Friday, April 15, 2011

Thoughts on color

Image
between the Collette pattern pallete challenge and Gertie's quoting of the "Cruelen Blue" scene in the Devil Wears Prada, I got to thinking...and found this amazing article talking about the history of color in fashion. I added the pictures for fun. Full text below...


The Color of Fashion


Humanities, March/April 2008
Volume 29, Number 2
BY REGINA LEE BLASZCZYK


Every fashionista remembers the scene. In The Devil Wears Prada, aspiring journalist Andrea Sachs, slumming it as a personal assistant to fashion editor Miranda Priestly, sniggers as the magazine staff banters over which “stuff” to put in a photo shoot. With catlike speed and a world-weary delivery, Priestly sizes up Andrea’s lumpy blue sweater and explains that it isn’t just blue or Turquoise or Lapis, but Cerulean, introduced by Paris designer Oscar de la Renta in 2002. From the catwalk, Cerulean Blue attracted the attention of several other designers and eventually found its way to mass retailers like Casual Corner, where proletarians like Andrea shop for bargains. “It’s sort of comical how you think you’ve made a choice that exempts you from the fashion industry,” Priestly concludes, “when in fact, you’re wearing a sweater that was selected for you by the people in this room.”

Image


Cerulean Blue. It’s a striking name for a striking hue, but it isn’t a color that Oscar de la Renta invented. In 1999, the American color authority, Pantone, Inc., selected Cerulean Blue, described as the color of the sky on a serene, crystal clear day, as the “official color for the millennium.” Pantone is one of several global color consultancies that help big businesses like Apple, Mattel, and Nike make color choices for product development.

Image


Drawn by William Bolin in 1931, this woman wears a bright green, knit wool jersey hat with scarlet feathers by Talbot, a deep brown wool suit by Schiaparelli, and a green scarf and light brown gloves from Saks-Fifth Avenue.
— © Condé Nast Archive / Corbis
As colorists forecast, they must anticipate changes in taste several years in advance. They take into consideration the lead time needed for dye manufacturers to secure raw materials and negotiate contracts with suppliers, and the relentless shifts in consumer tastes. So, when Oscar de la Renta draped his fabulous Cerulean Blue gown, he may have been inspired by a Pantone color chip created well before the millennium. What seemed cutting edge on the Paris catwalk had, in fact, been imagined years earlier by color forecasters laboring over fabric swatches and paint chips somewhere in New Jersey.
None of this would have been possible without a confluence of circumstances that linked English ingenuity, German chemistry, French fashion, and American entrepreneurship. The Germans perfected reliable dyes, while the French created high fashion. For decades, the New York fashion industry copied the Europeans, until two American women transformed the business by setting color standards for manufacturers and scooping the Paris prognosticators.



Despite its curious name, there’s nothing strange or mysterious about the process that created Cerulean Blue. Color forecasting is a profession with a long history, going back to the late 1800s when French textile mills first issued color cards. These foldout books, made from paper and ribbon samples, showed what colors were popular among Paris dressmakers and milliners in the current season. On this side of the Atlantic, French color cards became valuable tools for textile mills, tanneries, straw makers, and feather importers—the industries that supplied the ready-to-wear business, hatmakers, and shoe factories. Manufacturers matched their dye lots to a particular shade card, ensuring that the thread used to sew a pair of fine kid gloves matched the color of the leather, or that Porcelaine Blue was really Porcelaine Blue.



The history of reliable colors that don’t fade in sunlight or streak when washed dates to Victorian England, when teenaged chemist William Perkin stumbled across a new purple dye while running experiments to synthesize quinine in 1856. Perkin’s mauveine ignited a chemical revolution, launching the synthetic dye industry.

Before this, dyes were made only from natural materials like plants and shells, and most faded over time. Since ancient times, the people of Tyre, in what is now Lebanon, had made purple dye from the ingredient found only in two types of rare mollusks that live along the eastern Mediterranean coast, making this expensive color fit only for the robes of kings and princes. The new synthetic dyes, inexpensively manufactured from coal tar that didn’t run or fade, changed how purple was made. Perkin started his own company, making the dyes that gave the 1850s and 1860s their nickname, the “mauve decades.” After Empress Eugénie and Queen Victoria wore mauveine dresses, hoop-skirted ladies made purple silk all the rage in middle-class parlors from Stockholm to Cincinnati.

While the English discovered mauveine, the Germans created the world-class chemical industry that made synthetic dyes the colorants of choice for textile mills in Europe and North America. After unification in the nineteenth century, the German state fostered innovation with a strong patent system, funding to research universities, and encouragement to cartels. By World War I, Germany supplied 90 percent of the dyes used by the American textile industry.


A fall 1891 color card from the Paris house of Renard, Villet & Bunanol.

—Courtesy of the Hagley Museum & Library

Across the Rhine in France, Paris achieved a similar monopoly in fashion. During the 1850s, an English transplant, Charles Frederick Worth, revolutionized the craft of French dressmaking and turned it into an art. The wealthy French had always loved fine clothes—the silk waistcoats and delicate slippers that separated the posh from the plain. Worth capitalized on elite taste, creating haute couture, a design and marketing system authorized by the French government to create exclusive designs for wealthy clients. On the eve of the First World War, Paris was the world’s undisputed fashion capital, setting trends that were copied from Moscow to New York. Paris designers not only dictated the silhouette, but their textile mills determined what colors were “in” or “out.”

Manhattan was America’s fashion hub. While the French dominated high style, the Americans catered to everyone else. New York was the center of the ready-to-wear industry, putting attractive clothes on the backs of shop girls and factory workers. Every year, American garment makers and retailers steamed across the Atlantic to see the Paris shows, returning with trunks full of couture models and color cards to copy. Surreptitiously, they also paid Parisian style experts to spy on the French, write reports, and secure samples of the newest fabrics. New York factories used the sewing machine, the division of labor, and French fashion secrets to produce the Paris look for less, marketed as “New York Style.”

World War I burst the transatlantic fashion bubble. The British blockade of the North Atlantic cut off supplies of German dyes, leaving the New York fashion industry high and dry. When they ran out of imported dyes, textile mills used substandard American materials that could only produce colors like Olive Drab and Battleship Gray. At the same time, Parisian color cards were unobtainable. In desperation, textile mills and retailers established the Textile Color Card Association to design an all-American palette that would be conceived and produced at home.

America’s first professional color forecaster, Margaret Hayden Rorke headed the association for nearly four decades. A former actress and suffragist, Rorke helped her male colleagues in manufacturing and retailing to understand what women expected of fashion. The association generated a Standard American color card, good for two to three years, and semiannual forecasts for ready-to-wear, millinery, leather, and hosiery. Members such as Gage Bros. & Co., the country’s largest hatmaker, or Sears, Roebuck & Co. knew women were discerning customers. They had seen shoppers stomp out of stores if the ribbons, feathers, or lace didn’t match a new Easter bonnet. The mail-order buyer who ordered five hundred silk dresses to complement his stock of Heliotrope shoes, belts, and gloves would be in the lurch if he got Orchid or Fuchsia. Disappointed flappers would send back the Fuchsia dress and look elsewhere. Color could make or break a retailer in the twenties, as the economic boom allowed more Americans to step through the portal of consumer society and buy ready-to-wear.

The war had taught Americans the dangers of depending on European expertise. Exploiting German patents that had been conscripted during the war by the U.S. government, chemical companies experimented with new paints, dyes, and pigments. By the mid-1920s, the assembly line looked like a rainbow. Macy’s promoted Color in the Kitchen to sell blue brooms and mottled mops. General Motors used True Blue as a weapon in their war against Ford. In 1930, Fortune magazine called this explosion nothing less than a “color revolution.”

Rorke managed this state of affairs for the association and was also one of its principal architects. The organization’s 1,500 paying members welcomed her monthly newsletters, color bulletins, and published forecasts. Nothing could force a knitting mill to comply with the rayon hosiery color card, but many mills found this information to be indispensable as they adjusted their production practices to the new American dyes. Other members, like the buyers from Sears or John Wanamaker’s department store, saw the cards as essential tools for keeping up with trends and anticipating consumer demand.

Every summer, Rorke went to Paris to see the couture openings, browse the boutiques, and watch the chic set in cafes. She returned to New York invigorated, sharing her ideas as she worked on committees to design shade cards for silk, leather, and hosiery. After seeing the stupendous Exposition Internationale des Arts Décoratifs et Industriels Modernes in 1925, she realized she needed up-to-the-minute news on French styles. Everyone’s eyes were fixed on Paris; giant chemical company DuPont sent its professional colorist to size up the Salon de l’Auto and chat up the couturiers. Determined not to be outdone, Rorke ventured into fashion espionage, hiring style spies to keep her abreast of the latest trends.

Between 1929 and 1940, Bettina Bedwell, a journalist at the Chicago Tribune’s Paris bureau, was Rorke’s main link to French fashion. Born on a Wyoming sheep ranch, Bedwell studied at the Chicago Art Institute before going to Paris to be a fashion illustrator. She landed at the Tribune, where she wrote a breezy column on Paris styles for Americans who could sew their own clothes from a Tribune Paris Pattern. In private life, Bedwell and her husband, painter Abraham Rattner, hobnobbed with the Cubist-Expressionist avant-garde. The couple lived in the creative enclave of Montmarte and socialized with Pablo Picasso, Joan Miró, Man Ray, Alberto Giacometti, Henri Matisse, and Marc Chagall. Rattner painted while Bedwell kept tabs on fashion until the impending Nazi invasion forced them to flee to New York.

Bedwell’s reputation as a columnist gave her entrée to exclusive restaurants, private parties, and society events. Her weekly letters to Rorke described what chic women liked. “Many Frenchwomen are getting away from black,” she explained in January 1936. “Navy blue, brown and red are the winter colors . . . worn by smart women now.” In June, she dined at the Spanish Embassy, sizing up the gowns of the Comtesse de Janzé and Princess Karam of Kapurthala, India. Earlier that year, on an unusually cold Sunday in April, Bedwell attended the horse races on the Paris outskirts hoping to see the latest styles, only to be disappointed to see that heavy fur coats hid the new Easter outfits.

The Tribune opened doors at the couture salons on avenue George V and at the wholesalers in le Marais, where Bedwell sniffed out tailors, dressmakers, and salespeople. Bedwell’s 1937 Yellow Dusk, a novel about drug smugglers and design pirates, vividly depicts the inner sanctum of the couture house. Her real-life covert operations focused not on who doped an American heiress, but on which colors Lucien Lelong or Elsa Schiaparelli fancied for the next season. Couturiers didn’t invent colors, but, with the help of the press, they could make or break a particular hue. Back in New York, the fashion-industrial complex—the magazines, department stores, dye makers, textile mills, and garment manufacturers—jumped when Paris blinked.

Bedwell and Rorke stoked this fashion machine from their little corners of Paris and New York. Bedwell tracked color trends from the conservative salons to the chic boutiques. She reported on the seasonal openings of all the leading couture houses: Coco Chanel, Lucien Lelong, Edward Molyneux, Jean Patou, Elsa Schiaparelli, and Madeleine Vionette. In May 1929, the French Industries of Fashion issued its fall forecast, described in Bedwell’s letters and swatches. Nearly every dressmaker drooled over Vert Amande, a light brownish-green tint. First adopted by Jenny, it was now a favorite of the House of Worth and Philippe et Gaston. Italian shoemaker André Perugia, whose rue du Faubourg-St. Honoré shop catered to Follies Bergère dancers, introduced sexy new dancing shoes in Vert Amande. Bedwell also picked out trends with potential Yankee appeal. In November, she sent Rorke a sheet of “new nail polish colors being worn by the ultra-fashionable in Paris”; Cutex, after seeing samples from another style service, she wrote, planned to introduce them back home.

In early 1936, Bedwell’s letters traced the flow of accessory colors from the couturiers to the boutiques and shops around Paris. Rorke relished these detailed reports because so many of her constituents made the leather, braid, ribbon, and plastics for hats, belts, shoes, and gloves. On a typical shopping trip, Bedwell visited Alexandrine de Paris at 10, rue Auber, described by the Los Angeles Times as “the most fashionable glove shop in Europe.” Close to the Opéra Garnier and the grands magasins, Mme. Alexandrine produced custom-made gloves, hats, and handbags for couturiers like Worth and Hollywood royalty like Gloria Swanson, capitalizing on the celebrity to market spin-offs to the general public. When Alexandrine scoffed at the idea of colored gloves, Bedwell reported it to Rorke but kept her eyes open. It soon became clear that the fashionable glover had misjudged. On the streets, Bedwell saw “several women, who while not outstandingly chic, were at least smart,” wearing red gloves, carrying red handbags, and wearing blue or black suits. With a nod to trickle-down fashion, Bedwell speculated that bright gloves would “undoubtedly be worn by the masses later,” both in Paris and New York. And they were.

Rorke didn’t use Bedwell’s correspondence to copy the Paris colors verbatim, but she matched the reports to her own recent forecasts. When the mail arrived, Rorke and her assistant, Estelle M. Tennis, poured over Bedwell’s swatches, comparing them to forecasts that the association had already published. Rorke used the French reports to enhance the association’s position as a color authority.

Rorke’s monthly newsletter, The Broadcast, vividly described how the French fashion industry had adopted colors just like the association’s Sistine, Empire, and Versailles blues. Privileging American tastes over French trends, the newsletter suggested that Rorke, color forecaster extraordinaire, had anticipated Paris fashions.

Whether in the 1930s or the twenty-first century, couturiers and colorists are part of the same transnational business system, with everyone struggling to understand the ebbs and flows of trends and tastes through the wider culture. Andrea’s Cerulean Blue sweater, the devil in Prada explains, had cost millions of dollars and created countless jobs. The process Miranda Priestly describes—how a color on a Paris runway becomes popular in American malls—gets to the heart and soul of the global fashion system. From Denver to Dubai, we all live and breathe fashion, making reality TV shows like Project Runway and What Not to Wear into cable success stories. Yet while everyone’s life is affected, most people don’t know how the fashion system works. Reality shows offer their own fantasy version of the fashion world in which a designer plus an idea plus a little bit of money and business savvy equal a successful product. The real business of fashion includes the coordination of so many players—from the color forecasters in New Jersey to the designer in Paris, from the buyer at Macy’s to the knockoff manufacturer in Hong Kong, from the red carpet parade to the oblivious shopper at the bargain basement. Perhaps that’s what makes the Cerulean sweater scene so memorable; it exposes how we are all part of the fashion system, like it or not.

Image


Regina Lee Blaszczyk, PhD., is a historian affiliated with the Department of the History and Sociology of Science at the University of Pennsylvania. This article is drawn from her research for a book on the color revolution, supported by an NEH grant. Her book Producing Fashion: Commerce, Culture, and Consumers will be published later this year by the University of Pennsylvania Press.


Humanities, March/April 2008, Volume 29/Number 2

Thursday, April 14, 2011

cape mod is *finally* done! and future cape ideas for fur...

Image
This was my first project of 2011. (Yeah, it took 4 months to post it.)

It actually does look mod, when paired with matching tweed shorts and silly hats and boots...

The thing is, I am a whimsical dresser, but Ive had a little bit of trouble going out in this getup in public. Even so....

I'm liking how the weight of this garment turned out with the interlining. It really feels like a proper winter garment. (yeah, I know it isn't winter any more!)
Image


And most of all, I LOVE my choice of lining and trim (a cheeky tribute to my blog title).

Image


This is my first time making something that really is as nice on the inside as on the outside...and I never thought I'd say this, but I think it was worth it! It totally makes the difference from a RTW garment. I know all of you have been saying that, forever, but its really true. Plus now, I finally have some confidence in making buttonholes that actually show on the front of a garment! I did do a lot of measuring, but in the end, they were a piece of cake!


And, because nothing is ever perfect, the problems...
I was excited when I found the buttons, because they fit my vision perfectly at the time- (leather with this woven look)In retrospect, though, I'm not so happy with my choice- they are a little eighties or something--I might have to replace them with brown wooden ones, if I find anything good.

Also, despite the fact that this pattern only involves 3 pieces (and 3 each of lining, and interlining, of course) I managed to screw up the fit- the shoulders are somehow a little too broad. I couldn't figure out what to do about this, so I just left it.

Also, if I ever make this again, I would raise the arm slits, to make this easier to bike in.

Image


I had originally envisioned this as a trial run for using the fake fur I acquired with Cidell, and now, I'm not sure if this is the right shape. I think I'm going to need something more like a shrug, with folds, or something ... so that it mimics the way I'm wearing it here.
Image

Or, I could use it as a furry collar on some future coat, a la
Image

OR, I could do one of those silly furry scarves the Sartorialist likes so much these days...like:

Image

this is a subtle version.

one that looks more like my fabric is this one....
Image

and the more adventurous version, just for kicks!
Image
(or as I like to say, Burning man in Milan.)

You know I love that burning man fashion .Image

Thursday, April 7, 2011

What the Heidi dress can look like...

Image
Check out this amazing creation by Sunni!

This is from the Sew Weekley site, where Mena, who I mentioned before, shared a vintage lace find with a bunch of different bloggers to see what they came up with. I actually have a little bit of this same lace from my swap meet winnings, so I might have to join in, even though im not any kind of official participant. I was thinking of dying it though- white lace has never been my thing. What do you think? is that a vintage no-no?

Friday, April 1, 2011

Balinese fire top

Image
Look at me, stashbustin'! Ok, so this is another project being created just as intended. Check out this awesome fabric! It reminded me of a missoni knit when I bought it, or a stlylized fire motif.
Image


I realized that the gnarly bosch painting in the background might be distracting y'all, so I took it down for the next picuture...
Image



And, it isn't finished yet- merely basted together as I contemplate different options... So-contemplate with me! Should there be facings or bias binding? Should this stay sleeveles, or should I add cap sleeves, or 3/4 length?

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Muslin for spring pallette # 4

So, I promised you pictures of the horrific, but also cute bug print. Here it is!

Image

And this is what I did with it--

Image

Ya, I know it doesn't fit. It looks better with a belt, though!

Image

I made a few adjustments that may have helped since I took this picture over the weekend.---I partically closed those pleats in the front, and I added some pintucks in the shoulders. I'll post another picture of these adjustments after I hem.

I think that this pattern shows that I have officially gone down to a 36 in Burda. Which would be good news, except that I have to print/tape/cut everything out again that I've ever made! Also, this pattern makes it clear that I probably should do petite adjustments on most bodices I make as well as FBAs. Here, I took in the shoulders by an inch already before I took these pictures, and after these pictures, the pintucks I added account for another 6/8ths of an inch, and I took the waist seam up by a quarter inch too...and its still about and inch and a half too long in the torso. I should have known this would be an issue....I totally had a preview of my future fitting troubles when I had a fellow sewing friend over at my house to work on a project together, and she picked up poor Veronica, and ran around the house with her, yelling "huge b$*#s! short torso!"

*sigh* The things I deal with to have sewing friends.

All in all, I think this dress is kinda cute. DBF, on the other hand, told me that the only thing good about it is its uniqueness...(his way of putting it is that it's so weird that it doesn't even look like it came from a trampy vintage store full of ugly stuff.) Whatever. I guess it will get used for gardening, since it already has stains and bugs on it! :)

Spring Palette #3-Pendrell!

Image


Yay! Finally!

This was actually a really easy garment to sew, although I took a month to finish it. It really looks like RTW!

Here it is untucked.

Image

I have about 8 other versions planned :).

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Destash and restash...

I got to meet the prolific and talented Mena a few weekends ago of Sew Weekly fame, along with some other amazing sewing bloggers, like Erin of Dress a Day.

The event was a swap hosted by Sew Weekly. I was totally excited because Ive been following this year's weekly themes and creations with bated breath- these women are making amazing stuff every week! Plus, I had a big bag of destash to get out of my house- from patterns hastily bought in the wrong sizes at Joannes, to eighties and early nineties freebies from SCRAP, I had my share. Also- the rest of my ill advised dog clothing material had to go, along with some wool that was definitely not my color. (sorry- no photos to demonstrate the ugliness...)


But, little did I know, I was in for restash of the highest order...

Image


I guessed the winning number of buttons in Mena's button stash, and won buttons galore.
Image

(Instead of sewing, I wound up using the entire following Sunday afternoon sorting the #!*$ things. I now have more buttons than god.)
Image

More importantly, I won patterns, fabric and MORE buttons in amazing retro technicolor. I just acquired the Colette Beignet pattern, so I see these green and purple on some rad slim skirts.

Image


The patterns themselves are so great, they are going to have to have a post on their own. The fabric has also led me to some new projects for the queue...
Image

The yellow polyester on top may have to be a muslin of the Colette Roobis that I've been planning. The brown/red rayon is really nice, and will hopefully finish out its life as the Alexander pattern from Burdastyle that was used in the Frock by Friday sew along from last year at Grosgrain.

Image

I don't know yet what to do with that gingham. Or that blue/green flowery stuff. Any ideas?

And I scored all manner of other folks' discarded fabric too, as well as advice. I resolved to try the Heidi pattern at Erin's recommendation- I wasn't going to buy it, because it seemed really close to the free Danielle Burda pattern, but without sleeves. I'm beginning to realize though that four dollars might be worth it to get a pattern that doesn't need major style tweaks to wear.
Image



Heidi is apparently an easy, flattering pattern that only uses two yards of fabric. She suggested the pattern when I contemplated some kinda cute, kinda hideous twill with bugs printed all over it. Erin herself has made like, eighteen of them or something, and I daresay they are cute, regardless of the fabric used!

I think this is the dress pattern Ive been looking for-spring palette challenge. .

Once I get the threads cut off, I'll post my completed toile- and y'all can decide whether you think it's wearable in all its buggy glory, or if I should tweak the fit and try again.