Pinned
AI hype is real — 81% of software teams are using AI in their testing workflows. 📈
That’s just one of the things we learned when we surveyed 625 software developers and engineering leaders to learn about their test automation practices. 🧵
Rainforest QA
@rainforestqa
Hassle-free test automation for SaaS startups. Powered by AI.
- In QA, visible test failures are actually the safest thing that can happen. A green checkmark only means something when you know how it got there.
- Self-healing in QA sounds great… until you realize you have no idea what was changed. Self-healing should save you time, not hide regressions. If the tool can’t show you exactly what was healed, it isn’t helping.
- 40 minutes from meeting → production-ready code. We documented the exact AI-assisted workflow our team used to build a new architecture feature — including the moment a human had to override the AI. Worth a read 👇 hubs.ly/Q043DnDk0 #SoftwareTesting #AI #DevTools
- Some AI for QA tools brag about how many tests they can generate. Hundreds! Thousands! Entire suites written in minutes! Here’s the part they don’t mention: Most of those tests don’t matter. Transparency matters:
