Copy
View this email in your browser
Tripwire Report
Own the Threat
Image
Statistic of the Month:

The number of ideologically motivated threats against public officials is growing, with law enforcement, elected officials, healthcare workers, and educators receiving the highest share; federal charges averaged 38 per year from 2013 to 2016 but sharply increased to 62 per year between 2017 and 2022, and preliminary data indicates prosecutions are on track to reach record highs. 
Source: Rising Threats to Public Officials: A Review of 10 Years of Federal Data

Date: August 11th, 2025

 

 

Intelligence bias and trying to understand violent behavior

     Throughout our history, there are many scenarios that illustrate the treachery faced by decision makers when using (or misusing) or misinterpreting intelligence. Whether it is the Iraqi War, the raid on Abadabad, Washington's Secret Six, or a simple SWAT raid at the wrong address, decision makers can sometimes make intelligence say or mean whatever they want.
     This month’s Tripwire Report focuses on what could be the most significant misuse of intelligence in our country’s history. Using intelligence as the means to justify an end can be a dangerous proposition. Confirmation bias is part of any intelligence analyst’s checklist to ensure their analysis and reporting are objective and neutral. Once in the hands of the decision makers, analysts can be powerless in what the intelligence they generated is used for. The results will ultimately be scrutinized when things don’t go as designed by the decision makers. We are witnessing such a situation in real time.
     The second Tripwire topic this month is the recent high profile violent acts and what may be the cause. Twenty-four hour news and rhetoric from politicians have put political disagreements in everyone’s living room and social media gives them a platform to weigh in. When the rhetoric becomes violent it escalates the emotions of the public. The result can be volatile.
     The recent sentencing of the shooter in Idaho, the assassination of the healthcare CEO, and recently a walk-in shooter in a NY city office building all appear to be random but done with a feeling of justification. All shooters felt they were doing something laudable or someone else’s fault. Accountability or consequences of their actions are not important. We heard screams of “why” and citizens demanded to know a motive for these acts. Tripwire feels that asking for a rational explanation for an irrational act is unproductive. A person willing to needlessly take the life of another is probably not going to be truthful anyway and knowing the truth may only make it worse for the families left behind.
     Evil exists and always will.

Image

Pam Bondi seeks grand jury review of origins of Trump-Russia investigation

     Former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan have been central figures in claims of false intelligence being used to support the 2016 Russia collusion case. This case refers to the comprehensive investigations into Russian interference in the U.S. presidential election and allegations of coordination between the Donald Trump campaign and Russia. The inquiries, most notably led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, aimed to determine the nature and scope of these activities. Individuals, including current CIA Director John Ratcliffe, contend that Brennan and Comey made false statements to Congress and manipulated intelligence. Ratcliffe has publicly criticized the 2016 intelligence community’s assessment of Russian interference, stating it was conducted within a "politically charged environment" influenced by the former directors. Furthermore, declassified records from former Special Counsel John Durham have fueled claims that intelligence regarding a "Clinton Campaign Plan" to falsely tie Trump to Russia was not adequately investigated.
     The specific allegations against Comey focus on his leadership of the FBI during a time when the agency used the "Steele dossier" to obtain Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants to monitor former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. According to declassified records, the FBI under Comey allegedly failed to investigate intelligence that the dossier and the broader "Russia collusion" narrative may have originated from a "Clinton Campaign Plan" to smear Trump. Comey is accused of making false or misleading statements to the FISA court by not fully disclosing that the dossier was funded by the Clinton campaign and the DNC. Similarly, Brennan has been accused of manipulating intelligence to "get Trump," with a "tradecraft audit" reportedly questioning the "high confidence" level in the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) about Russian interference. The audit also reportedly found that Brennan brushed aside concerns about the unverified Steele dossier because he believed it conformed "with existing theories." These allegations have led the Department of Justice to empanel a federal grand jury to investigate the matter. The grand jury will examine the claims and may consider criminal charges against Comey, Brennan, and other officials from the Obama administration for their alleged roles in the Trump-Russia probe.
     However, these claims are subject to ongoing investigation and debate. The Durham report, while identifying flaws in the Russia investigation, did not uncover evidence to disprove the existence of Russian election interference. Likewise, a Justice Department Inspector General report found significant errors and omissions in the FBI’s applications for FISA warrants related to the Carter Page investigation. Yet, it also concluded that the FBI was justified in opening the initial investigation. As The Guardian notes, while there are ongoing investigations and claims of wrongdoing, the full truth remains a matter of continued scrutiny and debate.

Sources Used:

Image

Trump administration puts US civic freedoms under severe threat – CIVICUS Monitor Watchlist


      In early 2025, the United States was added to the CIVICUS Monitor’s Watchlist due to a decline in civic freedoms. CIVICUS, a global civil society alliance, cited a number of threats to freedoms of expression, peaceful assembly, and association under the Trump administration. The organization pointed to “unprecedented executive orders designed to unravel democratic institutions, rule of law, and global cooperation.” These orders resulted in the mass firing of federal employees, the replacement of key positions with Trump loyalists, and the slashing of federal funding for organizations supporting marginalized communities. This includes a total od 46 programs and/or organizations that are affected by this. CIVICUS noted that the U.S. now has a "narrowed" civic space, a designation for countries where violations of these rights are becoming more common.

These programs/organizations are:

Educational and Social Programs:

  • Head Start: A proposed 20% cut to this program, which provides early learning and health services to children.

  • Pell Grants: While the Senate has resisted cuts, the administration has proposed a reduction in the maximum award.

  • Federal Work Study: Proposed cuts would eliminate support for hundreds of thousands of students.

  • English Language Acquisition grants: The administration has proposed eliminating funding for these programs, which support millions of English learners.

  • Administration for Community Living: This agency, which supports programs like Meals on Wheels for older and disabled Americans, has faced significant staff and funding cuts.

  • Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP): A program that helps low-income individuals afford heating and energy bills is on the list of programs for elimination.

  • National Education Association and NAACP: These organizations, along with other groups, have filed lawsuits challenging the proposed dissolution of the Department of Education, which would affect their ability to advocate for vulnerable students.

  • Legal Services Corporation: A major funder of civil legal aid in the nation.

Healthcare and Public Health:

  • Planned Parenthood and other reproductive health clinics: The administration has implemented a new law that restricts Medicaid payments to clinics that provide abortions, affecting providers like Health Imperatives in Massachusetts.

  • LGBTQ+ and Reproductive Health Programs: Federal funds have been directed away from promoting "gender ideology," reportedly leading to some HIV programs and community health centers losing funding for their transgender-inclusive initiatives, while all international family planning and reproductive health programs have been cut, with 48 grants to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) being terminated.

  • National Institutes of Health (NIH): Although the Senate has voted to increase its budget, the administration has proposed deep cuts and has frozen or canceled numerous research grants.

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): A proposed budget cut of 22% would affect programs for gun violence prevention, opioid overdose prevention, and suicide prevention.

  • Public Health Fund: The Department of Health and Human Services' Prevention and Public Health Fund is targeted for cuts.

  • Medicaid: Proposed cuts to Medicaid would significantly reduce coverage for millions of low-income individuals.

International Aid and Diplomacy:

  • USAID: The administration issued an executive order freezing foreign aid and a stop-work order on existing initiatives, leading to the termination of contracts and staff layoffs.

  • United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA): All international family planning and reproductive health programs have been cut, and numerous grants to the UNFPA have been terminated.

  • Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB): The administration has moved to rescind $1.1 billion in funding for the CPB, which funds public broadcasting stations like PBS and NPR.

Cultural and Environmental Institutions:

  • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Initiatives: A new executive order titled "Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing" led to the cancellation of DEI training and contracts, the withdrawal of the Department of Education's Equity Action Plan, threats to withhold federal funding from universities with DEI policies, and the firing of the entire office at the Department of Health and Human Services that works on federal poverty guidelines.

  • National Endowment for the Arts and National Endowment for the Humanities: Both agencies are on the list of programs for elimination.

  • Institute of Museum and Library Services: This small federal agency that supports museums and libraries is also targeted for elimination.
  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): The administration has proposed a $2.5 billion cut for the State Revolving Fund, which supports water infrastructure projects, and aims to eliminate various offices and research labs.
     These concerns were supported by a Human Rights Watch (HRW) report, which documented 100 actions by the Trump administration in its first 100 days that were seen as violating, threatening, or undermining human rights. HRW's report detailed attacks on free speech, the rights of immigrants and asylum seekers, and various social and environmental protections. The report also highlighted ongoing concerns about racial justice, particularly in relation to the legacies of slavery and the treatment of Native peoples. Specific examples of these issues included abusive practices in Florida immigration detention centers, bans on gender-affirming care for transgender youth, and the expulsion of third-country nationals to Costa Rica.
     The addition of the U.S. to the CIVICUS Watchlist and the detailed HRW report emphasize a significant shift in the country's human rights landscape. The reports cite specific actions, such as the deployment of military force against protesters, restrictions on journalists and civil society, and the aggressive targeting of anti-war advocates. These actions are viewed by these organizations as a clear departure from democratic norms and a cause for concern regarding the future of human rights in the United States.

Sources Used:


Netanyahu meets security officials as Israel considers full Gaza takeover

 

     On 5 August, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel met with senior security officials to finalize a potential new strategy for the conflict in Gaza, with reports from Israeli media indicating he is favoring a full military takeover of the territory. This takeover would reverse the 2005 decision to withdraw from Gaza and has sparked international concern. The prime minister's office did not confirm the reports, but Netanyahu stated the need to "complete the defeat of the enemy in Gaza, release our hostages and ensure that Gaza never again constitutes a threat to Israel."
     The possibility of a full Gaza takeover has emerged following the collapse of ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Hamas, and amidst mounting international pressure to address the humanitarian crisis in the region. The United Nations (UN) has been particularly vocal, with a UN official telling the Security Council that such a move would be "deeply alarming," and could "risk catastrophic consequences" while further endangering the lives of the remaining hostages. A Palestinian official speculated that the proposal might be a negotiating tactic designed to pressure Hamas into making concessions.
     The ongoing conflict has led to a severe humanitarian crisis. A global hunger monitor has reported an "unfolding famine," and Gaza authorities state that 188 Palestinians, including 94 children, have died from hunger - citizens are reaching ‘the point of no return’. The Israeli military, which has had to repeatedly mobilize reservists, has throughout the war pushed back against the idea of a full occupation of Gaza, highlighting a divide between the military and some members of the ruling coalition. In a sign of this tension, far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir publicly challenged the military chief of staff to state he would comply with government directives if a full takeover was decided. Separately, a group of former Israeli security chiefs urged the U.S. President to tell Netanyahu that the military phase of the war was over and he should instead focus on a hostage deal.   

Sources Used:

Image
      On 27 July 2025, eleven people were injured in a mass stabbing at a Walmart in Traverse City, Michigan, when a man armed with a folding knife began attacking shoppers near the store’s checkout area. Bystanders, including a retired Marine, subdued the suspect, 42-year-old Bradford James Gille, in the parking lot before police took him into custody. Authorities say the victims ranged in age from 29 to 84, and all are expected to survive.
     Gille, who is homeless and has a documented history of mental illness and prior assault charges, now faces 11 counts of assault with intent to murder and one charge of terrorism under Michigan state law. Prosecutors argue that the attack was designed to create fear and disrupt the public’s sense of safety, not just harm individuals. “This is something that is done not to individual people… but to affect the entire community, to put fear in the entire community,” said Grand Traverse County Prosecutor Noelle Moeggenberg. “That is why we’re looking at that terrorism charge.” However, Sheriff Michael Shea acknowledged that because Gille was apprehended so quickly, it is difficult to determine his true motivations and objectives.
     During his arraignment, Gille delivered rambling statements about poisoned cigarettes and population control, leading the judge to mute his microphone. His lawyer and court documents both referenced a history of involuntary hospitalizations. Just 24 hours before the attack, law enforcement had received a court order to locate and hospitalize him, but they were unable to find him in time. Thus, the decision to charge Gille with terrorism has stirred debate. Many officials question whether the attack was truly ideologically driven or rather primarily a result of untreated mental illness, which seems to be a notable factor. Michigan law defines terrorism as an act intended to intimidate a civilian population or influence government behavior through coercion. Prosecutors successfully used it once before in the 2021 Oxford High School shooting, but the line remains blurry, especially when mental instability and incoherent ideology overlap. The FBI has opened an investigation and is assisting local officials, though no federal terrorism charges have been announced.

Sources Used: 

Image

      On 29 July 2025, four people were killed and one injured in a mass shooting at a Midtown Manhattan skyscraper that houses the NFL’s headquarters and several high-profile businesses. The shooter, 27-year-old Shane Tamura of Las Vegas, entered the lobby of 345 Park Avenue wearing body armor and carrying an assault-style rifle. He killed three people there, including one NYPD officer. Surveillance footage shows he spared at least one bystander before taking an elevator to the 33rd floor, where he killed a fourth victim. Tamura then died by suicide.
     Officials believe Tamura intended to attack the NFL specifically but ended up in the wrong part of the building. A note found on his body blamed the league for what he said were brain injuries from playing football as a teenager. He wrote that he believed he had CTE, a degenerative brain disease linked to repeated head trauma, and asked that his brain be studied after his death.     
     Police executed search warrants at both his apartment and his workplace locker at a Las Vegas casino, recovering ammunition, a rifle bipod, and a note suggesting long-term planning. He had two prior mental health crisis holds in Nevada (in 2022 and 2024), and had been arrested for trespassing and disorderly conduct at a Las Vegas casino less than a year before the shooting. Despite a documented history of instability, he maintained a concealed firearm permit and managed to travel across the country heavily armed.
     In the aftermath of this shooting, as well as the December 2024 murder of UnitedHealthCare CEO Brian Thompson, companies across the U.S. are ramping up security measures, especially at offices housing high-profile executives. Corporations in New York have doubled their plainclothes security presence, and many firms are accelerating emergency response plans, expanding building surveillance, and boosting protections at executives’ homes. New data shows that median spending on executive protection hit a record high in 2024, with more companies now providing personal guards, home security systems, and cybersecurity services. Ben Joelson, head of security risk and resilience at the Chertoff Group, said threats against executives are at the highest levels he’s seen in a decade, driven in part by grievance-filled social media posts targeting institutional leaders. He added that artificial intelligence is making matters worse, contributing to an “exponential rise” in phishing and impersonation threats. As targeted violence against business leaders continues, creating incident response plans for such attacks has been made a top priority.

Sources Used:

Image

     Ernesto Vazquez Reyna, a federal prosecutor, was found dead in Reynosa, Tamaulipas, Mexico after a drive-by shooting on 4 August 2025. His vehicle was discovered on fire on Monday near Hidalgo Boulevard and Las Chaparritas Street, opposite a shopping plaza. Tamaulipas State Police responded to the scene, blocking traffic lanes as the investigation began. Details about Vazquez’s death remain limited, with the Tamaulipas Attorney General’s Office referring inquiries to the Federal Mexican Attorney General’s Office, which is still gathering information.
     Tamaulipas Governor Américo Villarreal condemned the killing, expressing solidarity with Vazquez’s family and pledging full cooperation with federal authorities to seek justice and restore peace. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum also acknowledged the incident, stating her security cabinet is working with state and federal prosecutors and will provide further updates.
     While officials have not confirmed motives or suspects, there is likely a link to criminal groups and federal efforts to combat illegal activities such as oil smuggling. Tamaulipas is a hotspot for organized crime, with drug cartels heavily involved in various illicit operations including trafficking, extortion, and illegal fuel extraction. In July, authorities seized 475,000 gallons of illegally obtained gasoline, tanker trucks, pumps, and gasoline containers from numerous groups, which was described as a “great setback” for the cartels. Investigators suggest this is likely an attack of retaliation for the seizures but have not named any particular organization.

 

Sources Used: 

@tripwireSS @tripwireSS
Steve Hooper Steve Hooper
www.tripwiresecuritysolutions.com www.tripwiresecuritysolutions.com
@tripwire.intelreport @tripwire.intelreport
Copyright © 2019 Tripwire Security Solutions, LLC, All rights reserved.
Volume 1 Issue 192

Our mailing address is:
32531 N Scottsdale Rd
Ste. 105
PNB 132
Scottsdale, AZ 85266

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.