10-Day Vipassana Meditation – Vipassana Briefly Explained

I posted a video on my YouTube providing a brief explanation of Vipassana. I just wanted to provide a transcript for the video in case you’d prefer to read, rather than listen. Also, since I made reference to certain terms that may be unfamiliar to you, this transcript may serve as a companion to the video.

Vipassana is the form of meditation that Siddhartha Gautama (commonly known as The Buddha) practiced thousands of years ago. The Buddha is actually a term that means enlightened one, so anybody has the potential to be The Buddha. Anyway, that’s a whole other discussion. For now, I just want to focus on some of the basic concepts of Vipassana. So, without further ado, here’s a brief summary of what I learned from the discourses that we watched every night from Goenka, the preeminent teacher of Vipassana meditation, who I found out just passed away on September 29th at the age of 89.

Gautama saw suffering everywhere and sought to find the cause of suffering. He discovered that whenever we have a craving, whether it’s to cling to a pleasant sensation or to wish an unpleasant one would go away, we suffer when that craving is not fulfilled. In other words, whenever there’s attachment, there is bound to be misery, and the greater the attachment, the greater the misery. To get to the root of this suffering, he investigated within himself. He discovered that everything we encounter we register through our six senses–the five physical ones, as well as the mind, which generates emotion. Because of our senses, everything produces sensations in our body. Some sensations may be settle, others may be gross. Some are buried deep down, others are on the surface. Whenever a pleasant sensation arises, we like it and want it to last forever. Whenever an unpleasant sensation arises, we don’t like it and want to get rid of it and if we can’t we wish it away. These momentary reactions of liking and disliking develop into craving and aversion, respectively, which are both forms of attachment. Because of our attachments we generate strong reactions, called sankhara, which make deep impressions in our mind and causes suffering. So the source of suffering is this habitual reaction to sensations in our body that arises from everything we encounter in our day-to-day lives. He calls this habitual reaction ignorance.

According to Gautama, the way out of suffering is to break this chain of ignorance, in which every sensation gives rise to a reaction of liking or disliking, which develops into great craving or aversion, which causes misery. So, instead of habitually reacting to sensations, we learn to just observe the sensations equanimously with the understanding that “whatever arises passes away” (this understanding is called anicca). So instead of ignorance, these sensations now give rise to wisdom. So the entire purpose of Vipassana is to change the normal habit pattern of the mind of constantly reacting to sensations with craving or aversion, generating one sankhara after another. In order to do this, Vipassana meditation is a systematic way of becoming aware of the sensations in our body. Sensations refers to ANYTHING you can feel physically in or on your body. And by anything, I mean anything. It can be the dryness on your lips, a pulsing sensation on your temple, moisture around your eyes, an itchy sensation on your forearm, a sharp pain in your back, soreness in your muscles, warmth from wearing a winter hat, etc. Anything!

I won’t get into the particulars of the meditation, but the idea is to feel these sensations in your body in a systematic way and train yourself to be aware of all the the sensation in your body, but not to react to them with craving or aversion. To remain completely equanimous. In other words, the purpose of Vipassana is to develop your level of awareness and equanamity so you break the chain of ignorance and stop habitually reacting to situations or events that arise in your day-to-day life. I know some may think Vipassana is trying to train people to be a bunch of passionless vegetables, cause that’s what it sounds like. But it’s not about turning people into unfeeling beings. It’s about getting you to not be a slave to your habitual patterns of constantly reacting to everything you encounter so you can see the big picture. Because when you’re constantly reacting with craving or aversion, you’re too busy reacting you can’t see the big picture of what is happening in the moment. Eckhart Tolle, the writer of The Power of Now, says, “Right now, there are no problems.” What he means is that there are only situations, but your mind makes a problem out of these situations. For example, if your car is stuck in the mud, that is a situation. But when we generate aversion to the situation, then that is our mind making a problem out of the situation. In other worse, because we dislike the situation of our car being stuck in the mud, we want the situation to go away, so we keep focusing on how much we hate the situation and how much we wish that situation to not be so. This is what it means to generate a sankhara. But when we come out of our habitual pattern behavior of constantly reacting we see the situation for what it is and we come up with a plan to get out of the situation, rather than continue to cling to how much we hate the situation. I hope that clears things up some.

10-Day Vipassana – I’m Built for Vipassana, but Not Sure if it’s for Me

So far in my previous posts, I haven’t exactly explained what Vipassana meditation is. So I will attempt to do that now as briefly as possible.

Siddhartha Gautama (The Buddha) saw suffering everywhere and sought to find the cause of suffering. He discovered that whenever we have a craving, whether it’s to cling to a pleasant sensation or to wish an unpleasant one would go away, we suffer when that craving is not fulfilled. In other words, whenever there’s attachment, there is bound to be misery, and the greater the attachment, the greater the misery. To get to the root of this suffering, he investigated within himself. Continue reading

10-Day Vipassana Meditation – How My Ego and Weightlifting Allowed me to Experience the Wisdom of Surrender

People think of meditation as something you do to relax. And these people aren’t wrong, because there are meditation methods that are all about relaxation. Vipassana is not one of those methods–especially not in the beginning.

The way they teach Vipassana at this 10-Day retreat, which is done exactly the same way all over the world, is very intelligent. They deconstruct every aspect of the meditation and give you one element at a time so you can master that one element before moving on. Continue reading

10-Day Vipassana Meditation – Initial Reaction

So I got back from the 10-Day Vipassana Silent Retreat today. So much to say I don’t think I’ll be able to do it all in one post. So may take several posts and I also plan on possibly providing instructions to the technique. Apologies in advanced for the lack of coherency and elegance in this post. Continue reading

Going on 10-Day Vipassana Meditaion Tomorrow

Back in May, I wrote a post about Vipassana Meditation. Well, tomorrow, I will be experiencing the same thing that the prisoners in that documentary experienced. I have to admit, a lot of people will consider this pretty “New Age-y” and I won’t deny that, but I’m also completely fine with it.

I’m looking at this first and foremost as an interesting vacation. Most people go on vacation and they come back feeling more tired, and none the better. Even though this is less than two hours away, I might as well be going to some remote island somewhere, because what I’ll experience in these 10 days is nothing that I will ever experience. So at the very least, it will be challenging and possibly eye-opening. Continue reading

Same Love

A long while ago, I heard this song on the car radio, only I didn’t know anything about it. I didn’t know the name of the artist or even the name of the song. I only caught some of the lyrics and they didn’t sound like the typical hip hop lyrics that you hear on mainstream radio. What immediately drew me to the song, though, was the overall composition. I especially like the rap over piano, because if I ever wanted to produce a hip hop track, that’s exactly what I’ve thought of doing in the past. I’ve always wanted to combine rap with very minimalist sounds, like the piano and possibly even the cello. I also like the female vocals, but that’s pretty common place in hip hop tracks now. Still, I don’t think that’s something I’ll get tired of. It’s very Yin-Yang. So I’m all over that. Continue reading

PTSD + Medal of Honor

I have my alarm set to NPR. Most mornings, I either hit the snooze or shut off the alarm when NPR comes on. But every now and then, I hear something that causes me to just lie there and listen. This morning was such an occasion when an interview with Staff Sergeant Ty Michael Carter on Morning Edition woke me up. Continue reading

Why Isn’t Meditation Taught in All Prisons?

I just happened to come across this fascinating documentary on a type of meditation called Vipasanna Meditation that was taught to prisoners in the South.

Because I understand and have experienced the value of meditation, I’m not surprised by the positive transformations that these hardened criminals went through. But it did make me wonder why meditation isn’t taught in all prisons. Continue reading

Meditation for the Every Day Person

Remember that episode in Seinfeld where Jerry talked about how he can’t have a threesome, because he’s not an orgy guy? How he’s not ready for it, because it would mean that he would have to dress differently, get new curtains, new lighting, etc?.

Well, that’s kind of what I think the average person thinks of meditation. They think it’s this “new age” thing that doesn’t mesh with the identity they have of themselves. I get that, because I think I’ve shared these feelings in the past. Continue reading

Classroom Teachers as Coaches

I watched an interview with Salman Khan, the founder of Khan Academy, on Charlie Rose a while back and something he said stuck with me. He said that teachers in the classroom should be more like coaches. I’m paraphrasing here, but he essentially said there’s a motivation problem among students. They don’t view their math teachers, for example, as being on their side. This is very different from their coaches, who they do see as being on their side. Continue reading

Being Fully Present in the Moment

In 2010, Marina Abramovic had a show “The Artist Is Present” at the MOMA, in which she invited anyone to sit in front of her for a minute of silence. It reminds me of one of my favorite scenes in Darjeeling Limited, in which all of the brothers and their mother just sit around a table in silence, communicating with their eyes. Anyway, I caught an interview with  Abramovic on the Brian Lehrer Show on WNYC and she said that people would actually break down and cry during the minute of silence. I think that speaks to the power of being fully present in the moment. I don’t think it had anything to do with Abramovic. It was just the power of being fully present in the moment. Continue reading

A Moving Essay by Director Ang Lee

Ang Lee is one of my favorite directors.He surprised shocked a lot of people by winning best director. I read Life of Pi,but didn’t see Ang Lee’s movie based on the book that got him the Oscars.

I saw this very moving essay, in which he talks about how hopeless things looked in his pursuit of his dream to be a director. If it weren’t for his very supportive wife, we would have missed out on some of the most moving and insightful creations that broaden our human capacities. Continue reading

Have you heard about the Solvency Amendment?

There’s been a lot of talk about America’s debt problem. A lot of talk and heated battles and arguments on Capital Hill, but no concrete solutions. Well, I came across a recently published book that lays out an ingenious solution to our country’s long-term debt problem. It’s called, American Solvency and is available on Amazon.com. The author, Wes Nicholson, also has a free PDF available at http://www.americansolvency.net. Continue reading

Unhampered by Politics, Obama Gives one of the Best Inaugural Addresses

Words matter. Of all days, yesterday is one that should remind us that words have power. MLK’s words moved a nation to make real, pragmatic change. Obama is a similarly gifted orator, who I think we’ve taken for granted. Some even resent Obama for his adeptness with words, somehow reasoning that words and action are mutually exclusive. Continue reading

Election Night Results Expose the Liberal Media Myth

On election night, Fox News was forced to confront an unavoidable truth and the result was awkwardness, because the truth almost never goes their way. Up until the election results, the Far Right Fringe media machine ignored all the information from the world outside their bubble and predicted wins for Romney. Many of them projected landslide electoral wins (e.g., George will gave 321 electoral votes to Romney and Michael Barone said Romney would win by 100 electoral votes), which ignored every shred of evidence to the contrary outside their bubble. Continue reading

Obama’s victory speech reveals leadership qualities he’s always possessed

Obama’s best speech in a while! It reveals his profound understanding of and empathy for the enormous challenges facing us.

When I assess presidential candidates, I don’t care a whole lot about positions they take, as long as they’re reasonable and thoughtful. I don’t much care for campaign promises either, knowing they’re fleeting and are often not something a candidate has full control over once they take office. What I look for are the traits that make a great leader: character, empathy and moral courage. Continue reading

Lack of enthusiasm and bitter hatred for Obama is misguided

Lack of enthusiasm and bitter hatred for Obama is misguided. Here’s why:

When Obama came into office, it was a monumental event. People were literally dancing in the streets.  We were all on a high (some, literally). There was nowhere for Obama to go but down from there. Continue reading

This presidential race shouldn’t be this close. Wake the fuck up, people!

I’m pretty confident that Obama will win the electoral vote, but it still blows my mind (not in a good way) why this race is so damn close. 50% of our country can’t be this ill-informed or dim, can they? Continue reading

Romney’s wrong calls

For those who are dissatisfied with what Obama has done and want to give Romney a try, just because he’s not Obama, you don’t have to use too much of your imagination to see how terrible of a leader he would be. Continue reading

Romney’s Jeep ad is emblematic of his contempt for the public

I’m sure you’ve all heard by now of Romney’s blatantly dishonest Jeep ad that’s being aired in Ohio to a bunch of auto workers. To me, it’s really fitting that this ad is one of the final pieces of communication that Romney has to the public, because it is emblematic of how Romney views the public, a public that he claims to want to serve. Continue reading

Romney Win could Set Disturbing Precedence for Lying in Presidential Politics

Politicians are notorious for being, ahem, less than truthful. As bad as all the lying is in politics now, it could be taken to an entirely new level if Romney wins this election. Political strategists tend to emulate what works. So if Romney wins this election, we can see future presidential candidates changing positions and rapidly remaking themselves to appeal to whatever group they feel they need to appeal to at whatever moment to gain more votes. Continue reading

Romney/Voter Apathy toward Foreign Policy is Dangerous

While the Economy is front and center in American presidential politics, foreign policy is largely ignored by the public. I doubt the presidential debate on foreign policy will figure much into voters’ decisions. I find this disturbing, because we’re living in such a complex, connected world that is very unstable. One that requires an American president who has a deep knowledge of and appetite for foreign policy. Continue reading

It’s NOT the Economy, Stupid!

“[It’s] the economy, stupid!” This phrase coined by James Carville to help Bill Clinton win the 1992 presidential campaign has done a disservice to the American public’s understanding of the economy by making the economy front and center in presidential elections. Because of this phrase, the economy is the most overrated and misunderstood issue in presidential politics. Continue reading

Charlie Sheen is Winning

Charlie Sheen Is Winning
by Bret Easton Ellis
Newsweek
March 12, 2011 | 4:55pm

With his tweets, his manic interviews, his insurgent campaign against the entertainment world, Sheen is giving America exactly what it wants out of a modern celebrity. In this week’s Newsweek, Bret Easton Ellis explains how you are completely missing the point if you think Sheen’s meltdown is about drugs.
“Drugs” is the first word Charlie Sheen utters in his only scene from Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, a cinematic relic from 1986. It takes place in a police station where Jeannie Bueller (Jennifer Grey), waiting to get bailed out by her mom and fuming about brother Ferris’s charmingly anarchic ways (he breaks all the rules and is happy; she follows all the rules and is unhappy), realizes she’s sitting next to a gorgeous (he was!) sullen-eyed dude in a leather jacket who looks like he’s been up for days on a drug binge. But he’s not manic, just tired and sexily calm, his face so pale it’s almost violet-hued. Annoyed, Jeannie asks, “Why are you here?” and Charlie, deadpan, replies, without regret: “Drugs.” And then he slowly disarms her bitchiness with his outrageously sexy insouciance, transforming her annoyance into delight (they end up making out).

That’s when we first really noticed Sheen, and it’s the key moment in his movie career (it now sums up everything that followed). He hasn’t been as entertaining since. Until now. In getting himself fired from his hit TV show Two and a Half Men, this privileged child of the media’s sprawling entertainment Empire has now become its most gifted ridiculer. Sheen has embraced post-Empire, making his bid to explain to all of us what celebrity now means. Whether you like it or not is beside the point. It’s where we are, babe. We’re learning something. Rock and roll. Deal with it.

Post-Empire started appearing in full force just about everywhere last year while Cee Lo Green’s “Fuck You” gleefully played over the soundtrack. The Kardashians get it. The participants in (and the audience of) Jersey Shore get it. Lady Gaga arriving at the Grammys in an egg gets it, and she gets it while staring at Anderson Cooper and admitting she likes to smoke weed when she writes songs—basically daring him: “What are you gonna do about that, bitch?” Nicki Minaj gets it when she sings “Right Thru Me” and becomes one of her many alter egos on a red carpet. (Christina Aguilera starring in Burlesque doesn’t get it at all.) Ricky Gervais’s hosting of the Golden Globes got it. Robert Downey Jr., getting pissed off at Gervais, did not. Robert De Niro even got it, subtly ridiculing his career and his lifetime-achievement trophy at the same awards show.

James Franco not taking the Oscar telecast seriously but treating it with gentle disrespect (which is exactly what the show deserves) totally got it. (Anne Hathaway, unfortunately, didn’t get it, but we like her anyway for getting naked and jiggy with Jake G.) Post-Empire is Mark Zuckerberg staring with blank impatience at Empire Lesley Stahl on 60 Minutes and telling her how The Social Network and its genesis story (he creates Facebook because he was rejected by a bitchy girl!) got it totally wrong (which it did; he was right; sorry, Empire Aaron Sorkin). Empire is complaining that the characters in Jonathan Franzen’s great 2010 novel Freedom aren’t “likable” enough.

For every outspoken I-don’t-give-a-shit Empire celebrity like Muhammad Ali or Andy Warhol or Norman Mailer or Bob Dylan, there were a dozen Madonnas (one of the queens of the Empire who was never real or funny enough to get it—everything interesting about her seems, in retrospect, dreadfully earnest) and Michael Jacksons (the ultimate victim of Empire celebrity—a tortured boy lover and drug addict who humorlessly denied he was either). To someone my age (47), Keith Richards (67) in his memoir, Life, has a rare healthy post-Empire geezer transparency. For my younger friends, it’s no longer rare; it’s now the norm. But nothing yet compares to the transparency that Charlie Sheen has unleashed in the past two weeks—contempt about celebrity, his profession, and the old Empire world order.
To Empire gatekeepers, Sheen seems dangerous and in need of help because he’s destroying (and confirming) illusions about the nature of celebrity. He’s always been a role model for a certain kind of male fantasy. Degrading perhaps, but aren’t most male fantasies? Sheen has always been a bad boy, which is part of his appeal—to men and women. What Sheen has exemplified and has clarified is the moment in the culture when not caring what the public thinks about you or your personal life is what matters most—and what makes the public love you even more (if not exactly CBS or the creator of the show that has made you so wealthy).

It’s a different brand of narcissism than Empire narcissism. Eminem was post-Empire’s most outspoken character when he first appeared. We were suddenly light-years away from the autobiographical pain of, say, Dylan’s Blood on the Tracks (one of Empire’s proudest and most stylish moments). It’s not that we’ve moved beyond craft; it’s just that there’s a different kind of self-expression at play—more raw, less diluted. On The Marshall Mathers LP, Eminem rages much more transparently than Dylan against the idiocy of his own flaws and the failure of his marriage and his addictions and fantasies than any Empire artist (and let’s include Empire Bruce Springsteen and his great Tunnel of Love album while we’re at it) by recording fearlessly the fake murder of his ex-wife at his own enraged hands, a defying act that Bob or Bruce would never have even considered. Blood on the Tracks and Tunnel of Love have an Empire tastefulness and elegance that in post-Empire has no meaning. That doesn’t deny their power or artistry. It just means we’ve moved on. And, hey, that’s OK. Let it go.

You’re completely missing the point if you think the Charlie Sheen moment is really a story about drugs. Yeah, they play a part, but they aren’t at the core of what’s happening—or why this particular Sheen moment is so fascinating. I know functioning addicts. They’re not that rare or that interesting. What this moment is about is Sheen solo. It’s about a well-earned midlife crisis played out on CNN instead of in a life coach’s office somewhere in Burbank. The midlife crisis is the moment in a man’s life when he realizes he can’t (or won’t) any longer maintain the pose that he thought was required of him. Tom Cruise had a similar meltdown at the same age in the summer of 2005, but his was more politely handled (and, of course, he was never known as an addict). Cruise had his breakdown while smiling. He’s always essentially been the good boy who can’t say “Fuck you” the way Sheen (or even someone as benign as Cee Lo) can. Cruise is still that altar boy from Syracuse who believes in the glamour of Empire earnestness, and this is ultimately his limitation as a movie star and as an actor.

But oh, no, not Sheen. Arrests. Accidental overdoses. Halfhearted stints in rehab. Martin Sheen’s teary-eyed press conference. The briefcase full of coke. The Mercedes towed out of the ravine. The misdemeanor third-degree assault on the third wife, who also went to rehab. Sheen allegedly threatening to cut off same wife’s head, put it in a box, send it to her mother. Sheen chain smoking on TMZ. The priceless dialogue. (On CBS executives: “They lay down with their ugly wives in front of their ugly children and look at their loser lives.”) The September 11 conspiracy theories. Shooting Kelly Preston in the arm. Fucking porn stars Ginger Lynn and Heather Hunter and Bree Olson. Compared with Cruise, Sheen has put on a mesmerizing and refreshing display of midlife-crisis honesty. He’s just himself, an addict—take it or leave it.

It’s thrilling watching someone call out the solemnity of the celebrity interview, and Sheen is loudly calling it out as the sham it is. He’s raw and lucid and intense: the most fascinating person wandering through the culture. (No, guys, it’s not Colin Firth or David Fincher or Bruno Mars or super-Empire Tiger Woods.) We’re not used to these kinds of interviews. It’s coming off almost as performance art and we’ve never seen anything like it—because he’s not apologizing. It’s an irresistible spectacle. We’ve never seen a celebrity more nakedly revealing—even in Sheen’s evasions there’s a truthful playfulness that makes Tiger’s mea culpa press conference look like something manufactured by Nicholas Sparks.

Anyone who’s put up with the fake rigors of celebrity (or suffered from addiction problems) has a kindred spirit here. The new fact is: If you’re punching paparazzi, you look like an old-school loser. If you can’t accept the fact that we’re at the height of an exhibitionistic display culture and that you’re going to be blindsided by TMZ (and humiliated by Harvey Levin, or Chelsea Handler—princess of post-Empire) while stumbling out of a club on Sunset Boulevard at 2 in the morning, then you should be a travel agent instead of a movie star. Being publicly mocked is part of the game, and you’re a fool if you don’t play along. Not showing up to collect your award at the Razzies for that piece of crap you made? So Empire. This is why Sheen seems saner and funnier than any other celebrity right now. He also makes better jokes about his situation than most worried editorialists or late-night comedians. A lot of it is sheer bad-boy bravado—just cursing to see how people react, which is very post-Empire—but a lot of it is pure transparency, and on that level, Sheen is, um, winning.
What do people want from Sheen? I’m not denying he has drug and alcohol problems—or even that he might struggle with mental illness. But so do a lot of people in Hollywood who hide it much better—or who the celebrity press just doesn’t care enough about. What fascinates us is the hedonism he enjoys and that remains the envy of every man—if only women weren’t around to keep them liars. (His supposed propensity for violence against women hasn’t hurt his popularity with female fans either.) Do we really want manners? Civility? Empire courtesy? Hell, no. We want reality, no matter how crazy. And this is what drives the Empire to distraction: Sheen doesn’t care what you think of him anymore, and he scoffs at the idea of PR. “Hey, suits, I don’t give a shit.” That’s his only commandment. Sheen blows open the myth that if men try hard enough, they will outgrow the adolescent pursuit of pleasure and a life without rules or responsibilities.

We’ve come a long way in the last two weeks: Sheen is the new reality, bitch, and anyone who’s a hater can go back and hang out with the rest of the trolls in the graveyard of Empire. No one knew it in 1986, but Charlie Sheen was actually Ferris Bueller’s dark little brother all along.

Why Architecture Matters

“Architecture is a conversation between generations conducted over time.”
Heard on Studio 360 over the weekend. Said by Paul Goldberg, who has a book out called “Why Architecture Matters”.