SIMULATION Cosmos3
+41.1 percentage points
7 unseen RoboTwin 2.0 tasks
Evolving World Action Models
through Video-Action Verification
‡ Equal contribution† Project lead* Corresponding author
01 / RESULTS
Mean task success (%) · R0–R4
+41.1 percentage points
7 unseen RoboTwin 2.0 tasks
+17.9 percentage points
7 unseen RoboTwin 2.0 tasks
+56.7 percentage points
3 unseen long-horizon composite tasks
02 / THE STORY
EVO-WAM learns from its own generated video–action trajectories, retaining prefixes that pass task-completion and action-consistency checks.
Self-training uses no additional expert demonstrations or external execution of candidate actions.
Method03 / IN ACTION
Separate trials, similar layouts. Inference pauses removed.
04 / THE METHOD
Duck placement
Visual check
Visual scan → IDM → endpoint vote
Frame reviewBlue duck lands between the bowls.
Frame reviewObject inconsistency: a second duck appears while the original remains.
IDM failed; endpoint votes skipped.
Retained for training.
Checks: goal completion · release · object consistency · robot consistency. Endpoint vote: ≥2/3 Accept.
Action consistency
Mean MSE / threshold0.008226 > 0.008111
Mean MSE / threshold0.006650 < 0.008111
Accumulate verified prefixes across tasks and rounds, mix them with the original data, and fine-tune the WAM for the next round.

Paper, Figure 2.
05 / RESOURCES
@misc{zhou2026evowamevolvingworldaction,
title={EVO-WAM: Evolving World Action Models through Video-Action Verification},
author={Shiyang Zhou and Xionghao Wu and Wenbo Li and Shenghe Zheng and Jiyao Zhang and Songsong Yu and Yijun Yang and Jianhui Liu and Haoze Sun and Senqiao Yang and Li Jiang and Jingyong Su and Haoyang Huang and Zhuotao Tian},
year={2026},
eprint={2609.38057},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CV},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38057},
}
Download BibTeX