Vulnerabilities are Superpowers


Image

If we pay attention, our vulnerabilities become our superpowers. Winston Churchill, considered one of the greatest public speakers of all time, struggled with a speech impediment. Noel Gallagher, singer and lead guitarist and songwriter for the rock band Oasis, had a stutter. 

There’s something alchemical and inspiring about a problem turning into a strength. 

I’ve experienced this in my own little way. My family moved to the United States from San Salvador when I was five years old. I didn’t speak English because my primary caretaker had been Solita, a Salvadoran who only spoke Spanish. 

My father, himself a Swiss immigrant, spoke limited English as well. We moved to the rural Wyoming town of Centennial, home to just fifty people and many, many cows. 

Centennial had a downtown of sorts, and in it was a metal trailer turned ice cream parlor.  One exciting day my dad brought my sister and me in for ice cream. I was a cheerful kid, and tried to engage with the large, pretty woman serving the ice cream.  

“Are you pregnant or are you just fat?” I asked her with a big smile in my friendliest voice. She did not smile back. Her scowl surprised me. My father tried his best to intervene. 

“I’m sorry,” he said, “we’re just teaching her English and we haven’t taught her how to lie yet.” He also smiled his friendliest smile, and laughed a little bit as well. Her frowny face lines made it clear she was mad. I did not know what I did wrong. Nor did my father understand why his attempt to explain my faux pas went awry. 

Needless to say, we were not popular among the locals. 

Now, decades later, I believe my ease and skill in communicating comes directly from my inability to do so. 

From birth until I was five, my family lived in three countries with three languages and three separate cultural norms about discussing bodily differences (absolutely celebrated in Jamaica, my birthplace, where a bus driver would cheerfully call out “Fatty, you break ‘da bus” when a larger lady boarded). 

A million communication mistakes ensued. In second grade my friend told me her dad was in the Navy. “That’s silly,” I said, “your dad can’t be inside a color.” I was sure she was joking. She thought I was disrespecting the military. 

All of this heightened my awareness of how important and delicate communication was, of how intensely I wanted to understand others and to make myself understood. 

In my work as a therapist, my clients often have trauma histories that create vulnerable feelings of urgency, anxiety and dread. 

But also, dealing with trauma creates within them a strong capacity for empathy, compassion and commitment to protect the vulnerable.  These qualities might not exist if they hadn’t once experienced victimhood in the hands of the powerful. 

If we pay attention, our vulnerabilities become our superpowers. 

Real Things Living


Image
Photo by Katarzyna Modrzejewska on Pexels.com

Tanya Ruckstuhl LICSW

I’m so lucky to get to meet dynamic, interesting people in my work, and through my writing life. Brigitte Cutsall, the host of the “Real Things Living” podcast is one of those folks. She’s a generous-spirited, curious interviewer and I loved being on her show. I hope you enjoy it as much as I did!

Here are the links:

Spotity – https://bit.ly/4nIhekB

Apple – https://bit.ly/466qUz6

iHeart Radio – https://bit.ly/4kunKbJ

YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tp8FXm9HFHs&t=1244s

The Great (micro) Escape


Image
Photo by Matthias Zomer on Pexels.com

By Tanya Ruckstuhl LICSW

Today I am writing about time off, not from work, but from marriage. Not in any kind of alarming, relationship-dismantling kind of way, but more like a vacation from the normal pattern of cohabitation.

My husband bought a decrepit, tear-down house in Southern California during Covid. He proceeded to revive it from the studs, learning along the way how to frame, hang sheetrock, install trim, lay tile, create irrigation, and stagger asphalt shingles.

Sometimes I accompany him, but mostly I stay home, working and eating seafood (which he detests and I adore), going out with friends every evening (he wishes I would mostly stay home and adore him), and cleaning my house to surgical standards. I have time now to wash the curtains, replace the vacuum filters, clean out the leftovers, launder and hang dry all the blankets, use baby bottle cleaners to scrub out the hummingbird feeders.

I read two books a week when he’s out of town, and just when I miss him too much to enjoy my freedom, he comes home.

Meanwhile he enjoys his time off just much: he sleeps on the couch in front of the television which he never turns off, cuddling the dog which I am allergic to. He eats fast food of frozen food for every meal. He doesn’t shave or shower more than occasionally.  He goes to Home Depot three times a day and doesn’t keep track of his receipts and throws away anything he can’t use because I’m not around to nag him about wasting money.

Buying a property in another state is an extreme—and expensive—proposition and I can’t recommend it to anyone: The short-term rental that we now manage in the adorable and fixed up home is sometimes more effort than our full-time jobs combined in terms of aggravation, and with a wee fraction of the income to boot.

But it gives us a break from one another. He doesn’t have me insisting the countertops be wiped down just so and can just sort of push the food residue around with his laptop and then later not even notice that its greasy and covered in crumbs.

I believe every successful relationship is a cross-cultural endeavor with each party bringing their own experiences, expectations, and preferences, each member instinctively—and incorrectly–believing that they alone are doing things the “right” way. It takes years of soul searching and honest communication and compromise to find a middle path that both can walk: one where each person’s non-negotiables are met, and both parties are willing to live with the idiosyncrasies of their beloved.

My wish for you this glorious spring is both that you have love in your life and that you get to take a break from that very same beloved. Whatever floats your boat—and not your partner’s boat—I hope you get all of it, companionship and solitude, the full range of your heart’s desire. And I hope you don’t think there is anything wrong with you or with your relationship if you relish escaping once in a while.

How To Be Human and Not An A$$hole


Image

Announcing “How to Be Human and Not an A$$hole”

I’m thrilled to announce my new book How to Be Human and Not an A$$hole is now available on Amazon in both print and Kindle editions!

This is a collection of essays, blog posts, public speaking, and reflections on how to help us all (firstly, me: I am my first intended audience as I have strong assholic tendencies!) wrestle with self-centeredness and the fleeting desire to bonk people on the head when they piss us off.

If you think you might relate, this book will at least help you feel less alone, and hopefully can help you develop some skills to be a less frequent asshole.

I would be honored if you checked it out: https://www.amazon.com/How-be-Human-Not-hole/dp/B0F3XXXBRW/ref=sr_1_1?crid=280S15484KBVE&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.bLJoX_WxoYuUm1-aHUlIpIwjDM7zgLsIP9Uwul9J-WXGjHj071QN20LucGBJIEps.yhXUkA8N2Z9NDPSPGrMciDmKJMRw5Gi-WZ_sladY1ak&dib_tag=se&keywords=how+to+be+human+and+not+an+a%24%24hole&qid=1744841720&sprefix=how+to+be+human+and+not+an+a+hole%2Caps%2C181&sr=8-1

I’ve Thought About it and I’ve Changed My Mind….


Image
Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

by Tanya Ruckstuhl LICSW

I wish this were only true of my clients and not me personally: but it’s not. Lately, I’ve been discussing a phenomenon one of my clients cleverly dubbed “Delayed Emotional Processing,” for her own need for time to figure out how she feels about an interaction that brings up emotions.

I love the neutralizing effect of putting a label on a common experience (I thought I felt one way but really, I feel differently/more/less than I realized) that can elicit self-criticism, self-doubt, and relationally inconvenient things like changing our minds about previously made agreements.

Decades ago, I took an “Imaging the Goddess” class at a new age bookstore in the town I attended college. One of the exercises involved standing in a circle, declaring: “the goddess in me salutes the goddess in you” while holding our right hand on the heart of the person next to us. The person next to me was one of the few men in the class, and when his turn came, instead of putting his hand on my heart, he stuck his hand out and cupped my breast. I was so shocked I did nothing.  After all, I told myself, maybe this was a particularly goddess-ey way to do this exercise, boobs being a particularly feminine body part. No one said anything. Later, the facilitator asked me if she should have intervened and I reassured her that it was fine. After all, my co-dependent self didn’t want to make her feel bad.  It was only later, after thinking about this greasy and gross man touching my breast without permission, that I realized I was disgusted by what he did and angry at the facilitator for failing to stop and correct him, and finally, angry at myself for going along, even reassuring the woman running the class that what he did was okay with me.

This was a small-potato, unpleasant event in my life: nothing more came of it, I avoided the guy henceforth in the class and had no dealings with him outside of it. He had no power over me emotionally, financially, or in my circle of connections. I was not afraid of him and he was not an ongoing presence or perpetrator in my life. So the event was not traumatic, but it was yucky.

And it perfectly illustrates the difference between how I acted “everything is fine” and how I later felt: disgusted and pissed off.

We all need to give ourselves permission to take time to connect to and identify our feelings and needs after an emotional event. It’s okay to think (or not think) and act one way at one time, and then to think and feel another way about it later. VITAL CAVEAT: So long as we don’t expect other people to read our minds. The responsibility to create a mutually acceptable reality is shared by all participating, and no one is more or less important than anyone else.

Emotional experiences take time to process. This concept is for ladies in particular, because we are raised to be other-focused and self-sacrificing, and then can catapult into rage and resentment when we give too much.  My wish for us is the grace and generosity to give ourselves and those around us ample freedom and permission to say, “I’ve thought about it and I’ve changed my mind…”

How Grownups Think


Image

Tanya Ruckstuhl LICSW

Long ago, late at night when my twins were perhaps four or five years old, we were all asleep and I heard one of my boys–who had been struggling with potty training–holler from his bedroom, anger and disappointment in his voice:

“Mom!  You should have woken me up!” I knew what this meant: He had peed himself in his sleep, but because he was young and experienced everything as my responsibility, in his mind I was the one who had failed.

“I was asleep!” I hollered back.

A moment of silence, followed by a grumpy voice:

“Well, you should have woken me up anyways.”

I got up and helped him change his clothes and the sheets on his bed, and we both went back to sleep. Eventually he learned to wake up when he needed to go to the bathroom, and we all got a better night’s sleep.

I love this story because it beautifully illustrates the difference between how kids think: the adults in charge have all the power and all the responsibility, and how adults think: we have some of the power, and most of the responsibility.

When I was in college, I had a professor whose beloved wife died of cervical cancer. In discussing his experience of the medical system, he stated great bitterness: “If only doctors wouldn’t medically hex their patients by telling them they were terminal, those patients could live.” His belief was that the cancer might not have been fatal, if only the doctor hadn’t pronounced it so.

Some years later I worked with a woman whose husband died of pancreatic cancer and she said, “If only the doctor had told us he was terminal, we would have spent more time together and wasted less trying to treat the cancer and act like everything was normal.”

All three of these stories are about the perception of authority figures from the perspective of people with limited power who need help.

None of them involve anyone acting with malicious intent: not the authority figure and not the person complaining about the authority figure’s behavior.

It’s important for our own mental health to remember that the rate of sociopathy holds steady between three and five percent, meaning there are legitimately dangerous, malignant people in the world, but mostly we are made up of the sleeping mother, the potty-training kid, the frightened person navigating a health crisis, the doctor who can’t get it right if they give the bad news straight or if they soft pedal it.

In this divisive political season, I believe: Authority figures have limited power to solve their own problems, much less the problems of other people. If a country like Mexico, overrun by crime and poverty, lies next to a country like America where even poor people can get food from food banks and soup kitchens and Tanif programs, no one is going to be able to stop them from crossing our borders. Neither a republican nor a democrat. If the global economy has outsourced production to developing counties with lower cost goods and labor, nothing is going to turn back the clock to a time when our cars and clothes and shoes were made in America, in factories staffed by union members who could afford to buy a house and pickup truck while their wives stayed home to raise their children. Not a republican nor a democrat.

Anyone who tells you they can take a starving person and stop them from immigrating is either a liar or they are plotting mass murder.  Anyone who tells you they can bring back manufacturing to this country, that they will be able to take our least marketable-skill-specialized citizens and give them a living wage is either delusional or a liar.

It’s time for us to be our own trusted authority figures, to be appropriately skeptical swallowing a comforting story about someone else taking care of us. Sociopaths present as saviors, with tempting candy and promises of help. Grownups check in with their own understanding of reality and maintain intellectual autonomy, checking promises other people make against the possible distortion of the speaker’s agenda and assessing what is their realistic capacity to bring about results. Barring disability, grownups assume the mantle of responsibility for themselves.

A sense of personal agency (aka power) is a cornerstone of mental health. If we are lucky enough to live in a democracy, voting is one of the ways we can exercise it. No matter which party or candidate you back, I hope you think for yourself this season, and I hope you vote.

The Urban-Rural Divide


Image
Photo by Archie Binamira on Pexels.com

By Tanya Ruckstuhl LICSW

I love playing with questions that defy tidy answers.  Stories, parables, and folk/fairy tales illuminate humankind’s perennial issues: individual identity, connection with others, conflict. Barbara Kingsolver’s brilliant, sometimes painful-to-read book Demon Copperhead is a deep dive into intergenerational trauma, addiction, and the urban/rural divide. Trauma and addiction are familiar story topics, but her exploration of the urban/rural divide blew my mind. Specifically, how rural or “land” people are more self sufficient and pay less taxes than urban or “city” people, and how this creates an economic agenda to encourage migration to the city. This is done by depicting rural or land people in the media as stupid, unsophisticated country bumpkins while casting city people as glamorous, intelligent, and cool.  This manipulative programming creates a yearning for the big city life, where the formerly rural now must work for others to make money to buy food and services, where once they could work their land and grow, hunt and fish their food.

Another angle on this rural/urban identity has come from the Martyrmade podcast by Darryl Cooper on “Fear and Loathing in New Jerusalem,” which I’ve been listening to in an attempt to develop a more robust historical understanding of the Israel/Palestine conflict. He makes an interesting point about rural tribal identity versus urban national identity. In areas with long-standing, intergenerational residents, there is more nepotism, more kinship ties, more tribal identity and distrust of state institutions as interlopers and power thieves. In higher density, more mobile, urban areas, there are smaller nuclear families, less history and loyalty to place, and greater trust in state mechanisms to set the rules and solve conflict as well as greater national identity. National identity is good for political stability because it ties people together who hail from different religions, locations, and cultures: the melting pot idea.

To be a fully functional adult, we each must navigate both the communal “we” and the individual “me:” This means figuring out how to belong to a group for the purposes of education, employment, intimacy, and friendships, as well as holding on to our individual identity to retain some sense of autonomy or freedom of choice. We must know ourselves as individuals to know what we want.  We take that individual awareness into our decisions to join or leave a group.  We balance the importance of our group belongingness against the importance of our individual identity to know when to go along versus when to dissent within the group or to leave it altogether.

I was born in a developing country with tremendous poverty and corruption. I do not share my fellow liberal’s misty-eyed views of decentralized government, but probably would if I didn’t have personal experience that made me grateful for government structure. One of my bestie’s husbands grew up on a Montana farm. He has a whole collection of guns, and while this is unusual for Seattle folk, it is completely normal for people who grow up in areas where the police are too far away to arrive quickly if you are in danger.

Are you more city (mobile, specialized, liberal) or country (self-sufficient, kinship obliged, suspicious of outsiders)? How much of this identity has absolutely nothing to do with you individually assessing the various perspectives out there and deciding what you believe to be most sound? I would wager: all of your urban or rural identity and the resulting personality traits likely have nothing to do with you. We are products of our environment and some of these influences are so subtle, we don’t even see them.

Take nursing homes and day care. City people put their youngsters as well as their elders in the care of others because most of the time, both members of a couple work full time and don’t have time to do it themselves. Rural people take care of them at home, because often only one member of a couple works full time and as a result, they don’t have the money to do it differently. Both groups are (let us hope) deeply concerned with the protection and wellbeing of their loved ones, they just happen to solve the problem of providing care in different ways because most have no choice and the ones who do, look around and imitate what is done in their communities.

Sometimes, it’s helpful to look at our behaviors and the values they convey as vestigial clutter we carry around, like VHS tapes or wisdom teeth. Once upon a time wisdom teeth were insurance: back then, we lived in pre-dental societies when jaws were larger and tooth loss common. Once upon a time, VHS tapes were cutting edge 80’s entertainment.

What do you think is true because you happen to live in a place where others think it is true?  What might you be missing out on from your limited perspective?  What seems dead obvious to any of us in terms of politics, science, religion, or current trends may be entirely a product of when and where we happen to come from…not something to feel proud or self-righteous about. My hope is that we each can retain some intellectual autonomy to be curious and equally skeptical about beliefs and conclusions both within and outside of our group identities.  Just as conflict between two people starts to soften the minute one can honestly say to the other “I see your point,” our ability to step outside of our own perspectives is radical and healing.