The first post in this series looked at the structure of Claude’s Constitution.
The second post in this series looked at its ethical framework.
This final post deals with conflicts and open problems, starting with the first question one asks about any constitution. How and when will it be amended?
There are also several specific questions. How do you address claims of authority, jailbreaks and prompt injections? What about special cases like suicide risk? How do you take Anthropic’s interests into account in an integrated and virtuous way? What about our jobs?
Not everyone loved the Constitution. There are twin central objections, that it either:








