Checking in on my WordPress account – turns out my account from 7 years ago is still working ?! Reading my thoughts from so many years ago seems strange – it’s as if  I was a different person.

I also seem to have forgotten how to write after so many years of teaching.

So much of my life has changed – dated a nice man, became engaged, bought a house, got married, had a baby, So much could happen in less than 3/4 of a decade. 2011 Me would have thought these things were impossible. But here I am, and here we are.

Life is good – work remains exhausting but somewhat satisfying. Home is where I can rest my head (figuratively now since I have lost my attempt to get sleep thanks to my baby) and I love where I am right now. Not much, still mediocre. But life is pretty satisfying.

 

as the term draws to a close, i’ve arrived at the busiest time of the year. Most of my time at work is divided between marking and talking – unevenly. Marking is lonely. You sit in your cubicle with stacks and stacks of paper and each piece questions your ability as a teacher – or, your ability to make sure they write grammatically. Well I’ve given up on the Great Mystery of Bad Grammar. I have stopped beating myself up over my students’ horrible grammar and illogical arguments. This is called letting go.

I am also at my laziest. Since there is no teaching or yelling involved, my days at work have been very pleasant. I no longer rush in at 645 to print the day’s work. I no longer dread getting up in the morning. Well, not by much anyway. Plenty of work to do and none of it involves high blood pressure and seething rage. At least not for now.

The time for reflection will come later. For now, I just want to get through a class of essays without finishing another pack of keropok. These things kill you – because the mindless chewing takes your mind off the numbing pain of endless marking, but it destroy your throat and appetite.

I haven’t written anything in a long time. Except for badly scribbled caustic remarks on a poor student’s work. I think I need to vent a little.

This term feels crazy and no less hectic than before. But I think my attitude has changed a bit – leave when I get time and don’t look back. Don’t let insufferable children get to me.

Work is still piling up, but I’ll manage.

Been more involved with my CCA recently, what with the performance at SCH and all. I was practically drowning in endless nostalgia with no one to share it with. I saw the figment of my past, sitting (quietly) amongst their peers at yet another performance. And it was surreal. I saw my cello teacher and couldn’t help but be excited to see her. It has been almost a decade since I last saw her.

My Coral kids were beyond excited about the performance. It was a rare occasion – us performing alongside the heavyweights at a public concert. Some were nauseous with worry; others simply couldn’t sit still out of anxiety. I looked to my right – a sea of crisp white shirts and black pants, students unfazed by the prospect of a public concert. We were used to it. We did this all the time.

And my heart swelled with pride as I looked at our little school. Kids who are indeed excited about performing and behave like little children during rehearsals. Embarrassing compared to the slick professionalism of DHSCO? I think not. When I was a part of them, I wanted to be a kid when everyone wanted us to be otherwise. So we were the naughty ones and I had forged friendships that lasttill now. So I say let the kids be kids. We all grew up rather nicely, didn’t we?


True nostalgia is an ephemeral composition of disjointed memories.

This is a film that I’ve waited 2 years to watch, and I’d say my expectations for it couldn’t be higher. So it’s no wonder that I went into the cinema feeling apprehensive – that it won’t be anywhere near as good as how I feel it should be.

But I needn’t have worried. Despite what some people say, I am certain that it did not disappoint – it is new and improved, and I loved every minute of it.

Much of what I loved about the first film – the humour, the quick dialogue, RDJ – are back in the second, with an extra helping of smarminess in the form of Sam Rockwell’s Justine Hammer, the new Tony Stark wannabe.

While I loved the first one, I thought the film lagged in some parts, and the climatic action sequence wasn’t ‘visually stimulating’, at least not enough for a superhero film. The second one builds on the fault and made it a visually all-encompassing experience. The fight sequences are what they’re supposed to be- flying, bombing, screaming, shouting with a dash of humour. Humour runs throughout this film, the quick-witted dialogue between various characters sets the overall tone of film. It is campy and fun, and this is what I love about it.

There were solid performances all around, RDJ is at the top of his game as Tony, and I’m stunned that Scarlett’s character was surprisingly likable. The chemistry between Pepper and Tony is just as intense this time round, with more screen time allocated to Paltrow’s character. Despite the many newcomers, the plot didn’t feel convoluted as the new folks were elegantly introduced and substantially fleshed out. I was especially amused by Hammer’s wannabe behaviour.

I go to the movies to be entertained, and this movie does that – and more.

I live in Singapore, so I don’t get much of those late night programmes that are so popular in the US. However, Craig Ferguson’s Late Late Show is one that I try to watch as much as I can, dragging out episodes on Youtube before the all-encompassing evil corporations make them take it down. His humour is always endearing, and his guests always seem like they are having fun on his show. The latest episode with Stephen Fry was part of his experiment to return to a less formatted, more personal talkshow – a talkshow where people actually have a decent conversation without the noise of an audience. The two discussed topics from poetry to Twitter – it was rich and captivating to watch and listen to a decent conversation. Nothing felt forced, and I actually learnt new words while enriched by the programme, lightly laced with humour and wit and a touch a humility.

the 2 new words of the day

a.  Pleonasm (noun), pleonasitc (adj) – the use of more words than are necessary to express an idea; redundancy.

b. Tautology (noun), tautological (adj) – needless repetition of an idea, esp. in words other than those of the immediate context, without imparting additional force or clearness.

Image

What’s in your backpack?

The best are the films that portrays the humanity in us – that we are prone to err, thatwe often dont know what we want, that we are creatures of habit. This is a story about a man, Ryan Bingham (George Clooney), who spends more time flying than back home. The airport, together with its first class lounges, stale fruit juice and endless crowd, is his home. But these might just change when he meets the female version of himself, Alex. (Vera Farmiga)

This is not a love story. The film is about many things – a man’s metaphorical journey (and his many literal journeys) that led him to re-examine the structure of his life, the place of technology in human interactions, and the little fallacies that we construct for ourselves that often disintegrate with the passing of time.

George Clooney plays the role with the effortless charm and relentless wit that he is known for, but the surprise is his counterpart, Vera Farmiga, who is able to meet his quiet brilliance toe to toe. She plays with an easy grace and the best scenes are those with both – with them, so much is said even in the non-verbal gestures.

The only sore point is the young naivete Natalie – often, her character came across as whiny, brazen and rude, only becoming slightly bearable towards the end. I didn’t like her judgemental manner and overbearing presence – which is jarring in comparison to the quiet grace of the two older actors.

As with all ‘indie’ films, it comes with an amazing soundtrack as well. I’ve thoroughly enjoyed this film – it makes you think and it’s all too human.

Another reason to watch? Jason Bateman.

Image

Why do we think the way we do?

Another offering from the ever addictive Malcolm Gladwell. Once again, questioning, challenging, pondering the very reason why we do/look at/think about things in a certain way. Unlike his other books (Blink, Outliers), this one focuses on a few questions which he attempts to tackle through a series of essays – all sourced from his columns in The New Yorker.

Persuasive and engaging, this book taunts and examines the most taken-for-granted phenomenons, often citing works from the fields of psychology and sociology. Yet his writing is accessible while taking the reader through the lens of a professional. My favourite story is the profile on the Dog Whisperer, Cesar Millan. He made a show about training dogs appear entertaining and intriguing – enough for me to actually watch the show, which is, in all honesty, as captivating as how it was written. This means I’ll have to get The Tipping Point soon 🙂

A more than enjoyable read that is easy to follow – especially if,  like me, your only time to read is that daily hour on the train.

i’ve decided to move here. i think i’ll like it.everything is in varying shades of white and grey – easy on the eyes.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started