Closed
Conversation
The wasm32-wasi target respects configuration around `crt-static` in general, but is defaulted to being static. This interacted badly with code which validated the `cdylib` crate type for `wasm32-wasi`, erroneously saying that the `cdylib` crate type wasn't supported on `wasm32-wasi` by default. This commit sets the appropriate flag in `wasm32_wasi`'s target specification to indicate that the `cdylib` crate type is supported regardless of `crt-static` Closes rust-lang#64187
Fixes an issue where we did not nest tables correctly when resolving associated types in formal argument/return type positions
Performance shouldn't be impacted (see [1] for a perf run) and this should allow us to catch more bugs, e.g. [2] and [3]. [1]: rust-lang#64262 [2]: rust-lang#64250 [3]: rust-lang#57298
Improve hygiene of `alloc::format!` `format` now uses `format_args` though a `__export` module, as described in rust-lang#63687 (comment). Fixes rust-lang#63687
Replace file_stem by file_name in rustdoc markdown Before this PR, a file name like `some.file.md` will be output to a file named `some.html` with is not correct because the expected output file must be `some.file.html`
Tweak unsatisfied HRTB errors r? @oli-obk Close rust-lang#35180.
rustc: Allow the cdylib crate type with wasm32-wasi The wasm32-wasi target respects configuration around `crt-static` in general, but is defaulted to being static. This interacted badly with code which validated the `cdylib` crate type for `wasm32-wasi`, erroneously saying that the `cdylib` crate type wasn't supported on `wasm32-wasi` by default. This commit sets the appropriate flag in `wasm32_wasi`'s target specification to indicate that the `cdylib` crate type is supported regardless of `crt-static` Closes rust-lang#64187
… r=varkor
save-analysis: Nest typeck tables when processing functions/methods
Fixes an issue where we did not nest tables correctly when resolving
associated types in formal argument/return type positions.
This was the minimized reproduction case that I tested the fix on:
```rust
pub trait Trait {
type Assoc;
}
pub struct A;
pub fn func() {
fn _inner1<U: Trait>(_: U::Assoc) {}
fn _inner2<U: Trait>() -> U::Assoc { unimplemented!() }
impl A {
fn _inner1<U: Trait>(self, _: U::Assoc) {}
fn _inner2<U: Trait>(self) -> U::Assoc { unimplemented!() }
}
}
```
using `debug_assertions`-enabled rustc and by additionally passing `-Zsave-analysis`.
Unfortunately the original assertion fired is a *debug* one and from what I can tell we don't run the tests with these on, so I'm not adding a test here. If I missed it and there is a way to run tests with these on, I'd love to add a test case for this.
Closes rust-lang#63663
Closes rust-lang#50328
Closes rust-lang#43982
…r, r=cramertj documentation for AtomicPtr CAS operations The examples in the documentation for AtomicPtr CAS operations only show code that does *not* perform the CAS operation. I suggest to change them so that they actually do exchange the AtomicPtr's value.
Member
Author
|
@bors r+ p=6 rollup=never |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 02fd8f4 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Collaborator
|
⌛ Testing commit 02fd8f4 with merge 88303427b03b97561f71447b963cb9de15b7b2a3... |
Collaborator
|
💔 Test failed - checks-azure |
Contributor
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
9 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
alloc::format!#64060 (Improve hygiene ofalloc::format!)Failed merges:
r? @ghost