Mundabor's Blog

Some time ago, Crisis Magazine posted a Dubia (of sort) to the SSPX, with a number of questions concerning them and what is happening. The SSPX’s answer, written by an anonymous priest but approved by the SSPX, is a very good short guide to understanding the SSPX.

You will see that several topics are touched upon there, and these are the main questions a person exploring, or starting to understand, Traditionalism might have. I can’t imagine of a better way to spend your next 4 or 5 minutes, if you have any hesitation on this.

The article also links to another article, which I read many moons ago and might, or might not, have written about. This is about attendance to a non-SSPX Mass. This is not the “officially sanctioned” SSPX’s position; it is, however, a very sensible take from a very sensible priest, and it seems to have gotten traction; so much so, that now this article is linked as part of the “officially sanctioned response” to the Dubia.

I think that the two documents, together, can clear a lot of confusion in a lot of people in a very short time.

I recommend the reading of both documents.

A little step in your day, but a much bigger step towards your salvation.

You got to admire the shameless style of Pope Leo the Better Dressed. In keeping with his Francis ideology, the guy just can’t shut up on all sort of matters that do not have anything to do with his job. He will drone about the environment all day long, and will criticise Trump in twenty different, subtly but clearly bitchy ways. He will go out of his way to deny Catholic doctrine even as the downplays the evil of abortion (these seamless garments guys, ehy? Just so you know, they are often homosexual). He will even talk about changing doctrine, as if he were even better than an angel coming down from heaven.

But let one of his most courageous Cardinal be jailed for 20 years, and this extremely talkative guy, who has something to say, very publicly and with not much in the way of diplomacy, orthodoxy, or even decency, about pretty much everything that is nothing to do with his job, will suddenly say that he “cannot comment”.

What a little piece of work this man is.

Well, you know what I mean, anyway.

Mind this first: this quote comes from a third party, a Protestant preachers called Jerry Pillay. However, the quote is so explosive that the Vatican would have issued a strong, possibly raging dementi if the quote had not corresponded with the thinking of the Unholy Girl.

The statement is this one: “While our task is not to build a Christendom yet Christians must work together in unity to heal and restore the world”.

Read it a couple of times, and shiver at the enormity of the words.

No Great Commission anymore. No proselytism. Nothing of what, in the end, makes Christianity Christian. Christians are not worried, in this perspective, of the things of heaven. Death, judgment, heaven and hell are not what they worry about. They seem blessedly unaware of the Fall. Christ’s death on the cross happened for reasons they can’t really fathom. They use their Christian faith merely as a tool for their NGO work. It’s all about “healing” and “restoring” the world. They seem to think that everybody goes to heaven, which is where the Christendom will be “built”. There can be no other explanation to the statement.

It’s like being a second-rate Buddhist. It’s the most atrocious thinking, the biggest offence to Christ’s Sacrifice that can be uttered by a person who calls himself Christian, short of outright blasphemy. It’s like being the Biggest Virtue Signalling Moron on earth.

Every Catholic should vocally demand that Pope Leo either releases a strong statement of denial, or else abdicates and buggers off to a job for the Clinton Foundation.

When I watch this video on my Living Room’s TV, I get the option of English subtitles.

When I watch this video from here, I don’t. No idea why, but I hope you will have the ability to get the English subtitles.

This is a very simple, enlightening video.

I recommend the vision.

I am very happy to re-publish this beautiful video from John-Henry Westen.

Proper, proper Catholicism.

Wearing a red hat does not make one immune from criticism, or from being called out. Even so, when the guy thus called out is a guy who, as a whole, tries to be OK.

Yesterday was the anniversary of the CIA- and MI5-led coup in the Ukraine. Tomorrow will be the anniversary of the start of the Special Military Operation. The two events are very closely related, as the Western coup in the Ukraine persuaded Putin that harsh action had to be taken: the liberation of Crimea and the “little green men” in the part of Donbas that the pro-Russian partisans could keep.

The consequences of the coup and of the Russian reaction were momentous: the rise of Neonazism in the Ukraine (because the Neonazi militias were the only ones who really wanted to fight, and took back substantial territories initially liberated by the pro-Russian Partisans), a growing climate of fanatical revanchism, and the decision of the West to leverage the fanatical hatred in the Ukraine and use it as a sword against Russia.

Anglos are good at creating a propaganda climate that helps them to look as the victim whilst they really are the aggressors. Ask Lincoln and FDR, and they will tell you everything you need to know. The “Maidan” followed exactly the same pattern, with Western deep state operatives gunning down people so that the Coup could be justified. Leading to 2022, the game was played again: 5000 civilians, many of them women and children, gunned down in senseless civilian bombardments over several years, so that when Putin intervenes he can be called the “aggressor”.

All this happened 4 years ago now. I thought then – as many also did – that the Russians would, once Putin understood that the conflict was there to stay (this would be after the failing of the Instanbul agreement and the massacre in Bucha, which the Ukrainians staged to blame the Russians), just put the Ukrainian army on the grill and cook them rapidly, well-done. To my surprise, Putin disregarded the grill, took out the slow-cooker, and created a sort of “low pressure” conflict that could be sustained indefinitely both from a financial and from a political standpoint; knowing that the superior Russian army would, in time, sweep away the resistance, no matter how strong and sustained the NATO help to the Ukraine.

Four years have passed, and the slow-cooker has been working incessantly. Whilst the Western propaganda was claiming, every second week, that the Russian army was sustaining huge casualties and were about to collapse, both the Russian army and the Russian economy were growing robustly; not without challenges, but certainly growing robustly.

We now write the Year of the Lord 2026, and even my red fish can see where this is going. It will still take time, perhaps a long time, as long as Putin resists the growing call of his generals to ditch the slow-cooker and take out the grill already. It will still take time, but there can be only one outcome, and the only unknown is…. how much of the Ukraine the Russians will be willing to take.

Meanwhile, the cognitive dissonance in the West is becoming the stuff of legends, with clown like the Finnish prime minister even claiming that the Ukraine is winning. I think he is applying for some jobs in Bruxelles. There is an entire raw of high-profile jobs that you can be given just for lying. It’s quite funny to watch.

Four years later, we got the slow motion instead of the action-packed movie, but the story has still gone towards its unavoidable end. The main losers are, of course, the Ukrainians, who are now facing horrendous losses and something between an amputated Country and no Country at all. The second worst losers are the Western Europeans, particularly Germany, who have stupidly sacrificed cheap energy for the sake of virtue signalling.

This war should have ended a long time ago. What kept it going was, firstly, the unforgivable bigotry of the Ukrainians and, secondly, the unforgivable blindness, incompetence, and outright Russophobia of the Western ruling class. The Ukrainians are now paying the price in blood; the Western ruling class have paid the price in credibility (forget the loss of jobs: there is always a cushioned sinecure paid for by the Masters for those who are good servants), the European people have paid the price in standard of living.

In Italy they say that il tempo e’ galantuomo, “time is a gentleman”: it treats everybody fairly and gives to everyone what is due to him.

We are seeing this at play now, and the huge cemeteries filled with Ukrainian flags tell a chilling tale of human stupidity.

I pray that the conflict may end soon (though I don’t think it), and that as much justice as possible may be done on this Earth already.

There are times where you read news which, though utterly irrelevant in the great scheme of things, are still a small gauge of where the world is going.

The irrelevant, heretical, ridiculous, utterly cartoonish outfit calling itself the “church” of England has been discussing the possibility of marriage for perverts since 2013. After 10 years of discussions they decided, in 2023, that it would make of them even worse clowns than they already are. Therefore, the plans were abandoned. No “marriage” for you, Adam and Steve, but we will give you some sort of “blessing”, in order to make every pervert feel included.

Fast forward to 2026, and something even more surprising happens: after another long period of work, and discussion, and reflection, and discernment, the Blessed Anglicans of the Pretend Female Clergy decided that… it’s not going to happen. None of it.

No “marriage”. No “blessing”. In fact, what happened is a revolt of the African Tribes, who used the weapon of their opponents and cried “wound” and “injustice”. Because they carry privileged status as “Global South”, the wider Mickey Mouse “church” did not feel it appropriate to make them feel “excluded”. “Don’t you dare teach me Christianity, you smug English queer!”, the darker, but authentically Christian people said. The pale queers had to stop in their track. They had to fight against Christ, political correctness, and social justice at the same time. It was too much.

My take is this: there is a global trend toward the rejection of homosexuality as a “fashionable” movement that must be “affirmed”. This is due, in part, to the reaction to homosexualism, and rejection thereof, from the majority of normal people, reaction which emerges more naturally and more strongly in those cultures that have been less contaminated by White Activism; and in part, perhaps, from another phenomenon that is slowly taking shape: the explosion of conversions to Christianity among the heathenish youth in Countries like the United Kingdom. There are already signs that the new converts, thanks to the Internet, want to convert to the Christianity they have informed themselves about, not to the homo fantasies of their vicars of Dibley. I can’t but smile at the thought of people presenting themselves to conversion course in the so-called church of England, to a guy (or, more likely, gal) who is less Christian than they already are!

One sees a trend here. A slow one, that might unfold in the next decades. But a trend nevertheless. The time of the homo stunts is slowly coming to an end; at the very least the environment for it is getting more and more difficult.

Nature is healing.

Because human nature is not so easy to pervert.

Have a look at this.

Forget, for a moment, the crappy dialogue. Epstein was plotting to have Putin deposed, and Peter Mandelson offered to help him get a visa to visit Russia. It is, therefore, clear that he did not have any feelers inside the Kremlin and was, actually, hostile to Putin.

What is impressive here is the pace at which virtual reality is growing to be a perfectly acceptable substitute of real actors. This 15 second clip, likely made by amateurs, will soon become much longer clips made by professionals. In time, proper characters will be developed, with their own physique and faces, and they will be absolutely acceptable for big screen consumption.

The implications of this for the entertainment industry (in particular, for the actors’ profession) will be vast. You will soon be able to spend vast sums in production and promotion of movies, knowing that your investment does not run the risk of being ruined by some narcissistic cretin, to whom you have given $25 million just to see him or her ruin your whole investment with some deranged piece of virtue signalling.

Your new AI hero will never be late for shootings, will not have unreasonable requests, will not behave like a diva all day, and will never impact your product with his drug addiction, his arrest for domestic violence, or his publicity stunts. You will not be able to give your AI work copyright protection as such, but you will still be able to protect your creative work. So for example if you create a new movie series about “Johnny Pond, the spy who came from the cold”, you will be able to protect all the creative work involved in the storytelling, making your “Johnny Pond” factually unassailable by cheap Chinese knockoffs.

Will this cause the disappearance of acting? Certainly not. There will always be space for acting where people want to see the physical person (say: theaters), or where there is a particular need for authenticity (say: art movies); but the $300m production will be insulated by the nefarious effects of idiot actors exactly to the extent that is wished by the production house, nobody thinking that, say, Mark Ruffalo as he breathes and spits nonsense is necessary in any way in a Hulk/Superhero production or in any work where the willing suspension of disbelief is an important part of the experience. Yeah, the intimate love story will likely still require humans to create connections with the viewers, particularly the female viewers, as humans will likely still be better at conveying humanity for a while. But superheroes, secondary characters, extras in numbers, war scenes, spaceships, and the like, will be revolutionised in a way the industry will not like.

If you have seen Sergei Bondarchuk’s wonderful “War and Peace”, created at vast expense during some eight years of production by a Soviet regime that did not care for costs, you start having an idea of what the future might bring, at vastly lower production cost, without the ticking bomb of a leading actor going rogue.

This opens all kind of possibilities: from movies about the Passion to lives of the Saints, apologetic work will be able to find ways to your home at low cost, but with a very high impact value. What you have to say will be far less limited by the money necessary to say it. In the same way as the Internet now allows basically one-man band operations to reach a vast audience that was formerly only addressable with massive infrastructure investments, the movie production will give far more power to people who have something interesting to say, and can package it in an attractive way at a tiny fraction of what it would once have cost.

Rachel Zegler better prepare herself for a future in pantomime.

Nobody will cry about her loss of professional opportunities.