Sponsor: Ministry of Spatial Planning, Urbanism and State Property Type; International, open, one-stage, anonymous Fee: none Language: English Eligibility: Individuals residing or legal entities with registered office in the territory of Montenegro or any other country can participate in the Competition. At least one of the authors of the competition entry (an individual Read more…
Aerial view of site Sponsor: Seoul City government (Yeongdeungpo-gu Office) Type: International, one-stage, anonymous Eligibility: Korean and international architects must have the professional accreditation of their home country. As of the registration deadline, foreign architects (offices or individuals) must hold architect qualification under the laws of their own countries, and must Read more…
Image courtesy Neeraj Bhatia 100th Anniversary Competition Celebrates Legacy of Fumihiko Maki; Award Raised to $100,000 Sponsors: Sam Fox School, Washington University in St. Louis with St. Louis AIA Type: Open, International, one-stage Fee: $75 Eligibility: Architects with a degree during the past eight(8) years Timetable: 1 November 2025 Read more…
2023 Teaching and Innovation Farm Lab Graduate Student Honor Award University of Southern California (USC) Architecture at Zero competitions, which focus on the themes, Decarbonization, Equity and Resilience in California, have been supported by numerous California utilities such as Southern California Edison, PG&E, SoCAl Gas, etc., who have recognized Read more…
Site Plan courtexy Skanska Sponsor: City of Malmö, Sweden Facilitator: Skanska Type: international, RfQ, two-stage Languages: Swedish, English Fees: see announcement Qualifications: Experience in similar projects Timetable: 02 December 2024 – Q&A deadline 06 December 2024 – Deadline for Expressions of Interest (EOI) Design Challenge: Skanska invites respondents to Read more…
Sponsor: Land Berlin (Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung, Bauen und Wohnen) Type: Open, ideas, 2-stage planning competition Languages: German, English Fee: See announcement Process: Second stage will be restricted to 20 shortlisted competitors Eligibility: Architects, Landscape architects, Planners Geographical eligibility: EUR Compensation: There is no compensation in Phase one; in Phase two, Read more…
Sponsor: The Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (CTBUH) Type: open, one-stage Eligibility: students in U.S. and Canada Language: English Prizes: $15,000 total Timetable: 15 December 2024 – Competition entry deadline Design Challenge: This competition focuses on the use of mass timber in multi-story buildings through the Read more…
Completed IMEX by Tuck Hinton Architects. Photo courtesy Anecdote It is not often that we look back to a competition that occurred three decades ago that was also covered in detail by COMPETITIONS (Vol. 4, #4; pp. 14-27). What made the Chattanooga IMAX different back in 1994 was that Read more…
Aerial View of site. Photo courtesy Northcrest Developments Competition organizer: Northcrest Developments Type: International two-stage invited with Expressions of Interest (EOI) and Request for Proposals Category: Architecture and Planning Fee: none Language: English Timetable 28 October 2024 – Expiration of Q&A period 22 November 2024 – Submission deadline for EOI Read more…
Creating a Museum for all Nelson-Atkins Museum with Steven Holl addition right Photo: courtesy Nelson-Atkins Museum Sponsor: Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art, Kansas City, Missouri Type: International, open, RfQ, invited Language: English Fee: none Competition facilitator: Malcolm Reading Consultants, London, UK Eligibility: Registered architects, landscape architects, etc., including team Read more… |
The Finnish Museum of Architecture and Design Finalists and Winner
 Finnish Museum of Architecture and Design competition site
Dating back to the 18th century, the history of architectural competitions in Finland has become an established process on the way to achieving exceptional design in its public realm. It became a model for other countries in the 20th century with projects by architects such as Aalvo Aalto and Eliel Saarinen receiving notice internationally. Concurrently, it was the elder Saarinen’s 2nd place winner in Chicago’s Tribune Tower competition that grabbed the attention of American’s architectural community in the late 1920s. As for process, Finland’s focus on a design selection process, based on anonymity, has survived to this day. It is the standard by which a shortlist for a second stage in the present Architecture and Design museum’s competition was reached. Read more …
San Jose’s Urban Confluence Winner Cancelled 
This week we received the news that the winning design for San Jose’s Urban Confluence competition by SMAR Architecture Studio has been cancelled. This comes after the original competition site was abandoned in favor of one more centrally located in downtown San Jose, Plaza de César Chávez. We can only assume that even this wasn’t enough to generate enough interest from major donors. From the very beginning of the competition, it appeared that the enthusiasm of those sponsoring the competition might be lacking links to potential donors with deep pockets—the hi-tech firms in Silicon Valley. After the competition resulted in a design that certainly entailed a major budget, the project had to be in trouble. The competition did produce a remarkable design; but this turned out to be another case where a competition, intended to generate enough public interest to fund a major project, came up short. -Ed “A Museum for All” 
Winning entry by Weiss/Manfredi Landscape Architecture and Urbanism
Background
The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art’s slogan “Creating a Museum for All” certainly reflects the efforts of many art museums to counter the notion that art museums exist primarily to cater to an elitist few. But one should note that this competition for an expansion of the museum’s capacity to serve a wider audience saw an initial step in this direction with the 1999 competition resulting in the Steven Holl addition, a series of pavilions stretching down one side of the large lawn area..
Read more… Preparation and Organization of Design Competitions 
[phase 1] Benjamin Hossbach / Christian Lehmhaus / Christine Eichelmann
210 × 230 mm, 192 pp.
over 600 images
softcover
ISBN 978-3-86922-316-2 (English)
ISBN 978-3-86922-240-0 (German)
Dom Publishers
€48 in EU (For price abroad, see below)
Founded in 1998 in Berlin, Phase 1 has been a principal player in the organization and facilitation of design competitions, not only in Germany, but abroad as well. The accomplishments of the firm have been well documented in three volumes—The Architecture of Competitions—beginning in 2i006. Whereas these books mainly focused on the results of the competitions they have administered, the present work, Fundamentals of Competition Management, takes one from the very beginnings of the competition process to its conclusion. The authors envisioned the publication as “three three books in one: one „blue book“ with example projects, one „yellow book“ with statements and the „white book“ with the actual guideline to competition management.”
Although there have been a number of handbooks covering the administration of designcompetitions a study covering the entire process in such detail is a welcome addition to the the literature in this field. As a contribution to this important democratic process that has yielded exceptional design for decades, this volume is not only valid for Europe, but a current overview of the process for those globally who wish to raise the level of design by virtue of a design competition. -Ed Foreign institutions wishing to obtain a copy of the book will recieve a discount to cover the cost of foreign shipping.
To obtain a copy for that offer, go to: [email protected] Since the recent realization of SMAR Architecture’s winning design we have now received images from a professional photo shoot. As an open competition for one of the more important projects in Europe at the time, we feel that full documentation of the process from start to finish was an important page in the history of architecture in the early 21st century. Documentation by us during the 2017 competition, with images from all finalists from the 144 entries is available at: https://competitions.org/2020/11/science-island-design-competition-finalists/ 
See more images… 
Completed IMEX by Tuck Hinton Architects. Photo courtesy Anecdote
It is not often that we look back to a competition that occurred three decades ago that was also covered in detail by COMPETITIONS (Vol. 4, #4; pp. 14-27). What made the Chattanooga IMAX different back in 1994 was that the article covering that competition was authored by Prof. Marleen Davis, then Dean of the University of Tennessee’s School of Architecture and a member of the jury panel. This was not just a short article, covering the high points of the competition with a few talking points about the winning design. This 4,000+ word document also described in detail the jury’s observations about all the finalists, including the honorable mentions—one of the few times we have gained such a detailed glimpse in this country from the inside of the competition process. Read more… 
Winning entry by Luca Poian Forms Image ©Filippo Bolognese images
Good design seldom happens in a vacuum. And so it was with an international competition for a new mosque in Preston, U.K. A mid-sized city of 95,000, and located in Lancashire near the west coast and almost equally distant from London and Glasgow, Preston has a storied past, going all the way back to the Romans and the late Middle Ages, where it was the site of significant battles. During the Industrial Revolution, the city prospered, and it was not until after World War II that Preston experienced the British version of the U.S. Rust Belt. In the meantime, the city has experienced an upswing in economic activity, with an unemployment rate of only 3%. Aside from the appearance of new industries, the city has benefitted from the establishment of Central Lancashire University (CLU), which employs over 3,000 faculty and staff, and, as such, is one of the regions major employers. Any new university requires new facilities, and one of the most outstanding examples of this at CLU was the new Student Centre and Plaza, a result of a 2016 RIBA-sponsored competition won by Hawkins/Brown
Read More
 Changdong Station winner – image ©D & B Partners Architects
Whereas international competitions for real projects have become a rarity lately, Korea is a welcome exception. Among the plethora of competition announcements we receive almost weekly, several have ended with foreign firms as winners. But the history of welcoming international participants does go back several years. One notable early example was the Incheon Airport competition, won by Fentress Bradburn Architects (1962-70).
Among the more recent successes of foreign firms was the Busan Opera House competition, won by Snøhetta (2013-) and the Sejong Museum Gardens competition, won by Office OU, Toronto (2016-2023).
Read more… 
1st Place: Zaha Hadid Architects – night view from river – Render by Negativ
Arriving to board a ferry boat or cruise ship used to be a rather mundane experience. If you had luggage, you might be able to drop it off upon boarding, assuming that the boarding operation was sophisticated enough. In any case, the arrival experience was nothing to look forward to. I recall boarding the SS United States for a trip to Europe in the late 1950s. Arriving at the pier in New York, the only thought any traveler had was to board that ocean liner as soon as possible, find one’s cabin, and start exploring. If you were in New York City and arriving early, a nearby restaurant or cafe would be your best bet while passing time before boarding. Read more… |
