Add support for \aa, \AA, \lq, \rq, \lbrack, \rbrack #1069
Conversation
The lack of \aa and \AA was reported in KaTeX#1066. Added these via simple macros, with supporting tests. Also add \lq, \rq, \lbrack, \rbrack as aliases for "`", "'", "[", "]" which were in the same area of latex.ltx.
|
Thanks for the typo fix, and quick review! |
|
@edemaine thanks for adding all of these commands. |
|
I realize that I'm late here, but I want to point out that |
|
@ronkok good catch. Since there are multiple ways to define things, we might want to have some sort of central dictionary of all the commands regardless of whether they were defined as a symbol, function, macro, or environment. In LaTeX, if you have something that you've defined as a command and then you redefine it as something else, like a color or a length, is LaTeX cool with that? |
|
Anyway, the goal of having a central lookup would be to provide a way to audit for duplicates so that we're not shipping code we don't have to. |
|
Well, I caught it because I was updating the function support page and found that those two functions were already there. So in a sense, the function support page already serves as a low tech dictionary. No doubt you're looking for something more robust. |
3 participants
The lack of
\aaand\AAwas reported in #1066. Added these via simple macros, with supporting tests.Also add
\lq,\rq,\lbrack,\rbrackas aliases for "`",',[,]which were in the same area of latex.ltx.