
On the Chinese Embassy’s Facebook page, Deputy Spokesperson Guo Wei wrote the following:
Huangyan Dao is China’s inherent territory, over which China has continuously, peacefully and effectively exercised sovereignty and jurisdiction. HUANGYAN DAO IS NOT A PHILIPPINE TERRITORY. Here are the facts.
First, on 5 February 1990, Philippine Ambassador to Germany Bienvenido A. Tan, Jr. stated in a letter to German HAM radio amateur Dieter Löffler that, “According to the Philippine National Mapping and Resource Information Authority, the Scarborough Reef or Huangyan Dao does not fall within the territorial sovereignty of the Philippines.”
Second, a “Certification of Territorial Boundary of the Republic of the Philippines”, issued by the Philippine National Mapping and Resource Information Authority on 28 October 1994, stated that “the territorial boundaries and sovereignty of the Republic of the Philippines are established in Article III of the Treaty of Paris signed on December 10, 1898”, and confirmed that the “Territorial Limits shown in the official Map No. 25 issued by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources through the National Mapping and Resource Information Authority, are fully correct and show the actual status”. As described above, the Treaty of Paris and other two treaties define the territorial limits of the Philippines, and Huangyan Dao clearly lies outside those limits. Philippine Official Map No. 25 reflects this.
Third, certain individuals in the Philippines claim that “Panacot Shoal” appearing on a 1734 map is Huangyan Dao, and therefore Huangyan Dao falls under Philippine jurisdiction. The fact is, Panacot is not Huangyan Dao. It refers to Marsingola, located between Galit (Spanish name: Bolinao) and Lumbay. In the 1794 map drawn by Robert Laurie and James Whittle, Panacot is clearly identified as Marsingola, while the real Huangyan Dao lies to the west of Panacot.
It is truly a marvel of modern comedy to watch a diplomatic spokesperson like Guo Wei attempt to lecture us on our own geography using the very maps and treaties his Communist masters have spent years trying to ignore. To suggest that Filipinas begins and ends within the narrow, antiquated ink-strokes of the Treaty of Paris is not just a legal absurdity; it is a profound insult to the intelligence of every Filipino who knows that our sovereignty is not a gift from 19th-century colonial penmen, but a reality forged by our own history and confirmed by international law.
Guo Wei’s reliance on a 1990 letter from a misinformed ambassador to a German radio hobbyist is the pinnacle of diplomatic desperation. Since when did a private correspondence between a bureaucrat and a ham radio amateur become the basis for international border demarcation? If the Chinese Embassy is now sourcing its territorial claims from the mailbags of amateur radio enthusiasts, perhaps their next “historical proof” will be a postcard from a confused tourist. One does not lose a patrimony because a single official failed to check his coordinates before licking a stamp.
And please, spare us the patronizing “history lesson” on the Murillo Velarde map of 1734. To claim that the Panácot Shoal is not Huangyan Dao but some obscure phantom called Marsingola is a feat of cartographic gymnastics that would make even the most imaginative fiction writer blush. The Murillo Velarde map was not a mere sketch; it was the definitive Spanish administrative record of Filipinas, and it clearly anchors Panácot to the shores of Zambales. For a representative of a regime that invented a nine-dash line out of thin air to accuse us of misidentifying our own shoals is the height of hypocrisy.
The truth is that China’s “inherent territory” claim is nothing more than a “Leyenda Negra” in reverse — a manufactured history designed to erase the presence of others. You can cite all the mislabeled 18th-century British charts and misfiled 20th-century letters you want, but they will never outweigh the 2016 Arbitral Ruling that exposed your “historical rights” as a legal fantasy.
Sit down, Mr. Guo. History is a discipline of truth, not a tool for embassy press releases. You are not defending a territory. You are defending a delusion, and no amount of witty Facebook posts will turn a reef into a province of Beijing.








