An award was given out yesterday for a project I had the honour of being involved in. I was aware of the nomination, and prior to it being announced, I was approached on the matter. You see, I caused an upset some years ago by very publicly turning down an award. I turned it down because they announced my name as the “winner” of that award, something I strongly disagreed with.
It’s surprising how big a deal awards have become to volunteers and charities. Many would say that the work they do is without reward (financially) so they don’t have any issue with an award to honour that. I disagree. Regardless of not receiving financial reward, we are rewarded in ways that you cannot put a financial value on. We are without doubt the richest, wealthiest people on the planet – for all we have seen and heard and learnt from people facing the most unimaginable challenges and are doing so with courage and hope and joy. We are rewarded. Awards are not necessary.
I disagree with glorifying people, awarding them accolades, raising them up on pedestals, suggesting they are superior. It all becomes about me, me, me. So very far from the motivation that volunteers should have.

Reading that now might not seem particularly revolutionary. Only, I had somehow become a bit of a darling in the charity world, being roped into regular PR gigs and all sorts of big events. I became accustomed to the stage, the cameras, giving interviews, being photographed. I don’t think I saw how wrong it was at first. But I did come to realize it, and I knew it had to change.
Everything we did was a team effort. Credit should not be and should never have been allocated to one person. My very public reaction on my name being read out at an awards ceremony in London caused an upset. My words reverberated around the world. (Jack cites the experience as one of the reasons he knew he wanted to spend the rest of his life with me.) It has not fundamentally changed anything – for the most part, awards are still given out to individuals. But it made a lot of people think. So, the organisation who contacted the man who has direct oversight over all of my assignments (and who consulted with me) know that cannot happen again. If a project I am involved in is recognised, now they know, we need to come up with a plan.
This time round, I was notified that the work, the project was to be recognised with a nomination. Receiving a nomination meant there was a possibility that the award would also be given out in recognition of the work. So, on the eve of the award, would I be present? would I consider being involved in accepting the award? In other words, they threw the question out to us, how can we shine a light on the work, on the team effort, in a way that works for us? It really is a team effort – at every layer – planning, budgeting, sourcing, training, coordinating, supervising, constructing, cleaning, polishing, opening. maintaining… and so much more.

Consulting with us was appreciated. Jack was hugely keen on me thinking carefully about the response. You see, I am uncomfortable generally with comparing, suggesting one project is superior to another. The whole culture of awards makes me dubious. It makes Jack less dubious. He sees it as a way to motivate and celebrate volunteers. Jack is in the limelight whether he likes it or not – in the role he serves in – trust, transparency, accountability, being a role-model mean he has to be seen. He is a safe choice for that sort of a role – it does not go to his head. He is humble through and through. I have found ways to avoid the limelight. I am a little bit of a purist when it comes to motivation I suppose. You cannot be thinking of yourself when you volunteer. Lots of celebrities do – which really is bizarre. I presented a proposal through my direct overseer, which he communicated. We would work on a video presentation, so that if the project was chosen to receive an award, the video would deliver an acceptance in the words of our team.
We prepared the video. It was given to the organisation behind awards a few weeks ago. Last night, the awards were presented, and I was not overly surprised that in our category, it was the project we had been working on that received the award. The video that they played conveyed the same message I gave out when I rejected an award, but perhaps in a more palatable manner. It was all about why we do what we do. Nobody went was on stage. All eyes were on the screen. I sat there trying to pretend I did not notice the glances in my direction from those who knew… who knew that the organisation would have preferred to read out a name and see a person on stage saying something pretty. No, we delivered a video to make volunteers think and avoid improper motives.
It was a lovely evening. I spoke with many people I have known since I was in my late teens and early twenties. There were others who are newer to my acquaintance – and I firmly refused some requests for a photograph. The occasion to gather with fellow volunteers was worthwhile.

Frequently – I am on a stage – for the purpose of training and teaching. I have been interviewed, in front of many thousands of people, but that was for the purpose of training and teaching. The moment it becomes about credit, glory, honour – something goes very wrong. It cannot be. It has to be focused on the reason we do what we do. Highlighting the work going on can be very encouraging – and that is the value of a gathering like the one Jack and I attended yesterday. Volunteers are rewarded (not financially) and are the richest, wealthiest people on the planet – no awards are needed – thank you.












