coelsblog

Defending Scientism

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Scientism
  • Science
  • Secularism
  • Atheism
  • About
Image

Scientism

A series of posts on “scientism” and the nature of science.

Outlining Scientism

  • Basics of scientism: the web of knowledge

  • What does “science” in “scientism” mean?

  • Defending scientism: mathematics is a part of science

  • The roots of empiricism: Hume’s fork, and the divide between knowledge “by observation” and “by reason”

  • The unity of maths and physics revisited

  • Tools of science: Induction and Occam’s razor

  • A scientific response to the Brain in a Vat

  • Scientism and questions science cannot answer

Criticisms of scientism

  • Massimo Pigliucci’s critique of New Atheism and scientism

  • A scientism defence of Logical Positivism

  • On Wieseltier on Pinker: How to misunderstand scientism in one easy step

  • Nagel’s bat doesn’t demonstrate incompleteness in materialist science

The nature and scope of science

  • What does “existence” mean?

  • Disagreeing (partially) with Sean Carroll about what is science

Morality and Free Will as a part of science

  • Science can answer morality questions

  • Six reasons why objective morality is nonsense

  • There is nothing wrong with morality being subjective!

  • Lacking “free will” does not negate moral responsibility

  • Why Jerry Coyne is barking up the wrong tree on moral responsibility and free will

  • On Richard Carrier’s argument for objective morals

  • Richard Carrier’s argument for objective morals — redux

Most Popular

  • Nazi racial ideology was religious, creationist and opposed to Darwinism
  • Six reasons why objective morality is nonsense
  • Britain’s 10 worst violations of religious equality
  • A fine-tuned universe argues for atheism
  • Einstein the atheist on religion and God
  • Science can answer morality questions

Recent Posts

  • God does not belong in a science class
  • Is the dimethyl sulphide in the atmosphere of exoplanet K2-18b real?
  • Barnard’s Star is orbited by four small, rocky planets
  • Estimates of the heritability of intelligence do include gene–environment interactions
  • Contra Michael Shermer, facts and reason cannot determine values and morals
  • GWAS studies underestimate the heritability of intelligence
  • Misinformation and the cost of smoking

Categories

  • academia
  • Atheism
  • Book Reviews
  • Debates
  • Exoplanets
  • Human Rights
  • Philosophy
  • Religion
  • Science
  • Scientism
  • Secularism
  • Society
  • Uncategorized

  • apostasy
  • Britain
  • cartoons
  • censorship
  • Charlie Hebdo
  • children
  • Christianity
  • consilience
  • creationism
  • Darwinism
  • Dawkins
  • determinism
  • education
  • Einstein
  • empirical reality
  • empiricism
  • epistemology
  • equality
  • evolution
  • falsifiability
  • fine tuning
  • free speech
  • free will
  • God
  • Islam
  • Islamophobia
  • Jefferson
  • Jerry Coyne
  • JWST
  • laws of physics
  • Maajid Nawaz
  • Maarten Boudry
  • Massimo Pigliucci
  • mathematics
  • morality
  • moral realism
  • moral responsibility
  • multiverse
  • objective morality
  • philosophy of science
  • Pseudoscience
  • Ratzinger
  • reductionism
  • religious freedom
  • Sam Harris
  • Scientia Salon
  • scientific method
  • theology
  • universe
  • William Lane Craig

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 395 other subscribers

Archives

Most Popular

  • Nazi racial ideology was religious, creationist and opposed to Darwinism
  • Six reasons why objective morality is nonsense
  • Britain’s 10 worst violations of religious equality
  • A fine-tuned universe argues for atheism
  • Einstein the atheist on religion and God
  • Science can answer morality questions

Recent Posts

  • God does not belong in a science class
  • Is the dimethyl sulphide in the atmosphere of exoplanet K2-18b real?
  • Barnard’s Star is orbited by four small, rocky planets
  • Estimates of the heritability of intelligence do include gene–environment interactions
  • Contra Michael Shermer, facts and reason cannot determine values and morals
  • GWAS studies underestimate the heritability of intelligence
  • Misinformation and the cost of smoking
  • Did Aboriginal Australians predict solar eclipses?

Categories

  • academia
  • Atheism
  • Book Reviews
  • Debates
  • Exoplanets
  • Human Rights
  • Philosophy
  • Religion
  • Science
  • Scientism
  • Secularism
  • Society
  • Uncategorized

  • apostasy
  • Britain
  • cartoons
  • children
  • Christianity
  • consilience
  • creationism
  • Darwinism
  • Dawkins
  • determinism
  • education
  • empirical reality
  • empiricism
  • epistemology
  • equality
  • evolution
  • falsifiability
  • free speech
  • free will
  • Islam
  • Jefferson
  • Jerry Coyne
  • Massimo Pigliucci
  • mathematics
  • morality
  • moral realism
  • moral responsibility
  • multiverse
  • objective morality
  • philosophy of science
  • reductionism
  • religious freedom
  • Sam Harris
  • scientific method
  • theology

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Image coelsblog
    • Join 395 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Image coelsblog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
Advertisement