I mean, apart from the fact that I don’t believe in God. It came to me while I attended Easter mass, because yeah I went to church for Easter.
I’ve always wanted to for Christmas and Easter, but fell off the wagon in Hong Kong. This Christmas, I went with my parents and I really enjoyed the service, even though we were sitting outside the church on plastic chairs. My parents weren’t impressed by the church because architecturally it doesn’t hold a candle to our parish church in Bombay, but a good choir can make up for all manner of shortfalls.
In December, the kids agreed to go with us to church, and they didn’t find it too bad, but this time around, only Mimi expressed interest, and then she backed out at the last minute. I wasn’t keen on forcing church on anyone – I think Mimi’s shortlived enthuasism was motivated by her history teacher asking her if she had gone to church (because this being India of course anyone and everyone is into your religious business) – so I went alone.
Anyway, at the start of the Easter service, the priest went on about how the resurrection is the foundation of Christian belief – which I already knew – and it came home to me that not only am I not convinced of the plausibility of the whole thing, I’m not even impressed by it conceptually. People really seem to need to believe there’s something after this life – and I don’t.
I’m quite happy for all this to end, after I’ve discharged my obligations to my parents and my children. The idea of eternal life – of going on and on sounds exhausting – no matter how wonderful it’s made out to be.
It seems like the reward of paradise in the hereafter is needed to motivate people to be good in this life, whereas I feel ethical behaviour should be an end in itself. Be the best person you can be and then die – that’s my credo.
The other thing about church is how banal the homilies are. One of the things that always strikes me when I listen to some of the gurus who have attained fame in recent years is how simplistic they are. I’ve rarely heard a good sermon in church. Most priests keep ranting about something or other, not very profoundly. But maybe this kind of homespun “wisdom” is what appeals to the average person. We used to have a priest who did the most amazing, aphoristic two minute sermons, but apparently, these were beyond the understanding of many people.
Which reminds me of one of my pet peeves. Why don’t they teach philosophy at school? What could be more important learning how to think and the history of thought itself? I’ve often heard people making pronouncements as if they’d come up with some original insight, when if they had just done a philosophy 101 course, they would have known that their idea had not only already been aired, but debated, possibly even dismissed.
I was just going to suggest that priests study philosophy, but apparently they do. It doesn’t seem to show in most sermons though. I wish they could do away with the homily only, and just let the word speak for itself. Always find myself rolling my eyes in the middle of the mass.
What on earth was I doing there, then? Well, there’s something meditative about performing a ritual you’ve been doing since childhood, discounting the 20-year-break. And that’s the crux of it. I realised that I feel so moved by the mass today because it takes me back to a simpler time: a time when I was less jaded, happy, secure in the love of my parents, when I believed that I had all the good things ahead of me and it would all work out, and yeah maybe believing in a God who would right the wrongs and grant my prayers helped.
It’s hard facing the randomness of the universe, the sheer Sisyphean plod of life, dead on, but once you’ve seen it, you can’t unsee it. Mass, for me, is an attempt to revisit the innocence of the believer and the child.