CHARISMA GAINED, CHARISMA LOST

14 03 2026
Image

photo courtesy Clifford Chappell and The Farm Family Photo Archives

This post and the one that follows is an article/sidebar I wrote that recently appeared in Communities Magazine. Since it is behind a paywall there, I am publishing it here. This version differs from the printed version only in that I have repositioned the photographs and captioned them. The captions were cut from Communities due to space limitations.

Stephen Gaskin, the spiritual teacher who inspired The Farm (started in 1971 in Summertown, Tennessee), was also a major contributor to its dissolution as he gradually foundered in his role as our teacher/guru/guide/abbot. His weaknesses gave the whole community a shaky foundation, and his personal failings became more pronounced and consequential over time. I am writing this to give an account of his trajectory, as a cautionary tale for communities which are strongly influenced by charismatic individuals, whether they are formally recognized as “a guru” or not.

While some former Farm members have grown very cynical over his motives for starting the community, I believe he was sincerely trying to make the world a better place.

Stephen framed The Farm, and Monday Night Class before it, as “a teachers’ college.” “I don’t want you to venerate me,” he would caution us. “I want you to learn to do what I’m doing, ’cos there’s so much needs doing that I ain’t gonna be able to do it all… They call colleges where they teach people how to be teachers ‘normal schools.’ OK, we’re an ‘abnormal school,’ but that’s what this is about.”

It all began at a college—San Francisco State, where Stephen taught in the English Department, which was headed by S.I. Hayakawa, the renowned linguistics scholar who went on to become a Republican Senator.

By Stephen’s account, there was good news and bad news in his situation. The good news was that, if he stuck around, he would likely become the next head of the English Department. The bad news was that he felt guilty about being an unpublished author who was nevertheless teaching creative writing.

He started noticing that his favorite students were dropping out and moving to the Haight-Ashbury, so he went to check up on them, tried some of what they were having (LSD), and got his mind blown.

It wasn’t just the drugs—it was the cultural climate. He and his former students and a great many other people were reading everything they could find on subjects like Tibetan Buddhism, the Western Magickal tradition, and the implications of theoretical physics, not to mention general semantics, which Stephen, as a student of S.I. Hayakawa, must have known well. People were having long, intense discussions about what these sometimes abstruse texts meant in light of their psychedelic experiences—and for their everyday lives. Read the rest of this entry »





SEX AND THE SINGULAR SPIRITUAL TEACHER

14 03 2026
Image

Stephen with Louise, who, along with her husband, Thomas, who was the keyboard player and songwriter for The Farm Band, turned Stephen’s four-marriage into a six marriage. He referred to her, lovingly, as “Little Annie Fanny.” photo courtesy Clifford Chappell and The Farm Family Photo Archives

This was the “sidebar” in the print version of my “Charisma Gained, Charisma Lost” article in Communities Magazine. I have slightly altered the ending. 

One common aspect of charisma is sexual attractiveness. This goes way back in our history—primatologists point out that “trophy mating” with the alpha male is common in many primate species: the females gain status by mating with the alpha, but do not expect him to be monogamous or help raise his children.

More recently, we have the “groupie” phenomenon, in which young women seek one-night stands with their favorite rock stars.

Stephen’s charismatic ministry arose in the “free love” atmosphere of San Francisco in the late ’60s, and was informed by, among many other influences, Wilhelm Reich’s view that mental neurosis and sexual inhibition are interlocking phenomena—or as George Clinton put it, “Free your mind and your ass will follow”…and vice-versa.

While he was no George Clinton, Stephen was definitely a rock star. It should come as no surprise that, like other rock stars, he attracted groupies. As a spiritual teacher rather than a musician, he offered not just the healing value of intimacy, but also wisdom and insight.

His sexual involvement with female students is not well-documented. There are only a few stories floating around in online Farm discussion groups, but from what I have been told it appears to have been a part of Stephen’s teaching repertoire from early on, and to have become somewhat common on The Farm.

two hippies, man and woman, kissing passionately

This woman was not one of his wives, but one of his students. My reading of the body language here is that she is enthusiastic about the kiss. photo courtesy Clifford Chappell and The Farm Family Photo Archives

It was widely known in the community that women who were not getting along well with their husbands would go to Stephen for hands-on therapy. This is not so strange when we consider that “sexual surrogacy” has become a recognized, albeit controversial, adjunct to sex therapy. (Nobody on The Farm offered this for men.) Read the rest of this entry »





THE IMPERMANENCE OF DONALD TRUMP

8 03 2026

As I was getting ready to write this month’s post, the main thing on my mind was addressing the widespread concern that The Donald appears to be setting himself up to be a long-term dictator in this country–a possibility, for sure,  but one whose success I think unlikely. Then, last Saturday morning, I woke to find that the US had partnered with Israel to once again attempt to decapitate Iran, in a bid to ensure USraeli hegemony in the region. While I agree that, if this gambit is successful, it could restore the US to its position of unipolar domination of the world, and Trump as the unquestioned ruler of the US, I think the effort is far more likely to fail, and end with the flattening of much of Israel, evicting the US from West Asia, and sending a sizable contingent of the US Navy, and Donald Trump’s power, to the bottom of the ocean. So, first I’m going to review the other factors that make Trump’s reign unsteady, and then look at why his attack on Iran is likely to lead to his undoing, one way or another.

So–let’s review Trump’s weaknesses.

ImageFirst of all, the guy is old and in poor condition. Men of his class have a life expectancy of 87 years. He is currently about to turn 80. He is eating a poor diet, which even the best health care cannot necessarily save him from. He is already our oldest President. Ronald Reagan, our second oldest, was in serious cognitive decline in the last years he was in office, as was Joe Biden, another of our oldest Presidents, and both basically served as  figureheads for the people behind them. Could that happen to Trump? Possibly. He has floated  running for an unconstitutional third term, hoping to ensure victory by disqualifying millions of voters with Presidential decrees, an effort that so far has been slapped down by the courts.  Should he seek to impose it anyway, which would not be surprising, it would lead us into “second American Civil War” territory, a possibility I will address later. No matter  what happens in 2028,  there is simply nobody with his charisma who could replace him. Without a strong figure like him, all the fragile, self-important egos he has marshaled in the service of institutionalized selfishness will quickly fall to fighting among themselves, resulting in a return to Democratic Party rule if our voting system stays intact, or a descent into chaos, civil war, and the possible fracturing of the country if Trump succeeds in disabling enough of our electoral infrastructure to make peaceful change impossible. Upshot: I think there’s some chance he won’t survive this term, let alone be in shape to go for a third.

The question of what kind of Democratic Party we will have over the next few years is a subject unto itself. I’ll talk about that some other time.. Read the rest of this entry »





OH, WHAT A LOVELY WAR!

8 03 2026
cemetery with rows of simple crosses

So far, the majority of victims have been Muslim, but there will be rows of crosses soon enough.

So

…of all the doors Mr. Trump could step through to commit political suicide, Trumppa the Hut chose door number three–attack Iran and lose. Perhaps it’s early to announce that conclusion, but the nature of this conflict–USrael embarking on a war of choice while Iran fights for its existence–shapes it so that all the Iranians have to do to win is keep fighting, while for USrael the requirement is to get Iran to stop fighting, and that will prove to be an impossible task, no matter how much propaganda they try to paper it over with.

The problem for USrael is that Iran saw this coming decades ago, and got ready for it–not merely by producing and stockpiling large quantities of weapons and people who know how to use them, but by decentralizing their government and military command structure, so that the “decapitation” USrael failed to achieve last June was even less likely this time.

The USraelis thought they had that one figured out. Mossad agents in Iran got wind of a meeting of all high-ranking members of the government to discuss Trump’s latest “peace plan,” and decided it was time to strike. But it wasn’t totally a spur-of-the-moment decision. It turns out that USrael was planning to attack Iran in a few weeks anyway, so most of the pieces were in play already.

We should note that this is not the first time the Trumpenyahu government has used “negotiations” as a bait to lull and lure somebody into a trap and kill them. Last Summer, the Israelis pulled this stunt on the Palestinians in Doha–which was not the first time they killed a Palestinian official involved in negotiations with them. Maybe the Iranians thought they were safe from such shenanigans due to being large and powerful. Now they know they are not. USrael will not get another such opportunity, and you can be sure that, at some point in the future, our government will pay the price of such treachery. Read the rest of this entry »





I WAS SWEPT UP IN A NATURAL DISASTER

15 02 2026

We spent a week without electricity and another without internet, so there will be no post this month–not that there isn’t plenty to write about! There’s still a lot of broken limbs and brush to clean up, and that has been keeping me busy. First things first!





VANDALISM IN TENNESSEE, CONTINUED

11 01 2026
Image

This is what zinc mining does to the landscape. Green, huh? (This mine is not in Tennessee.)

Last month I wrote about the environmental impact of the destruction of some of Nashville’s remaining forested land in order to build more high-end housing. This month. I want to examine the environmental impact of attempting to rebuild America’s industrial base here in Tennessee. My interest was sparked by a news story proudly announcing that Korea Zinc Corporation had bought the Tennessee properties of an American zinc-producing corporation and was going to reinvigorate zinc smelting in Clarksville, Tennessee, as well as opening a new zinc smelting facility on an old mine site in Gordonsville, Tennessee, east of Nashville.

Nothing says “environmental degradation” quite so plainly as “smelting metals.” The Copperhill area in southeastern Tennessee is notorious for being completely denuded of vegetation due to the copper mining activities in the area. Smelting zinc results in substantial amounts of cadmium and lead being vaporized, going into the atmosphere, and then falling to, and into, the ground and the groundwater when it rains. These acutely poisonous neurotoxins also end up in the people who live downwind from the smelter. Once they’re in the environment, they are extremely difficult to remove. There does not seem to be a way to “scrub” these poisons before they enter the environment.

devastation caused by pollution from zinc smelting

This is your landscape on zinc smelting. (Again, this shot is not from Tennessee.)

I checked out the websites of both Nystar Zinc, the current owner, and Korea Zinc. While both have nice things to say about “sustainability” and “green energy,” neither of them claims to be scrubbing the lead and cadmium out of their emissions. I kind of think they would be shouting it from the rooftops if they were. Read the rest of this entry »





TRUMP WHOMPS THE TAR BABY

11 01 2026

ImageBack during the Obama Presidency, I wrote the only post that I have ever been heavily criticized for writing. When I was a child in the fifties, our cultural understanding of what constitutes racism did not extend to works like Joel Chandler Harris’s “Negro dialect” book “Tales of Uncle Remus,” The 1881 book compiled African-American folk tales, frequently part of what people had been able to save from their original African cultures, and told them in Chandler’s rendition of the way African-Americans spoke English at the time. Walt Disney made a film version in 1946, before I was born, but I was a dedicated Disney fan as a child and, having seen the film somehow. O went to my local public library and secured the book. The thought that there was anything racist about a white man writing in “Negro dialect” never surfaced.

So, when, in late 2009, Obama  announced a “surge” of US troops in Afghanistan, the country known as “the graveyard of empires,” I smelled disaster, I wrote a story in the style of Joel Chandler Harris and called it, “B’rer Obama An De Tar Baby,” recounting Br’er Obama’s encounter with a tar baby made to resemble Br’er Obama’s neighbor “Afghan Stan,” and how disastrously it ended for poor Br’er Obama, since, in my telling, Br’er Fox was not fooled into throwing him in the briar patch.  I was so roundly criticized as a racist for writing this that I deleted the blog entry and don’t seem to even have a backup copy. I got it half right, though–while Obama has paid no penalty for the futile destruction he wrought in Afghanistan, it was, indeed, futile, although it took another twelve years for the US to finally admit defeat and leave.

And now, B’rer Trump has whomped the Venezuelan tar baby a good one, and he is promising to whomp a whole line of tar babies besides. How is this going to play out in the mid- to long run? Read the rest of this entry »





MAJOR ACTS OF VANDALISM ON McCRORY LANE!!!

28 12 2025
high-end row housing

No, these buildings weren’t vandalized. They are the vandalism. photo by Ernie Journeys/Unsplash

When people destroy what other people have created, it’s criminalized as “vandalism.” Usually, damage from vandalism gets repaired pretty quickly. When people destroy what Nature has created, it’s praised and called “development,” it stays vandalized, and, really, it’s beyond our human power to restore it to its original state. That was my initial thought when I read this bit of local news:

The largest project, Newsome Station, is under construction off of McCrory Lane – just across the railroad tracks at Highway 70. The development will include 162 townhome rentals and is being built by AHV Communities, a Texas-based company that operates luxury rental communities in Colorado, Washington and Texas, with new developments underway in Alabama and Tennessee.

AHV Communities is also behind Westbrook Pointe, a 153-unit rental project next to Eddy’s Market on Highway 70. Plans call for 84 townhome rentals and 69 single-family home rentals.

At one of its communities in San Antonio, Texas, AHV charges $2.3k-$2.5k per month for three and four bedroom single family homes that range from 1,500-1,900-square-feet. The townhomes range from $2k-$2.3k per month for two to four bedrooms and 1,200- to 1,700-square-feet. This Texas community includes amenities like a pool, pickleball courts and a fitness center.

What we see here is housing built to appeal to high-end renters. That’s kind of typical of our economy, in which the top 10% of earners are doing 50% of the retail spending, the main driver of the US economy, while the bottom 80% of households are spending less. This dynamic has exacerbated the level of income inequality in the US and helped make us us the 14th most unequal economy in the world. The way things are going, we are likely to rise on that list. While the Trump regime’s policies are making things worse, the disparity has been rising since the 1970’s, no matter which half of the duopoly was in power. We have not had our current level of income and wealth inequality since the early 20th century, the time known as “the gilded age.” Back then, a rising tide of labor organizing, socialism, and humanitarian liberals were able to institute major reforms once “the gilded age” ran its course and collapsed into “the great depression” of the 1930’s. Is that a scenario that is likely to replay? I’ll look at that a little later. Meanwhile, let’s get back to housing. Read the rest of this entry »





BACK WHEN AMERICA WAS (NOT SO) GREAT

28 12 2025
A guest post by Genny Harrison. This has been shared 7800 times as a Facebook post, so I don’t think she will mind me using it here.
Image
The photograph shows what America wants to remember: a father in his suit and tie, home from the office, sitting on the floor with his children in their pajamas. Mother stands above them in her yellow blouse and blue skirt, hair perfectly coiffed, smile radiant. The living room glows with warm light, flowers arranged just so on the side table. Everyone is laughing. This is the image that fuels a thousand political speeches about “traditional marriage” and “family values.” It’s beautiful. It’s also a lie.
Not because the photograph itself is fake, but because what it doesn’t show matters more than what it does. It doesn’t show that the woman in the yellow blouse couldn’t open a bank account without her husband’s signature. It doesn’t show that if he hit her, the police would call it a “domestic dispute” and refuse to intervene. It doesn’t show that forcing her into sex wasn’t legally rape because she’d said “I do” at the altar. It doesn’t show that her paycheck, if she worked, belonged to him by law. It doesn’t show that leaving, no matter how bad things got, meant social suicide and likely destitution. It doesn’t show that those smiling children had virtually no legal protection if abuse happened behind closed doors.
The 1950s family photograph is a masterpiece of selective memory, and it’s worth examining exactly what we’re selecting to forget. Because when conservatives invoke traditional marriage, they’re not talking about an abstraction. They’re talking about a specific legal regime, a complete package deal that treated women as property, trapped people in dangerous situations, and required enormous human suffering to maintain its picture-perfect façade. You don’t get to cherry-pick the pot roast and the Sunday picnics while disclaiming the coverture laws and the legalized marital rape. It’s a package. And some of us (not me) are old enough to remember exactly what was in that package.
Traditional marriage in the 1950s operated under legal principles that would shock most modern Americans, including those who lived through the era and simply accepted it as usual. The doctrine of coverture, inherited from English common law, meant that a woman’s legal identity was absorbed into that of her husband upon marriage. This wasn’t metaphorical. In most states, a married woman could not sign a contract in her own name, own property separately from her husband, keep her own earnings (her paycheck legally belonged to him), obtain credit without her husband’s permission or co-signature, serve on a jury in many jurisdictions, or start a business without spousal approval.

Read the rest of this entry »





THE SECOND–THIRD?– AMERICAN CIVIL WAR

16 11 2025

ImageWhat I try to do with these commentaries is look at things from a broader perspective in order to gain a deeper understanding of the pattern made by the rush of daily events. Gaza! Iran! Yemen! Sudan! Ukraine! Afghanistan! Nigeria! Venezuela! Colombia! Jamaica! Hurricanes! Droughts! Floods! Massacres! Assassinations! ICE raids! National Guard sent to cities! AI  everywhere! Mass layoffs! Government shutdown! Scrooge McTrump cuts food stamp program entirely! Gives half of it back–sometime soon, maybe… taking in the pummeling rush of daily tragedies, outrages and occasional advances is like being caught in a rainstorm so intense that the only thing you can think of is seeking shelter.

It’s been clear to me, at least, that, since around the election of Barack Obama, this country has been moving with increasing speed towards a second American Civil War. Obama is the seminal, polarizing figure in this gathering storm for a number of reasons. First, he violated the country’s cultural norms by being an African-American, being named “Barack Hussein Obama,” and becoming the President. American Presidents are supposed to be Protestant white guys with last names you could find in any phone book in England. The Roosevelts, Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy, and Donald Trump (originally “Drumpf“) are the only outliers to that, and, as exceptions to the rule go, they’re pretty vanilla–Holland, Germany and Ireland are England’s closest neighbors, after all, except for France, which is apparently too exotic to provide an American President. Italy? Spain? Eastern Europe? Fuggedabout it! So…a black guy with a very Muslim middle name, whose father was Kenyan. The fact that his Kenyan father had a Master’s Degree in economics and was the senior policy analyst for the Kenyan Ministry of Finance rarely enters the conversation. Those who believed, as my late father-in-law exclaimed, that “A man of Muslim descent cannot be the President of the United States” no doubt pictured Obama’s father spear in hand, clad in a loincloth, squatting around a fire on which a spitted goat was roasting, plotting with his fellow Mau-Mau to terrorize some innocent family of British Christian Kenyan plantation owners. Sorry, folks. The guy had a nice collection of high-end three-piece suits. Nevertheless, this…..African President….violated the expectations of a broad swathe of the population, albeit a swathe that wouldn’t have voted for him because he was Democrat, never mind all that other stuff.

Once Obama was elected, he violated his supporters’ expectations when he chucked all that “hopey, changey stuff,” and made good on his promise to Wall Street: “I’m the only person between you and the people with torches and pitchforks. But don’t worry–I’m your friend.” And he was, indeed, their friend, bailing out most of Wall Street, prosecuting no one for financial crimes that had cost millions of Obama’s rank and file supporters their homes, betraying those millions of supporters for his supporters with million$. The rank and file, “the people with the torches and pitchforks,” were not amused. While they weren’t provoked sufficiently to sharpen ththeir pitchforks and make sure their torches were soaked in flammables, let alone show up thus equipped at their local bank or legislature, any of them defected from the Democratic Party.

There were two basic directions of defection. Some of those disenchanted with Obama gravitated towards radical economic and social analysis, realizing through Obama’s betrayal that there was no point in trying to rework the capitalist system in hopes of improving the condition of the working class.  Those people gravitated towards Occupy Wall Street and the world of cooperatives and mutual aid networks. But they, or should I say we, were, and remain, a minority, albeit a growing one. The vast majority of the working class voters that Obama jilted reacted by becoming, well, reactionary. They embraced capitalism even more fiercely, and demonized others, people they saw as “not like us,” for their problems. They blamed uppity women, African Americans, immigrants, people whose sexual expression is not cisgender, and “socialists,” like an abused woman who never holds her husband responsible for his violence, but instead is fixated on the idea that, if only the kids behaved better, he wouldn’t get mad and beat her.

These folks left the Democrats in huge numbers during Obama’s years in office. They joined the Republican Party, and pushed the GOP further to the right through “The Tea Party” far more successfully than “progressives” or “democratic socialists” have ever been able to push the Democrats to the left. They pushed the whole country to the right, as nearly a thousand elected offices formerly held by Democrats flipped to the GOP during Obama’s Presidency. Perhaps some were initially still open enough so that a Bernie Sanders 2016 candidacy could have caused them to change direction, but watching the DNC systematically sabotage Bernie only made them more cynical and reactionary.

Read the rest of this entry »