You Let Him Hit It Raw, Now You Are a Single Mom

Several years ago, Warren Farrell published The Boy Crisis, which documented the negative life outcomes for kids who grew up without an actively engaged dad. From it, I noted the causal link between dad deprivation and a broad range of public policy issues like criminality, gun violence, terrorism, mass shootings, poverty, child abuse, mental illness, suicide, drug abuse, welfare dependency, education failure, and health problems. I am just saying a little common-sense single mom control could solve a lot of expensive problems.

This week on X the sex war in politics focused for a moment on Fresh unintentionally putting a bun in the oven.

For those wise enough to not know, Fresh (Walter Weekes) is part of a podcasting duo called Fresh & Fit. Their stick is to bring many Miami party girls, Instagram thots, and OnlyFans sex workers on their show where the guys neg them and explain to the girls why women are awful and dumb. On the Fresh & Fit podcast, what is best in life for a man in current year is to have sex with many women without commitment. While media types and commentators incorrectly label them as Red Pill, it is accurate to call them pickup artists or dating coaches who seek to profit by teaching men how to get chicks. Reportedly for Fresh & Fit that includes in practice propositioning their show’s guests and paying prostitutes. Basically Fresh & Fit are low self-esteem posers who convince too many women to have sex with them.

That is not exactly news as this diagnosis of them is years old. However, audio of a conversation has been made public between Fresh and Daisy Chen claiming to be pregnant by him. Maybe he is the daddy, but he should ask Maury because a third of paternity tests are negative. In the recording, Fresh tells her to get an abortion. When he isn’t offering marriage, she goes for the bag by threatening him with child support, then she immediately put him on blast.

While this should be a private matter between Fresh and his reported baby momma, it is of political significance because of child support in the courts, welfare for irresponsible single mothers, and the public debate over abortion. Meanwhile the usual collection of women (feminists, trad wives, and trad-influencer single moms) are using Fresh’s failures as a man to dismiss the legitimacy of all complaints that men have about legal issues related to heterosexual relationships in current year (see Cassie Jaye’s documentary “The Red Pill”).

Most importantly for the young guys, let me start with a safety briefing (HT: Terrence Popp of Redonkulas). Guys, don’t have sex with a woman who you don’t intend to have a family with; not because “God” says so but because women tend to be untrustworthy, especially related to contraception such as putting holes in your condom or sperm jacking your man juice from a condom in the trash. That said if your biological urge compels you to work on your stroke game, don’t be a fool and wrap your tool then destroy the biological material before she can steal it. The life you save will be your own so be selfish.

Next let’s deal with a point that is more controversial than abortion: this unwanted pregnancy is her fault based on her bad judgement in a lover. She let a promiscuous braggart, who was having sex with four other women at the same time, raw dog her. Despite his public statement about his financial success, in the recording, Fresh tells her that he is broke so she shouldn’t expect any child support. If he doesn’t pay for her bad judgement, then the taxpayers may be stuck funding her bastard. In a polity where a woman’s bad judgement is subsidized by others, only a fool would be surprised that female bad judgement proliferates. Note that as soon as he rejected her child by telling her to abort it, she opted to call on the surrogate violence of the court and police to force him to pay her. If Fresh is broke, how long before she uses the government to pick the pocket of every man in our country through welfare?

This later point may be complicated as she is Chinese in the US on a tourist visa. Did she just make herself an anchor baby for public benefits and to become a legal immigrant? Is baby trap tourism to the US going to become a thing? Such is speculative but is referenced to highlight how our broken immigration system also potentially impacts what should be a private matter between Fresh & the self-proclaimed baby momma.

Finally let’s address abortion. In the audio, he tells her he doesn’t want a kid so she should see the doctor for an abortion pill. They do not agree about an abortion, but his opinion doesn’t matter as she has legally baby trapped him with only her judgement now deciding. Fresh isn’t a victim but allegedly a fool who allowed himself to be trapped; such short-term thinking has consequences. I am not talking about what should be, but what is.

Anti-abortion women are dancing on the grave of Fresh’s future because his reported baby mama isn’t going to abort but will try to stick it to him financially. While abortion is legal and should be legal, woman too often choose abortion for immoral reasons, which in the long term often cause those women future guilt and emotional distress. As Fresh’s reported baby momma appears to have gotten pregnant on purpose thinking that it would lead to marriage, her choosing not to abort the embryo is morally responsible. Without an involved dad in that child’s life, hopefully she will consider adoption as in the child’s best interest.

The big picture of this private situation is that bad parental choices have long term public policy consequences. Public policies that we have in place are broken for child support, child custody, welfare, adoption, and foster care as they do not work to protect the best interest of affected kids. These areas require reform, but our useless politicians evade these problems and their negative impact on kids. Hopefully Fresh’s alleged kid likely to be raised by a single mom doesn’t grow up to carjack you.

Acknowledgement: YT character & comedian Undead Chronic’s review of the facts of Fresh’s reportedly weak pullout game informed me of the relevant details.

Extra point:

Posted in The Courts | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Battle of the Sexes Election?

Previously women activists have shrieked about engaging in sex strikes over political issues and refusing to date men who vote for the other party. How are these female activists’ efforts to politicize sex going? Women are recently getting punched in the face on the streets of NYC with many men responding “we told you so.” Maybe those ladies should have listened when they were being manslained to about the dangers of keeping violent criminals and the mentally ill on the streets. 🙂


Obviously this is bad, but it is also important to look at what is and not just what should be. Increasingly men have begun to clapback in response to women sexualizing politics; that is to say men are treating women as equals and many women don’t like being held accountable for the consequences of the bad policies these women support.


Of course everyone is an individual but from a marketing perspective political affiliation can track to demographics. If you segment voters by sex and marriage, only single women have majority support for Democrats. Single men, married men, and married women have majority support for Republicans. That is to say single women vote so overwhelmingly Democrat that it can wipe out the advantage Republicans have with everyone else.


While this can make single women feel empowered and heard by Democrats who cater to them, these women don’t recognize that Democrats have an incentive for women to not be married and Democrats pursue economic policies that undermine marriage. The demographic trend in the US is for more women not to get or stay married; especially middle-aged women. While 5% of women are not interested in marriage, Democrats have left many single middle-aged women crying into their glass of boxed wine, “Where have all the good men gone?”


Increasingly men are on strike. On strike from marriage and engaging in a productive life that is penalized by Democrat economic, regulatory, and tax policies. Now men are becoming increasingly vocally disagreeable with women in politics as this coming election begins to focus.


Today I saw several women tone policing men about political discussions on X. Those female commentators said that men shouldn’t talk to women as they do if they want women on their side. However there is a growing cohort of men that aren’t interested in convincing those women but instead to correct them and judge women for the negative consequences of idiotic political policies that those women support.


The geriatric presidential candidates are unresponsive to, and likely unaware of, this male frustration and growing hostility because efforts have been made to suppress its expression on social media. Thus excluded from public discussion, those alienated men have talked to each other IRL and in the hidden corners of the internet. Now more and more of that male frustration is breaking out into public.


Women increasingly feel frustrated by receiving disagreement from men. Sometimes women feel like they are good women catching strays intended for bad women. However men increasingly have frustration with both single and married women for different reasons. For married women, it is the lack of reform to divorce laws and the terrible consequences kids suffer in divorce. For single women, it is their tendency to know nothing and do nothing but have an ignorant opinion about how men should do things as women direct.


Should sex be a politicized battlefield? No. Is it? Increasingly yes.


How has this happened? The totalitarian Left are the intellectual leaders of the Democratic Party. As with all totalitarians, like communists and fascists, these totalitarian Leftists (sometime referred to as Woke) believe that everything should be political and subjected to state control. In current year, it isn’t just green haired obese women championing totalitarianism but more generally single women tend to be in the vanguard mindlessly repeating the thoughts of their ideological puppet masters. Such women aren’t thinking for themselves but thoughtlessly repeat the mantra without the capacity to engage with reality or discussion.


I don’t have a ready answer to this problem as it is drifting into becoming a life boat situation. How does one deal with the irrational? In small doses, irrational people can be avoided, but this isn’t small. Women (#NotAll but as a demographic), especially single women, are increasingly unhappy, depressed, anxious, and mentally ill. Meanwhile they are supporting a political party whose policies are destroying both our economy and our justice system. Perhaps the tough love of rhetorical correction and punishment is not unjustified.

Posted in Election | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Merge NBA and WNBA for Equal Pay

Despite all evidence to the contrary, the wage gap between men and women remains a vacuous slogan. Famously the US Women’s soccer team sued for pay inequity despite having rejected the contract terms negotiated for the men’s team.


I have a modest proposal to settle this debate in response to claims the women who play for the perpetual money losing WNBA are underpaid compared to men in the NBA. Let’s merge the NBA and WNBA.


Each team will have both male and female players. Men and women will play equal minutes. A lineup of women will play against women and men against men so competition is fair. Meanwhile there will be no more separate but unequal treatment. Men and women will play before the same paying audience under the same television contract so the same revenue stream to get equal pay.


Shouldn’t the starting female power forward get the same pay as the male one for playing equal minutes?


Of course the NBA plays more games than the WNBA; 82 vs 40 regular season and best of 7 vs 5 game series in the playoffs. That can’t really change as it would depress revenue thus pay. The ladies will just need to put on their big girl panties and ignore the consequences of the longer season’s physical toll. How does the line from Rocky IV go? If they die, they die.


Unfortunately, fans will not like this product. As the corporate mantra in current year is “Going broke, so go woke,” professional basketball should just power into that iceberg and like Disney ignore the interests of their paying customers. As the Critical Drinker jibes, “it will be fine” to ignore the obvious problems.


As with Swift’s modest proposal this one is intended to be absurd. While proclaiming equal the nonessential and ignoring the important, it only emphasizes the gap in productivity which drives compensation. The audience is there to see the men play not the women. Most points will be scored by the men, not the women. Men’s jerseys will outsell women’s. The most popular players will continue to be men, not women.


I am not intending to dunk on women. With some jobs women can out earn men and in others they get the jobs because they will work for less money. I am however saying that when political activists say that government should force equal pay for men and women in similarly categorized jobs that the context of productivity driving compensation is evaded.

Posted in Political Discussions | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Dem & Repub Platforms on Immigration

A few months ago before Google Bard was rebranded as Gemini, I asked it several questions to assess the state of AI.


Like any “expert” the answer from an AI needs to be verified by human intelligence and may include made up “facts.”


This example asks the AI to compare two documents. I have not verified the AI’s analysis, but present it raw.


Analysis Request


Contrast the immigration policy in the 2016 Republican platform and the 2020 Democratic platform.


AI Answer


The 2016 Republican platform and the 2020 Democratic platform differ significantly in their approaches to immigration policy.
The 2016 Republican platform called for a number of measures to reduce immigration, including:

* Building a wall on the US-Mexico border
* Increasing the number of border patrol agents
* Ending sanctuary cities
* Canceling the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program
* Making it more difficult for people to obtain visas

The 2020 Democratic platform, on the other hand, called for a number of measures to expand immigration, including:


* Creating a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants
* Expanding the DACA program
* Reforming the asylum system
* Increasing the number of refugees admitted to the United States
* Ending the travel ban from several Muslim-majority countries

The two platforms also differ in their approach to border security. The 2016 Republican platform emphasizes the need for a physical barrier on the US-Mexico border. The 2020 Democratic platform, on the other hand, focuses on investing in technology and personnel to improve border security.


In addition, the 2016 Republican platform calls for a reduction in legal immigration. The 2020 Democratic platform, on the other hand, calls for an increase in legal immigration.


The two platforms also differ in their approach to family reunification. The 2016 Republican platform calls for making it more difficult for people to sponsor family members for immigration to the United States. The 2020 Democratic platform, on the other hand, calls for making it easier for people to sponsor family members for immigration to the United States.


Overall, the 2016 Republican platform and the 2020 Democratic platform reflect the two parties’ very different views on immigration policy. The Republican platform is focused on reducing immigration, while the Democratic platform is focused on expanding immigration.

Posted in Immigration | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Killing Grandma for Universal Healthcare

A few months ago before Google Bard was rebranded as Gemini, I asked it several questions to assess the state of AI.


Like any “expert” the answer from an AI needs to be verified by human intelligence and may include made up “facts.”


This example is a strictly factual question, but note that the AI inserted unrequested value based evaluations.  Such judgements by the AI reflect accepted opinion, but accepted by whom? Sometimes it is a common consensus and other times it is a fringe bias.


During the HillaryCare debates in the 90s, Clinton Administration plans for death panels were a chilling topic for debate. Such panels would decide when a patient should stop receiving medical care, essentially to save costs.


Recently this issue has been framed as Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID). In Canada, MAID has risen to 3% of all deaths. Meanwhile, Canada maybe expanding MAID to the mentally ill. Media reports in Canada frequently report instances of citizens being offered MAID instead of denied or delayed medical care.


Although I support euthanasia, when government pays the healthcare bills, it becomes a means for bureaucrats to cut expenses by killing those with expensive illnesses.


Question


In Canada and some European countries, there is expanding policies for Medical Assistance in Dying. Are any US states considering adopting such policies?


AI Answer


Yes, there are a number of US states that are considering adopting policies for Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID). In fact, MAID is already legal in 10 US states and the District of Columbia. These states are:

* California
* Colorado
* District of Columbia
* Hawaii
* Maine
* Montana
* New Jersey
* New Mexico
* Oregon
* Vermont
* Washington

In addition, there are a number of other states that are considering legislation to legalize MAID. These states include:

* Connecticut
* Delaware
* Illinois
* Indiana
* Iowa
* Maryland
* Massachusetts
* Minnesota
* Nevada
* New Hampshire
* New York
* North Carolina
* Ohio
* Pennsylvania
* Rhode Island
* Virginia
* West Virginia

The support for MAID is growing in the United States, and it is likely that more states will legalize it in the coming years.


MAID is a controversial topic, but there are a number of people who believe that it is a compassionate option for terminally ill patients who are suffering. MAID allows patients to choose to end their lives on their own terms, rather than having to endure pain and suffering.


There are also a number of people who oppose MAID, believing that it is morally wrong to kill. They argue that MAID devalues human life and that it could be used to pressure vulnerable people into ending their lives.


The debate over MAID is likely to continue for many years to come. However, it is clear that the support for MAID is growing in the United States, and it is likely that more states will legalize it in the coming years.

Posted in Political Discussions | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment