FANTASY AUTHOR’S HANDBOOK

  • Image

    AM I THE CADILLAC LADY?

    My last retail “day job” was managing a record store in suburban Chicago. This would have been late 1994 or early 1995, before I got the job at TSR in September ’95. I had outgrown that job by then—and I mean really outgrown it—and most of that last stint in music retail was entirely forgettable. But this one customer has never left my consciousness, and that’s because I made a mental effort to fix her there.

    One weekday morning when the store was typically really dead an older woman wandered in. I guessed her to be maybe in her seventies, and I could immediately tell she was a fish out of water. Of course I approached her to ask if she needed any help and, relieved, she said she’d just bought a new car and wanted to “get some music for it.” She quickly added that she liked “the old timey stuff, like Tony Bennett.” Not at all surprised, I happily walked her over to the Easy Listening section and, it being 1994-5 asked the obligatory question: “Do you want CDs or cassettes?”

    The look that descended over her face almost made me gasp out loud. It was as if I’d asked her to compare Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity to his Special Theory of Relativity, citing sources no older than three years, and only from peer-reviewed journals.

    Her answer: “Its a Cadillac.”

    Okay, now, again, this was 1994(ish) so at that point I still needed a specific answer. Not wanting to prolong the confusion I asked if she had the car with her and she did, so we walked outside and I looked at the dash and found a cassette player. Mystery solved, we walked back in and she happily picked out a few groovy easy listening tapes and went on her way smiling.

    God only knows if she figured out how to play them.

    But that interaction left a deep impression on me. In that moment, right after she left the store, I told myself:

    Never be that lady.

    And not because she was a bad person—she was super nice, actually—but because, at least I felt then as a young and vibrant thirty-year-old, that she had chosen to be left behind. She didn’t have to be some kind—any kind—of audiophile or tech first adopter, but I felt as though she should at least have had a general working knowledge of the world around her. CDs and cassettes were not today’s disruptive new technology. They had both been in operation for a long time. I really felt she should have known at least which format her fancy new car required.

    So I made the promise to myself that no matter how long I lived, and no matter how the technological landscape changed around me, I would at the very least know the difference between a CD and a cassette.

    And you know what? I’ve kept that moment in mind lo these thirty and more years, and indeed I have not been left behind. You’re reading me on the internet right now. I’ve rolled along with social media, streaming television, upgrading computers and phones along the way. I know what an app is. I know I have an iPhone and how that’s different from an Android phone. I’m not on TikTok or Instagram but I know what they are. I know the difference between Google and DuckDuckGo and have chosen the latter. Though I don’t use every single new thing, I live in the present moment.

    And then we get to AI.

    Because that new technology attacked me directly by going after writing and editing, by going after artists, my shields went up and I will have none of it. And now, because of that, every instance of those two initials makes my skin crawl and I’m ready to defend myself. The fact that my son graduated with a degree in computer science and works in a super market because the once massively job-rich Seattle area tech scene has been laying people off since the end of the pandemic, which coincided with his graduation… well, that doesn’t help. My daughter is currently unemployed because her career looks to be on the AI chopping block, too.

    I understand what things like ChatGPT and Copilot are and what they tell us they’re supposed to do, and how it’s a good thing, but being aware of the technology means I’m also aware of the death toll ChatGPT is now dragging behind it. I’m seeing Amazon flooded with AI generated “books” that are doing enormous damage to the already unfairly negative reputation of indie publishing. And I’m also keenly aware of the abusive relationship I’m now trapped in with Amazon. How do I sell my books without them, even if neither of those books are actually selling very many copies? I’ve gotten used to just clicking on the app and things I need appear in a day or two like magic… though very few of the things I order arrive in good condition or are made with the tiniest eye on quality, so…

    And then, because of the obvious and undisguised evil of Jeff Bezos, am I supposed to get a full list of Amazon Web Services’ clients then boycott them too? That would be—trust me—a lot of companies big and small. I just said I’ve been keeping up with technology, and in fact my livelihood now depends on being online. I can’t just find a cabin somewhere and live off the land.

    I don’t know what to do… and I can feel myself fading into depression even as I write this.

    I don’t think I’m the old lady with the Cadillac when it comes to AI. It’s attacking human creativity, it’s stealing intellectual property, and it’s pushing skilled white collar workers out of the workforce literally tens of thousands at a go. And it is infected with racism, conspiracy stories, pseudoscience, propaganda…

    But then we still keep hearing things like, “Oh, no, there might be growing pains, but this is a miracle. It will take away all the little tasks that keep you from…”

    Doing what?

    Making art that AI has completely devalued?

    Working at my non-existent job?

    I know the difference between a CD and cassette, and I know the difference between a figurative killer app and a literal killer app.

    Or am I just an old fart who’s been left behind by a world that not only doesn’t give a shit about old farts—and that’s been true of America for at least fifty years—but doesn’t give a shit about anybody.

    I don’t know, man, point me to the punk rock section of Spotify and leave me there to cry while I try to get it to play “California Über Alles” in my Ford Fiesta.

    Does that have Spotify?

    —Philip Athans

    Join our group on GoodReads!

    Fantasy Author’s Handbook is also on YouTube!

    Did this post make you want to Buy Me A Coffee

    Send me a book from my Amazon Wishlist

    Join me on Bluesky

    Get into other stuff at Substack

    Link up with me on LinkedIn

    Find me at PublishersMarketplace

    Check out my eBay store

    Or contact me for editing, coaching, ghostwriting, and more at Athans & Associates Creative Consulting or Reedsy?

    As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

    Absolutely not one word of this post was in any way generated by any version of an “AI” or Large Language Model, and no permission is granted for the use of any of the contents of this blog in the training of AI, LLM, or other generative systems.

    Please help Jeff Bezos recover from his bad investment in the Washington Post by buying this book…

    best of
  • Image

    HOW LONG WILL OUR WRITING SURVIVE?

    This morning I chose a book at random from a stack of books in my library. What I came up with was Selected Poems by Po Chü-i. As with many of the 2400 or so unread books I own I have no recollection at all as to how, when, or why this book came into my possession, but as I’ve said before: I trust my past self. I bought it for a reason… didn’t I?

    It’s a general practice of mine to immediately start reading any book I add to “currently reading” on GoodReads. In my continuing extreme deadline energy state, which will remain in place through the month of February, that hasn’t always been the case as time for reading has, unfortunately, been squeezed. But there are certain “general practices,” including reading for pleasure every day, that I not only can but have already started adding back in between editing sprints, so I did sit down and start reading this book this morning.

    Another general practice of mine is to skip introductions so as not to be infected by that scholar’s opinions or cultural or historical biases—for or against—and instead skip right to the text and read it, as much as I can, entirely without other context. I’ll make my own decisions about these poems, ask my own questions, etc. Then, when I’m done, I will go back and read the introduction, extended author biography, etc.

    So all that having been said, here is the complete text of the first poem in the collection…

    Ten years, nothing but grueling study;

    a mistake perhaps, but suddenly my name’s on the list.

    Just passing is no real prize, though;

    true glory comes when you break good news to parents.

    Six or seven friends who passed at the same time

    see me off from the imperial city.

    Canopied carriages set out in procession,

    strings and flutes lift parting sounds.

    Success softens the pain of leave-taking;

    half drunk, I think little of the long road ahead:

    the swift clatter-clatter of horses’ hooves,

    the feel of this spring day as I head for home!

    Po Chü-i was born in 772 and died in 846, living and writing in T’ang Dynasty China. The poem above was written in the year 800—and it’s immediately recognizable and entirely relatable to this reader, born in 1964 and reading the poem in 2026 in a country that did not exist in the poet’s lifetime.

    If written today, only these two lines:

    Canopied carriages set out in procession,

     …and…

    the swift clatter-clatter of horses’ hooves,

    …might have to be revised. Otherwise, this is the story of every college graduate, apparently for at least the last 1226 years.

    That thought inspired the question asked in this post’s title:

    How long will our writing survive?

    Who will read us in the year 3252? What languages will our work have been translated into? What county, what city… what planet will that reader hail from? I’m reading the Burton Watson translation published in 2000 by the Columbia University Press in trade paperback format. What will this book—or anything I’ve ever written—look like in 3252?

    Could Po Chü-i ever have imagined that a university not unlike the one he’d graduated from when he wrote this poem, but over a thousand years in the future in this alien language, nation, and society, would publish his work?

    He may have imagined it, just as I’m imagining being read on another planet in the year 3252, but one thing’s for sure: he couldn’t have known.

    Neither can I, and neither can anyone else.

    But we can imagine.

    And I’d like to imagine someone 1226 years from now thinking, Wow, maybe revise these two lines, but otherwise I relate to every bit of this poem!

    Who knows…?

    —Philip Athans

    Join our group on GoodReads!

    Fantasy Author’s Handbook is also on YouTube!

    Did this post make you want to Buy Me A Coffee

    Send me a book from my Amazon Wishlist

    Join me on Bluesky

    Get into other stuff at Substack

    Link up with me on LinkedIn

    Find me at PublishersMarketplace

    Check out my eBay store

    Or contact me for editing, coaching, ghostwriting, and more at Athans & Associates Creative Consulting or Reedsy?

    As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

    Absolutely not one word of this post was in any way generated by any version of an “AI” or Large Language Model, and no permission is granted for the use of any of the contents of this blog in the training of AI, LLM, or other generative systems.

    Please don’t wait another 1226 years to read…

    Image
  • Image

    GRAPHING A STORY…?

    This week let’s think about this bit that I pulled out of our March 2025 Fantasy Author’s Handbook group read and the first book finished in my 100-Book ChallengeThrill Me: Essays on Fiction by Benjamin Percy:

    Make a graph of your story or novel or essay or memoir. Step back and judge it as a whole. Pay attention to how you might balance the physical beats and the emotional beats rather than entangle them. Tell a story; have some thoughts about it. Tell a story; have some thoughts about it. Then your feckless pondering will become feckful.

    This is an interesting idea and one that can certainly be useful as we continue our writing journey, which is a learningjourney no matter how long you’ve been doing it or how many books you have or have not sold.

    There are apps out there that purport to help you do this, but at risk of sounding like the Luddite I am not and have never been, the process of creative writing—in all its stages—is not something that can be cobbled together algorithmically or in any other way forced into a program or, yes, “graph” of any kind.

    Think of it this way: Here is an idea, thanks to Benjamin Percy, but the execution of that idea is entirely your own.

    No two authors’ writing process is exactly the same. No two authors’ voices are exactly the same. Not all authors’ literally anything are exactly the same. That’s because no two people are exactly the same across any measure, especially when it comes to any creative activity.

    Please lead your life with at least that understanding.

    As an author it will help you spot nonsense like Save the Cat or the Hero’s Journey or any version of “AI” (LLM, generative AI, chatbots, etc.) and run as fast as you can away from it. Creative writing, regardless of genre or category, is a creative pursuit, not a mathematical pursuit. It can not be done mathematically. Period. And that means machines (or people) who rely on math to understand creative writing will not be able to understand it, so will not be able to help you.

    Breathe that in, authors. You’re on your own out there—and that’s a good thing.

    So were these four authors: Aristotle, Homer, Dostoyevsky, and everyone else.

    Well, no, actually, maybe that’s not true. We’re not at all on our own. There’s a huge community of fellow authors, editors, teachers, agents, readers, and lots of other creative humans out there that can have a huge effect on your development as an author. Those other four authors I mentioned had some number of people working with them, were inspired by other authors, and so on, going back as far as history takes us.

    Still, you are your own first reader. You have your own individual brain that thinks differently from mine and everyone else’s. You have to not just think, but more importantly feel your way through your education as an author.

    Back to Percy, and his advice to:

    Tell a story; have some thoughts about it.

    What does that look like for you?

    You’ve finished a piece of writing: a short story, a poem, a novel or a chapter of a novel, an essay… whatever.

    Don’t just read it—think about it. Consider making notes on your own work the same way you might while reading someone else’s writing. I write notes in the margins of books (almost) all the time. I keep a “commonplace book” file on my computer where I save things like the quote from Thrill Me that started us off here. Do I do that with my own writing…? Kind of. Not always.

    But actually, yeah, at least for longer works I had notebooks full of stuff—things I felt I needed to go back to, more research to be done, questions for my editor, fresh ideas to consider, and so on. I’ve shown what one of my outlines ends up looking like here. That counts, doesn’t it? I was definitely thinking!

    Could your “graph” just be five or ten minutes of letting a poem settle in your head? Could it be a page or more in a notebook where you list out things you were happy with and things you were less than happy with? And don’t forget to identify the good, and not just the bad! Are you a bit more analytically inclined than me? Do you want to create a questionnaire for yourself? Could you adopt some version of this list of questions from author Steve Rasnic Tem in an interview in the book The Horror Writer, edited by Joe Mynhardt (another of our group reads)?

    I think critical, “aware” reading is essential. If you want to write short stories, I suggest you read at least a thousand of them representing all genres and styles critically. How did the writer begin the story? How did he or she end it? Make a list of the beginnings and endings you particularly like. If you do this conscientiously you will develop an inventory of possible beginning and ending strategies for your tales. It’s an area that can be especially troublesome for inexperienced writers. Do the same for “middle” strategies. How did the author get from point A to point B? How did the author keep you reading? Was there some sort of structure involved? Rising and falling action? Subplots? Complications? Just pondering these issues in specific examples can teach you a great deal about writing.

    Can we even see all this stuff in our own writing? I think we can. Not as clearly as an experienced editor could, which is why people like me remain an important part of the world of writing and publishing, but we can, as authors, at least think about these questions.

    And so then however you get to the “have some thoughts about it” stage and what that looks like for you, as I jotted down on this page in Thrill Me

    Always be creative, rather than analytical, in the creation of art.

    —Philip Athans

    Join our group on GoodReads!

    Fantasy Author’s Handbook is also on YouTube!

    Did this post make you want to Buy Me A Coffee

    Send me a book from my Amazon Wishlist

    Join me on Bluesky

    Get into other stuff at Substack

    Link up with me on LinkedIn

    Find me at PublishersMarketplace

    Check out my eBay store

    Or contact me for editing, coaching, ghostwriting, and more at Athans & Associates Creative Consulting or Reedsy?

    As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

    Absolutely not one word of this post was in any way generated by any version of an “AI” or Large Language Model, and no permission is granted for the use of any of the contents of this blog in the training of AI, LLM, or other generative systems.

    What came out of that outline was…

    Image
  • Image

    BENEATH VS. UNDER

    Writing trends can be weird. They can come out of nowhere and come and go so fast most people don’t even see them happening. The English language, maybe even more so than any other language on Earth, is an ever-evolving, living thing. That said—that understood—I don’t spend too much time wringing my hands over neologisms and alterations or additions to accepted usage—especially since “accepted” implies there’s someone in charge to either accept or reject things like the singular theydisrespect used as a verb, and so on.

    For the record, no such authority exists.

    That said, I can be at least a bit of an old school curmudgeonly copy editor, and anyway, I have a deep and abiding respect for the language. So when, over the course of the last few months or so, I started seeing author after author drop out the word under almost completely in favor of beneath, I just have to ask…

    Where the hell is this coming form?

    I can’t help but think this might be another grammar check hallucination (another new usage I wish we didn’t have to adopt). That is actually a thing now, and those hallucinations are easiest to see in fiction, which is the hardest form of writing to apply algorithmic rules to. This was true when all of a sudden said was being changed to spoke and I had to change it back—dozens of time in dozens of books.

    Now I need to attack the creeping influence of beneath, which, yes, is indeed a word with many perfectly fine uses, but it does not replace the accepted ,and more importantly expected idiomatic uses of under. I see this now, and I see it a lot:

    The ground beneath his feet.

    They’re digging beneath the wall.

    She jumped beneath the wagon.

    Hear me, all authors of all things. It’s:

    The ground under his feet.

    They’re digging under the wall.

    She jumped under the wagon.

    It just really actually is.

    Need some extra authority? Here’s what The New Fowler’s Modern English Usage has to say on the matter:

    beneath. Over the centuries, beneathbelow, and under have tended largely to overlap. It would appear that, by the end of the 19C., beneath had become somewhat restricted in use: ‘a literary and slightly archaic equivalent of both below and under. The only senses in which beneath is preferred are 7 (“beneath contempt”), and fig. uses of 4 (e.g. “to fall beneath the assaults of temptation”).’ (OED). Fowler (1926) judged that, apart from the ‘beneath contempt’ sense, ‘it is now a poetic, rhetorical, or emotional substitute for under or below’.

    Be that as it may, beneath has a wide range of idiomatic contextual uses now. Examples: 1 (in a lower position than) Lowe dropped to his knees, as if to drive the knife upwards beneath Leiser’s guard—J. le Carré, 1965; I watched a child drag a butter-box on wheels beneath the cold streaky sky—T. Keneally, 1980; drinking pre-lunch aperitifs beneath crystal chandeliers—P. Lively, 1987; his body was positively abloom beneath the riding mac—T. Wolfe, 1987; the pipes and conduits that jostle each other beneath the streetNew Yorker, 1988; (fig.) The Dog Beneath the Skin—W. H. Auden and C. Isherwood, 1935.

    2 (not worthy of) he considers such work beneath him; she had married beneath her (i.e. to a man of lower social status).

    Here are noted three instances in which beneath is not necessarily preferred, but used anyway, with some examples of authors going it on their own. Even then I have to admit I’m working from a terrible old, third edition of Fowler’s from all the way back in 1996.

    Okay, yeah, I do need a new edition of that, eh?

    Still, I would respond to Fowler’s agreeing with me with these simple revisions, entirely more welcoming to a contemporary ear:

    Lowe dropped to his knees, as if to drive the knife up under Leiser’s guard—le Carré was an English author so in any case in the US it would be upward, or in this case, actually, just up.

    I watched a child drag a butter-box on wheels under the cold streaky sky—heck, U2 knew it was Under a Blood Red Sky!

    Image

    drinking pre-lunch aperitifs beneath crystal chandeliers—though it may be terribly old fashioned to drink pre-lunch aperitifs, you’ll actually be doing that under crystal chandeliers. And, y’know, ya gotta get a chandelier!

    I’d probably give this one to Tom Wolfe, but… his body was positively abloom under the riding mac works just as well.

    Never use the New Yorker’s bizârre antíquarianne stile güide for any-thing unless you know you’re write-ing for The New Yorker.

    And finally, Auden and Isherwood, please proceed with my compliments.

    —Philip Athans

    Join our group on GoodReads!

    Fantasy Author’s Handbook is also on YouTube!

    Did this post make you want to Buy Me A Coffee

    Send me a book from my Amazon Wishlist

    Join me on Bluesky

    Get into other stuff at Substack

    Link up with me on LinkedIn

    Find me at PublishersMarketplace

    Check out my eBay store

    Or contact me for editing, coaching, ghostwriting, and more at Athans & Associates Creative Consulting or Reedsy?

    As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.Absolutely not one word of this post was in any way generated by any version of an “AI” or Large Language Model, and no permission is granted for the use of any of the contents of this blog in the training of AI, LLM, or other generative systems.

    best of
  • Image

    WHAT THESE AUTHORS SAID…

    Image
    Image
    Image
    Image
    Image
    Image

    Join our group on GoodReads!

    Fantasy Author’s Handbook is also on YouTube!

    Did this post make you want to Buy Me A Coffee

    Send me a book from my Amazon Wishlist

    Join me on Bluesky

    Get into other stuff at Substack

    Link up with me on LinkedIn

    Find me at PublishersMarketplace

    Check out my eBay store

    Or contact me for editing, coaching, ghostwriting, and more at Athans & Associates Creative Consulting or Reedsy?

    As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

    Absolutely not one word of this post was in any way generated by any version of an “AI” or Large Language Model, and no permission is granted for the use of any of the contents of this blog in the training of AI, LLM, or other generative systems.

  • Image

    MICROSOFT WORD FOR AUTHORS

    A couple weeks ago I challenged authors to go ahead and pay the $60 a year for the non-AI (Copilot) version of Microsoft Office, and so of course y’all have gone and done that as a new year’s present for yourself, right?

    If you’re just starting out, or have been using it for a little while and have gone down some of this gigantic app’s various rabbit holes, please allow me to introduce you to All the Word You’ll Ever Need.

    First of all, write however you please—whatever works for you. I write some stuff by hand. I write other stuff in a more condensed single-spaced form—in fact, I’m writing this in that state, since I know it’s going to be pasted into the WordPress editor anyway, and no one but me will read it until it’s published.

    But once you’re ready to share this with agents and editors, the standard manuscript format is your friend. Not only that, it’s your best and only friend. This is how you send your manuscripts to the professional world. Please, please believe me that that remains true, even in the era of tech disruption and… whatever…

    What is the standard manuscript format, you might ask? Well, I made a handy document you can download here in .docx format that goes into detail on that, but especially if you’re new to Word, or are working from styles maybe set by your employer, or what you’ve cobbled together that works for you to write in, here’s how a working author sets up Word, which you’ll see is mostly by turning stuff off.

    All these examples are for the current Mac version, so Windows might look a little different…? I don’t know, but most likely not. Anyway, please let me know in the comments if there are any major differences.

    Let’s dive in, first with Preferences, which can be found under Word in the top menu. Click that window open and start with General, which looks like this:

    Image
    General

    Click on these boxes and none of the others to be exactly like me.

    You’re welcome.

    If you like Dark Mode or have a Pen… knock yourself out. But this keeps things clean as is.

    We really get into the nitty gritty in View:

    Image
    View

    Notice I have almost nothing selected here, but the most important thing, especially when you get into revision and editing, is to click on All under Show Non-Printing Characters. this allows you to see into the formatting. You’ll now see if there are two spaces between words or a space before or after a paragraph mark, or if you accidentally had your finger on shift when you hit return and inserted a manual line break instead of a paragraph mark. Ever wonder why your indents all of a sudden stop working for no apparent reason? That’s the reason, and it’s apparent when you can see the non-printing characters.

    Next up is Edit:

    Image
    Edit

    I like it set up this way, which gives me the greatest measure of control.

    Not much else to say there so I’ll jump to Spelling, which is kind of a big one:

    Image
    Spelling

    I used to have all this shut off but have learned to appreciate the little red lines under misspelled words—or much more often for an editor working primarily in the fantasy and science fiction genres, invented words that aren’t in any real world dictionary.

    But what’s most important here is that I have none of the boxes checked under Grammar. Every once in a while I experiment with that to see if they’re improved it at all, and though it’s a little better than it used to be, it returns far more incorrect results than correct results. It does not understand punctuation around dialog, has some inexplicable ideas about commas, and otherwise does not understand the first thing about fiction or creative writing. If you’re still learning the craft of writing, this will teach you up wrong. Just say no to grammar check. Instead, learn how to write.

    Next is a source of almost constant frustration, AutoCorrect:

    Image
    AutoCorrect

    These sets of tools try to understand what you’re going for without asking you and start to format stuff in seemingly random ways, forcing sentences into lists, adding links, and otherwise causing havoc. Allow yourself to decide how you want to format your manuscript. But please do check the two boxes here to make sure you don’t have straight quotes, which are used to indicate minutes and seconds in latitude and longitude, in some stricter style guides feet and inches, but are not quotation marks! And being able to just type two hyphens and have them magically transformed into an em-dash is one of the world’s great delights!

    Okay then, so you’ve got your basic settings established, now it’s time to open up a new document and make it editor-ready. What you’re going for is something that will, when edited, look like this:

    Image
    Edited Manuscript

    See all the non-printing characters and where I changed a manual line break into a paragraph? Here’s how you make all that work. Looking up at the Format menu on the top like, leave the Document format well enough alone—that tends to be a basic page that works. But you will need to address the Paragraph menu, which looks like this: 

    Image
    Paragraph

    Just make yours look exactly like this, starting with everything flush left. You can go in and center a few things like chapter heads and scene breaks, but do that manually, not with styles! That’s a big one, actually. Just like there’s only font (12-point Time New Roman), one color of ink (black) and one color of paper (white), there is only one style and it’s Normal. Period. Your headers and weird scene breaks and borders and shading and literally anything else might make it look all fancy when it’s printed out but it’s 2026 already, ya’ll. No one is printing this out.

    Embedded styles, especially anything you’ve created yourself, just adds unnecessary difficulty to the busy professional you’re sending this to, who is only interested in the story and the writing, not your style sheet acumen.

    I know… but please believe me. No styles!

    Anyway, set your Indentation to zero and select First line and use the default .5”. I know, printed books tend to have shallower indents than half an inch, but this is not a printed book we’re making, it’s a manuscript—and all of this we’re working through today goes directly to that. You are not typesetting here, you’re writing, and expecting only a few professionals to read it—professionals who are keenly aware of the difference between a manuscript and book and do not need you to show them what it’ll look like when it’s published, or what you want it to look like… Do all that when you decide to publish it yourself—or hire a typesetter/designer to do that for you—but this is a manuscript, and all this is how you make it look and function like manuscript.

    And please do not fiddle with Spacing. It’s zerozero, and Double. Be sure to check the box: Don’t add space between paragraphs of the same style. Since you only have one style (Normal), that means there won’t be any extra space between paragraphs.

    Next up, how did I make it so you can see all the things I changed, and read the comment about which vs. that? First, from the Tools menus, select Track Changes and then Highlight Changes.

    Image
    Track Changes

    Then click all the boxes:

    Image
    Track Changes

    There are options in terms of how you see this on your screen. Here’s how I have that set up:

    Image
    Track Changes

    This you’re finding in the Review pane under Markup Options (check all) then check Show Revisions in Balloonsunder Balloons, because balloons are fun.

    No, seriously, this makes the text itself cleaner by showing what you deleted off to the side, not right next to what you added in its place, which can get pretty confusing pretty fast.

    This feels like a lot, but it’s a one-time setup that will be your forever default, so a small bit of fire-and-forget effort that let’s you do the most important thing, and that’s writing amazing works of literature. And remember when I said don’t waste the time of busy professionals? Well, you’re a busy professional too, right?

    —Philip Athans

    Join our group on GoodReads!

    Fantasy Author’s Handbook is also on YouTube!

    Did this post make you want to Buy Me A Coffee

    Send me a book from my Amazon Wishlist

    Join me on Bluesky

    Get into other stuff at Substack

    Link up with me on LinkedIn

    Find me at PublishersMarketplace

    Check out my eBay store

    Or contact me for editing, coaching, ghostwriting, and more at Athans & Associates Creative Consulting or Reedsy?

    As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

    Absolutely not one word of this post was in any way generated by any version of an “AI” or Large Language Model, and no permission is granted for the use of any of the contents of this blog in the training of AI, LLM, or other generative systems.

    Image

  • Image

    HOW DO I LOOK BACK ON 2025?

    This is the last Tuesday and so the last Fantasy Author’s Handbook post of 2025…

    Am I really going to write some kind of year-end wrap-up for what has been a great year for me, and one of the worst years ever for me—along with seemingly everyone else here in Republican-ravaged America… a crime still in progress?

    But yeah… this isn’t a “political” blog, is it, so let’s set national and world news aside (for the love of all that’s holy) and instead just be happy with our own personal triumphs, however small or even seemingly insignificant they might be in however grand a Grand Scheme of Things you’re tempted to inhabit.

    Did I have New Years Resolutions from last year? I don’t even remember and feel no need to go back and check, which pretty much sums it up for resolutions in general. I will work to be a bit more like Benjamin Franklin, and I do have a nice big home repair/renovations to do list… but to do lists aren’t “resolutions” are they? Whatever you call it I do have more to finish by the end of 2026, and really, really have to get to a few “mission critical” components to that taken care of. If I’m looking back on the personal level in 2025 that was probably the biggest failure: putting the required time and energy into those home projects. I guess I’m “resolved” to get that stuff done in 2026… but you don’t care about that.

    But no, wait, I was meant to look back, wasn’t I. Okay, then, let’s try looking back and leaving “the news” aside… at least once I mention that I participated in my first ever protest this year.

    Image

    Okay? Now, off the politics, except that no one who loves books (or intellectual freedom, the US Constitution, personal freedom, basic human rights, and other little things like that) can fail to mention the unprecedented assault on books, authors, booksellers, publishers, and maybe especially librarians that are, in many places in this country (and one place in this country is one place too many) still going on. This is where I once again ask all authors—at any point in your career—to be a part of…

    Image

    Okay, so then now no more politics.

    I don’t know, y’all…

    Anyway, thanks to Reedsy I’ve been super busy—that’s where the positives are. Not only was business up, but the books that came to me this year were some of the best I’ve worked on in ages. There are enormously talented authors out there writing fantastic books and with this level of quality and imagination and creative energy, oh, wow are the genres I love in good hands, with more hands being added daily. Thank you, Reedsy, and everyone who found me there in 2025. And as we move into 2026 I remain…

    Image

    That really was the big moment of gratitude for me in this weird-ass year.

    I read some great stuff otherwise, too, and had some fun talking about them on YouTube while I work through my 100-Book Challenge.

    That’s when you read a hundred books you already own before you can buy any more books. I’ve gotten to be quite the I buy books, therefor I am  kinda guy over the last almost all of my entire life, so this has been hard—the not buying books part. But reading a lot of books this year was great. I set my 2025 GoodReads challenge at 60 books and am currently at 59 with the possibility of finishing one more today or tomorrow. Of those 59 books, the last 39 were part of the 100-book challenge, which works out weirdly symmetrical. If I do finish one more before the clock strikes 2026 it means if I set the same 60-book target for next year I will finish the 100 book goal right at the end of 2026. Won’t that be tidy.

    Hopefully I’m as busy or even busier with work in 2026 because once that 100-book Challenge is completed holy bananas will I start buying books. Lots of books. Like, maybe a reverse 100-Book Challenge where I have to buy 100 books before I can read one I already own. That should take me about a week to finish up, so check back with me on that around January 8, 2027.

    Anything else…?

    Yeah… no, that pretty much sums it up because I’m not going to talk about AI.

    We’re ignoring that out of existence, right, people?

    Right?

    Happy New Year everybody, let’s keep this reading, writing, and editing train a’rollin’ in ’26!

    —Philip Athans

    Join our group on GoodReads!

    Fantasy Author’s Handbook is also on YouTube!

    Did this post make you want to Buy Me A Coffee

    Send me a book from my Amazon Wishlist

    Join me on Bluesky

    Get into other stuff at Substack

    Link up with me on LinkedIn

    Find me at PublishersMarketplace

    Check out my eBay store

    Or contact me for editing, coaching, ghostwriting, and more at Athans & Associates Creative Consulting or Reedsy?

    As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

    Absolutely not one word of this post was in any way generated by any version of an “AI” or Large Language Model, and no permission is granted for the use of any of the contents of this blog in the training of AI, LLM, or other generative systems.

    And buy this book already…

    Image
  • Image

    TEMPERING OUR OPINIONS

    Here in this penultimate week of 2025, thoughts turn to the next year, and dare I say New Years Resolutions? I’ve worked past that idea myself, but then this is a moment we can take to think about what worked for us in the past year, what didn’t work for us—as authors and as readers and as… people.

    Carrying forward a bit from last week’s post, I’d like to offer this, from Benjamin Franklin: His Autobiography

    I made it a rule to forbear all direct contradiction to the sentiments of others, and all positive assertion of my own. I even forbid myself, agreeably to the old laws of our Junto, the use of every word or expression in the language that imported a fix’d opinion, such as certainly, undoubtedly, etc., and I adopted, instead of them, I conceive, I apprehend, or I imagine a thing to be so or so; or it so appears to me at present. When another asserted something that I thought an error, I deny’d myself the pleasure of contradicting him abruptly, and of showing immediately some absurdity in his proposition; and in answering I began by observing that in certain cases or circumstances his opinion would be right, but in the present case there appear’d or seem’d to me some difference, etc. I soon found the advantage of this change in my manner; the conversations I engag’d in went on more pleasantly. The modest way in which I propos’d my opinions procur’d them a readier reception and less contradiction; I had less mortification when I was found to be in the wrong, and I more easily prevail’d with others to give up their mistakes and join with me when I happened to be in the right.

    And this mode, which I at first put on with some violence to natural inclination, became at length so easy, and so habitual to me, that perhaps for these fifty years past no one has ever heard a dogmatical expression escape me. 

    Wouldn’t this be a nice change to the National Discourse?

    What if we started with what we love the most: books. In 2026 can we give ourselves a moment’s pause before declaring that audiobooks don’t count, no one reads prologues, all romantasy books are “fairy porn,” men don’t read, or whatever nonsense comes along? Can we just read books and like them or not without declaring some version of a minor border skirmish over whether or not sprayed edges are a good thing?

    I’d bet that if we put this idea on with some violence to natural inclination, seeing first and foremost the positives in the community of readers and authors may just become at length so easy, and so habitual to us, that perhaps for the next fifty years no one will ever hear a dogmatical expression escape us?

    What if that’s the new algorithm for the 21st Century?

    —Philip Athans

    Join our group on GoodReads!

    Fantasy Author’s Handbook is also on YouTube!

    Did this post make you want to Buy Me A Coffee

    Send me a book from my Amazon Wishlist

    Join me on Bluesky

    Get into other stuff at Substack

    Link up with me on LinkedIn

    Find me at PublishersMarketplace

    Check out my eBay store

    Or contact me for editing, coaching, ghostwriting, and more at Athans & Associates Creative Consulting or Reedsy?

    As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

    Absolutely not one word of this post was in any way generated by any version of an “AI” or Large Language Model, and no permission is granted for the use of any of the contents of this blog in the training of AI, LLM, or other generative systems.

    Editor and author Philip Athans offers hands on advice for authors of fantasy, science fiction, horror, and fiction in general in this collection of 58 revised and expanded essays from the first five years of his long-running weekly blog, Fantasy Author’s Handbook.

    best of
  • Image

    IT’S OKAY TO JUST READ A BOOK

    Okay, the first step in recovery is to admit you have a problem…

    Hi, I’m Phil, and I’m addicted to BookTube.

    You know what that is, right? It’s the loose collection of YouTube channels in which people talk about books—their favorite and least favorite books, the books they just read or are planning to read, the books they just bought, and all that surrounds the act of reading: do you drink tea or coffee? One channel I’ve watched seems more concerned with the preparation of matcha than with the books read while drinking it. Others obsess over how to take notes while reading, whether or not to directly annotate the book itself and if so then how. Do we use sticky tabs or colored highlighters? What is their color coding system? Is this book book part of a personal curriculum…?

    And all the while we suffer over the necessity of not just reading a book, but close reading a book.

    Because if you don’t close read a book, how can you have an opinion about that book? How can that book make you smarter/better than people who either haven’t read that book or haven’t read it close enough—haven’t made as many annotations or taken as many notes? And then what brand of notebook are you taking those notes in, exactly—and why? It better goddamn well have a leather cover, because serious people have serious notebooks, and serious notebooks have leather covers.

    All of this, according to BookTube (and I assume the adjacent spaces on TikTok and Instagram—two platforms I’m far too old to engage with) matters, and matters more so—or so it would seem—than the actual content of the book itself.

    Oh, but no matter what, for God’s sake, do not be seen close reading that book in public lest you be accused of “performative reading,” which is, somehow, worse than maintaining a public YouTube channel in which you perform the act of reading—excuse me, close reading, annotating, notetaking, and reviewing the same book some guy was photographed without his knowledge reading on a New York City fire escape, or wherever this guy was—that classic performative reader he is.

    Image

    For years, of course, I’ve been advising authors to read books—and so has Stephen King and lots of other people who know what they’re talking about. Writing books while not reading books is exactly like writing songs without listening to music. It’s absurd. You will, absolutely, learn more about the art and craft of writing (in any category or genre) by reading well-written and professionally edited and published examples of same than you will in the most expensive (aka “prestigious”) MFA programs.

    And by all means, talk about those books! I do—here, on GoodReads, and even on YouTube, Heaven help us all.

    I “close read” books for a living, and as stated above, I believe authors should have a version of a “personal curriculum” around writing, too. And if you want to study anything else, terrific. I’ve done—and continue to to do the same thing. I was curious, for instance, about Carl Jung, so I spent a month reading his work and work about and around him. I found him fascinating, but yeah… way too metaphysical for me to take too seriously. I’m a Greek American and have been studying the history of Ancient Greece out of that tenuous connection and my own intellectual curiosity. Am I outlining some kind of work of historical fiction set in Ancient Greece? No. I’m just curious.

    Absolutely be curious—always be curious—and satisfy that curiosity by reading.

    But also please feel free to go ahead and read a fun book for the fun of it. If you don’t believe me, believe Elizabeth Bear who, in “Stem Lesbians in Space! A Conversation with Elizabeth Bear,” said:

    I don’t think reading should ever be akin to taking your medicine—we get indoctrinated into this idea that reading is something we should do, that it’s good for us. The truth is that we connect with stories not because we should but because we want to. They are a force of nature. They are healing, and they are enjoyable. We don’t need to get all puritan about it.

    And do that on your fire escape or in your carefully decorated home YouTube studio designed to evoke that perfect Dark Academia vibe.

    Drink that matcha, damn it.

    And say what you will of the book—any book—wherever you want to, however you want to.

    But don’t let anyone tell you you’re reading wrong.

    Unless you skip the prologue, in which case you’re reading wrong.

    —Philip Athans

    Join our group on GoodReads!

    Fantasy Author’s Handbook is also on YouTube!

    Did this post make you want to Buy Me A Coffee

    Send me a book from my Amazon Wishlist

    Join me on Bluesky

    Get into other stuff at Substack

    Link up with me on LinkedIn

    Find me at PublishersMarketplace

    Check out my eBay store

    Or contact me for editing, coaching, ghostwriting, and more at Athans & Associates Creative Consulting or Reedsy?

    As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

    Absolutely not one word of this post was in any way generated by any version of an “AI” or Large Language Model, and no permission is granted for the use of any of the contents of this blog in the training of AI, LLM, or other generative systems.

    Image
  • Image

    WRITING: AMERICA’S CHEAPEST “STARTUP”

    “Contrary to what many of you might imagine,” wrote Fran Lebowitz, “a career in letters is not without its drawbacks—chief among them the unpleasant fact that one is frequently called upon to actually sit down and write.”

    But how you manage to do that—to make words appear in one form or another—is as varied as the various authors themselves. And understanding what Haruki Murakami taught us in Novelist as a Vocation

    Writing novels is, to my way of thinking, basically a very uncool enterprise. I see hardly anything chic or stylish about it. Novelists sit cloistered in their rooms, intently fiddling with words, batting around one possibility after another. They may scratch their heads an entire day to improve the quality of a single line by a tiny bit. No one applauds, or says “Well done,” or pats them on the back. Sitting there alone, they look over what they’ve accomplished and quietly nod to themselves. It may be that later, when the novel comes out, not a single reader will notice the improvement they made that day. That is what novel writing is really all about. It is time-consuming, tedious work.

    …there’s really no expensive anything that will effectively glamorize the work of writing, so welcome to the cheapest business startup in America.

    Here we are creeping up on the end of another year, and another reckoning in the form of taxes. This business—editing and writing—is what I do for a living as a full-time freelancer. That means I have to run my little business as a… well, a little business, not to put too fine a point on it. I’ve been running this little business for a decade and a half now and all that time the biggest struggle I’ve had when it comes to taxes is finding anything I can deduct.

    I used to see writing by hand as an unnecessary affectation. Now I rip through cheap spiral notebooks (because I see no reason to buy expensive notebooks) like crazy. I bought a bunch of notebooks when they were on sale at the beginning of this school year at my local supermarket for 29¢ each. Here they are, stacked up in my closet…

    Image

    This, and a pen you can pick up for less than a dollar—or even free here and there—is all you need to write the Great American Novel. In our November 2025 GoodReads group readWriting Down the Bones, poet Natalie Goldberg said of notebooks:

    This is your equipment, like hammer and nails to a carpenter. (Feel fortunate—for very little money you are in business!) Sometimes people buy expensive hardcover journals. They are bulky and heavy, and because they are fancy, you are compelled to write something good. Instead you should feel that you have permission to write the worst junk in the world and it would be okay. Give yourself a lot of space in which to explore writing. A cheap spiral notebook lets you feel that you can fill it quickly and afford another. Also, it is easy to carry. (I often buy notebook-size purses.)

    You may be surprised how many authors are out there, pen and notebook in hand. Like, for instance, Stephen King:

    I’ve still got a little bit of that scholar’s bump on my finger from doing all that longhand. But it made the rewriting process a lot more felicitous. It seemed to me that my first draft was more polished, just because it wasn’t possible to go so fast. You can only drive your hand along at a certain speed. It felt like the difference between, say, rolling along in a powered scooter and actually hiking the countryside.

    And Lydia Davis:

    The notebook is also where I write stories. Every story I write begins in the notebook and in fact is usually written entirely in the notebook. There is a good reason for that, though it took me a while to realize it: in the notebook nothing has to be permanent or good. Here I have complete freedom and so I am not afraid. You can’t write well—you can’t do anything well—if you feel cornered. I am not afraid because what I write in here doesn’t have to become a story, but if it wants to, it will.

    You may well have a different process, and indeed I don’t write everything by hand. This blog post you’re reading right now is being typed into a Word document. Like Philip Roth

    I don’t ask writers about their work habits. I really don’t care. Joyce Carol Oates says somewhere that when writers ask each other what time they start working and when they finish and how much time they take for lunch, they’re actually trying to find out “Is he as crazy as I am?” I don’t need that question answered.

    Hell, maybe you’re in with the retro typewriter crowd. Those tactile miracles worked for an awful lot of talented authors for an awful long time. Here’s how Allen Ginsberg described writing Howl:

    I had a secondhand typewriter, some cheap scratch paper. I began typing, not with the idea of writing a formal poem, but stating my imaginative sympathies, whatever they were worth. As my loves were impractical and my thoughts relatively unworldly, I had nothing to gain, only the pleasure of enjoying on paper those sympathies most intimate to myself and most awkward in the great world of family, formal education, business and current literature.

    Likewise, how much you spend on your writing is up to you, from way more than I’m sure I would ever recommend to effectively nothing at all. This is where your mileage may vary, or as Rick Rubin wrote in The Creative Act: A Way of Being:

    When there are no material, time, and budget constraints, you have unlimited options. When you accept limitations, your range of choices is reduced. Whether imposed by design or by necessity, it’s helpful to see limitations as opportunities.

    And for writing, there are so few limitations, it’s essentially all opportunities. This business—the business of writing, though not so much self-publishing—is so cheap to start and run it’s confounded my CPA this whole time. What can I write off to reduce my income? I don’t have any inventory because I have nothing physical to store, sell, or ship. I do not have separate office space because all I need is a desk and a computer (and okay, a few other things, but…). Having some kind of office that I can drive to and sit in, all by myself, just makes no sense. Still, “If you want a room to write in, just get a room,” Natalie Goldberg wrote. “Don’t make a big production out of it.” Though Murakami made it clear that, “Wherever a person is when he writes a novel, it’s a closed room, a portable study.”

    And is writing done better at home anyway? In Essays, Wallace Shawn wrote:

    To lie in bed and watch words bump together until they become sentences is a form of hedonism, whether the words and sentences glorify society and the status quo or denounce them. It’s very agreeable to live like that, even if people don’t like your work, criticize you, whatever.

    In any case, I know I would be sitting in my rented office all by myself because I have no employees. I have no work for an employee to do. I’m writing this all by myself, and if you hire me to edit your book, I will do that all by myself, too. I don’t and will not ever employ any sort of AI agent, either. Anyone who knows me even a little will know that that goes without saying.

    The ongoing costs of my business are few and not terribly expensive. I think my $30/month to PublishersMarketplace ($360 a year) is my biggest expense. I pay $2.99 a month for some extra iCloud space. And I think it’s somewhere around six dollars a year for the dictionary app I have on my phone. And $60 a year (plus high Washington state sales tax) for the entire Microsoft Office suite. And that’s more or less it in terms of ongoing expenses.

    This year I did buy a few things. I needed a new printer (which 99% of the time is a scanner), and my tiny little desk finally drove me to the point of buying a bigger one.

    This is good news for anyone thinking of writing—or already writing. You do not need investors, unless you don’t have the initial hit for a computer, I guess. Even then you won’t be going hat in hand to the likes of Peter Thiel.

    And yes, you can even save the $60 or so a year on Word (sans the hated AI, which would bring that up to $100) by using some free things like Google Docs. This will work just fine until you actually finish the thing and want to start getting it in front of other professionals, so here’s where I’m going to challenge you to spend that money, at least.

    Word, whether anyone anywhere likes it or not, is the professional tool. It doesn’t do everything perfectly, but it does everything necessary better than anything else. It really just does. And though you may be a Scrivner devotee you will eventually have to send your work to a professional of some kind—an editor, a designer/typesetter, etc.—and that’s where Scrivner ends.

    It’s a never-ending source of confusion to me where authors I work with tell me they write their novel in Google Docs or even the Notes app on their iPhone because Word (at $60 a year) is too expensive. And this I discover after they’ve made the first of two payments of $1500 each for my services.

    I’m not kidding. please tell me you see how weird that is.

    Someone like me is actually by far your biggest expense, but someone like me who knows what they’re doing isn’t just running through your book and making a few notes and suggestions, moving a few commas around. What we’re doing is teaching you to write in a way that’s  precise, detailed, and completely focused on you and your work. And I only come in after you have finished writing the complete novel from beginning to end, and have brought it as far as you feel you can on your own. For some authors I’ve worked with that’s as much as ten years of spending almost nothing.

    What I bring to the table is worth it—I honestly would not be doing this if I didn’t know that for sure. And consider the cost of 3¢ a word against the probably $70,000 for a creative writing MFA.

    Look, I get why we don’t want to give any more money to any of the tech giants, so who wants Microsoft to get $60 a year richer? But instead, you’re going with Google? Because you think you’re actually getting anything for free from… Google?

    You don’t have to pay me, but please at least cross Microsoft’s palm with silver so the rest of the world can work with you—after you’ve spent as long as you need to spending maybe a hundred bucks a year..

    —Philip Athans

    Join our group on GoodReads!

    Fantasy Author’s Handbook is also on YouTube!

    Did this post make you want to Buy Me A Coffee

    Send me a book from my Amazon Wishlist

    Join me on Bluesky

    Get into other stuff at Substack

    Link up with me on LinkedIn

    Find me at PublishersMarketplace

    Check out my eBay store

    Or contact me for editing, coaching, ghostwriting, and more at Athans & Associates Creative Consulting or Reedsy?

    As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

    Absolutely not one word of this post was in any way generated by any version of an “AI” or Large Language Model, and no permission is granted for the use of any of the contents of this blog in the training of AI, LLM, or other generative systems.

    Image
An error has occurred, which probably means the feed is down. Try again later.