Venezuela

ImageI’m no specialist on South America but some thing are clear. This operation was legal-it’s precedent i the operation in Panama some years ago, but this is cleaner/. Panama i now quite rich because it was rescued from a drug lord tyrant. With luck, Venezuela will be similar, it has a democratic tradition which has been suppressed but a lot of the people remember.

The other thing that caused this is that the illegitimate regime was cozying up to Russia, China, and Iran, we nzve always physically opposed colonialism in the New World, but these three ar obvious threats to free people everywhere. Remember the Monroe Doctrine  was put into place to stop Europe (read mostly, France, Spain, and Metternich’s Austria) from recolonizing the South American republics that had freed themselves under the leadership of Simón Bolívar and José de San Martín during the Napoleonic Wars. You probably know that Prime Minister of Great Britain George Canning, proposed it to President Monroe (not least to protect their trade relations with the continent) but Secretary of State John Quincy Adams advised that the United States should not give the impression of a ccocksboat in the wake of the British Man-of-War, and so we promulgated it on our own, knowing that the Royal Navy would enforce it, as they did.

Not the only time the two countries cooperated in those days. The US Atlantic Squadro9n also cooperated with the Royal Navy in stopping the transatlantic slave trade. That importation of slave was banned on January 1, 1808, during Thomas Jefferson’s presidency, the earliest that allowed by the Constitution. Slavery was already illegal in Britain, arguably it always was. The3 abolition of slavery in the US would eventually cost the lives of more than 600,000 Americans, more than ll the wars of America from The Revolution till most of the way through Vietnam.

Anyway, what are the Venezuelans thinking about it. To soon to tell, but a lot of the ones here same to be approving eustatically. Here’s one of them with the guys from Triggernometry:

I’m very happy with the removal of this illegitimate ruler. My only caveat, is that we might have some short term things, military and financial, to help them recover our real gift is to give them the chance to fix there own country. We should remember that the day the US invaded Grenada is now a Grenadian holiday. We ain’t perfect, so we need to learn when to but out.


So this matters but not maybe as much as she thinks.

Ordinary Joes

Image

HST, Attlee and Mackenzie-King

Yesterday, I noted Jess’s article on St. Joseph had a follow up? This is it, fom 2012. shortly after Romney had (deservedly) been defeated by Obama. I clearly remember John Charmley asking if that was the best we could do? The answer was a rueful “Yes, it was.” then but that changed in 2015. Jess spoke to us thirteen years ago about acoule of men, whose ideas had there flaws but who were indeed representatives of their people. Let’s have look at what she said.

On my own blog yesterday I wrote a post on St. Joseph – ‘an ordinary Joe’. I hope no one finds it in poor taste to call a Saint that, but for me that’s the point of him for us other ordinary folk. Neo here speaks, like so many of those who post here, as one of ‘we the people’. From where I sit a long a way aways, the problem I see is the one you guys have – no one is listening to Ordinary Joes.  We, like you, have a bunch of Fancy Dans, guys and gals for whom politics is everything and who get a good living from it; but like you, we don’t think they understand us – or even want to.

The politicians aren’t like us – they are obsessed with politics for a start. Through my co-author I know a few professional politicians, and when they come home they are full of who is ‘in and who is ‘out’ and what job x is getting, or who y is sleeping with; they are fixated on the process. Perhaps they weren’t all like this, and of course we know they are not and that there are some, like Rebecca Hamilton, who set the most marvellous example; but do these politician prosper in their profession? How many of them get to ‘the top’?

When that smooth-talking guy Tony Blair wooed us UK voters, I was in my teens, and because I am not easily impressed by such guys, I kept a tight hand on my virtue; I wish others had, as he thoroughly debauched the economy and political life. He rode the great tide of easy money and he made the sorts of promises which seducers maake to innocent young ladies; but when she woke up and found herself pregnant, where was he to be found? Why, nowhere, he’d found another mistress – money.

There was a time when politicians paid to be politicians because they were wealthy enough to spend their own money on public life. Men like George Washington and Thomas Jefferson were not plutocrats or millionaires, but they had enough and they lived off it and served the Republic. Even very recently, someone like Harry S Truman could leave public office no wealthier than he entered it. Over here the other successful Labour leader, Clement Attlee, had his wife drive him round when he campaigned against the great Winston Churchill in 1945. They used to stop by the side of the road and have a picnic, and then she’d drive Clem off to give a speech somewhere. He, too, left office no richer than he had entered it.

Ordinary Joes could relate to Harry S or Attlee. No one had to agree with their politics, and they could be nasty ‘sobs’ when they wanted, but they were like us – they lived in the world we lived in. Attlee looked like a provincial bank manager, Truman like he ran a drapers store or sold dry goods. When Attlee was pictured smoking a pipe it was because he smoked a pipe; when his later successor, Harold Wilson was so pictured, it was because it was a good ‘image’; made him look down to earth and one of the people, even when he wasn’t.

But hey, at least back then they wanted to look like us. Now they don’t care, they flaunt their wealthy connections and their jets and their privilege. Nothing is too good for the representatives of the people. Shame about the people themselves – where’d it all go wrong?

That’s about as good a description of the grifters all of us in the west are infested with as I’ve read. One thing she missed though; George Washington was one of the richest men in the American Colonies, yer he volunteered to put his neck in the noose, and to live almost eight years in a tent, then serve eight years as President. Then he gave it all up, even though the country didn’t want him too. When King George heard this he commented to John Adams, then Minister to the Court of St. James (England) and the kings friend, “Then he shall be the greatest man of the age”.

But Jess is right, the aristocratic Virginian, and the Labour politician, whose policies nearly bankrupted the United Kingdom, were authentic, and they were men you understood and reflected their people.

But for us something changed after the ‘Reign of Error’, quite suddenly in 2015, an orange man came down a golden escalator. My how he scared and still scares the grifters in both parties. I was slow to see it, I liked and still like Ted Cruz, but the people, the Demos, the Populi, saw more clearly.

You can take this too far, easily in fact, President Trump acts more like Andy Jackson or maybe his favorite, Theodore Roosefelt, but are also echoes of Washington there, in the willingness to spend his own wealth on the country, and strict adherence to the law. Don’t forget Washington took the field as Commander in Chief,  when whiskey distillers in western Pennsylvania refused to pay the excise tax on their product. Wonder what he would have done with our illegals? They’re probably lucky Trump is President. Even to ordering the six frigates (including USS Constitution) to protect our commerce from the French, and the Barbary pirates.

By the way, after Eisenhower was inaugurated, Harry and Bess got in their personal car and drove home to Missouri.

Life, Liberty, and Libertinism

ImageAgain, I’m going to reach back to one of our old friends, also the holder of an Oxford doctorate, and a celebrated albeit retired, head of a distinguished Yorkshire boys school, Geoffrey RS Sales.

Here he gives an excellent overview of how ‘life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness has come to mean an anti-Christian libertinism, rather than Anglo-American ordered liberty counterbalanced by duty.

This too is from 2016, and was published on All Along the Watchtower.

Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness seems to have become shorthand for the objectives the modern world places before us as being desirable: we should exercise and take care of our bodies not because they are the temple of the Holy Spirit, but because that will allow us to live longer; we want to be as free as possible because that will allow us to fulfil all our needs; and we are entitled to be happy. I don’t blame this on the Americans (although they have to answer for popularising it), it is the underpinning ethos of the liberal ideology which pervades the modern world. There is nothing in this of repentance, self-denial and self-sacrifice, let alone of obedience to the divine law as revealed to us through Christian practice and theory. We must be free to believe what we want, do what we want (as long as it is not illegal), buy what we want (with the same caveat); the accumulation of goods is a proxy for the good life; the more ‘stuff’ we have, the happier we are – as the Rolling Stones put it many years ago:

When I’m watchin’ my tv and a man comes on and tell me
How white my shirts can be
But, he can’t be a man ’cause he doesn’t smoke
The same cigarettes as me

I sometimes wonder whether the modern definition of bliss is not quite close to older definitions of a kind of hell? A raucous cacophony of the assertion of ‘my right’ to have what “i want’ when ‘I want it’, and devil take the hindermost.

Christianity is the real counter culture. We are adjured to take care of the orphan and the widow, we are told to share of our good things, and we are required to do so within God’s plan for these things – His will, not our will is what we ask to be done – not much liberty of happiness there in the world’s eyes, but for Christians this is where we find both – as well as a purpose in our lives which raises us above the ranks of apes gathering fruit in the forests. Jesus is not hot on possessions, and he is not big on self-indulgence – the parable of the Prodigal is, among other things, a commentary on where hedonism leads. We see, in the Christian communities in Acts, the way in which coming to Christ led men and women to a more generous attitude toward their fellows, and we see how the different communities would try to help each other. We know from the history of the very early church that it was this sort of community spirit which gave such a powerful witness that others came to be helped, and stayed to help others.

Again, you should read it all. Also note that while the phrase itself is clearly based on John Locke’s Two Treatises on Government,  which provides much of the foundation of American and  English (after the Glorious Revolution) governance, Jefferson also packed a lot of French enlightenment, the source of many bad ideas which we see to this day on the left, both here and in the Anglosphere.

And that is the dichotomy between the government and the people has roots.

Corporatism Destroying Communities

Overview of Miller, NE DowntownThis is where I live and in fact, I worked in it for about a year. If this goes through, it will just about shut down three counties and seriously hurt at all through Nebraska, and neighboring states. There are rumors here that Tyson got fed up with Walmart constantly trying to push the price down and even opening a small packing plant of their own in North Platte. That doesn’t preclude what the  vvideo speaks of, either. This is a good  video and pretty much on point.

I remember Northwest Indiana, when the mills closed, that mess is memorialized to this day in the ruins of Gary, Indiana. This has the potential to be worse. How Washington reacts will affect how I vote next year, especially since I’m not a major fan of Ricketts, who is basically a product of the NEGOP machine. So we’ll see.

Note from Neo.  I’m typing on my touch screen, which is a slow and painful process, so forgive me for the dearth of  posts. I’ve lots in drafts but this is a pain! Soon. 🙂

Common Sense

A real post is coming soon but for now some common sense from Elon on what the NYC election today means.

See ya soon. Neo

 

 

MS. Smith goes to Washington

Watch this and then we’ll talk about this.

It’s a pretty hood comparison isn’t it? But not quite. I think it closer to compare her to John Hancock and Company, you know The Second Continental Congress, Who trued so hard to remain both British and free citizens. They found it impossible and so America was born in the only successful revolution in history It succeeded primarily because of 150 years of self governm4nt and our English Political heritage boyh of which Alberta shares/ Sp,ethig else hey share is a memory of that ;omh ahp Ju;y 5th/ many pf their ancestors were tere, but though independence a ste[ too far, and so left for Canada. But that doesn’t mean they didn’t share much of what Jefferson wrote

.We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world

And note that not only are the Prairie Provinces considering this, so even i our common Mother, England itself, is once again.

So what does that mean to u. for the moment we are France, wishing Alberta and Canada well but knowing we cannot help except with the prayer of free mem an women. In a sense we are the Deringer in Ms Smiths handbag, which I suspect is a hand down from Maggie herself. Pierre had the role of Pitt the Elder, Edmund Burke, and Charles James Fox of trying to make a tyrannical government see its errors and back off.

Taking all of Canada is not a wise move any more than asking the 13 colonies into France would have been, it will make no one happy. Yes, the Praries Provinces would probably be alright, but without them who is going to keep Ontario and Quebec from freezing while the starve in the dark, for that is their sure and certain fate..3

 

.Ah, yes, King George is worried about misinformation in America so he will henceforth appoint and pai al judicial personnel in the colonies and any trial that really matter will be heard in Admiralty Court, in London, if we get around to it You rabble sit down and shut up.

 

OK one of my favorite singers, a ginger Brit,, of course, had a hit back in 1949. Enjoy