Lately the only travel I do is between here and California. This is by choice, which isn’t to say that I don’t occasionally miss traveling, perhaps in part because for a stretch of about five years, I was doing almost nothing else. Regularly experiencing the unfamiliar became my familiar. Now, I miss it most during this time of year, which I think of as my Grief Trifecta: Jackson’s birthday in April, Mother’s Day in May, then D-day (if you don’t know my history, “D” stands for death) in June, one upon the other with a short space of breathing room in between in which to gird my loins. Do people still use that expression? I looked it up and it turns out it comes from the Bible, referring to tucking one’s long robe into a girdle (i.e., a belt) in order to keep it out of the way of physical labor, though gradually the term broadened to include mental labor as well.
These days my day-to-day routines and interactions with my 94 year old father serve as building blocks, frozen chunks as well as floating particles which I drop into my memory well, from which I will draw in the years to come. I am keenly aware of how soon he will be gone from my life forever, and I understand that I have a chance here that I didn’t have with Jackson. I may not be able to choose my memories now any more than I could then, but I’m more conscious of them as they pass through my fingers. I linger longer. Obviously I expected Jackson would grow up and leave home, move on to a life of his own, but his time never felt finite to me the way my father’s, or even mine, did (and increasingly does). Our life together felt fluid, and in a way, predictable. I had living, breathing examples all around me of what, presumably, was to come. I realize now only a parent of a child with a terminal illness would ever see their child’s time as finite. The others expect to die first, so why think of what will happen (long) after they are gone? They won’t be around to face it, so they don’t need to think about it. In a way though, old age in a loved one is a terminal illness. It advances to the point where you can’t deny its looming shadow, growing darker and more pronounced, and because of this you see every day as potentially the last in this life as you know it to be. Complacency is not your bedfellow.
I had hoped being around my family during my Trifecta would lessen the blow, and reduce the time spent girding. I feel less alone than I did before, but I find myself loathe to share the depths of my grief with others who may feel it less and/or feel their own and/or not want to witness mine. With each layer of intimacy removed between the griever and the grievee, surely there exists an increasingly remote distance, added at increasingly faster speeds, to the sense of loss one continues to feel over time.
This year, unlike when I was traveling, there are no automatic, organic distractions – no exotic smells or cheeky monkeys to remind me, in a way “the news” never can, how vast and diverse our planet is, yet how intricately interconnected all of us are who live upon it. How trivial, minuscule and fleeting each of us really is. How momentous in possibility any one moment might be. And for all the overuse the word receives, how being “mindful” of this can be healing.
Two down, one to go. The plan this D-day is to drive about an hour north to a small town on the Chesapeake Bay where I’ve reserved a room at a bed and breakfast for the night, thus creating my own small distraction, a new unfamiliar. I won’t think less about Jackson, nor will I not cry, miss him, or mourn his death. You take yourself with you, after all, wherever you go. I will think as I often do about the words that people use when they hear about disaster, disease and death, and how those words morph into labels they apply to themselves and others, like badges of honor or self-selected scarlet letters. In particular, words like survivor and victim. How we take these labels and incorporate them into our identity, using them to distinguish ourselves from others, set us apart, except for the select few with whom we believe we share their criteria (our club. Do you remember the line by Groucho Marx, “I wouldn’t want to belong to a club that would have me as a member”?). How we think our character is somehow shaped by which label we choose for ourselves, and conversely, that the label reflects our character, as well as what we expect from life, perhaps even receive. Am I weak because I got knocked down and find it so difficult to get back up? If so, is this why I’m a victim, or the result of my victimhood? If I get through a traumatic event and I’m still standing, am I by definition strong and tenacious? Is strong morally superior to weak? Is stoicism preferable to visible struggle, and does what doesn’t kill us really make us stronger, or does it just bring us one step closer to death? Will the meek inherit the earth??
In the end, of course, none of it really matters – what we choose to call ourselves or other people – ultimately Death sees to it that everyone is victimized, and nobody survives. The very opposite of the labels we would wish for ourselves are chosen for us, and words are just words. Perhaps we put too much stock in labels, and waste too much time pondering, picking and preferring them. Perhaps there are more important things to think about, and do.
Now if you’ll excuse me, I have some loins to girder.




town of Polis in the northern Paphos district, surrounded by fields, olive groves, and the turquoise Chrysochous Bay.




