Hochul must reveal the “ruinous cost” of the Climate Act
If the Climate Act requires severe economic damage to New Yorkers over the next few years, that incredible fact should be a major election issue.
If the Climate Act requires severe economic damage to New Yorkers over the next few years, that incredible fact should be a major election issue.
The singular ability of language and reasoning models to analyze huge bodies of technical information opens up new ways to understand and advance research.
Rationing gasoline and diesel under the Climate Act is a predictable prescription for chaos.
A new lawsuit could finally end the secrecy surrounding wind turbines killing eagles.
This draft monitoring standard must be thoroughly revised to reflect the huge issues with offshore wind.
The program is called "cap and invest," which sounds good. Note the missing word: "tax."
New York State cannot cut emissions by the required 30% in just four years and Governor Hochul admits it.
Brazil fumbled the COP process to the point that an undefined new process is underway.
Follow the money.
Most of the issues are about money, of course, although the call for increased 2030 emission reduction targets is also on the table.
New York State is between a rock and a green hard place.
The big thing missing is easy to see. This is the strident call for trillions of dollars in "financial flows" from developed to developing countries via various UN funds.
The IMO was supposed to pass the NZF at its October meeting, but the Trump warning had a clear effect, so that vote never happened. Now the fight really begins.
The world's largest offshore wind developer, backed by the government of Denmark, is on a deliberate collision course with the Trump administration.
An alert Massachusetts watchdog group has blown the whistle on the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) for issuing potentially catastrophic guidance for building grid scale battery facilities.