this is the smidge, a.k.a. otto the cat.
i started calling her "pooch" not long after adoption, partly out of irony and partly because it's kind of a generic term of affection i give all new dogs i meet.
it evolved into "pidge," which was something our managing editor started calling our city editor, which i assumed was a phonetic pronunciation of the letters in "p-i-g," the original moniker he'd bestowed on him.
(i thought our m.e. was using it to praise brad the way the farmer in "babe" did to address the pig after the big competition at the end of the movie: "that'll do, pig.")
not long after, i skipped the plosive "p" for the easier continuant of "sm" and "smidge" was born, which was apt for the slight bit of mammal that she is.
i started calling her "pooch" not long after adoption, partly out of irony and partly because it's kind of a generic term of affection i give all new dogs i meet.
it evolved into "pidge," which was something our managing editor started calling our city editor, which i assumed was a phonetic pronunciation of the letters in "p-i-g," the original moniker he'd bestowed on him.
(i thought our m.e. was using it to praise brad the way the farmer in "babe" did to address the pig after the big competition at the end of the movie: "that'll do, pig.")
not long after, i skipped the plosive "p" for the easier continuant of "sm" and "smidge" was born, which was apt for the slight bit of mammal that she is.
(and, truth be told, i can sort of credit "mutts" for my understanding of living with cats. mcdonnell, in his spare, zen-like fashion, conveys the imaginings of feline thought and how "peoples," as the critters in the strip call us, experience life with pets. his work has provided a good kitty primer for a dog person like me; otto's actions are much less bewildering because of it.)
i mention all this because the image with this entry is titled "smidge-in-the-box," and it illustrates an observation of a mode of thinking i haven't exercised in at least five years.
back then, and in the 15 years previous, i was the owner/caretaker of indoor dogs, schnapps (a.k.a. grumpnet) and hogan, who were boon companions and all-around characters.
as mostly well-behaved and house-trained as they were, they probably also suffered separation anxiety, as all wee dogs do, i suspect. (they were miniature schnauzers.)
they wanted to go wherever we went, put up quite the fuss when we tried going anywhere and were noisily jubilant upon our return.
and while we missed them as well and were buoyed at the thought of their greeting us at the door, i also came to notice i was imperceptibly planning my scheduling into blocks of the fewest exits and entries as possible to minimize the drama -- and the guilt.
well, as the relatively new owner of a young cat, i find myself again doing the same thing.
otto is not nearly as anxiously demonstrative as schnapps and hogan were in sensing a departure, but she follows me to the door and, as often as not, sits before the big picture window watching my jeep in the driveway at least until i pull away.
if there's enough key-jangling or noise upon my return, she meets me at the door and rubs against my leg; a restrained greeting, but a greeting nonetheless. (sometimes she'll come to the window as i'm unlocking the door and i'll see this mute "meow" form on her face.)
kris says she can see when otto feels neglected from too much time away from the house, which might reading too much into things, but i can agree that there's probably some pent-up play waiting to be let loose when i haven't paid any attention to her.
i must say it's easier to leave a kitty because of the apparent lack of anxiety and, well, they're definitely more independent and self-sufficient by way of bathroom breaks and feeding.
i'm still fairly low on the cat learning curve, but i think i can say i've gleaned this much from my brief experience with one: i don't think even feline types enjoy existing in a social void. they seem to welcome a warm touch now and then, as much as any dog ever did -- no offense.