Skip to content

Conversation

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Fixes #136652.

The feature implementation is complete: all string related values now have their _value method and proc_macro2 integration seems to be working as expected.

Integers are voluntarily left untouched as an equivalent API for them is much trickier to provide. I'll open an ACP once I come up with a design I'm happy with.

r? @Amanieu

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez added the T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Feb 2, 2026
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 2, 2026
@jhpratt jhpratt added the needs-fcp This change is insta-stable, or significant enough to need a team FCP to proceed. label Feb 2, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs-fcp This change is insta-stable, or significant enough to need a team FCP to proceed. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Tracking issue for proc_macro_value

4 participants