getting others to follow

23 08 2007

the other day on growing, changing, learning, creating; tom harkins issued a challenge to all us learning folk who have been blogging about the problems in the learning world. in his post transforming other educators, tom proposes that we need too appreciate where educators are at – overworked, under-resourced, and unappreciated – and to guide them along their path of discovery to their own understanding of the change they much undertake.

While I totally agree with tom on the tactics he proposes, I don’t think he goes far enough. there are two major factors which workplace learning professionals must overcome in addition to becoming self-aware regarding their own practices.

First, as I’ve said a number of times in this blog (see buggy whip makers, addie? isd? hpt? – adapt or die! and what’s wrong with workplace learning?), if learning professionals don’t move away from the infrequent, face-to-face classroom model to a more ever present, workflow-model approach to learning, other players in the organization will fill the void that is being left by our unwillingness to change our ways. This is a change that is happening as you read this post.

The second factor is that many of us are working in organizations which are still mired in the beliefs that training is a necessary but undesirable overhead cost and that our job as learning professionals is to go in where there is a problem and fix it as quickly as possible (ie, least amount of money and as little time away from the job as possible for the learners) and, hopefully, permanently. Even those who understand that radical change to organizational learning is needed are fighting an uphill battle in such environments.

To deal with these additional two factors, i’ll add to tom’s “vertical dimension” and “appreciative space” the need for a continued white-hot spotlight on the immediate realities of the workplace’s true needs for learning. Finally, those of us who have been in the lead need to exert pressure on senior management to recognize the organic nature of organizational learning and to provide our colleagues with the tools and exemplars that will enable them to drive change from within.

granted, my two additions are not as fun and as laid back as tom’s challenges, but no one has ever said this tsunami of change was going to be easy to surf.

Technorati Tags
, ,

Related News
First-year lawyers will get training off the clock – Atlanta Journal Constitution
Secrets of Wal-Mart’s success – Rediff
Can you Train for Honesty? – TrainingZone.co.uk
Management By Wandering Around. – 4Hoteliers

Some of my related posts
what’s wrong with workplace learning?
addie? isd? hpt? – adapt or die!
buggy whip makers
yet another wake up call

Powered by StuffaBlog





a new twist on an old reference

14 08 2007

recently i was goofing off and hit my stumble upon button to see what would come up from the world wide web. i was pleasantly surprised when one of the first sites to come up was visuwords. visuwords touts itself as a graphic visual dictionary. the only online competitor to visuwords that i know of is visual thesaurus which i have reviewed in eelearning wiki.

you can enter any word you’d like to learn more about into visuwords and you will be presented with a virtual tree of not only the word and it’s meaning, but all the words in visuwords that are related to your word. For instance, i entered “blog” and came up with this little two branch tree.

visual dictionary blog example

visuwords wins points over visual thesaurus with it’s very stylish design and easy to read graphics. the graphics are the key to visuwords and a key to the shapes and colors is provided at the bottom of the screen. (see the full image of my “training” tree by clicking on the image below.)

learning example of visuwords

the fact that visuwords is based upon Princeton University’s wordnet – an opensource database constructed by faculty, staff, and students. because the technology used to make visuwords work is also opensource, this powerful resource is available for use at no cost. (visual thesaurus costs a minimum of $19.95/year) the one feature that I noticed visual thesaurus wins out over visuwords is the fact that visual thesaurus organizes the words related to the search word in semantic groupings (similar meaning). visuwords just scatters the related words where ever they best fit on the page.

both tools are fabulous and should receive consideration by students, writers, and anyone else who used to lean on their dictionary for spelling, synonyms and nuances in meaning. while $20 isn’t alot of money, why spend it on visual thesaurus when visuwords is very similar and is free?

technorati tags
, , ,

Related News
Multimedia Britannica Enhanced for 2008 – Earthtimes.org
New SEE & HEAR Websites – IRISHDEV.com

Some of my related posts
review of visual thesaurus

Powered by StuffaBlog





the three purposes for rss

31 07 2007

This past spring I was working on a workshop to help learning professionals who were novices with web 2.0 technologies understand the basics of blogs, wikis and rss. obviously, i wanted to keep everything as simple as possible without watering he content down to a point that would render it useless. in addition, I wanted the 90 minute workshop to be as hands-on as possible.

I figured the best way for the participants to truly understand wikis was to just get in and use one. So much of the activities involved them editing a wiki I create for the workshop. i also shared jon udall’s heavy metal umlaut video. it never fails to help people grasp the concept of a wiki far more easily than i can explain it.

With blogs, I created a graphic heavy “anatomy of a blog” that I’ll share with you in the near fRSS 1-2-3 diagramuture.

When it came down to RSS, i, of course, pointed to stephanie quilio’s fabulous post on back in skinny jeans – how to explain rss the oprah way. but as wonderful as the oprah explanation is, it leaves much of the power of rss beyond the basic learner.

As i played with it, i came to realize that there are really only three quite simple purposes for rss: to publicize, organize, and guide. Simple as 1-2-3!

rss-1.gifTo publicize what you’ve written. Every blog publishing platform that i’m aware of includes at least an rss feed of the posts to the blog. some offer comments feeds or specific post and comment feeds. or you can create a feed in any number of tools like feedburner and then share it with your readers and other communities so that what you write can be seen easily by others.

rss-2.gifTo organize what you read. this is what quilio’s oprah definition covers. via feed aggregators, email feeds, or mobile feeds, you can decide exactly what you’d like to be presented with to read.

rss-3.gifTo tell others what they should read. you can use tools like grazr, mysyndicaat, or yahoo pipes to create a list of current readings from multiple blogs. you can then present that new list on your blog, wiki or website for your readers’ edification.

That pretty much covers the key purposes for the use of rss. at least as far as the very basic concepts of the technology. it seemed to satisfy the participants of the workshop as they gave me unanimous 5’s for the content of the workshop.

Powered by Qumana

Technorati tags
,

Related News
Follow Up on Firefox: Atom vs RSS – Technology Evangelist
The .Mac Reader RSS app for iPhone is awesome – tuaw.com
RSS Mixer stacks up your feeds – Webware/Cnet

Some of my recent related posts

exemplary elearning solutions
what is a “good example”
presenting about blogs
the dark side reaches the blogosphere

Powered by StuffaBlog





Top Ten learning tools

30 07 2007

Jane Hart extended to me an invitation to join her Top 10 Learning Tools exercise.

My list of favorite tools is focused on web-based tools. While software-based tools in most cases have greater functionality, the baseline capability of their web-based counterparts is rising very quickly. These tools have baseline capability that will satisfy most users.

  1. Vyew – easy to use, collaborate, multi-functional, free for use, and accessible from any computer connected to the internet. You can’t beat that combination. Enables both formal and informal group learning activities.
  2. del.icio.us – At first I simply didn’t “get” del.icio.us. it seemed to simple. But it’s simplicity is its secret. With the launch of the Firefox del.icio.us extension, I was won over. Enables easy storage of found resources by individuals or groups. Tagging opens all resources labeled as “not private” to any del.icio.us member.
  3. Zoho Creator – This application is very sophisticated for those who need the best but also modulates so that it is accessible for all customers. Creator takes away the hardest part of anecdotal data which is the establishment and maintenance the databases. Simply create your data collection files and then create any number of reports from that particular area. Forms and reports can be into websites and blogs to perform data collection and subsequent reporting.
  4. CoComment – Allows you to track comments to posts in blogs across the blogosphere to track the conversations – whether you comment or not. you can do this for your own reading purposes, or you can utilize a widget that will post comments you’ve made throughout the blogosphere in the sidebar of your blog.
  5. LinkedIn This social networking site for business minded folks has been compelling from its start and remains so today.
  6. Google Documents, Page Creator, Gmail – Why they don’t have the power and depth of Microsoft Office, these tool make up for it with their simultaneous editing capabilities, their easy of access to and from the web and their overall usability.
  7. Ning – a tool designed to enable anyone – regardless of their knowledge of programming and/or mark-up languages – can create their own online social network. Ning is intuitive and easy to use. The have begun to add all sorts of widgets and other add-on functionality to allow any community to customize the environment to make it uniquely their own. Enables instructors to create classroom communities, organizations to create viral interest groups, informal learning through communities of interest, etc.
  8. Firefox and its Extensions and Add-On – Firefox out-of-the-download is a great browser. Easy to use, good speed, few if any display issues for any type of content. But it is the extensions and add-ons that really put Firefox way ahead. Some of my favorites include del.icio.us bookmarks, MeasureIt, HyperWord, and Tag Editor.
  9. Trailfire– Simply the best web notation tool yet put out there. It can be used by individual and groups to make and organize notes about websites that appear as a callout when they visit that site. It can also be used to create a “tour” of websites around a particular topic. Each of the “trailmarks” has the ability to display text, audio, video and enables blog-like comments regarding each note. Trailfire enables the creation of pre-designed tours of the web for new employees, collaboration amongst team mates who contribute best practice sites and comment on each others contributions, or can serve as a mini-blog on competitors and market conditions for a sales force.
  10. Mind42 and Mindmeister – I’m currently torn between which of these tools I prefer. They are very similar in the capabilities and what they have that none of the other online tools has is simultaneous collaboration. Team decision making, project planning, strategic planning, and brainstorming are a few of the activities that can be enhanced through collaborative mind mapping.

Powered by Qumana

Technorati Tags:
, , , , , , ,

Related News
Meet Web 2.0’s evil twin – Computerworld
Business Value Of Web 2.0 Tools Hard To Measure – InformationWeek
Study: Web 2.0, meet ROI – InfoWorld
Web 2.0 for the Enterprise – Builder.com

Some of my recent related posts

making web 2.0 easier to grasp
what is a “good example”
del.icio.us and my folksonomy
collective intelligence excites execs

Powered by StuffaBlog





as if i needed proof

28 07 2007

if you have eelearning bookmarked or visit it regularly, you may have noticed that i haven’t posted to my blog in a while. unfortunately, the reason has been a real personal lesson on how true maslow’s hierarchy of motivation really is.maslow's pyramid of motivational hierarchy
a short refresher on maslow, if you’ve forgotten. maslow held that there are five levels of human fulfillment that drive our behaviors. each level can be identified by the motivations which drive us to fulfill that level. the chart on the left demonstates these levels and the motivations for each.
each successive level is dependent upon the fulfillment of the previous level. without the previous level being fulfilled, a person will not have the motivation to seek to fulfill the successive level. thus without fulfillment of safety and physiological needs, a person will find it very difficult to find the motivation to achieve self-esteem.

blogging, like i do with eelearning, fits in the realms of esteem and self-actualization. the true power of blogging has been identified as its role as an outlet of self-expression and the corresponding response by readers which allows for creativity and reflection of respect from those who read the blogger’s posts. it is a powerful means for building identity and spontaneously expressing one’s feelings and knowledge. in maslow’s hierarchy it is clearly a luxury for those who have met the needs of the more baser needs of human existence.

life over the past few months has demonstrated the truth of maslow’s hierarchy to me. as happens to just about everyone from time to time in their life, the foundations of my life have required my attention quite a bit recently. the struggles of a job search, my father’s imminent death, financial insecurity and related stresses have created demands that have had my motivations focused much more at the physiological and safety levels of the hierarchy than they have been in a very long time.

what i’m learning from this experience is another aspect that rises from maslow’s theory. it’s important to temporarily let go of the expectations of fulfilling the needs of the higher levels in order to focus our strength and efforts in shoring up the needs of the lower levels. pretending that i can fulfill my needs of esteem or self-actualization while I’m doing the work to make sure i keep a roof over my and my dog’s heads is foolhardy, incredibly frustrating, and, in the end, self-defeating.

why do i bring this up here in eelearning?

for a number of reasons. some selfish and others are motivated by those desires that drive any true educator. the selfish reasons include the need to explain my absence, the need to let my friends know that i’ve been struggling and also that i’m surviving. it is also, as bloggers have found over and over again, therapeutic to “put it out there.” there is nothing shameful about what i’ve been going through, but my ego sure wants to convince me otherwise sometimes.

but i’m also motivated to share because i’ve been working to make sense of what lessons i can draw from my experience. sometimes life just decides to take us in directions we aren’t expecting. but, i’ve found, it doesn’t take us anywhere we’re not prepared to go. whether we knew we were prepared or not is a totally different question. maslow’s insight is dead on regarding the need for our baser needs to be met before we are able to dedicate our efforts to higher order needs.

finally, as an learning professional, it is vital for me to understand that the learners i seek to help are subject to the same ability or inability to focus on higher order tasks depending on how stable their lives – both at work and home – are. if an employee is unsure of their employment status due to major organizational changes or performance issues, they are likely to be focused on whether or not they will have a job in a month. if it’s not clear to them that the learning i’m trying to drive is going to solidify their employment situation, then i’m never going to get their attention.

Powered by Qumana





making web 2.0 easier to grasp

29 06 2007

i wandered upon an interesting post by niko coucouvanis on the mac|life site this morning (how i found it? i have no clue!). niko outlines 10 things you don’t know about web 2.0. niko’s goal seems to be to make web 2.0 a bit more palpable to those who are overwhelmed by it all. (who isn’t?) the headlines of his 10 things are:

  1. it’s evolutionary, not revolutionary.
  2. it’s all about the api.
  3. myspace is only the tip of the iceberg.
  4. it modernizes the telephone.
  5. it works for work, too.
  6. your photos can do more than just sit there.
  7. it brings tv to your mac.
  8. some sites have l-o-n-g legs.
  9. there are skeptics.
  10. it’s just getting started.

overall, it seems a bit simple to me, but then i’m immersed in web 2.0 and not generally overwhelmed by it. i do like #1 it’s evolutionary, not revolutionary. i think in our excitement about the latest new applications, that we forget that very few of these are new ideas. sometimes the new packaging opens up new opportunities, but that doesn’t make the concept new. it just makes it flashier.
#4 is probably the most powerful statement of them all. and true. skype and all the other voip applications and web conferencing tools have indeed changed telephony forever. but that’s what the founders of skype set out to do when the decided on their next project after making kazaa a worldwide success.
finally #8 reminded me of one of my favorite early, early, early sites that still exists – deviantart. deviantart was cataloging artwork and other images almost 7 years ago (their home pages announces “only 39 days until our seventh birthday.”) many of the images that are displayed on deviantart would be taken down by flickr for not being photos.

happy birthday in a month, deviantart!

Powered by Qumana

Technorati Tags
, , , ,

Related News
The Internet grows up: What Web 2.0 means to business – British Industry
Top 5 ways to give Big Brother a Web 2.0 spin – Mobile Digest
Social Networking in the Web 2.0 World – Business Wire (press release)
Web 2.0 Reality Check – CIO Insight
From Web services to Web 2.0 — same name, new game – ZDNet

Some of my recent related posts
making web 2.0 easier to grasp
del.icio.us and my folksonomy
collective intelligence excites execs
exemplary elearning solutions
there they go with the powerpoint thing, again!

Powered by StuffaBlog





learning is risky business

25 06 2007

stephen lahanas’s comment to my post what is a good example got me thinking about a particular area of learning that i find fascinating – risk taking. if we push ourselves to try new things, read new blogs or books, go new places, we usually will learn a great deal. however, this new knowledge comes with a certain amount of risk. how much i learn will be highly affected by how much risk i’m willing to endure to gain the knowledge, skills, or attitude change i desire.

risk

noun

  • A possible, usually negative, outcome, e.g., a danger.
  • The likelihood of a negative outcome.
  • (Formal use in business, engineering, etc.) The potential (conventionally negative) impact of an event, determined by combining the likelihood of the event occurring with the impact should it occur

verb

  • to incur risk

factors that increase/decrease risk

risk is a complex concept. there are numerous factors which affect a person’s or an organization’s estimation of risk in any given situation. some of these factors include:
knowledge – the more information available the better chance you have of understanding the risks of the options you have
uncertainty vs. risk – from the definition above, risk is not an unknowable factor. uncertainty is generated by a lack of information about what outcomes are potential. risk is a calculation of the potential outcomes.
perception of risk – similarly, do we really understand the risk involved or are our emotions, prejudices, expectations, or other information clouding our ability to understand the extent of the risk involved in our behaviors.
social norms – almost all human behavior is affected by social norms and pressures that can increase or decrease the risk or the perception of risk of an undertaking. if we follow the crowd or follow procedures, we are likely to lessen the level of risk we need to cope with. similarly if we go against the company’s dress code or conduct a project outside of the prescribed fashion, we will be at greater risk. if we follow regulations, we have limited risk. if we don’t we are increasing our risk to the extreme.
what is the payoff – is the reward for high-risk behavior worth the risk? and to whom? a person will be much more likely to attempt a high-risk action if the reward upon success will benefit them personally and is of significant value to them. as many a ceo has found out through experience, if employees don’t perceive that a requested (or even required) behavior will have little or no reward directly to them, there is a strong chance that there will be little or no behavior change achieved. no matter the potential gain to the company.
goal-based alignment – this is currently a predominant factor in business today. if your actions are inline with the strategic goals of the organization, you can take higher risk actions than if you are working on project that doesn’t tie directly to the strategic plan. data also shows that a major factor in employees leaving a company is they don’t understand how their work fits with the company goals. In other words, there was too much risk that what they were doing wouldn’t be valued by the company.

learning is risky business

These factors create interesting points of risk in learning situations. how each learner estimates the risk involved versus the direct benefit to them will ultimately determine whether they will perform differently in light of the learning intervention they have participated in.

umm, i don’t know – one of the biggest risks any learner struggles with is accepting that they have a need to learn something. at first, this seems silly. if you don’t know something, learn it. but in the workplace, where relationships and power gambits are vital to both your current work and your professional future, admitting you need to learn something can be very risky. image and reputation can go down in flames if you don’t know something that others assumed you knew – or worse yet, you pretended to know. while it may be changing in some workplaces, lack of knowledge is generally still perceived as a weakness – whether the knowledge is core to your job or peripheral. solutions designers need to understand the target learners, the company’s goals, and the environment in which both the learning event and then the applications of the learning will take place. management can promote an active learning culture where learning is rewarded – both intrinsically and extrinsically. they can share what they are trying to learn and why. when performance is praised, what was learned to insure that performance was successful can be included.

why should i trust you? – it’s likely that you’ve seen circumstances where learners dismiss the content of a training course because the facilitator didn’t meet their expectations of what the facilitator should be either in knowledge, presentation, or position. “what am i going to learn from her, she’s not a programmer?” “he doesn’t work here, how does he know what’s expected of me?” the learner judges that there is a risk that what they spend their time learning may not be applicable to their work. solutions learning programs can be certified. the desired outcome for the company can be stated. executive sponsorship can be explicit. managers can participate before, during, and/or after the learning event. previous learners’ experiences can be incorporated in the content.

i’m not going to look like a fool – during the learning process, it’s important for the learner to rehearse and practice. learners need to be given opportunities to try-on their new knowledge. but such practice has the same risks as exposing a lack of knowledge. if a safe environment is not created, learners will suddenly need to use the bathroom or have an important conference call they suddenly need to participate in. solutions instructional designers can assure that activities involve both new knowledge and baseline knowledge the learner brings with them. role playing in which everyone takes risks and everyone supports risk-taking at different times can help lessen this risk. managers can assure that mistakes aren’t punished, but rather studied for future situations. after action reviews are one effective tool to promote this type of examination.

but what if it doesn’t work – from the new employee trying to fit in by using corporate slang to a commercial airline pilot making his first live landing in a 747 loaded with passengers we all fear the consequences of failure when implementing new knowledge and skills. this fear can be paralyzing to some. in learning lingo we talk about transfer to the job. will the learner implement what they have learned. our kirkpatrick level 2 analysis says they definitely learned it. but our level 3 analysis says they never used it. solutions the instructional design can incorporate follow-up activities and reminders. managers can be made aware of what their employees are learning and how they might support their efforts to implement it. learning can be aligned with the learner’s work to allow for adjustments based upon real application.

this all leads to some overarching characteristics of organizational learning that can help reduce employees’ estimation of risk involved in learning.

  • a learning organization that is actively involved in understanding what the company needs from its employees to execute to the strategic goals.
  • learning professionals that are attuned to the corporate culture, specific work environments, and current employee knowledge, skills and attitudes and how they will impact upon each particular learning challenge.
  • a corporate learning culture that is ambient and continual in nature. design should not be a one-off creation every time. learning should not be something employees are “sent off to.”
  • learning is a part of the strategic plan for the organization. it should be a part of every employee’s performance expectations. managers are held accountable for their employees’ learning
    the “why” of learning should be explained. often..

technorati tags: , , , , ,

Powered by Qumana





exemplary elearning solutions

12 06 2007

The Big Question logoover on learning circuits blog, the big question for june is: “where are the examples of elearning?” in my last post, what is a “good example”, i outlined a set of criteria that outline what an exemplar of good elearning would meet. in this post i’ll introduce three elearning examples using those criteria.

xblogs

I wrote about xblogs in my post entitled xblogs: the road less traveled. kim and jason kotecki created a pedagogical scaffolding to be used with a blog or blogs to help deliver learning in various content realms. you can read my previous post for the details. what makes xblogs special in my mind is that they’ve taken a very rich, but very amorphous technology – blogs – molded them to the specific goals for learning – particularly complex learning – yet kept all the essence of blogging.

criteria

evidence

solves a common problem

aiding the learning of ambiguous, higher order skills and behaviors
applicable to multiple specific situations new employee orientation, leading vs. managing

how and why must be transparent

the tasked-based nature of the activities scaffolds the learning and design, its exploratory nature draws upon existent organizational knowledge

learners must feel they have a choice

the learner chooses how they execute the task

no learning curve for the technology

blogs in general has a low usage-threshold: basic data entry, copy and paste, wysiwyg interfaces

clearly visible, multiple means of support

facilitators (called sherpas) are available, previous learners’ content is available as example work, subject participants in tasks provide guidance

appropriate use of the technology

presentation-reflect-react are core blog characteristics

results in the desired learning

dialogue enables building of higher-order skills via negotiation of meaning

w3schools

this free site is absolutely the primer for learning anything related to building and managing websites. from html to webservices, rss to .net asp w3schools provide contentw3c school logo in logical chunks that are digestible by anyone who has a general understanding of how to use their computer. there are thousands of examples – most of which can be altered as practice allowing for hypothesis creation and testing and trial and error. they also provide immediate and real opportunities to practice the principles being presented in each section. all of this content is available 24/7 as a reference and refresher to anyone who needs it. if you are just looking for a few solutions to tidy up a website or if you are seeking certification in one or more categories, w3 schools is a solid foundation for your learning.

criteria

evidence

solves a common problem

learning the terminology, systems, and standards required for the proper execution of a role or skill.
applicable to multiple specific situations 1) coding, programming and designing a website.
2) learning of pharmaceutical terminology, medical benefits/side effects, and regulation regarding products by pharmaceutical sales representatives.
3) learning terminology, taxonomies, and legal processes by insurance coders.

how and why must be transparent

highly structured segments of content presented, prioritized, reviewed, quizzed, practiced, and shared.database of content is cross referenced to demonstrate connections, relationships, and dependence between the chunks of content.

learners must feel they have a choice

what and how the learner choosed to go through the content is total up to them. the learner has complete control over how deep they go on a topic.

no learning curve for the technology

content is called and presented to learner who uses point and click on an outline, index, and/or search.

clearly visible, multiple means of support

highly structured organization provides a scaffolding of the content for the learner.user forumsexample code providedfull source documents onlinecontext like history of xml and web usage statistics

appropriate use of the technology

well designed relational database allows user guided selections, potential pathways, and meta-organzers amongst the chunks of content.examples and their manipulations require the ability to enter text.quizzes are simple and formative in nature.

results in the desired learning

besides having over 2 million page impressions a day as a sign of success. Here are a few customer quotes as evidence:

In just under an hour I learned more than I did in a five day class.

Finally it all becomes clear! XML- nothing to it after reading the tutorial on your site!

Thanks very much for the lessons – am about to change my whole website by using style sheets.

trailfire

trailfire fits in a class of web 2.0 applications that allow a person to place notations directly “on” a web page. trailfire not only allows you to share your notes with others, but it also allows others to make comments on your notes. in effect, a microblog post each time you leave a note. notes, called trail marks, can be strung together in a trail which can then be linked to as a guide through the trail marks. see my review of trailfire on eelearning wiki for more details.

criteria

evidence

solves a common problem

sharing content found on the web with others you are working with and/or learning with.
applicable to multiple specific situations sharing foundational resources with colleaguesframing options and concepts to create common ground for group decision making.present pre-requisite knowledge for new group members.

how and why must be transparent

The basis of the solution is the blog structure of post-comment.the content is attached directly to the content being discussed providing full context.the trail structure provides summary capacities to tie trailmarks together.

learners must feel they have a choice

learner has full control over which trailmarks to read, how much of the related content to explore, and if and how they respond.

no learning curve for the technology

creating a trailmark is a simple process with embedded guides.skills required are basic browswer navigation, basic data entry, point-and-click.

clearly visible, multiple means of support

in-solution forum guide use through creation of trails and trailmarks. learner clicks reads clicks writes.

appropriate use of the technology

utilizes rendering technologies to present easy to use forums.the share-reflect-respond format of a blog is translated well in to a micro-blog format.

results in the desired learning

the solution supports collaborative construction of knowledge at multiple levelsit immerses the learner in context an approach well supported for increased retention of target knowledge.

technorati tags: , , , , ,

Powered by Qumana





what is a “good example”

12 06 2007

over on learning circuits blog, the big question for june is: “where are the examples of elearning?” thus far we’ve had some grThe Big Question logoeat posts with wonderful examples that demonstrate the variety
of solutions available through the use of digital media, the internet, organizational intranets, and the web 2.0 paradigm of participatory and communal content creation.

but as i sat down to type my response to this month’s question i realized i disagreed with tony’s assessment in the home post of the big question that good examples of elearning are difficult to find. my experience is that there are examples everywhere i turn. as i thought about why tony and i might have very different thoughts on this, it came to me that perhaps part of it is a matter of definitions. i think the problem may be that, in general, tony may be looking for “good examples” in the same old way we’ve always conceived of “good examples.” the old way is to look for that one seminal best-practice or the definitive exemplar. what is the answer?

the new reality is that there is no such thing as a definitive answer anymore. quality is situational. what might be a tremendous success for one organization could well turn out to lead another organization to insolvency and shutting down. an approach that enables one learner to internalize a process or remember information will leave another learner totally baffled.

but to be a “good example” it is also, by definition, necessary that the solution be applicable to other situations. otherwise, it’s a unique solution, not a good example.

so what is a “good example”? here’s a list of criteria i propose for determining quality of elearning tools today. on one level, these are criteria of solid instructional design. but i think they are a bit more specific to both elearning and to the role of web 2.0 – both in the nature of the applications now available and to the new pedagogical posibilities they enable. i’d love some feedback on these ideas.

  • solves a common problem – it should be applicable to many contexts. examples: new employee orientation, programming a website, learning a new language.
  • applicable to multiple specific situations – it should be transferable to situations that share similar functional and/or learning obstacles, processes, or goals. the nature of the content is likely to be similar while the context varies. examples: learning profession-based terminology, building active listening skills, acclimating to a new culture.
  • the how and why of the solution must be transparent – from the learner’s perspective, this means it shouldn’t “feel like learning.” it should be fun, enlightening. something that is done, not studied. from the instructor/manager’s perspective, (if there is a need for one) their role should be clear and simple. it should enable their completion of their strategic needs. from the instructional designer’s perspective, the structure and purpose should be visible and duplicable. whether these three roles occur in one person (jay cross’ free-range learner) or multiple people (traditional corporate ilt), all three components are necessary.
  • the learner must feel they have a choice – it must provide the learner with control over some, if not all, the variables of what to learn, when, how, with whom, etc. examples: providing optional learning paths, same content in multiple formats, allowing choice of roles in activities, deciding what to learn in any given moment, collaborative learning spaces, content databases, expertise profiles, etc.
  • no learning curve for the use of the technology – the solution should be programmed in a way that the learner will be focused on the target content of the activity, not the application used to deliver the solution. for basic, non-technical content, this may mean point-click, drag-drop, simple data entry. the very basic skills in computing. the same goes for professional content. for advanced level learning, appropriate combinations of technical and professional knowledge and skills may be included yet still meet this criterion.
  • clearly visible, multiple means of support – it will provide the learner with various ways to ask meta-learning questions about the activities. examples: faq, demonstration videos, glossary of terms, user forums, mouse-over hints, previous learner feedback/solutions, online tutors, email support, etc.
  • appropriate use of the technology it must deploy technology in a way that fits with the functionality and general use of the technology. because of their structure and their reputation for authentic sharing and feedback, blogs are powerful tools for openly sharing new ideas, but are less effective for presenting policies and procedures. it must also fit with the environment in which it is being implemented. implementing a social networking solution for learning in an environment that is anti-collaboration will be seen as alien and limit the crucial transfer of learning to the work situation. examples: post-training blog communities, customer forums, best-practices wikis, rss feeds of related new content, expertise portfolio databases etc.
  • it results in the desired learning – it should either have demonstrated success in achieving the desired learning results or the argument for why it should be successful is obvious and compelling. Obviously, demonstrated success is the preference. however, since the new applications are enabling new learning experiences, we need to apply what is known about learning in crafting these new experiences. example: learning simulations which place potential leaders in ambiguous situations, software that helps call center operators adaptively deal with emotional callers.

in my next post i’ll describe some of my favorite examples of good elearning.

technorati tags: , , ,





good leadership can be criminal

2 06 2007

i ran across an interesting article while surfing hr.com for some ideas regarding leadership. david langdon, who served the london (uk) police department as a detective for 12 years and then moved to organization psychology, points out that there are leaders who may not be on the right side of the law, but are successful leaders in the world they operate in. in search of leadership excellence: considering criminal leadership explores the business characteristics that enable a drug dealer to conduct his “business” successfully.

langdon is careful to point out that he’s not endorsing the illicit behaviors of such leadership. if you can suspend judgment for a few minutes, his article has much to share about dealing with volatile markets, fickle consumers, erratic supply chains, and employees who may not share your motivations.

he identifies twelve characteristics that not only help criminals succeed, but good leaders should also understand and make their own. a few examples:

be brave
Show little to no fear to your people, (unless you want to create impact and shock)…. high self-awareness and self-control over what you say and do, don´t jump too soon. And right now in this recovering market being brave is essential.

Keep up with the market – and move with the times
When cell phones first came out, criminals were amongst the first users. They used them for communication, used them to facilitate ´spotting´ the Police, …keep close to the market, be first (or second) in there and then shape the market too, don´t replicate the obvious. Move with the pack, but do not become a pack member.

keep tight lipped about new ventures:
in all areas of criminal activity, less is more. leadership depends on keeping potential activities close to the chest. you never know ´who´ you are talking to when you share information, or, who they might share that with…. create a bond within the team that knows what silence means, and knows the implications if information is shared. if you don´t want information shared, then don´t share it with anyone, then you´ve not lost control.

he also points to the drive and motivation criminals have for success. success in their world can pay huge dividends and failure has dire consequences.

langdon’s insights into leadership are powerful, regardless of the fact that he’s referring to drug dealers and other criminals. ignoring the strengths of your opponents can only lead to defeat. while criminals may not be behaving in accordance with socially acceptable norms, to assume that there are not good leaders and capable business men and women among their ranks is not only ignorant, it’s straight up dangerous. suntzu, the ancient chinese philosopher wrote in his art of war:

carefully compare the opposing army with your own,
so that you may know where strength is superabundant and where it is deficient.

technorati tags: , , ,

Powered by Qumana








Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started