On October 29, Ada and I received the following email from the one and only Brooke Clayton Boyer:
There is a saying in marathon training that you should always "sprint the finish," or put your final, hardest, strongest push in the last mile of the race.
It's November, the holidays are upon us, I just spent a week eating chocolate in place of everything else, and I feel like this holiday season, I want to give myself the present of health! Back when I was single and had hours a day to work out and disposable income for Whole Foods (sigh), my sister put together a community health challenge. I thought she was nuts. Now I, too, am nuts, and crazy loves company, so I'm swiping her idea (I take it all back, Heather), and hoping I can find a few other crazies out there to up the ante for us all. I'm adding a big list of women on here, and please feel free to add more: no cap on entries! The more, the merrier. And no pressure whatsoever if for any reason this doesn't interest you.
Here's how it works:
- To join, you pay $30 into the Challenge Fund. All the $$ in the Fund goes to the PRIZES described below
- Earn points each day (10 max per day, 70 max per week)
- Stick to a list of daily health goals, plus a bonus goal each week. One point per goal per day. Here are the goals:
- Drink 6 glasses of water
- No more than 1 serving refined sugar per day
- No eating after 8 pm or when dinner finishes, whichever is later
- Exercise for at least 30 minutes, 5 days per week
- Eat at least 6 servings of veggies and fruit
- Study 20 minutes of holy text (or other personally uplifting work)
- Record one thing you're grateful for in journal
- Work toward one personal goal
- Record daily points on the group Google Doc to stay accountable and encourage others
- WILD CARD, announced each week (ideas welcome)
The Challenge will start on Friday, November 1, after we binge through Halloween, then we'll stick to the goals every day, for about eight weeks, and finish just in time for Christmas on December 22!
Now, most importantly, the prize $! There are 2 categories of winners:
(1) The three participants with the most points. 80% of the cash in the Challenge Fund will be divided among the three challengers with the most points. For example, if there is $500 in the kitty, $400 will be allocated amongst the three players with the most points. And, (2), a prize everyone can be eligible for: All participants with more than 70% of the available points. Because the Challenge is partly about getting the most points, but mostly about process, any person who gets an average of 7 points or better per day, will have won, and will be eligible for a random giveaway which will be funded by the remaining 20% in the Challenge Fund.
After a bit of consideration, we decided to join up because it's mostly things we ought to be doing anyway. Even in my pregnant state. Caboose will surely be happier with 6 servings of veggies and fruits rather than the 6 servings of Halloween candy she's been getting. Right? By the end of Friday, there were 46 people signed up, making the available pot of gold a whopping $1380! Brooke created Google spreadsheets in which to record points, with instructions for each competitor to record their personal goal for the group to see.
As we should have expected, the competitors list includes mostly type-A super accomplished personalities, including a smattering of Claytons, several lawyers and law professors, at least one doctor (who we later learned is also vegan) and more Ivy League degrees than we can count. Almost immediately, the collection of lawyers started requesting further defined terms. The biggest exchange to date has been over The Sugar Rule (in caps because, well, that's what we do with defined terms). Roughly a dozen emails flew back and forth on Saturday about what exactly constitutes 1 serving of refined sugar. After consulting with The Doctor, Brooke sent a refined rule:
"Three ways to answer, "Is this my one serving of sugar?" Choose the one that's strictest: (1) You can consult WebMD Sweets and Treats portion size. (2) Read the nutrition information on the packaging. (3) If it tastes like a treat, smells like a treat, bumps you off the wagon like a treat, IT'S A TREAT! Now get back to that edamame."
One lawyer responded with a proposal that we return to "the original version of rule 2 with regard to sugar" which was "one serving means the usually-very-small-defined serving size for the refined-sugar item you are eating, and anything with refined sugar added/on the ingredient list, including sugary cereals, yogurts, beverages, etc. counts." His expanded analysis:
"I can see reasons why the new rule (which as I read it says "you can only eat one serving per day from the following three categories: (a) food with refined sugar in it, (b) food with 15g or more of sugar per serving, and (c) food that can be plausibly categorized as a 'treat'") would be overall better for my health, but I think it has some serious problems (for example, it rules out lots of fruits, which kind of conflicts with rule 6), and it is much more complicated than the prior version and harder to administer/follow.
People could certainly make reasonable arguments in favor of the original rule AND in favor of the new rule (or in favor of any number of other specific sugar-intake rules that could take their place),so I suggest that we just stick with the version that was in place when everyone signed up and move ahead with that one. None of the rules are perfectly tailored as a guide for healthy living for the rest of my life, but all of them (including the original refined sugar rule) will have a beneficial impact on a person's lifestyle, and at the end of the day, contest rules are all inherently arbitrary on some level, so I think we should just use the rule that everyone was planning/expecting to follow, despite its flaws."
Michelle Mumford (resume: BYU law grad, former associate for Very Large New York Firm, current elected official in the Utah Republican Party, new Associate Dean of Admissions at BYU law school, and mother of 6 - including twin boys less than a year old) responded with a simple "I guess I didn't see the new rule as a new rule but only how to define sugar intake. I understand I can't eat refined sugar and I can have one serving-size treat a day. Is that correct?"
And here the doctor weighs in again to explain the 15g rule: "If a product (muffin, yogurt, juice, luna bar, green smoothie, ice cream, M&Ms etc) has more than 15 gms of sugar per serving then it counts as your serving of sugar for the day. Yes, this means that ice cream and orange juice would both count - choose wisely. Naturally occurring sugars in the form of whole fresh fruits are exempt. So I think this is more of a clarification of how to define your preferred sugary-type product."
YIKES!! My orange juice and green smoothie could count? Matt Clayton pointed out that a Costco apple spice muffin is as much of a sugary treat as the chocolate donut next to it, which is an idea I can get behind. But Ada and I can't process the thought of orange juice as our one-serving treat. Another participant said she felt that if the treat was just a small piece of candy that was shy of 15g of sugar, then it didn't count as your sugar serving. Which as I read it means that I could have a rather significant number of Halloween candies a day if I just spread them out over several non-servings.
Brooke issued her final ruling late Saturday night: "I think the preceding sugar comments have been provocative; thanks all. If nothing else, it's clear that lots of folks are making some pretty impressive efforts to cut added sugar out of all their food, not just dessert, as a matter of habit. So if you find yourself in the more liberally-minded "one serving sugar" camp, and you're in it to win it, it's probably worth scaling back your big-dessert-dreams (or not taking the point when it's a stretch). Rising tide lifts all boats."
So that's where we currently stand with respect to sugar. Now, what does "personal goal" mean? After noticing some hard-to-quantify goals on the group challenge board, people started weighing with suggestions for term definition. Brooke's eventual ruling: "The idea here is that you choose one challenging goal that you can score a point for every day. So to earn the point, you need a measurable, specific, 'reach' goal that you can identify as having hit or not hit each day. And it has to show up on the Challenge Board for you to claim the point."
Ada, wisely avoiding risking input from 46 people, texted Brooke to ask about Fast Sunday. Some Challengers are LDS, some are not. Brooke's advice to the group was to adjust the food you do eat post-Fast to fit the guidelines. Because what we all want is a post-Fast salad. But given the number of Competitors, including Ada, who scored 10 points yesterday, I suspect there were lots of post-Fast salad/water-guzzling dinners last night!
So that's where we stand, folks. Ada and I will keep you updated on this hilarious process in which we compete for cash with the most competitive group of people we know. There's bound to be more hilarity between now and December 22. For now, I'm guzzling water and trying desperately to stick to this week's Wild Card challenge: no soda. Oh how I'm missing a good Diet Coke right now!