Archive for February 20th, 2010

Did recession end between June 2009 and August 2009?

February 20, 2010

Oscar Jorda of FRBSF writes a short paper which says:

The beginnings and ends of recessions are officially dated about 12 months after the fact. A common rule of thumb declares recessions as two quarters of consecutive negative GDP growth, but this is very inaccurate. A better option is to apply medical diagnostic evaluation methods to the business conditions indexes of the Chicago and Philadelphia Federal Reserve Banks, which suggests the recent recession ended in July or August 2009. 

The two indices links: Chicago Fed National Activity Index  and Philadelphia Fed’s Aruoba-Diebold-Scotti Business Conditions Index.

We have seen many people suggesting recession ended in mid-2009. But this is one of the first research papers I have come across which says when it ended. And it also informs of two indices which could be used as alternative predictors for recession dating.

Knock Knock Knocking on Central Bank’s door

February 20, 2010

Bob Dylan sang – Knock Knock Knocking on heaven’s door. Thomas Hoenig of Kansas Fed just says – Knocking on the Central Bank’s Door.

In managing our nation’s debt going forward, it strikes me that we have only three options. First, the worst choice for our long-term stability, but perhaps the easiest option in the face of short-term political pressures: We can knock on the central bank’s door and request or demand that it “print” money to buy the swelling amounts of government debt. Second, perhaps more tolerable politically, although damaging to our economy: We can do nothing so long as domestic and foreign markets are willing to fund our borrowing needs at inevitably higher interest rates. Or third, the most difficult and probably the least palatable politically: We can act now to implement programs that reduce spending and increase revenues to a more sustainable level.

I recognize that this last option involves hard choices and short-term pain. However, in my view it is the responsible path to sustainable economic growth with price stability.

Hoenig has been raising numerous concerns over US economy in the previous speeches as well. This is another one on fixing the US fiscal problems. In the end he says:

The only difference between countries that experience a fiscal crisis and those that don’t is the foresight to take corrective action before circumstance and markets harshly impose it upon them. In time, significant and permanent fiscal reforms must occur in the United States. I much prefer this be done well before anyone feels an irresistible impulse to knock on this central bank’s door.

Pretty harsh words.

Addendum:

Here is another central banker, Alex Weber  referring to Bob Dylan’s very apt song for economists- times are changing. So before the crisis, we say times are changing. Then as crisis strikes (to prevent meltdown) and even after the crisis (to prevent fiscal crisis), we sing knock knocking on central bank’s door.  🙂

Elizabeth Duke reviews her first year at Fed

February 20, 2010

Elizabeth Duke, Fed Governor, reviews her first year at the central bank . She calls it unusual and exigent.

The Federal Reserve has been entrusted with special authority to act in unusual and exigent circumstances. Webster’s dictionary defines unusual as “not usual, uncommon, rare.” It defines exigent as “requiring immediate aid or action.” I sincerely hope that financial panics such as the one we just experienced remain rare and uncommon.

Very useful overview of various Fed policies in this crisis. She like Bernanke (and many others) considers AIG support as the most difficult decision. Though she adds given the circumstances, she would still vote to give support to AIG. She even defends usage of Section 13 (3) to prevent another depression. Overall she is proud of the way Fed handled this crisis

The speech gives you hints of pressure Fed officials faced in this crisis. Though, it would have been nice if she had also gioven her views on how Fed plans to manage the huge moral hazard they have created.

Work with DEA on G-20 research issues

February 20, 2010

In case you work for a research organisation, your organisation could partner with Dept of Economic Affairs for working on G-20 issues.

As an important member of the G-20, India has to bring to the table its own assessment of the crisis and the evolving situation and offer its own considered views on global economic cooperation. India has not been a contributor to the global imbalances or to the failures on the financial regulation which are at the root of the crisis. In fact, Indian banking remained relatively unscathed from the excesses of global banking through sound regulation. India’s strong economic position in the midst of the global crisis makes placed to influence and contribute towards reshaping of the world economic and financial order by a research support system pertaining to global financial and economic issues. The DEA proposes to develop such a system by partnering with one or more research organizations (called the Partnering Research Organisation/s- in short the PRO/s).

The research should be able to negotiating positions for India on these issues. It should, the issues posed for research:

  • Clearer understanding of Global Current Status (especially with reference to G 20 countries) and India’s Current Domestic status and standing on these issues.

  • Indian Perspectives and egotiating positions on these issues for the G 20 deliberations

  • Issues important to other countries and groupings.

  • Issues that should be raised by India

Read the concept note for details. 

Let your research organisation know. It could be good learning and networking with DEA.

 


Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started