As told by The Daily KOS

And PoliticusUSA

And Reuters

The Hill live-streamed it

NBC, BBC, CNN Gawker and Rolling Stone all provide coverage and positive media attention 🙂

Some of these Democrats are straight from the 60’s where sit-ins and public protests were practically invented. Nice to see the old tactics pulled from the closet, dusted off and put to good use again!

UPDATE:
This is video of how it started-
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/democrats-hold-sit-in-on-house-floor-to-demand-action-on-guns-20160622

Rolling Stone - Dems Sit-in

UPDATE TWO
And this is how it ended:
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/facing-democratic-sit-paul-ryan-takes-his-house-and-goes-home?cid=sm_fb_maddow

 

How true is this!

walking with scissors

SPECIAL UPDATE:

An Australian group called Gun Control Australia is calling for a boycott of all non-essential travel to the USA until the country fixes its gun problem. Full Story + video Here

Oz poised to boycott America

Personally I think this is an excellent idea and I hope other countries get on board. Travel Boycotts and trade sanctions would not be out of line.

… not just a few countries… THE REST OF THE ENTIRE WORLD thinks US gun control laws are beyond stupid.

Jeff puts it into perspective with humour. But really it’s not funny.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lL8JEEt2RxI

I may have published this before… old age is definitely setting in… but I don’t care… it’s worth watching again 🙂

Found on Facebook:
Blaming Musicians

Raw Cupcakes

Republicans Got There First

Pro-Lifers vs Guns

Atheists Posting Online

gun-nuttery 01

Another stroke of gun-nuttery from The Daily Kos…

In  a gun-nutshell, this family is on a canoe trip when one of the men (aged 24)  needs to pee. They pull onto the bank (this particular stretch of riverbank is referred to as a gravel bar)  and get out of the canoe.  The young man who needs to pee goes off to do so and another man appears waving a gun at the remaining couple (a young man and his wife) on the river’s edge. He screams at them to get off his land. Confusion reigns.

The salient details of this story are confusing and – I’m guessing – not all in as yet. (Click on gun-nuttery above for full story.) But for me those details shouldn’t even be a part of the discussion. For me, the only details that matter are these:\

Vacationers, American citizens on a day excursion in their own country, in their own home state, boating on a river for which they pay taxes to maintain, are threatened at gun point and ultimately shot at – with the end result of one death – all for the crime of exiting their canoe long enough to pee in the bushes.

Tell me again how it’s a constitutional right to bear arms. Go ahead. I dare you.

gun-nuttery 02

gun-nuttery 04

gun-nuttery 03

gun-nuttery 05

gun-nuttery 06

… would you still fight as hard for the right to smoke, 200 years later, after science had proven how dangerous it was? And not just dangerous to the person smoking but to those around him?

The science that unmasked the inherent dangers of gun violence in the United States has been successfully suppressed by National Rifle Association lobbyists since the 1980’s. Just like the big Tobacco companies before them, the NRA paid elected officials to quash current and make illegal any future research on the issue of gun violence.

If you’d known about the science, would you still hold so tightly to your 2nd Amendment rights that you would oppose any form of gun control – slash – regulations research or legislation concerning public availability of military-style weapons or super ammo?

It seems to me this issue is a chance for us to evolve as a society or prove we are no better educated than our slave-holding, tobacco-growing forefathers.

Yesterday I read this article about how MI lawmakers went behind closed doors to bully through legislature, a law that will allow guns in schools – and they did this literally hours ahead of the Sandy Hook school shooting. I posted the link on my FB page and got this unexpected reply:

[Click to enlarge]

Living in the Past

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I think I’m over proponents of no gun-control laws throwing the Second Amendment in my face. It might have been a good idea at the time but like all things, times change and we either embrace the changes or drown in our own stubborn ignorance.

The above commenter lives in Michigan and like so many other gun-toting Americans believes that if everyone owned a gun the Adam Lanzas of this world would be stopped dead in their tracks and all the victims would be saved.

Excuse me – but I think someone’s watched too many westerns and confused John Wayne with the average school teacher.

By the time a heroic school admin (or any other private citizen) identified a shooting was taking place, found, dusted off and loaded their Smith & Wesson, the guy with the semi-automatic would have already fired off at least 30 shots and would now be staring at the admin with a Paul Hogan-ish That’s not a gun – THIS is a gun look in his eye. And then the hero would be dead, too.

As a nation we are not trained to react to terrorist danger, use sophisticated firearms or think like an experienced Navy Seal. It would take our brains way too long to process all the information coming at us with lightning speed. We’re lucky to have the time and wherewithal  to hide our kids in closets and cabinets.

Private ownership of guns has passed its use-by date and it’s really time to rethink the whole concept.

I have a cousin with epilepsy. He’s not allowed to drive a car. He can, however, go to any gun show and buy a semi-automatic weapon and unlimited ammo. Go America.