Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Saved research
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  3. Article

Comparing supervised and unsupervised category learning

  • Brief Reports
  • Published: December 2002
  • Volume 9, pages 829–835, (2002)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Save article
View saved research
Image Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Comparing supervised and unsupervised category learning
Download PDF
  • Bradley C. Love1 
  • 11k Accesses

  • 204 Citations

  • 10 Altmetric

  • 1 Mention

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

Two unsupervised learning modes (incidental and intentional unsupervised learning) and their relation to supervised classification learning are examined. The approach allows for direct comparisons of unsupervised learning data with the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) seminal studies in supervised classification learning. Unlike supervised classification learning, unsupervised learning (especially under incidental conditions) favors linear category structures over compact nonlinear category structures. Unsupervised learning is shown to be multifaceted in that performance varies with task conditions. In comparison with incidental unsupervised learning, intentional unsupervised learning is more rule like, but is no more accurate. The acquisition and application of knowledge is also more laborious under intentional unsupervised learning.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Categorization
  • Comparative Psychology
  • Learning Psychology
  • Learning Theory
  • Machine Learning
  • Statistical Learning

References

  • Anderson, J. (1991). The adaptive nature of human categorization.Psychological Review,98, 409–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. (1990). On the indistinguishability of exemplar memory and abstraction in category representation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer (Eds.),Content and process specificity in the effects of prior experiences: Advances in social cognition (pp. 61–88). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D. C., &Dienes, Z. (1993).Implicit learning: Theoretical and empirical issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billman, D., &Knutson, J. (1996). Unsupervised concept learning and value systematicity: A complex whole aids learning the parts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 458–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, N. J., &Eichenbaum, H. (1993).Memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, R. L. (1996). Isolated and interrelated concepts.Memory & Cognition,24, 608–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, R. L., &Kruschke, J. K. (1994). Are rules and instances subserved by separate systems?Behavioral & Brain Sciences,17, 405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, N., &Broadbent, D. E. (1988). Two modes of learning for interactive tasks.Cognition,28, 249–276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hock, H. S., Malcus, L., &Hasher, L. (1986). Frequency discrimination: Assesing global and elemental letter units in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 232–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, W. A., Hawley, K. J., &Elliot, J. M. (1991). Contribution of perceptual fluency to recognition judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 210–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, R. T. (1982). When can we introspect accurately about mental processes?Memory & Cognition,10, 141–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowlton, B. J., &Squire, L. R. (1994). The information acquired during artificial grammar learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 79–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.Psychological Review,99, 22–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Love, B. C. (2001). Three deadly sins of category learning modelers.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,24, 687–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, B. C. (in press). The multifaceted nature of unsupervised category learning.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

  • Love, B. C., Markman, A. B., &Yamauchi, T. (2000). Modeling classification and inference learning. InProceedings of the Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 136–141). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, B. C., &Medin, D. L. (1998). SUSTAIN: A model of human category learning. InProceedings of the Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 671–676). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman, A. B., &Makin, V. S. (1998). Referential communication and category acquisition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 331–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D. L., &Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1981). Linear separability in classification learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,7, 355–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D. L., Wattenmaker, W. D., &Hampson, S. E. (1987). Family resemblance, conceptual cohesiveness, and category construction.Cognitive Psychology,19, 242–279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification— categorization relationship.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosofsky, R. M. (1988). Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 700–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosofsky, R. M., Gluck, M. A., Palmeri, T. J., McKinley, S. C., &Glauthier, P. (1994). Comparing models of rule-based classification learning: A replication and extension of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961).Memory & Cognition,22, 352–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosofsky, R. M., &Palmeri, T. J. (1996). Learning to classify integraldimension stimuli.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 222–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosofsky, R. M., Palmeri, T. J., &McKinley, S. C. (1994). Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning.Psychological Review,101, 53–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III,Weldon, M. S., &Challis, B. H. (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 3–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., &Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories.Cognitive Psychology,8, 382–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, B. H. (1996). Category representations and the effects of interacting with instances.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1249–1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C., Collins, G. C., &Hunter, L. E. (1986). Transcending inductive category formation in learning.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,9, 639–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seger, C. A. (1994). Implicit learning.Psychological Bulletin,115, 163–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., Hovland, C. L., & Jenkins, H. M. (1961). Learning and memorization of classifications.Psychological Monographs,75 (13, Whole No. 517).

  • Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.Psychological Bulletin,119, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squire, L. R. (1992). Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans.Psychological Review,99, 195–231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wattenmaker, W. D. (1991). Learning modes, feature correlations, and memory-based categorization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 908–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A., &Dorken, M. D. (1993). Incidentally, things in general are particularly determined: An episodic-processing account of implicit learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,23, 227–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953).Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamauchi, T., Love, B. C., &Markman, A. B. (2002). Learning nonlinearly separable categories by inference and classification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 585–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamauchi, T., &Markman, A. B. (1998). Category learning by inference and classification.Journal of Memory & Language,39, 124–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Texas, 78712, Austin, TX

    Bradley C. Love

Authors
  1. Bradley C. Love
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bradley C. Love.

Additional information

This work was supported by AFOSR Grant F49620-01-1-0295 to B.C.L. I thank Todd Maddox, Art Markman, Doug Medin, and Yasu Sakamoto for helpful discussions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Love, B.C. Comparing supervised and unsupervised category learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9, 829–835 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196342

Download citation

  • Received: 23 August 2001

  • Accepted: 16 January 2002

  • Issue date: December 2002

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196342

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Test Phase
  • Study Phase
  • Unsupervised Learning
  • Implicit Learning
  • Classification Learning

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Footer Navigation

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover

Corporate Navigation

  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

104.23.243.58

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature

Advertisement
Advertisement