetizing” fan works by raising and accepting money to cover their operating costs?) 

Not to mention the one perfectly innocent completely free and open-source app that was also crushed underfoot in here.

Damn, people! Pause for a moment, take a breath, and check your facts before you start inciting a riot and actively attacking people online. It’s like trying to explain to my grandmother how (and why) to use Snopes.com before she passes on the next “OMG! Warning!” email she gets forwarded from a friend. And, frankly, that alone is an embarrassing thing to have to explain to a fannish community.

Image
alyndra9

This. If readers want to be able to blacklist tags or authors, for example, that’s only likely to happen through a third-party app, and now because of a mass tantrum, nobody will want to make one, possibly ever again. Every major site other than AO3 anyone’s ever accessed fic through has been based on ad revenue or other monetization: FanFiction.Net, Yahoo groups, LiveJournal, Tumblr, Wattpad, you name it.

Woodsign was the only app maker doing anything wrong as far as I could see. Unless the mob also wants to file DMCA notices against Chrome, Internet Explorer, Firefox and Safari for allowing people to see AO3 fics through their software without individually checking to see which authors are okay with that.

sheesh ao3 ao3 app mob panic
voxofthevoid

Anonymous asked:

Hi! Love your blog! Maybe you and your followers will help me. I need an advice on summaries. How do I compose one? What issues should I take into consideration to produce a good summary - the one that would be engaging to readers in general? My fics don't get much attention,and recently I realised it's probably because my summaries suck. I often hear from readers that they nearly skipped my fics(which they loved in the end) because they didn't like the summaries. How do I improve my summaries?
Image

ao3commentoftheday answered:

What summaries really are when it comes right down to it is a kind of thesis statement about your fic. “In this story, I will tell you about two people falling in love in a particular place/time/way” or “In this story, I will explore a genre-specific take on a particular topic or theme.” A good summary will let readers know the main point of the story with enough information to know whether they want to click in or not. 

Issues to be wary of would be: not having anything in your summary at all, saying “I suck at summaries,” having poor grammar and/or spelling in your summary, or apologizing for being a bad writer. Other than that:

Here’s a list of do’s and don’ts I made a while back that might be helpful to keep in mind. (all just suggestions rather than hard and fast rules)

Here’s some examples of questions you can answer in your summary, depending on what genre of fic you’re writing.

For a discussion on the idea of using quotes from the fic as the summary, there’s an ask over here that tackles that. I’m not a fan personally, but a lot of people are.

That’s about all I’ve got. What about the rest of you? :)

Image
Image
voxofthevoid

The way I write summaries have changed over time and will likely continue to change. Earlier, it was pure plot description depending on the length of the fic.

Long fics got something like “Character X is — and Character Y is —. Plot A happens.” That was the general formula. Oneshots and the like usually got either a single line of description or a few lines. Sometimes, I used a line of quote as decoration of sorts.

Nowadays, it’s a mix of description and quotes, with the latter dominating. So, basically a part of the story - often but not always - with dialogue - so that readers will get a good idea of both my writing style and the fic content. Then, 1 to 3 lines of description that kind of gives a gist of things.

It’s just one way to write summaries but it works for me.

Image
alyndra9

It can be overwhelming to try to think about everything in your story and figure out how to tell the readers all of it right away. So instead, think about that first bright spark (or blaze) of an idea that made you want to write this particular fic. You might have to summon it up from a while ago, but what drew you in and made you excited to write it? That’s what will get your readers excited to read it. That’s your summary.

ricecakecrimes

Anonymous asked:

This is a genuine question, how do you feel about ao3 running 2 different "map" (pedophile) collections and supporting it
Image

ao3tagoftheday answered:

So, first of all, it’s important to note that AO3 doesn’t run these collections, or any others to my knowledge. AO3 hosts them. That’s an important distinction, because, if you have a problem with AO3’s posting guidelines, you need to be very clear what it is you are criticizing. It’s neither fair nor useful to call out AO3 for running a collection of works you object to, because they absolutely don’t.

So let’s rephrase your question: How do I feel about AO3 hosting collections of pedophilic works and defending their hosting of such works?

How do I, personally, feel about it? Well, friend, I think that’s kind of a silly question. AO3 was founded with the express purpose of hosting any fannish work that anyone wanted to post to it, provided the work was legal and belonged to the poster, and to then defend the legal rights of the creator to create and publish the work. That is literally what AO3 is for. That’s what the people who made it designed it to do, that’s how the people who run it direct its resources, and that’s what the people who post their work to it expect of it.

So asking what I think of AO3 hosting any particular kind of fannish work and defending their hosting of it is sort of like asking what I think of a pickle jar containing pickles. I don’t know, man. It’s a pickle jar. It’s got pickles in it. If it didn’t have pickles in it, it wouldn’t be a pickle jar, you know?

That’s not to say people aren’t entitled to have problems with AO3’s goals and policies. But those goals and policies aren’t going to change, because those goals and policies are what AO3 is. So whether or not I like that pedophilic works exist, they will continue to be hosted on AO3 as long as AO3 exists to host them. And if you or anyone else has a problem with that, the solution isn’t to tell AO3 to stop being AO3. If you want a jar that isn’t full of pickles, get a different jar. And if you want a fanwork hosting platform that doesn’t host works you don’t like, make a new hosting platform.

I’m not being facetious or condescending when I say “make a new hosting platform.” I’m totally serious. AO3 was created by fans because the existing platforms didn’t meet their needs. If the existing platforms, AO3 included, don’t meet the needs of a group of fans now, then that group should seek out a platform that does, or they should create one. Hell, AO3’s code is all open source! Anyone who wants to create an AO3 clone and limit what can be posted to it can do exactly that. But railing against AO3 itself for being exactly what it is and was always meant to be accomplishes nothing for anyone.

Image
Image
agustdonewithit

Laws and can (and should) be changed and AO3 could very easily forbide pedophilia.

Saying AO3 could not refuse pedophile works because it would be like saying a pickles jar should not hold pickles is a very bad comparison. First because pickles aren’t causing ptsd to most of their victims, but also because if the goal of a pickles jar is to hold pickles, the goal of AO3 is not to host pedophilia, it’s to host fan content, and fan content can very well not be pedophiliac. A better comparison would be: marriage gave men the right to rape their wives. One day,someone saif “hey, it’s shitty” and that became illegal. But marriage still existed.

That being said, even if it would be a very good action from AO3 to stop allowing pedophiliac content, the best solution would be to ask your government to forbide pedophiliac content. Then, not only would AO3 has to stop hosting it, but other websites and publishers as well, and it would be even less safe places for pedophiles.

Image
alyndra9

“it would be even less safe places for pedophiles.” Given the fact that we do not control the things we find hot, we only control whether the actions we take harm others or not, why are you so convinced it would be a net good to drive all talk of underage sex into illegal spaces? Making topics legally unspeakable (and don’t kid yourself, that’s what any kind of official ban would result in, because you can’t bureaucratically separate the horny from the working-through-trauma - even assuming they were mutually exclusive categories) is pretty much the opposite of helpful for ptsd. It’s not that people don’t recognize that the existence of these types of fics can be indirectly hurtful: that’s why they’re so thoroughly tagged and warned-for. But that hurt does not outweigh the hurt that would occur by taking away one of the very few spaces in which it is safe to talk about the darkest areas of the human psyche: fiction. And make no mistake: there is a huge difference between fictional abuse and men raping their wives. AO3 from the start has been committed to being a space where it is safe to explore fictional themes that other sites would arbitrarily and without warning ban and delete. People got real sick of waking up to find their fiction or their friends’ fiction or the fiction they liked to read gone because somebody went on a power trip with a banhammer. So fed up with it, in fact, that they decided to build An Archive Of Our Own where that wouldn’t ever happen.

Like OP said, if you don’t like it? Go build your own. Or just make an app that only lets people browse unproblematic fic, that’d probably be easier. People are always clamoring for an app. Nothing’s stopping you from solving this problem and the best part is you don’t even have to ask the government to stomp on vulnerable people for your solution!

tw pedophilia ao3 debate censorship abuse don't like don't read
ao3commentoftheday

Anonymous asked:

is it ok to like darkfic if you've never been abused?
Image

portraitoftheoddity answered:

Absolutely.

First off, darkfic as an umbrella term encompasses a lot of subjects and ‘dark’ topics, abuse being only one of many. It may be therapeutic for people who’ve endured abuse, but it can also be helpful for people who’ve struggled with other forms of trauma, or with mental illness, or other negative things. Depictions of intense, dark experiences can serve as a catharsis by being a direct analog for one’s own experiences, but they can also function more indirectly as a parallel, or a metaphor. Someone who has not been assaulted, but who has struggled with mental illness, may find a story about an assault victim resonating with them as they can identify with the fear and lack of control. And someone who has never been through a specific traumatic experience, but has a lot of fear of it and cultural anxiety around it, may feel bolstered by stories of characters surviving and recovering from that experience.

So for many people, with many different experiences, there can be a direct, therapeutic/comforting benefit to darkfic. 

But darkfic doesn’t need to be therapeutic.

There are, of course, other kinds of benefits. Someone who has never been abused might read a story featuring abuse (and clearly tagged for it) and because of it, identify potential warning signs in a real life relationship down the road and know to get out early before things get worse. Or, they might develop a better understanding of what abuse victims go through and as a result, have more empathy for real-life survivors they encounter. 

But it’s also 100% ok to like darkfic purely for entertainment value! It is, after all, fiction

Dark stories challenge us – and we can really enjoy that challenge. They take us to extremes of emotion and the human experience. They plumb the depths of the human id. Even someone with the most charmed life still lives in a world where bad things happen, and even the sweetest, naive person has the capacity for darkness in them. Darkfic lets all of us explore those in relative safety. It makes us feel, and can thrill and horrify us as much as any thriller or horror movie. It can make us consider our own darkness, and be more aware of it. And it can take us to a place so much worse than our reality, that when we resurface into our mundane lives, there’s a sense of relief; we’ve escaped from our escapism, and our hum-drum lives seem so much better and more manageable by comparison. 

Plenty of people create dark content who aren’t abuse survivors. There are books with very dark themes that are written by, edited by, published by, and consumed and made popular by people who have not been abused, but which may prove a lifeline for a survivor – one that might not have existed if the entire genre was limited to only people with lived experience. And by accepting that anyone can produce or consume dark content, we allow survivors the protection of anonymity, by not forcing anyone to disclose and reveal their trauma in order to justify liking a work without being harassed and shamed for it. Creating an exclusive club of heavily-scrutinized creators and readers who have to be ‘this traumatized to ride’ helps no one. Hell, trying to pass moral judgement on anyone by scrutinizing the potential reasons they may have for enjoying certain kinds of fictional reading material, rather than looking at their actions toward real breathing human beings, is utterly inane. Especially when fiction – including, and sometimes especially dark fiction – can be used to expand our horizons beyond our own lived experiences make us more thoughtful, empathetic people on the whole. 

Image
naryrising
Image
naryrising

I think that the “AO3 is a charity!” rhetoric can obscure some things.  AO3 is a non-profit, true.  AO3 runs exclusively on donations, which it needs to keep existing, also true.  But I think for many people, a donation to AO3 falls under what they might think of as their entertainment budget, rather than their charitable budget.  Many people might donate to other charities that serve particular causes they agree with, support vulnerable groups, or promote change in the world that they want to see.  AO3 does all of those things in its way (its ‘causes’ would include freedom of speech and anti-capitalism, for instance).  But you could also look at it as, AO3 provides free entertainment, and so it’s reasonable to take $20 you might otherwise have spent on going to the movies and give it to AO3.  If that’s the case, the money isn’t coming out of the pockets of needy children, it’s coming out of the pockets of Disney or Netflix or Marvel or whoever.  

For what it’s worth, the October 2019 drive had a little over 8500 donors contributing.  You can see the info here: https://archiveofourown.org/admin_posts/14030  8500 people, out of the 2.1 million users with accounts, or the (rough estimate) 4-5 million other users without accounts.  Even if we just calculate based on the number of accounts, that’s 0.4% of users who donated.  Those 8500 people decided to give an average of $28 apiece to help keep AO3 running.  And that’s great! That means that the other 99.6% of users can keep using the site for free, which is exactly what we want.  It’s a fundamentally non-capitalist model, which breaks some people’s brains.

Image
elizabethminkel

As bone-crushingly weary as the reemergence of this conversation makes me, this is a great argument that I think people would be well-served to bring up more often. I’ve seen people mention public radio and TV—I give a small monthly donation to WNYC, which I listen to, actively or passively, literally all day when I’m not writing/reading. Public radio is nonprofit, community-oriented media. They know only a small fraction of listeners donate, and in an attempt to convert a few more people from listeners to supporters, the language they use is frankly far more transactional than the AO3 ever has been, along the lines of “pay us to keep making more of this great content.” There’s no “us” to pay at the wholly volunteer OTW, just “help chip in on the bills for this thing we’re all using.”  

(I might also bring up the people who pay *me* via Patreon to make Fansplaining, and any other independent creator that you support—we don’t think of it as charity, but we sure as hell don’t make a profit. But I would not make a public media argument for our podcast lol, for the record.)

Much like last year, it seems like it’s 5 people making nasty, bad-faith arguments, and about 50,000 people coming to the defense of the OTW/AO3. I think we’d better off giving these folks a little less airtime (slash literally zero airtime), but I do think the residual effects—educating people about the nature of this organization, its founding, its finances, and its policies, whether you agree with them or not—is a good thing. And as a reminder, the public media donation model is just as the OP frames it—anti-capitalist, those who can afford to donate helping the many who cannot, etc etc. If you can’t swing a donation, do not feel guilty. These kind of systems give us the chance to help each other.

Image
elfwreck

AO3 was founded by people who knew fandom. Some of them had (and have) very solid careers with substantial leisure budgets; some of them were living on a shoestring budget and got their internet from free wifi cafes and libraries.

And the ones with budgets knew damn well they’d be supporting the ones without, and a huuuuge swarm of teens and college students who didn’t have any money now, but might at some future point in their lives. 

If you can afford to throw the price of a movie at AO3, great! If you can’t, or if you could but it would mean missing one of the three movies you can afford to see this year… don’t feel guilty for deciding to hold on to your money. AO3 was not founded on the idea, “if you like it and read two hundred fics, you’re supposed to start forking over money.” 

AO3 was designed to be used by everyone who wants it, and paid for by those who can afford to give it money. So far, that plan is working. No guilt required.

Image
zz9pzza

This last bit, each year we get people apologizing that they can’t afford to help and that saddens us. We try and ensure that people know the Archive will always be free to use at the point of access.

ladyknucklesofold-deactivated20

A New History of Fandom Purges

Image
olderthannetfic

On November 24th, 2018, I posted a list of major deletions of sites or of content on sites that stripped fandom of its history. A bunch of pro-shipper blogs had just been deleted, and people were nervous. I suppose I was thinking “All this has happened before…”

On December 3rd, 2018, Tumblr’s Department of Irony announced the NSFW ban. Thanks for providing this salutary lesson to The Youth and a billion reblogs to me, I guess.

Today, we have AO3 for writing. Audio, images, and video are in as much danger as ever, yet fans attack AO3 every donation drive. For those of you who forget our past…

HERE IS WHAT HISTORY HAS TAUGHT US!


This is only a small taste of the many times that:

  • Fannish moderators got bored, ran out of money, or had a falling out, deleting a site/list/forum along the way.
  • Sites got bought out and closed for being unprofitable.
  • Fandom got hit as governments targeted piracy or political dissidents.
  • Fans grudge reported each other.
  • Official forums got deleted when the canon finished.

It’s not always malicious. It’s not always about us. But we lose every time.

Some of these purges hit everyone. Many of them hit m/m content specifically or female gaze-y material in general. This is why antis are dead wrong. This is why anti-fujoshi policies end up being anti-m/m policies. This is why we need clear labeling, not content restrictions.

This is why we need AO3.

And it’s why we need a solution for audio, visuals, and video too.

Image
totallysilvergirl

So grateful for the historical memory and the long view on a phenomenon many of us have come to late, and/or take for granted.

And this is why AO3 generates twice its goal amount in just a few days: they are irreplaceable.

Image
lady-knuckles

I’m gonna assume that all the other sites before AO3 allowed slavery fics and pedo shit and Nazi fics and racist ass fics and shit as well and never fixed it, like AO3. They need to fix that shit and ban it if they wanna be great. Asking for donations and not taking a stance to fix that shit don’t sit well with me.

Image
alyndra9

“Fix it.” Easy to say. Ban and delete all the nasty stuff, so only ok stuff is left. It’s just shit people who’d write such shit, after all, and shit people don’t matter. They don’t have the right to free speech, they don’t have the right to feel bad if their problematic fiction gets wiped off the face of the Internet. Like God flooding out all Noah’s neighbors, you gotta take a flaming sword to evil and listen to them howl with a hard heart. …

One too many times, the klutzy hammer of righteousness blew down swaths of fannish creativity much wider than it should have. Out of those ashes rose AO3, determined that everyone had a right to their creative voice, regardless of how small. Yes, even those who dwell in darkness: even they have a right to tell their stories. No one has to read them; but no one who hates all darkness has the right to demand their deletion, either.

Because the only cure for darkness is light. Violence and making people shut up and banning them only ever shoves the problem down the road for someone else to deal with. Most likely, someone less able to shove than you.

So here’s the situation: AO3’s not going to bow to demands for censorship. Its back has been up on the subject for pretty much its entire existence. Picture a hissing cat.

If people want a site that doesn’t allow gross stuff, it is entirely and 100% on them to go build it. Build one better than AO3! Build one that has reasonable and evenly enforced rules that everybody agrees are good rules, and then ban anybody who breaks them! I hope you make a great site that’s kid-friendly and has awesome content and nothing too distressing! Heck, with very little effort, you could probably make an application that just browses AO3 while cutting out all the bad stuff.

But…you don’t get to ‘fix’ AO3 itself. It is a place to keep recorded all of our stories, all of our humanity. The good, the gross, and everything in between. It is An Archive Of Our Own.

anti antis ao3 discourse good vs evil taking a stance walk in the light to be great
ao3commentoftheday

Anonymous asked:

I'm frustrated. My small subsection of a larger fandom has become incredibly toxic. A small group of writers who write very bland fluff have bullied and pressured a significant chunk of the remaining people who were still contributing fic in the downtime between new canon content. They targeted anyone who was not writing fluff with accusations of "trauma porn" and moral judgment rather than just... not reading. (½)
Image

ao3commentoftheday answered:

At the end of the day, all of these fics were tagged “author chooses not to use warnings” or tagged with trigger warnings, so they had no reason to target the authors they did, but they did, both with hate messages and by encouraging others not to read their fics on a variety of social media platforms. It’s disheartening and immature and has made something I enjoyed ugly and frustrating and hurtful. I have no idea what to do. (2/2)

-

If you’re receiving “hate messages” that is something that you can file abuse reports for. All of the social media sites have this function, and so does AO3. Harassment is not okay, and one way to fight back against it is to call it out - not just on your blog or in conversations but through official channels, wherever they exist. 

I don’t write dark fic myself, so I haven’t personally had to deal with this kind of bullshit, but I know that some members of blog definitely have. How have you dealt with it as a writer? And if you’re a reader, what can you do to help? 

*hugs* I’m sorry you’re having to deal with this

Image
Image
star-anise

Yes, you can block and filter and stuff, but sometimes a little social engineering goes a long way. Here’s stuff that, in my experience, has made fandom a more positive experience in the face of bullying:

  1. Figure out who the people you want to be in fandom with are, and organize and promote around that. That can be emphasizing good behaviour, talking about the kind of fanworks you want to defend, or focusing on a character or aspect of canon that you all love. Your fandom as a whole contains both the people like you, and the bullies; find a way to define your subset of the fandom, where people write what they want and don’t attack other people. That lets you create community hubs–a Tumblr tag you all agree to use, a Discord, etc. That way you can do a lot of your fandom socializing through #bullyfreefandomtag instead of #fandomtag. Then you automatically have friends and allies who will support and encourage each other in making different kinds of fanworks and dealing with hate.
  2. Work to encourage good feelings in your community/subfandom. Consider encouraging people to post rec lists or do challenges to leave more feedback, or encourage remixing or sending each other gifts. Work to promote the kind of fannish interaction you do want to happen.
  3. Be really open and clear about what your community’s ethical standards are–eg. tag your stuff, put NSFW stuff behind a readmore, don’t send people death threats. Let people know really clearly how to be in your good books.
  4. This can include making it really clear how to handle disputes and differences of opinion, so you can go, “If you’re upset that story aspect isn’t tagged, you can just ask the author to tag it. We’ll signalboost your request to have those things tagged. That works way better than sending them vague hatemail.”
  5. The same way, make sure people know about ways to avoid the kinds of fic they don’t like. That can include posting about filtering devices (New XKit, AO3 Savior, Washboard, etc) or going to AO3, filtering your fandom’s new fic by all the stuff these people don’t like, and showing off the URL. (That way if people bookmark that URL and go to it instead of the main AO3 feed, it’ll be pre-filtered for them.) 
  6. If you argue in public, you’re not trying to make the bullies stop being bullies–you’re letting people know this conflict is happening, and persuading the bystanders to side with you. Your life can be a lot easier or harder depending on how many neutral parties will reblog callout posts or feed the bullies information, vs. how many will support you and promote good fannish behavior. 
  7. Keep the receipts. You might not choose to make these bullying tactics known right now–but having a folder of screencaps and saved emails that demonstrate how badly they’re acting is always useful. A lot of bullies try to spin their behaviour in the best way possible and gain social capital; if everything they did were publicly known, they wouldn’t have so many followers.
Image
grison-in-space

Also, if I can add a 1b: Reach out to and speak with other fans in your fandom that you like, especially if they are being targeted. Don’t let people suffer alone–build up positive interactions with the folks who are writing, and try to talk to them about the things they’re doing that you genuinely love. Do a lot of “yes, and!” commenting, not even necessarily on fics themselves but on the social media around fics–Tumblr, here, or twitter, or DW, or Pillowfort, or wherever your main fannish socializing is. Build up the kinds of pleasant conversations that anyone might chime in on. 

The thing is, you don’t necessarily have to build a specific formalish Thing to encourage the kinds of fandom dynamics you want if that seems too pointed and you don’t want to deal with open conflict re: the clique that you’re worried about. You can also achieve some of the same positive things by making friends with the people you really do like and coming up with an unrelated tag/discord/whatever that give folks an alternative to the bullying clique to hang out with. You can make a banner for a bully-free section of fandom that folks can cluster under without necessarily noticing that you’re uniting under a commitment to rejecting bullying tactics, and that can be a very helpful form of social organizing that makes it harder for callout posts to get traction. After all, you’re not formally organizing in opposition to Team Fluffybland–you’re organizing team NuancedEmotions, and part of that nuanced approach to human emotions might include trauma exploration. It’s harder for folks trying to shut down discussion to target groups of people than individuals, and it’s much harder for these folks to target groups of people organized around an explicit positive ideal than it is for them to target groups who are organized around something that casual observers might view as bad or shameful. 

giasesshoumaru

Anonymous asked:

So I'm in a fairly small fandom and really loving it! The source material is not aimed at any particular age group and deals with some heavier stuff, but the fandom consists mostly of minors or young adults. I'm definitely one of the oldest people in the fandom. I have some pretty popular fics and I've been toying with writing some smut set in the same timeline, but I know most of my readers are minors and i don't really want minors reading smut that I write. What should I do?
Image

ao3commentoftheday answered:

If you want to control who reads your writing, then don’t post it on the internet. 

Either post it and resign yourself to the fact that there are young people who are going to read it, or decide that writing it for yourself is good enough. There isn’t really anything else you can do.

Image
Image
giasesshoumaru

As long as it’s properly tagged and rated, you did what you were supposed to do and it’s out of your hands

Image
alyndra9

If you want to write something you don’t think your usual audience would appreciate, you have a few options:

1. Make a pseud on your account, and post under the pseud. This doesn’t do a lot, tbh: your subscribers will still be notified and people looking at your account can see that there’s a pseud and click on it. But it will keep that story from showing up in your main Works section.

2. Lock the fic to AO3 users only. Kids are supposed to be 13+ to get an account. It’s not perfect and could keep people who don’t browse logged in (for whatever reason) from seeing your fic, but I figure people with an AO3 account are pretty likely to be aware that there’s smut on this here website.

3. Post anonymously. You can do this by putting ‘Anonymous’ in the Post To Collections box. Note: if someone is serious about detective work, they can see on your account that you have a work posted to Anonymous, so if it’s a small fandom you may want to check if it would be obvious which work is yours (ie if there is only one fic in your fandom posted to Anonymous—larger fandoms don’t have to worry about this as much.)

4. Create a whole new account?