Assert vs Assertible
Assertible pairs API testing with monitoring and triggers from your CI/CD pipeline. Assert handles the production side, running continuous checks between deploys.
Overview
| Feature | Assert | Assertible |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Production API monitoring | API testing + monitoring |
| Assertions | Point-and-click builder | Visual + code-based |
| CI/CD | Webhook triggers | Deep CI/CD integration |
| GraphQL | First-class support | Via HTTP |
| Pricing | Free, then from $8/mo | Starts at $25/mo |
When to Choose Assert
Choose Assert if you need:
- Simple setup: monitors running in minutes
- Production focus: continuous health checks
- GraphQL support: native query and mutation monitoring
- Lower cost: 30 monitors for $23/mo
- Multi-region: 6 regions on every plan
Assert runs ongoing production monitoring. Set up a monitor, pick an interval down to 30 seconds, and it keeps running until you turn it off.
When to Choose Assertible
Choose Assertible if you need:
- CI/CD integration: trigger tests on every deploy
- Test suites: organize tests into logical groups
- Data capture: extract values for use in other tests
- Post-deploy testing: verify deployments immediately
- GitHub integration: test status in pull requests
Assertible is built for post-deployment testing and CI/CD workflows, verifying your API after every code change.
Feature Comparison
Assertion Capabilities
Both tools validate response bodies:
Assert:
- ✅ JSONPath assertions ($.data.id == 123)
- ✅ Header validation
- ✅ Response time thresholds
- ✅ Status code checks
- ✅ JSON type validation
- ✅ Point-and-click builder
Assertible:
- ✅ JSONPath assertions
- ✅ JSON Schema validation
- ✅ Response body assertions
- ✅ Header checks
- ✅ Regex matching
- ✅ Data capture & chaining
Monitoring vs Testing
Assert:
- Continuous monitoring (30s - 60min intervals)
- Production-focused
- Alert when issues occur
- Multi-region probing
Assertible:
- Scheduled checks (15min minimum)
- CI/CD trigger-based testing
- Post-deploy verification
- Deployment-focused workflow
CI/CD Integration
Assert:
- Trigger via webhook on deploy
- Monitoring runs continuously regardless
- Alerts on failures anytime
Assertible:
- First-class CI/CD integration
- Trigger tests from GitHub Actions, CircleCI, etc.
- Block deploys if tests fail
- GitHub commit status updates
Pricing
Assert:
| Plan | Price | Monitors |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0/mo | 5 monitors |
| Starter | $8/mo | 10 monitors |
| Pro | $23/mo | 30 monitors |
| Team | $65/mo | 60 monitors |
Assertible:
| Plan | Price | Checks |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0/mo | Limited |
| Starter | $25/mo | 10 services |
| Pro | $100/mo | Unlimited |
Use Case Comparison
Continuous Production Monitoring
Goal: Know immediately when production APIs fail
Assert: ✅ Built for this
- Set up monitors in minutes
- Checks every 30 seconds if needed
- Instant Slack/PagerDuty alerts
Assertible: ⚠️ Can do this
- Minimum 15-minute intervals
- More focused on post-deploy
- Works but not optimized for continuous monitoring
Post-Deploy Verification
Goal: Verify APIs work after every deployment
Assertible: ✅ Built for this
- Trigger tests from CI/CD pipeline
- Update GitHub commit status
- Block deploy if tests fail
Assert: ⚠️ Can do this
- Webhook trigger available
- But no native CI/CD integration
- Won't block deployments
API Contract Testing
Goal: Ensure API responses match expected schema
Assert:
- JSONPath assertions
- Type checking
- Value matching
Assertible:
- Full JSON Schema validation
- More comprehensive schema support
- Regex pattern matching
Real-World Scenarios
Scenario: E-commerce Platform
Using Assert:
- Monitor product API every minute
- Alert if
$.in_stockchanges unexpectedly - Check from 3 regions simultaneously
- Get Slack alert within seconds of failure
Using Assertible:
- Test product API after each deploy
- Validate full response schema
- Run test suite from CI/CD
- Block release if validation fails
Scenario: SaaS API
Using Assert:
- Monitor all public endpoints continuously
- Track response times over time
- Multi-region latency awareness
- Immediate PagerDuty escalation
Using Assertible:
- Comprehensive test suite per endpoint
- Post-deploy smoke testing
- Capture auth tokens for chained tests
- GitHub status integration
When to Use Both
You can run both:
-
Assertible in CI/CD pipeline
- Run comprehensive tests after each deploy
- Validate API contracts
- Block bad releases
-
Assert for production
- Continuous monitoring between deploys
- Fast detection of runtime issues
- Multi-region health checks
Assertible covers deploy time; Assert covers the gap between deploys.
Deploy-time or runtime
Assertible fits teams with a mature CI/CD pipeline that want contract validation on every deployment. It hooks into GitHub Actions, CircleCI, and commit statuses directly.
Assert covers continuous production monitoring: 30-second intervals, 6 regions, and Slack or PagerDuty alerts when a check fails. Paid plans start at $8/mo.
Try Assert free — no credit card required.