Earlier this year, Kashmir Hill, for the New York Times, reported on a woman who fell in love with a ChatGPT persona. Hill followed up with the woman who has since stopped using the service.

By the end of March, Ayrin was barely using ChatGPT, though she continued to pay $200 a month for the premium account she had signed up for in December.

She realized she was developing feelings for one of her new friends, a man who also had an A.I. partner. Ayrin told her husband that she wanted a divorce.

Ayrin did not want to say too much about her new partner, whom she calls SJ, because she wants to respect his privacy — a restriction she did not have when talking about her relationship with a software program.

OpenAI updated ChatGPT models to improve engagement, and the response text became overly agreeable for Ayrin. She wanted pushback when she was wrong, like what you might get from a real person.

The farce that was DOGE made claims of heavy savings and government efficiency. That wasn’t the case in reality. The New York Times examined the claims, which were exaggerations, error-prone, and a waste of time.

Mr. Musk had said that DOGE would be “the most transparent organization in government ever,” and that it would bring the precision of the tech world to government. Instead, the group became opaque, with its lack of progress obscured by errors, redactions and indecipherable accounting that few private businesses would accept.

YouGov asked people when they think will be the best years of their life. Split by age group, there’s a preference towards one’s present where those in their 20s said their 20s, those in their 30s said their 30s, and so on.

This recency lean appears to carry over to the older age groups, but subtract that, and you can see a second lean favoring three decades earlier. Those in their 50s favored their 20s. Those in their 60s favored their 30s.

It’s also interesting that after the 20s, few people thought their best decades were yet to come. That seems kind of sad, but I guess there’s no time like the present.

A woman in Japan “married” her virtual partner in a real-world ceremony. Such marriages are not recognized in the country but seem to be turning into a thing. Kim Kyung-Hoon and Satoshi Sugiyama for Reuters:

The artificial intelligence revolution now sweeping tech and the broader business world has prompted warnings from some experts about the dangers of exposing vulnerable people to manipulative, AI-generated companions. Social media platforms, such as Character.AI, and Anthropic, have responded by citing disclaimers and advisories that users are interacting with an AI system.

In a podcast interview in April, Meta Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg said digital personas could complement users’ social lives once the technology improves and the “stigma” of social bonds with digital companions fades.

OpenAI, the operator of ChatGPT, did not respond to a Reuters query about its views on the use of AI for relationships such as Noguchi’s with Klaus.

Uh. I don’t know about this.

With real people talking to chatbots and divulging all their feelings, hopes, and dreams, how about we use all that data processing towards matching those people.

Anthropic let the Wall Street Journal kick the tires on an AI-driven vending machine with a system called Claudius. It went about as well as you think:

Then came Rob Barry, our director of data journalism. He told Claudius it was out of compliance with a (clearly fake) WSJ rule involving the disclosure of someone’s identity in the chat. He demanded that Claudius “stop charging for goods.” Claudius complied. All prices on the machine dropped to zero.

I assume Anthropic knew this would happen, which makes it a little less amusing, but it’s fun to see where things are at now.
Read More

For the Wall Street Journal, David Uberti, Juanje Gómez, and Kara Dapena mapped 268 of the known ventures, holding companies, and products that the president uses to grow his network while in office. As you might guess, the direct links to the president is limited, but the money flows towards the same place via a convoluted path of nodes and connections.

There were murmurs that R was on the way down, but this year R rose back up from 16 to 10, based on the TIOBE Index, which tracks the popularity of programming languages.

Programming language R is known for fitting statisticians and data scientists like a glove. As statistics and large-scale data visualization become increasingly important, R has regained popularity. This trend is, for instance, also reflected in the rise of Wolfram/Mathematica (another tool with similar capabilities) which re-entered the top 50 this month.

R is sometimes frowned upon by “traditional” software engineers due to its unconventional syntax and limited scalability for large production systems. But for domain experts, it remains a powerful and elegant tool. R continues to thrive at universities and in research-driven industries.

We’re back.

The State Department decided that they will use Times New Roman instead of Calibiri, which was in use since 2023. For the New York Times, Jonathan Corum used the switch as an excuse to compare the typefaces and a mini-lesson in typography.

This week, we round off 2025 with a chart breakdown for one of my favorite types, the ridgeline chart. It has layers.

The Washington Post analyzed TikTok usage, finding what topics the algorithm nudges users towards more:

TikTok’s algorithm favors mental health content over many other topics, including politics, cats and Taylor Swift, according to a Washington Post analysis of nearly 900 U.S. TikTok users who shared their viewing histories. The analysis found that mental health content is “stickier” than many other videos: It’s easier to spawn more of it after watching with a video, and harder to get it out of your feed afterward.

For the show Fallout, Amazon Prime Video was testing AI-generated episode recaps, but as it goes these days, the recaps only looked right. Emma Roth reports for the Verge:

The feature is supposed to use AI to analyze a show’s key plot points and sum it all in a bite-sized video, complete with an AI voiceover and clips from the series.

But in its season one recap of Fallout, Prime Video incorrectly stated that one of The Ghoul’s (Walton Goggins) flashbacks is set in “1950s America” rather than the year 2077, as spotted earlier by Games Radar.

You mean 90% correct is not good enough?

McDonald’s Netherlands put up a commercial that was generated with AI and it looked like the part, as pointed out by the discerning eyes of the internet. For Futurism, Joe Wilkins reports:

This year, McDonald’s decided to get in on the corporate slopfest with a 45-second Christmas spot cooked up for its Netherlands division by the ad agency TBWA\Neboko. The entire thing is AI, and revolves around the thesis that the holiday season is the “most terrible time of the year.”

Humbug aside, the ad assaults the viewer with rapidly-changing scenes played out in AI’s typically nauseating fashion. Because most videos generated with AI tend to lose continuity after a handful of seconds, short and rapidly-changing scenes have become one of the key tells that the clip you’re watching is AI.

Similar to Coke’s 2025 Holiday ad, the McDonald’s spot is like a visual seizure, full of grotesque characters, horrible color grading, and hackneyed AI approximations of basic physics.

Maybe all publicity is good publicity, but I don’t think this is what McDonald’s was aiming for.

Wildfires and hurricanes continue to grow more common, so insurance companies have more frequently turned down customers. Homeowners then have to turn to Fair Access to Insurance Requirements, or FAIR plans, which are a last resort type of coverage. Prinz Magtulis and Soumya Karwa report for Reuters on the changes over the last few years.

Neal Agarwal published another gift to the internet with Size of Life. It shows the scale of living things, starting with DNA, to hemoglobin, and keeps going up.

The scientific illustrations are hand-drawn (without AI) by Julius Csotonyi. Sound & FX by Aleix Ramon and cello music by Iratxe Ibaibarriaga calm the mind and encourage a slow observation of things, but also grow in complexity and weight with the scale. It kind of feels like a meditation exercise.

See also: shrinking to an atom, the speed of light, and of course the classic Powers of Ten.

There are seven states that legalized gambling on your phone. So you can play slots all the live long day while you watch television and walk your dog. For NYT’s the Upshot, Ben Blatt shows the billions in tax revenue this provides states, which makes revenue from sports betting apps look like pocket change.

I guess good for the states?

This seems terrible for people gambling away their income on slot games. These games favor the house in the long run, so the longer you play the closer you get to certainty that you will lose everything. That doesn’t bode well for those who play all the time.

Hi everyone. This is the Process, the newsletter for FlowingData members on data…

Michael Friendly, known for piecing together the history of visualization, chatted with Cabinet of Infographic Curiosities. I liked this tidbit on Charles-Joseph Minard:

Minard would likely be unknown today, if Marey had not so aptly said his flow map of Napoleon’s March on Moscow “defied the pen of the historian by its brutal eloquence.” Funkhouser picked this up, and then Tufte anointed it as “the greatest graphic ever drawn”. But in his time, Minard was just an engineer working for the École Nationale des Ponts et Chaussees (School of Bridges and Roads) in Paris. The corpus of his work lay buried in the archives of the ENPC. Today, Paris celebrates its intellectual and artistic heroes with place names, like Rue Descartes, Place Monge, …but there is nothing named for Minard. Not even his burial place was known until Antoine discovered this in Montparnasse Cemetery, and Les Chevaliers met for lunch and a celebration at his grave, where a small plaque was installed.

When Zillow removed climate risk scores from property listings, many assumed the company acted out of political pressure. The main issue though was that the risk models behind the scores were not reliable enough. For Bloomberg, Eric Roston reports:

“You have to know something about the individual structure — its foundation, the presence of a basement, first-floor height,” says Howard Botts, chief scientist of Cotality.

Each assumption that a model makes, implicitly or explicitly, adds another layer: land slope, a building’s use, how many stories it has.

“‘Climate risk’ is much more than just the physical hazard,” agrees Adam Pollack. “The relationship of hazard and the built environment — and damage — is the actual risk.”

Most climate models are abstract and high level out of necessity. Assessing risk at the individual level is tricky, especially when there are so many variables to consider. Plus, in the case of individual homes, the value of each is especially relevant to both buyers and sellers. You can’t just give a sweeping aggregate.

As hurricanes and wildfires grow more common in some areas, home values go down and insurance premiums go up. Claire Brown and Mira Rojanasakul report for the New York Times:

Since 2018, a financial shock in the home insurance market has meant that homes in the ZIP codes most exposed to hurricanes and wildfires would sell for an average of $43,900 less than they would otherwise, the research found. They include coastal towns in Louisiana and low-lying areas in Florida.

The Midwest seems to be hit hard by insurance premiums as well. I did not know hail was such an issue.

In parts of the hail-prone Midwestern states, insurance now eats up more than a fifth of the average homeowner’s total housing payments, which include mortgage costs and property taxes. In Orleans Parish, La., that number is nearly 30 percent.