Dual View Random Solved Random Open
DISPROVED This has been solved in the negative. - $1000
Can the smallest modulus of a covering system be arbitrarily large?
Described by Erdős as 'perhaps my favourite problem'. Hough [Ho15], building on work of Filaseta, Ford, Konyagin, Pomerance, and Yu [FFKPY07], has shown (contrary to Erdős' expectations) that the answer is no: the smallest modulus must be at most $10^{16}$.

An alternative, simpler, proof was given by Balister, Bollobás, Morris, Sahasrabudhe, and Tiba [BBMST22], who improved the upper bound on the smallest modulus to $616000$.

The best known lower bound is a covering system whose minimum modulus is $42$, due to Owens [Ow14].

View the LaTeX source

This page was last edited 23 January 2026.

External data from the database - you can help update this
Formalised statement? No (Create a formalisation here)
Related OEIS sequences: A160559
Likes this problem None
Interested in collaborating None
Currently working on this problem None
This problem looks difficult None
This problem looks tractable None
The results on this problem could be formalisable None
I am working on formalising the results on this problem None

Additional thanks to: Alfaiz and Desmond Weisenberg

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #2, https://www.erdosproblems.com/2, accessed 2026-02-13