Peter Ainsworth writes in IEA blog:
Trump’s executive action-fuelled battles with woke universities fill the headlines. Columbia has capitulated; “heroic” Harvard holds its £53bn-endowment-funded ground. But these are skirmishes – tactical spats in a broader culture war. The real strategic shift is unfolding quietly in Congress, where profound legislative proposals to restructure university finance are advancing. If enacted, they won’t just reshape American higher education – they could undermine the UK’s global standing as the world’s No. 2 provider.
Enter the College Cost Reduction Act (CCRA), introduced by Representative Virginia Foxx, Chair of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce. A key component is institutional risk-sharing – where universities accept some liability for student loan defaults. This idea had been circulating in Republican policy circles for some time, and the bill was formally introduced in January 2024. At the time, it went nowhere—just one of several structural reform ideas parked under a Democratic president and a divided Congress.
But Trump’s return to the White House, coupled with Republican control of both Houses, has propelled the idea back onto the legislative agenda. What’s new is that key provisions have now been introduced to the House as the ‘Student Success and Taxpayer Savings Plan’. A revolutionary structural reform that once looked purely theoretical is now a live prospect. Amid headlines fixated on campus protests and DEI rollbacks, the CCRA carries a deeper ambition: a legislative mechanism for holding universities financially accountable when their graduates fail to repay their loans.
There is an opportunity to fix long term issues in UK univs:
Under the current model, where universities are paid on recruitment, the graduate earnings premium has been in long-term decline. The only way to reverse it is to link institutional remuneration to graduate success, as the Americans are proposing to do. Done well, that would motivate universities to reduce costs and/or reorient courses toward real labour market value, reestablishing the economic relevance of higher education.
What’s needed now is political courage. Risk-sharing isn’t just a technical reform—it’s a reset of the relationship between students, universities, and the state. The U.S. is moving first. If the UK hesitates, America – and any country that follows its lead – will improve the economic returns of their degrees, while the UK becomes less appealing to the international students who pay most of the bills.
The UK still has the infrastructure, the reputation, and the global footprint to lead. But unless universities are rewarded for delivering real value – measured in outcomes, not enrolments – it risks slipping into the second tier: still talking about the problem, while others get on with solving it.